Geriatric Assessment Domains Research Articles

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio ≥4 correlates with 6-month postoperative mortality in cancer patients age >75.

e23014 Background: We assessed the correlation between elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a pro-inflammatory biomarker, with patient frailty and post-operative 6-month mortality. Methods: Patients aged ≥75 evaluated preoperatively by the Memorial Hospital Geriatrics Service completed a geriatric assessment (GA). NLR was determined from preoperative blood work. Patients were included if they underwent elective surgery between 2015-2018 with hospital length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 day and had ≥ 6 month follow up. Univariate analysis was used to determine correlation between GA domains and NLR. Multivariable regression (MVR) analysis was used to assess the relationship of frailty and NLR with postoperative 6-month mortality. Results: 1028 patients (median age 80) were included. 323 patients (31.4%) had NLR ≥ 4. By univariate analysis, patients with NLR ≥4 were often male ( 57% vs. 45%), had Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 90 (44% vs. 37%), were dependent for instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) (53% vs. 44%), had social activity limitation (57% vs. 49%) (all p < 0.05) and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) > 10 seconds (40% vs. 33%, p = 0.06). Other conditions, particularly cognitive function, weight loss, polypharmacy did not differ between groups, nor did operative time and blood loss. Patients with NLR ≥4 experienced more major adverse surgical events (8% vs. 5% , p = 0.03) and had longer LOS (9 vs. 6.3, p < 0.001). After six months, 12% and 5% of the NLR≥4 and NLR < 4 groups respectively had died. By MVR analysis, patients with NLR≥4 were at higher risk for 6-month mortality (OR = 1.91, p = 0.01) after adjustment for gender, KPS, iADL, TUG, social activity, major adverse surgical events, LOS, and metastatic disease status. Conclusions: NLR ≥4 was associated with components of the GA but correlated with risk for major adverse surgical events and 6-month postoperative mortality. Ongoing work directed at clarifying the relationship between NLR and risk of specific complications to help plan interventions is needed.

Associations of uncertainty with psychological status and quality of life (QoL) among 527 older patients with advanced cancer.

11544 Background: Older patients with advanced cancer face considerable uncertainty related to their disease and treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the associations of uncertainty with psychological status and QoL. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of baseline data from a national geriatric assessment (GA) cluster randomized trial (URCC 13070; PI: Mohile). Patients aged ≥70 years with ≥1 GA domain impairment (e.g., function, cognition) and advanced cancer who were considering or receiving any line of cancer treatment were enrolled (n=541). Uncertainty was measured using the modified 9-item Mishel Uncertainty in Illness (MUIS), where respondents with higher scores perceive more uncertainty (range 9-45). QoL and psychological measures consisted of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), emotional wellbeing (EWB; FACT-G subscale), distress (distress thermometer), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale-15). Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate the associations of MUIS scores with each measure, adjusted for demographics, cancer type, and number of impaired GA domains. Results: Mean age was 77 years (SD 5, range 70-96); 26% had gastrointestinal cancer and 26% had lung cancer. Mean number of GA domain impairments was 4 (SD 1, range 1-7). Mean MUIS score was 20 (SD 5, range 9-37). On multivariate analyses, higher MUIS score was associated with lower QoL (β=-1.08, SE=0.11) and EWB (β=-0.29, SE=0.03), as well as higher distress (β=0.12, SE=0.02), anxiety (β=0.11, SE=0.04), and depression (β=0.09, SE=0.03; all P<0.01). Conclusions: Distress associated with uncertainty was common in a vulnerable population of frail older patients with advanced cancer and ≥1 GA domain impairment. A higher degree of uncertainty was associated with poorer psychological health and QoL. Our results underscore the important role that uncertainty plays in older patients' psychological status. Previous tested uncertainty management interventions (mainly including information and coping strategies) could be revised, tailored and tested to meet the unique needs of older patients with cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02107443.

Quality of Life of Caregivers of Older Patients with Advanced Cancer.

