Genotypic Resistance Testing Research Articles

Resistance Testing for Management of HIV Virologic Failure in Sub-Saharan Africa : An Unblinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Virologic failure in HIV predicts the development of drug resistance and mortality. Genotypic resistance testing (GRT), which is the standard of care after virologic failure in high-income settings, is rarely implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. To estimate the effectiveness of GRT for improving virologic suppression rates among people with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa for whom first-line therapy fails. Pragmatic, unblinded, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02787499). Ambulatory HIV clinics in the public sector in Uganda and South Africa. Adults receiving first-line antiretroviral therapy with a recent HIV RNA viral load of 1000 copies/mL or higher. Participants were randomly assigned to receive standard of care (SOC), including adherence counseling sessions and repeated viral load testing, or immediate GRT. The primary outcome of interest was achievement of an HIV RNA viral load below 200 copies/mL 9 months after enrollment. The trial enrolled 840 persons, divided equally between countries. Approximately half (51%) were women. Most (72%) were receiving a regimen of tenofovir, emtricitabine, and efavirenz at enrollment. The rate of virologic suppression did not differ 9 months after enrollment between the GRT group (63% [263 of 417]) and SOC group (61% [256 of 423]; odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.49]; P = 0.46). Among participants with persistent failure (HIV RNA viral load ≥1000 copies/mL) at 9 months, the prevalence of drug resistance was higher in the SOC group (76% [78 of 103] vs. 59% [48 of 82]; OR, 2.30 [CI, 1.22 to 4.35]; P = 0.014). Other secondary outcomes, including 9-month survival and retention in care, were similar between groups. Participants were receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy at enrollment, limiting the generalizability of the findings. The addition of GRT to routine care after first-line virologic failure in Uganda and South Africa did not improve rates of resuppression. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

High performance of integrase genotyping on diverse HIV-1 clades circulating in Cameroon: toward a successful transition to dolutegravir-based regimens in low and middle-income countries

A successful transition to dolutegravir-based regimens in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires an integrase genotyping assay effective on diverse HIV-1 clades. We herein developed and validated an in-house integrase genotyping protocol on plasma samples from 195 HIV-infected patients in Cameroon. Median [IQR] viremia was 23,574 (518-109,235) copies/mL; 128/195 participants had ≥1000copies/mL (i.e., WHO-threshold for genotypic resistance testing in LMICs). A total of 18 viral clades were detected: 72(51.1%) CRF02_AG, 38(26.9%) pure subtypes and 31(22.0%) other recombinants. Following WHO-threshold (≥1000copies/ml), sequencing performance was 82.81%(106/128). Regarding viremia, performance was 85.00%(68/80) with ≥100,000copies/mL versus 76.67%(23/30) with 10,000 to 99,999copies/mL (P = 0.22); 83.33%(15/18) with 1,000 to 99,999copies/mL (P = 0.55); 73.68%(14/19) with 500 to 999copies/mL (P = 0.19); 50%(13/26) for 200 to 499copies/mL (P = 0.0005) and 36.36%(8/22) for <200copies/mL (P < 0.0001). The developed in-house integrase-genotyping is highly effective on both pure and recombinant viral clades, even at low-level viremia. This performance underscores its usefulness in monitoring integrase-resistance mutations and supporting the scale-up of dolutegravir-based regimens in LMICs.

Characterization of HIV-1 drug resistance among patients with failure of second-line combined antiretroviral therapy in central Ethiopia.

As a consequence of the improved availability of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) in resource-limited countries, an emergence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) has been observed. We assessed the prevalence and spectrum of HIVDR in patients with failure of second-line cART at two HIV clinics in central Ethiopia. HIV drug resistance was analysed in HIV-1-infected patients with virological failure of second-line cART using the geno2pheno application. Among 714 patients receiving second-line cART, 44 (6.2%) fulfilled the criteria for treatment failure and 37 were eligible for study inclusion. Median age was 42 years [interquartile range (IQR): 20-45] and 62.2% were male. At initiation of first-line cART, 23 (62.2%) were WHO stage III, mean CD4 cell count was 170.6 (range: 16-496) cells/µL and median (IQR) HIV-1 viral load was 30220 (7963-82598) copies/mL. Most common second-line cART regimens at the time of failure were tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-lamivudine (3TC)-ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) (19/37, 51.4%) and zidovudine (ZDV)-3TC-ATV/r (9/37, 24.3%). Genotypic HIV-1 resistance testing was successful in 35 (94.6%) participants. We found at least one resistance mutation in 80% of patients and 40% carried a protease inhibitor (PI)-associated mutation. Most common mutations were M184V (57.1%), Y188C (25.7%), M46I/L (25.7%) and V82A/M (25.7%). High-level resistance against the PI ATV (10/35, 28.6%) and lopinavir (LPV) (5/35, 14.3%) was reported. As expected, no resistance mutations conferring integrase inhibitor resistance were detected. We found a high prevalence of resistance mutations, also against PIs (40%), as the national standard second-line cART components. Resistance testing before switching to second- or third-line cART is warranted.

