Abstract. Regulatory review of a licence application for construction and operation of a geological repository for radioactive waste should not only be based on information provided by the applicant but also on viewpoints brought up by stakeholders and decision makers. In the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority's (SSM) licensing review of a spent fuel repository at the Forsmark site, the main concerns brought up in court hearings, from national consultations and by the Swedish government were focused around the long-term protective capacity of the copper canisters with cast iron inserts. The most debated canister degradation mechanisms were anoxic corrosion of copper (in oxygen gas free water), localised sulphide corrosion (pitting corrosion and stress corrosion cracking), the influence of gamma radiation, and strain hardening of the canister cast iron insert. The main question addressed by SSM is not whether such effects can be ruled out altogether, but rather their potential extent and influence on canister integrity during a sufficiently long period in the repository environment. Constraints are mainly based on rock properties and associated hydrological and geochemical factors known from site investigation and knowledge about the protective capability of the buffer barrier. The key factors are in general well characterised and cover for instance sulphide availability, groundwater flow, mass transfer rates and expected mechanical loading on canisters in the repository environment. The canister corrosion/degradation mechanisms reviewed in this paper are judged by SSM to have a small or limited importance for demonstration of regulatory compliance, taking into account the characteristics of the site, the function of the buffer, and the margins provided by the significant thickness and mechanical strength of the proposed canister.