To evaluate the relationships between aging-related domains captured by geriatric assessment (GA) for older patients with advanced cancer and caregivers' emotional health and quality of life (QOL). In this cross sectional study of baseline data from a nationwide investigation of older patients and their caregivers, patients completed a GA that included validated tests to evaluate eight domains of health (eg, function, cognition). Thirty-one community oncology practices throughout the United States. Enrolled patients were aged 70 and older, had one or more GA domain impaired, and had an incurable solid tumor malignancy or lymphoma. Each could choose one caregiver to enroll. Caregivers completed the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Distress Thermometer, Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (depression), and Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12 for QOL). Separate multivariate linear or logistic regression models were used to examine the association of the number and type of patient GA impairments with caregiver outcomes, controlling for patient and caregiver covariates. A total of 541 patients were enrolled, 414 with a caregiver. Almost half (43.5%) of the caregivers screened positive for distress, 24.4% for anxiety, and 18.9% for depression. Higher numbers of patient GA domain impairments were associated with caregiver depression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.29; P < .001], caregiver physical health on SF-12 (regression coefficient [β] = -1.24; P < .001), and overall caregiver QOL (β = -1.14; P < .01). Impaired patient function was associated with lower caregiver QOL (β = -4.11; P < .001). Impaired patient nutrition was associated with caregiver depression (aOR = 2.08; P < .01). Lower caregiver age, caregiver comorbidity, and patient distress were also associated with worse caregiver outcomes. Patient GA impairments were associated with poorer emotional health and lower QOL of caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:969-977, 2019.

Predictive value of each geriatric assessment domain for older patients with cancer: A systematic review.

A geriatric assessment (GA) is increasingly used to help guide treatment decisions in older patients with cancer. However, there is no consensus regarding which domains should be included in the GA. In addition, the field of geriatric oncology moves very fast and as a result many new studies have been published since the last review in 2015. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to evaluate which domains of the GA could predict patient-related treatment outcomes of older patients with cancer and thereby should be included in a GA. A systematic literature search was performed for publications in English or Dutch between September 2006 and July 2017 addressing the association between individual domains of the GA and mortality, postoperative complications, or systemic treatment-related outcomes in older patients with cancer. Eight different domains were evaluated in 46 publications, namely functional status, nutritional status, cognition, mood, physical function, fatigue, social support, and falls. All eight domains were predictive for at least one of the investigated outcomes but the results were quite variable across studies. Physical function and nutritional status were the domains most often associated with mortality and systemic treatment-related outcomes, and the domain physical function was most often associated with postoperative complications. Overall, this review demonstrates that the GA should minimally consist of physical function and nutritional status, when the aim is to predict patients-related outcomes of older patients with cancer, although the results are quite heterogeneous. For the other domains, the findings are too inconsistent to draw conclusions about their overall predictive ability.

BPI19-011: Assessment and Management of Older Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Among Community Oncologists in the United States

Introduction: Geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended for evaluating an older cancer patient’s fitness for treatment; however, it is underutilized in the community. We sought to define the gaps that exist in community oncology practices in the assessment and management of older MBC patients through implementation and training on the use of GA for the care of older MBC patients. Methods: The first phase evaluated community oncology providers using questionnaires regarding their assessment and management of older MBC patients. The second phase included training through implementation of a patient self-administered GA among patients ≥65-years-old with MBC. The providers were blinded to the results of the GA and provided their assessment. Comparison of the 2 evaluations was conducted. The GA was ultimately shared with the providers, who were questioned about the effect of the results on care recommendations. Results: 43 providers from 10 practices were enrolled. Phase I revealed the majority (77%) of providers recognized the utility of GA, yet only 42% routinely conducted a GA pretreatment. Most providers (77%) reported evaluating various GA domains through patient interview rather than validated assessments. Validated scales were used in low rates to evaluate cognition (23%), psychosocial status (12%), and toxicity risk (9%). The limited use of validated assessment tools was not influenced by the provider’s demographics or their views of GA utility. Eighty patients took part in the training phase of the study to date, with average age 74 (range, 65–90) and 84% Caucasian. The majority of patients had subtype ER/PR+, HER2- (75%) and 46% were on first-line therapy. 277 recommended interventions were identified: 174 immediate interventions and 103 suggested interventions. Following review of these results, providers reported being surprised in 40% of the cases, mainly with lower than expected cognitive or social support scores. The providers reported plans for change in management in 44% of the patients as a result of the GA findings. Conclusion: Despite acknowledgement of the value associated with pretreatment GA, it is rarely used in the community. Furthermore, interview rather than validated assessment tools are used to identify age-related concerns. In our preliminary results, the GA identified a large number of deficient areas that had not been identified through the provider’s assessment, and resulted in management change. Additional updated results will be presented at the conference.

Geriatric Assessment in Older Adults with Multiple Myeloma.