Prevalence of HIV Infection and Resistance Mutations in Patients Hospitalized for Febrile Illness in Indonesia.

HIV prevalence in Indonesia is increasing, and only 64% of infected individuals know their status. In a prospective cohort of 1,453 hospitalized patients with unexplained fever, 46 (3.2%) had HIV, including 15 (1.1%) patients without a prior HIV diagnosis. Among 31 subjects previously known to have HIV, 21 (68%) had been receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) at the time of enrollment. Of 39 HIV cases with HIV RNA levels ≥ 100 copies/mL, sequencing for genotype analysis and resistance testing was successful in 30 (77%) subjects. The most common HIV subtypes were AE (90%) and B (10%). Five (16.7%) subjects had resistance mutations to nucleoside and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and all of them were on cART. No evidence of transmitted drug resistance was found in newly diagnosed individuals. Hospital-based screening may be an efficient method to expand HIV testing and identify a significant number of new cases. Access to care, close monitoring, expansion of anti-retroviral options, and ensuring availability of CD4 determinations, viral load testing, and genotyping are crucial to control of the epidemic in Indonesia.

Evolution of HIV-1 Surveillance Drug Resistance Mutations Over 10 Years in New South Wales, Australia.

New South Wales has the greatest burden of HIV in Australia, with 2012 and 2013 recording the highest rates of new diagnoses in 20 years. Concurrently, there has been significant changes in antiretroviral treatments and testing paradigms. We compiled a statewide resistance database to characterize changes in HIV-1 resistance mutations over time. Genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) was performed on request at three reference laboratories using commercial and in-house methods. In total, 7629 HIV-1 polymerase sequences obtained from GART from 2004 to 2013 were retrospectively collated, reformatted, de-identified, and analyzed using Stanford HIVdb program 7.0 and the 2009 World Health Organization (WHO) surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs). Analyses were performed on subgroups of known treatment naives, treatment experienced, and seroconverters. There has been a decrease in overall rates of prevalent drug resistance mutations from 57.8% in 2004 to 21% in 2013. Dual and triple class resistance mutations have decreased from 32.7% in 2004 to 5.8% in 2013 and 16.4% to 1.2%, respectively. In treatment-naive individuals (n = 450), the frequency of protease inhibitor (PI) mutations remains low at 2.7%. In seroconverters, rates of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) are 6.6%, 3%, 3%, and 1.5% for overall, PI, non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor (NNRTI), and NRTI, respectively. In treatment experienced, rates remain stable with 36.0%, 18.9%, 29.1%, and 6.4% for overall, NNRTI, NRTI, and PI mutations. The most common mutations in treatment experienced occurred at position M184, T215 (NRTI); K103 (NNRTI); I54 (PI). Apparent decreases in prevalent SDRMs can be attributed to changes in GART testing indications over time. In treatment-naive and -experienced subgroups, rates have been stable with low rates of TDR in seroconverters.

Genotypic HIV-1 tropism determination might help to identify people with exhausted treatment options and advanced disease.

