Research Article| October 01, 2013 Inference of Multiple Earthquake‐Cycle Relaxation Timescales from Irregular Geodetic Sampling of Interseismic Deformation Brendan J. Meade; Brendan J. Meade Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138meade@fas.harvard.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Yann Klinger; Yann Klinger Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Univ Paris Diderot, UMR 7154 CNRS, F‐75005 Paris, Franceklinger@ipgp.fr Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Eric A. Hetland Eric A. Hetland Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109ehetland@umich.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Brendan J. Meade Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138meade@fas.harvard.edu Yann Klinger Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Univ Paris Diderot, UMR 7154 CNRS, F‐75005 Paris, Franceklinger@ipgp.fr Eric A. Hetland Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109ehetland@umich.edu Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-3573 Print ISSN: 0037-1106 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2013) 103 (5): 2824–2835. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130006 Article history First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Brendan J. Meade, Yann Klinger, Eric A. Hetland; Inference of Multiple Earthquake‐Cycle Relaxation Timescales from Irregular Geodetic Sampling of Interseismic Deformation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2013;; 103 (5): 2824–2835. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130006 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of the Seismological Society of America Search Advanced Search Abstract Characterizing surface deformation throughout a full earthquake cycle is a challenge due to the lack of high‐resolution geodetic observations of duration comparable to that of characteristic earthquake recurrence intervals (250–10,000 years). Here we approach this problem by comparing long‐term geologic slip rates with geodetically derived fault slip rates by sampling only a short fraction (0.001%–0.1%) of a complete earthquake cycle along 15 continental strike‐slip faults. Geodetic observations provide snapshots of surface deformation from different times through the earthquake cycle. The timing of the last earthquake on many of these faults is poorly known, and may vary greatly from fault to fault. Assuming that the underlying mechanics of the seismic cycle are similar for all faults, geodetic observations from different faults may be interpreted as samples over a significantly larger fraction of the earthquake cycle than could be obtained from the geodetic record along any one fault alone. As an ensemble, we find that geologically and geodetically inferred slip rates agree well with a linear relation of 0.94±0.09. To simultaneously explain both the ensemble agreement between geologic and geodetic slip‐rate estimates with observations of rapid postseismic deformation, we consider the predictions from simple two‐layer earthquake‐cycle models with both Maxwell and Burgers viscoelastic rheologies. We find that a two‐layer Burgers model, with two relaxation timescales, is consistent with observations of deformation throughout the earthquake cycle, whereas the widely used two‐layer Maxwell model with a single relaxation timescale, is not, suggesting that the earthquake cycle is effectively characterized by a largely stress‐recoverable rapid postseismic stage and a much more slowly varying interseismic stage. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Read full abstract