The incidence of myeloma in older adults is increasing, yet little is known about geriatric impairments in these patients. We aimed to examine the prevalence of geriatric impairments in older adults with myeloma and the association between geriatric assessment and autologous stem cell transplant eligibility. Prospective cohort study. Two academic medical centers. A total of 40 adults 65 years and older with newly diagnosed myeloma were enrolled. Participants completed a primarily self-administered geriatric assessment, including measures of functional status, comorbidities, polypharmacy, psychosocial status, social support, quality of life, cognition, and physical performance. Outcomes were autologous stem cell transplant eligibility and receipt. Forty patients enrolled; their mean age was 71 years. Geriatric impairments were common: 62% reported dependence in one or more instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), 76.9% had polypharmacy (four or more medications), and 47.5% had one or more comorbidities. Median time on the Timed Up and Go was 13.3 ± 4.9 seconds. Those considered candidates for autologous stem cell transplant (N = 26) were younger, with fewer comorbidities, better performance status, and faster performance on the Timed Up and Go test. Factors independently associated with receiving autologous stem cell transplant (N = 21) included age and IADL dependence. Impairments in geriatric domains are common in this population, even among those considered to have a good performance status. Geriatric assessment domains are associated with both transplant eligibility and receipt. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:987-991, 2019.

Characterizing cancer cachexia in the geriatric oncology population.

Cancer cachexia, characterized by weight loss and sarcopenia, leads to a decline in physical function and is associated with poorer survival. Cancer cachexia remains poorly described in older adults with cancer. This study aims to characterize cancer cachexia in older adults by assessing its prevalence utilizing standard definitions and evaluating associations with components of the geriatric assessment (GA) and survival. Patients with cancer older than 65 years of age who underwent a GA and had baseline CT imaging were eligible in this cross-sectional study. Cancer cachexia was defined by the international consensus definition reported in 2011. Sarcopenia was measured using cross-sectional imaging and utilizing sex-specific cut-offs. Associations between cachexia, sarcopenia, and weight loss with survival and GA domains were explored. Mean age of 100 subjects was 79.9 years (66-95) and 65% met criteria for cancer cachexia. Cachexia was associated with impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) (p = .017); no significant association was found between sarcopenia or weight loss and IADL impairment. Cachexia was significantly associated with poorer survival (median 1.0 vs 2.1 years, p = .011). Cancer cachexia as defined by the international consensus definition is prevalent in older adults with cancer and is associated with functional impairment and decreased survival. Larger prospective studies are needed to further describe cancer cachexia in this population.

Approach to the Geriatric Patient

As of 2012, over one in eight Americans is over the age of 65, and this number is rising, particularly in the 85+ age group. This segment of the population has a rate of hospitalization three times higher than that for persons of all ages. General internists and family medicine physicians provide a large portion of care for this age group and should therefore be comfortable using a comprehensive approach to geriatric assessment. This review describes general considerations regarding geriatric care, including the process of taking a functional history and clinical implications of geriatric care. The geriatric assessment process is discussed in terms of physical, cognitive, social, and medical domains. The benefits of geriatric assessment in primary care, specialty care, and hospitalized patients are described. Tables outline activities of daily living, sensory changes with aging, major causes of visual impairment in the geriatric population, major neurocognitive disorder diagnostic criteria, medications to avoid or use with caution based on Beers criteria and Screening Tool of Older individuals’ Potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force–recommended services relevant to older adults, and vaccinations in older adults. Figures illustrate the key vulnerabilities of older adults; outcomes linked to functional dependence; common disorders associated with cognitive concerns; domains of cognition and examples of impairment in theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition; the social and medical domains of geriatric assessment; barriers to medication adherence in older patients; and resources for medication appropriateness in older adults. This review contains 8 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, 110 references, and 5 MCQs.

Approach to the Geriatric Patient

As of 2012, over one in eight Americans is over the age of 65, and this number is rising, particularly in the 85+ age group. This segment of the population has a rate of hospitalization three times higher than that for persons of all ages. General internists and family medicine physicians provide a large portion of care for this age group and should therefore be comfortable using a comprehensive approach to geriatric assessment. This review describes general considerations regarding geriatric care, including the process of taking a functional history and clinical implications of geriatric care. The geriatric assessment process is discussed in terms of physical, cognitive, social, and medical domains. The benefits of geriatric assessment in primary care, specialty care, and hospitalized patients are described. Tables outline activities of daily living, sensory changes with aging, major causes of visual impairment in the geriatric population, major neurocognitive disorder diagnostic criteria, medications to avoid or use with caution based on Beers criteria and Screening Tool of Older individuals’ Potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force–recommended services relevant to older adults, and vaccinations in older adults. Figures illustrate the key vulnerabilities of older adults; outcomes linked to functional dependence; common disorders associated with cognitive concerns; domains of cognition and examples of impairment in theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition; the social and medical domains of geriatric assessment; barriers to medication adherence in older patients; and resources for medication appropriateness in older adults. This review contains 8 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, 110 references, and 5 MCQs.