To evaluate HIV-1 tropism in 1382 combined antiretroviral therapy (cART)-experienced patients failing therapy to characterize those with exhausted therapeutic options. HIV-1 genotypic tropism was inferred through Geno2Pheno by estimating the false-positive-rate (FPR) values. Cumulative resistance and drug activity were evaluated by Stanford algorithm. Overall, median (IQR) CD4 count (cells/mm3) nadir and at last genotypic resistance test (GRT) available were 98 (33-211) and 312 (155-517), respectively. Considering HIV-1 tropism, 30.5% had X4/dual-mixed strains (FPR ≤5%: 22.2%; FPR 5%-10%: 8.3%). By stratifying according to tropism, by decreasing FPR, a significant decrease of CD4 nadir and at last GRT was observed. The proportion of individuals with CD4 count <200 cells/mm3, who were perinatally infected and with a long treatment history significantly increased as FPR levels decreased. Regarding resistance, 933 (67.5%) individuals accumulated at least one class resistance, with 52.7%, 48.2%, 23.5% and 13.2% of individuals showing resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs, PIs and INIs; while 23.2%, 27.2%, 14.3% and 2.8% harboured resistance to 1, 2, 3 and 4 classes, respectively. Individuals with FPR ≤5% showed a significantly higher level of resistance to PIs, NRTIs and INIs compared with others. The proportion of individuals harbouring strains susceptible to ≤2 active drugs was only about 2%; nonetheless, this proportion doubled (4.6%) in patients infected with FPR ≤5%. Our findings showed that a small proportion of cART failing individuals have limited therapeutic options. However, tropism determination might help to identify people who have accumulated a high level of resistance and have a greater risk of advanced disease.

Epidemiological and phylogenetic analysis for non-B subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in Busan, Korea

Recent data on non-B subtypes’ epidemiology among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) in Korea are lacking. We aimed to assess the changing trends in the epidemiology of non-B subtypes of HIV-1 in Korea using phyloepidemiological analyses. We analyzed the demographic records and sequencing data obtained from genotypic drug resistance tests between 2005 and 2019 from 517 patients infected with HIV attending a tertiary care hospital in Busan, Korea. Subtyping and phylogenetic analyses with reference sequences were performed. Additionally, transmission clusters were identified via maximum-likelihood trees. Non-B subtypes accounted for 21.3% of the 517 sequences. CRF01_AE (52.7%) was the most common non-B subtype, followed by CRF02_AG (16.4%), A1 (11.8%), and C (5.5%). The prevalence of non-B subtypes decreased from 36.4 to 13.4% by 2009, while it increased to 27.4% between 2015 and 2019. Among patients with non-B subtypes, the proportion of overseas sailors decreased from 66.7 to 7.5%; contrarily, the proportion of men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) increased from 0 to 46.9% over the study period. We identified 8 transmission clusters involving non-B subtypes, with sizes ranging from 2 to 4 patients, including 3 clusters containing MSM. Our results highlight the changes in the epidemiological trends of non-B subtypes of HIV-1 in Korea.

Factors associated with the use and composition of two-drug regimens in a large single-centre HIV cohort.

We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics associated with the use of two-drug regimens (2DRs) and the factors associated with specific antiretrovirals in 2DRs in a large single-centre HIV cohort. Retrospective analysis of demographics, HIV characteristics and AIDS events, antiretroviral prescription, virological failure and genotypic resistance testing, and laboratory results from all adult people with HIV (PWH) prospectively followed at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona who were receiving a 3DR or a 2DR in January 2020. We assessed factors associated with the probability of receiving 2DRs relative to three-drug regimens (3DRs) using a logistic regression model, controlling for age, sex and year of HIV diagnosis. The same methodology was applied to identify factors associated with the prescription of integrase inhibitor-based regimens or PI-based regimens among PWH receiving 2DRs. There were 3432 (88%) PWH receiving 3DRs and 463 (12%) receiving 2DRs. In the final adjusted model, ≥2 previous virological failures, previous resistance mutations, previous AIDS diagnosis, longer time on current regimen, higher total cholesterol or triglycerides and lower baseline haemoglobin were independent factors associated with 2DRs. The majority of 2DRs included an integrase inhibitor or/and a PI. We identified independent factors associated with the inclusion of integrase inhibitors (lower HDL cholesterol) or PIs (prior AIDS, prior genotypic resistance mutations and lower CD4/CD8 ratio) in the 2DR. In this large single-centre HIV cohort, a worse cardiometabolic status or more archived resistance were key factors associated with inclusion of integrase inhibitors or PIs, respectively, in 2DRs.

