PICK UP ANY newspaper and you can read about school problems and the ongoing debate about policy and reform. While schools certainly face critical challenges, rural schools face many of these same concerns. Yet we seldom hear about problems in rural schools. Perhaps we hear more about because most major media outlets are located in cities, or because high population densities in cities make the challenges more visible, or because voters are concentrated in cities. Regardless of the reason, focusing primarily on schools establishes a needless rural/urban antagonism and ignores the fact that and rural communities face similar struggles even though their circumstances differ. Both have experienced declining employment and increasing poverty that affect school funding. Both must respond to increasing federal and state demands for accountability and higher student achievement while facing growing teacher shortages during fiscally challenging times. Both have been adversely affected by economically driven population shifts. By identifying here the common threads of the challenges they share, we intend to stimulate discussion about how people in and rural communities can find common purposes. If the shared challenges are recognized, it may be possible for and rural schools to join forces and so exert more effective influence on the national sociopolitical arena. Over the course of the 20th century, the U.S. experienced a profound shift in terms of where people lived and how they earned a living. This shift accelerated about 30 years ago and has had two related effects: in large metropolitan areas, formerly clear distinctions between urban, suburban, and rural communities have substantially blurred, and in areas far from large cities, populations have steadily declined. Generally, areas are defined as having 1,000 people or more per square mile, while rural communities have fewer than 150 people per square mile. Using these criteria, rural America at the turn of the present century comprised 2,052 counties, including 75% of the nation's land but just 17% of its population and only 14% of its children. Notably, schools educated a similar proportion of the school-age population: approximately 13% or roughly 6.5 million children. (1) Yet classifying communities and schools by population densities alone ignores how the distinctions between urban, suburban, and rural have blurred in response to economic pressures. New Jersey, for example, is a predominately metropolitan state. Only one New Jersey resident in 10 lives in a rural area. However, 10% of New Jersey's population constitutes more people than there are in all of Maine. (2) Similarly, the term became common only after World War II, when the middle class left the cities for the suburbs and many rural citizens moved to cities for jobs and opportunities. As the middle class left the cities, impoverished people, often people of color, increasingly populated inner cities, where the cost of housing was lower. Subsequently, urban education became a euphemism for inner-city education, meaning schools for predominately poor communities populated chiefly by people of color. (3) However, more recent movements by the middle class have been either further away from the cities or back into gentrified city centers. Thus previously rural areas have turned into suburbs (sometimes called exurbs) and previously suburban areas (called ring suburbs) have become peri-urban communities with many characteristics formerly found primarily in inner cities. (4) We argue that the traditional classifications of schools based on their community's population density or geographic position may no longer be useful now that schools in various types of communities face similar challenging conditions, contexts, and social infrastructures. Let us look at and rural schools through a new lens. INCREASED DIVERSITY Urban schools have long struggled to level the playing field for the racially, ethnically, and linguistically diverse children of the families that have moved to inner cities for inexpensive housing near productive employment. …
Read full abstract