Improving communication with older patients with cancer using geriatric assessment (GA): A University of Rochester NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT).

LBA10003 Background: GA includes validated measures that assess age-related health domains (e.g., function, cognition) known to increase adverse outcomes. In this PCORI and NCI funded CRCT, we evaluated if providing a GA summary and recommendations for GA-guided interventions improves communication about age-related concerns for older patients (pts) with cancer. Methods: Pts aged ≥ 70 with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma and at least 1 impaired GA domain were enrolled. Oncology practices were randomized to intervention (oncologists received GA summary) or usual care (no summary provided). The primary outcomes were: 1) number of discussions about age-related concerns (the clinic visit after GA was audio-recorded and transcribed; 2 blinded coders evaluated quality of communication and plan for follow-up interventions) and 2) telephone surveys of patient satisfaction (modified Health Care Climate Questionnaire [HCCQ-age] scored 7-35). Outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed models with arm as the fixed effect, controlling for practice. Results: From 2014-17, 544 pts (295 in GA) were enrolled from 31 practices. There were no differences in demographics by arm (mean age 77 yrs; 49% female). More patients in usual care had impaired physical performance (96% vs 92%, p = 0.03) and social support (33% vs 25%, p = 0.05). In 530 evaluable pts, the overall mean number of discussions was 6.3 (SD: 4.0). The GA arm had 3.5 more discussions about age-related concerns (95%CI: 2.28-4.72, p = 10-6; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.24) compared to usual care; of these, in the GA arm, 2.0 more discussions on average had higher quality communication (95%CI: 1.20-2.69; p = 6x10-6) and 1.9 more led to interventions (95% CI: 1.14-2.73; p = 1.6x10-5). The GA arm had significantly more discussions for almost all GA domains. In 511 pts with HCCQ-age, the mean score was 22.9 (SD 4.5); the score was 1.12 points higher in the GA arm (95%CI: 0.23-2.03; p = .027; ICC = 0.02). Conclusions: Providing a GA summary to oncologists increases the number and quality of discussions about age-related concerns and improves pt satisfaction. Clinical trial information: NCT02107443.

Toxicity of Cancer Therapies in Older Patients.

In clinical practice, older patients are often undertreated due to underrepresentation in clinical trials and fear of toxicity. Our objective was therefore to review toxicities that are specific to older cancer patients, to review risk factors in order to help physicians guide their decisions, and to review interventions that can be implemented in routine clinical practice to prevent toxicity induced by cancer therapies. On the whole, reviews report similar number and frequency as well as similar grade 3 or 4 adverse events between subjects older and younger than 65years. Yet patients included in clinical trials are often not representative of real-life patients and are often fit older cancer patients. Moreover, tolerance to the additive impact of multiple adverse effects is different between older and younger patients. And specific symptoms such as stomatitis may cause a series of consequences such as dehydration, denutrition, renal insufficiency, and adverse events of renally excreted drugs. Older patients are at high risk of toxicity due to many factors but mainly due to the prevalence of frailty in this population that has been estimated to be around 40% increasing the risk of chemotherapy intolerance. As a consequence, interventions must be implemented according to altered domains of comprehensive geriatric assessment in order to improve anticancer tolerance. These interventions are reviewed here.

Communication about geriatric assessment domains in advanced cancer settings: "Missed opportunities".

Older patients with advanced cancer often have age-related health issues (e.g., memory impairment) that influence their cancer treatment decisions. Communication about these age-related concerns can potentially lead to further assessment and subsequent clinical interventions to improve treatment decision-making and patients' quality of life. Yet, little is known about the communication of age-related concerns between oncologists, patients, and caregivers. This study is a secondary analysis of data from the Values and Options in Cancer Care (VOICE) study. Audio-recorded and transcribed outpatient clinical oncology encounters with 37 patients with advanced cancer ≥60 years of age were content-analyzed. Two trained coders used a structured coding scheme based on pre-specified geriatric assessment (GA) domains to examine the transcripts for the frequency and quality of communication about age-related concerns. Atlas.ti version 6 was used for all analyses. The median age of the patients was 66 years (range = 60-90 years); patients were mostly female (26/37), married (22/37), and White (36/37). Out of 37 audio-recorded visits, 31 had at least one mention of an age-related concern with a total of 70 mentions. Oncologists initiated communication about age-related concerns half of the time (53%). When age-related concerns were mentioned, half of the time (50%) the oncologist did not implement further evidence-based interventions to address the age-related concern (e.g., conduct a cognitive screen for a memory concern). Interventions are needed to improve the frequency and quality of the communication about age-related concerns to improve the care of older adults with cancer.

Delphi consensus of an expert committee in oncogeriatrics regarding comprehensive geriatric assessment in seniors with cancer in Spain.

The aim of this work was to reach a national consensus in Spain regarding the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) domains in older oncological patients and the CGA scales to be used as a foundation for widespread use. The Delphi method was implemented to attain consensus. Representatives of the panel were chosen from among the members of the Oncogeriatric Working Group of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). Consensus was defined as ≥66.7% coincidence in responses and by the stability of said coincidence (changes ≤15% between rounds). The study was conducted between July and December 2016. Of the 17 people invited to participate, 16 agreed. The panel concluded by consensus that the following domains should be included in the CGA:(and the scales to evaluate them): functional (Barthel Index, Lawton-Brody scale, gait speed), cognitive (Pfeiffer questionnaire), nutritional (Mini Nutritional Assessment - MNA), psychological/mood (Yesavage scale), social-familial (Gijon scale), comorbidity (Charlson index), medications, and geriatric syndromes (urinary and/or fecal incontinence, low auditory and/or visual acuity, presence of falls, pressure sores, insomnia, and abuse). Also by consensus, the CGA should be administered to older patients with cancer for whom there is a subsequent therapeutic intent and who scored positive on a previous frailty-screening questionnaire. After 3 rounds, consensus was reached regarding CGA domains to be used in older patients with cancer, the scales to be administered for each of these domains, as well as the timeline to be followed during consultation.

Mild-to-Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease and Geriatric Outcomes: Analysis of Cross-Sectional Data from the Berlin Aging Study II

Background: Mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD G3a) is prevalent in older adults. Substantial evidence suggests that individuals with advanced CKD face a high risk for common geriatric conditions, like functional impairment and cognitive decline, whereas the relationships between mild-to-moderate CKD and functional impairment and cognitive decline, but also poor nutritional status and mood disorders, are still unclear. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore associations between mild-to-moderate CKD and impairments in the core domains of geriatric assessment (GA) in a large cohort of community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 1,476 participants of the Berlin Aging Study II. Study participants were stratified as to presence or absence of CKD G3a (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m² vs. eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²). GA comprised the following instruments: the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL), the Timed up and Go (TUG), the Tinetti test (Tinetti), the Mini-Mental-State Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). We used logistic regression models to estimate multivariable-adjusted associations between CKD G3a and impairments in the respective domains. Results: A total of 282 subjects with mild-to-moderate CKD (CKD G3a) were identified (19.1%). Overall, the prevalence of impairments identified was higher among subjects with compared to without CKD G3a (21 vs. 15.9%, p = 0.043). In multivariable-adjusted models, CKD G3a was consistently associated with increased odds of an impaired gait performance as to the TUG (adjusted odds ratio 2.06, 95% CI 1.04-4.09). In contrast, on average, individuals with and without CKD G3a did not differ as to their results in the MMSE, the ADL, the MNA, and the GDS. Conclusion: GA identified impairments in 21 versus 15.9% of older adults with and without mild-to-moderate CKD, respectively. However, except for an increased likelihood of impaired gait performance (TUG) with mild-to-moderate CKD, we did not find independent associations between mild-to-moderate CKD and geriatric conditions.

Modeling of quality of life in older adults with advanced cancer: Data from a URCC NCORP multisite trial.

218 Background: While the importance of symptom assessment is well recognized in Palliative Care (PC), limited evidence is available on the growing population of older adults with advanced cancer. Increasingly geriatric assessment (GA), which incorporates validated tools to assess health status, is advocated as a component of the care for older patients with cancer, but is not routinely incorporated into PC evaluations. We tested the hypothesis that variability in QoL for older adults with advanced cancer would be predicted by both symptoms and GA. Methods: Data from an ongoing cluster RCT conducted at 68 oncology practices were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were: &gt; 70 years old, advanced solid tumor diagnosis, impairment in at least 1 GA domain (e.g., function). Multiple reliable and valid objective assessments and self-report measures for each GA domain were completed. Symptoms were assessed by MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). Hierarchical regression modeling was conducted. The dependent variable was FACT score at Time 2 (4-6 weeks). The independent (Time 1) variables were entered in 3 steps: 1) gender, race, educational level( &lt; or &gt; high school), cancer type ( GI / Lung or other), receiving chemotherapy; 2) MDASI, 3) GA measures: Polypharmacy, Blessed Orientation and Memory Concentration Test, % weight loss, Short Physical Performance Battery, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Older Adult Resource Survey (OARS) Comorbidity, OARS Medical Social Support, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Results: N = 342 at time 1 (Mean age 77 years, 43% female, 90% white, 51% high school graduates, 49% GI or Lung cancer, 68% on chemotherapy). N = 303 at time 2(11% attrition due to death or withdrawal). Overall, 46% of variance in QoL was explained (demographic and disease characteristics: 4% [p = .05], symptoms: 32% [p &lt; .0001], GA measures: 10% [p &lt; .0001]). Significant individual GA predictors of worse QoL were lower social support, higher anxiety, impairment in IADLs, and poorer physical performance. Conclusions: Findings suggest that GA explains variance in quality of life scores for older adults with advanced cancer and reinforce the importance of symptom assessment and management in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT02107443.

Assessing Frailty and Vulnerability in Older Adults with Cancer

Aging is associated with decreased physiologic reserve, and older adults are more susceptible to cancer treatment toxicity. In this review, we discuss the implications of frailty and vulnerability in older patients with cancer. We also review a number of instruments that can be used to assess frailty and vulnerability and propose a practical approach to incorporate these tools in a general oncology or geriatric clinic. In older patients with cancer, frailty and vulnerability are associated with all-cause mortality, postoperative complications, and treatment intolerance/toxicities. If feasible, a comprehensive geriatric assessment should be used to assess of frailty and vulnerability. If a full geriatric assessment cannot be performed, screening tools such as the Balducci’s criteria, Vulnerable Elders Survey-13, Triage Risk Screening Tool, Groningen Frailty Index, and Geriatric 8 may be used. Future studies should evaluate geriatric assessment domains that have the greatest predictive value for toxicity for each cancer type and treatment.

Approach to the Geriatric Patient

As of 2012, over one in eight Americans is over the age of 65, and this number is rising, particularly in the 85+ age group. This segment of the population has a rate of hospitalization three times higher than that for persons of all ages. General internists and family medicine physicians provide a large portion of care for this age group and should therefore be comfortable using a comprehensive approach to geriatric assessment. This review describes general considerations regarding geriatric care, including the process of taking a functional history and clinical implications of geriatric care. The geriatric assessment process is discussed in terms of physical, cognitive, social, and medical domains. The benefits of geriatric assessment in primary care, specialty care, and hospitalized patients are described. Tables outline activities of daily living, sensory changes with aging, major causes of visual impairment in the geriatric population, major neurocognitive disorder diagnostic criteria, medications to avoid or use with caution based on Beers criteria and Screening Tool of Older individuals’ Potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force–recommended services relevant to older adults, and vaccinations in older adults. Figures illustrate the key vulnerabilities of older adults; outcomes linked to functional dependence; common disorders associated with cognitive concerns; domains of cognition and examples of impairment in theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition; the social and medical domains of geriatric assessment; barriers to medication adherence in older patients; and resources for medication appropriateness in older adults. This review contains 8 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, 110 references, and 5 MCQs.

An Introduction to a Head and Neck Cancer-Specific Frailty Index and Its Clinical Implications in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study Focusing on Respiratory and Swallowing Functions.

Frailty refers to a decreased physiologic reserve in geriatric patients and its importance in terms of treatment planning and outcome prediction has been emphasized in oncologic practices for older patients with cancer. We investigated the clinical implications of a head and neck cancer (HNC)-specific frailty index suggested by prospective clinical and functional evaluations of HNC patients. We analyzed data on 165 elderly patients with HNC who were prospectively enrolled in our hospital from 2010 to 2013. Pretreatment functional evaluations were performed according to all comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) domains. We additionally evaluated the patients' respiratory and swallowing functions using pulmonary function tests, voice handicap index (VHI), MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and other associated tests. Factors affecting the 2-year morbidity and mortality were also analyzed. Respiratory and swallowing problems were major causes of 2-year morbidity. Pretreatment performance status, VHI ≥8, MDADI <70, dental problems, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with early morbidity and mortality (all p < .05). CGA-assessed frailty was found in 72 patients (43.6%) and was significantly associated with 2-year mortality (p = .027) but not with morbidity (p = .716). The high-risk group according to our new HNC-specific frailty index that included functional evaluations of respiration and swallowing showed significantly higher 2-year morbidity (p = .043) and mortality (p < .001). Pretreatment functional disabilities related to respiration and swallowing were significantly associated with early morbidity and mortality. The suggested index would be more useful for assessing frailty in elderly HNC patients. This study is the first report in terms of suggesting a new frailty index focusing on respiratory and swallowing functions in elderly patients with head and neck cancer. This study shows that functional disabilities associated with respiration and swallowing significantly affected early morbidity and mortality in these elderly patients. The head and neck cancer-specific frailty index described in this report, which includes functional evaluations of respiration and swallowing, significantly predicted both early morbidity and mortality.

Factors associated with changes in mobility and living arrangements in a comprehensive geriatric outpatient assessment after hip fracture

Purpose: To examine factors associated with changes in mobility and living arrangements in a comprehensive geriatric outpatient assessment after hip fracture. Method: Population-based prospective data on 887 consecutive hip fracture patients aged 65 years and older. The domains of the geriatric assessment were the independent and changes in mobility level and living arrangements 4 months postoperatively the outcome variables. Results: Of the survivors, 499 (73%) attended the assessment. The mobility level had declined in 39% of the attendees and 38% of them had moved to more supported living arrangements 4 months after the hip fracture. In the age-adjusted univariate logistic regression analyses, almost all the domains of the comprehensive geriatric assessment were significantly associated with both outcomes. In the forward stepwise multivariate analysis, disability in activities of daily living, poor performance in Timed Up and Go and comorbidity as measured by the American Society of Anesthesiologists scores remained significantly associated with the outcomes. Conclusions: While comorbidity and disability in activities of daily living and mobility are the major indicators of poor outcomes of mobility and living arrangements after hip fracture, all the domains in the comprehensive geriatric assessment deserve attention during hip fracture care and rehabilitation.Implications for RehabilitationIn almost half of the patients the mobility level and living arrangements had deteriorated 4 months after the hip fracture, suggesting an urgent need for more effective postoperative rehabilitation.Almost all the domains of the comprehensive geriatric assessment were associated with poor outcomes and require equal attention during the acute and postacute phases of hip fracture care and in the course of rehabilitation.A geriatric outpatient assessment a few months after the hip fracture provides a check-point for the outcomes and an opportunity to target interventions at different domains of the comprehensive assessment.

Cumulative deficit model of geriatric assessment to predict the postoperative outcomes of older patients with solid abdominal cancer.

The geriatric assessment (GA) has proven to be of great value for clinicians treating older patients. However, a clear consensus on the optimal set of GA instruments is lacking, particularly for surgical patients. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to compare the prevalence of frailty, depending on the number of incorporated GA domains, and to evaluate its accuracy in predicting postoperative outcome. Seventy-five patients aged 65 years and older, qualified for abdominal surgery due to solid cancer, were enrolled. The GA included a wide variety of validated tools that evaluate functional, mobility, nutritional, co-morbidity, polypharmacy, and psychosocial domains. Depending on the number of incorporated GA domains the frequency of frailty was 23-97%. The cumulative score rather than individual components of the GA, turned out to be an independent risk factor of 30-day postoperative morbidity. In predicting 30-day "any" and "major" morbidities, the area under the curve was 0.67-0.72 and 0.70-0.82 (model including the severity of the surgery) vs. 0.57-0.66 and 0.50-0.65 (model not including the severity of the surgery), respectively. The number of incorporated GA domains has a great influence on the prevalence of frailty and on adequate surgical risk assessment. The summary deficit score based on Pre-operative Assessment of Cancer in the Elderly (PACE) or the GA consisting of functional, mobility, cognitive, depression, nutritional, co-morbidity, polypharmacy, and social support assessment domains can predict 30-day postoperative morbidity. However, only models with addition of the severity of surgery show moderate to good predictive value.