Prevalence of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTIs) resistance mutations in Henan Province, China (2018–2020)

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens containing integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have become the recommended treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients in the updated guidelines in China. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of acquired and transmitted INSTI-associated resistance of HIV-1 strains in the Henan Province (China) to provide guidance on the implementation of routine INSTI-associated HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing. Serum samples from HIV-1-infected patients seeking treatment in our hospital from August 2018 to December 2020 were collected and the HIV-1 integrase gene coding sequence was amplified, sequenced and analyzed for INSTI resistance. We obtained integrase sequence data from a total of 999 HIV-1-infected patients, including 474 ART-naive patients, 438 ART-treated patients, and 87 patients with unknown treatment history. We detected INSTI resistance in 12 patients (1.2%, 12/999) of the study group, which included 9 ART-treated patients (2.05%, 9/438), with 6 being INSTI-treated (14.63%, 6/41) and 3 INSTI-naive (0.76%, 3/397) and 3 ART-naive (0.63%, 3/474) patients. The most common major resistance mutation was E138AK (0.5%, 5/999), while the most common accessory resistance mutation was E157Q (1.8%, 18/999). Phylogenetic analysis based on the HIV-1 integrase gene indicated that INSTI resistance was primarily detected in patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B. In conclusion, our study reveals that INSTI resistance is observed in INSTI-treated patients, as expected, and the prevalence of INSTI resistance in ART-naive patients in Henan Province is low. However, baseline INSTI resistance testing should be considered, as the prescription of INSTI-based regimens is anticipated to increase considerably in the near future.

Factors associated with the emergence of integrase resistance mutations in patients failing dual or triple integrase inhibitor-based regimens in a French national survey.

Successful 2-drug regimens (2DRs) for HIV were made possible by the availability of drugs combining potency and tolerability with a high genetic barrier to resistance. How these deal with resistance development/re-emergence, compared with 3DRs, is thus of paramount importance. A national survey including patients who were either naive or experienced with any 2DR or 3DR but failing integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens [two consecutive plasma viral load (VL) values >50 copies/mL] was conducted between 2014 and 2019. Genotypic resistance tests were interpreted with the v28 ANRS algorithm. Overall, 1104 patients failing any INSTI-containing regimen (2DRs, n = 207; 3DRs, n = 897) were analysed. Five hundred and seventy-seven (52.3%) patients were infected with a B subtype and 527 (47.3%) with non-B subtypes. Overall, 644 (58%) patients showed no known integrase resistance mutations at failure. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with the emergence of at least one integrase mutation were: high VL at failure (OR = 1.24 per 1 log10 copies/mL increase); non-B versus B subtype (OR = 1.75); low genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) (OR = 0.10 for GSS = 2 versus GSS = 0-0.5); and dolutegravir versus raltegravir (OR = 0.46). Although 3DRs versus 2DRs reached statistical significance in univariate analysis (OR = 0.59, P = 0.007), the variable is not retained in the final model. This study is one of the largest studies characterizing integrase resistance in patients failing any INSTI-containing 2DR or 3DR in routine clinical care and reveals factors associated with emergence of integrase resistance that should be taken into consideration in clinical management. No difference was evidenced between patients receiving a 2DR or a 3DR.

Prevalence of genotypic baseline risk factors for cabotegravir + rilpivirine failure among ARV-naive patients.

Multivariable baseline factor analysis across cabotegravir + rilpivirine clinical trials showed that HIV-1 subtypes A6/A1 and the presence of rilpivirine resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were associated with an increased risk of virological failure of this dual therapy. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of genotypic baseline risk factors for cabotegravir + rilpivirine failure among ARV-naive patients. From 2010 to 2020, 4212 sequences from ARV-naive patients were collected from three large Parisian academic hospital genotypic databases. Cabotegravir and rilpivirine RAMs were defined according to the ANRS algorithm. Among 4212 ARV-naive patients, 38.6% were infected with subtype B, 32.4% with CRF02_AG (32.4%) and 5.1% with subtype A (85.5% being A6/A1 subtype). Overall, the presence of at least one cabotegravir or rilpivirine RAM was 16.2% and 14.3%, respectively. Considering genotypic resistance interpretation, using the ANRS algorithm, 0.74% (n = 31), 6.2% (n = 261) and 0.09% (n = 4) of sequences were resistant to cabotegravir, rilpivirine or both, respectively. The overall prevalence of L74I in integrase and E138A in RT was 13.0% and 3.2%, respectively, and stable over the decade. Thus, adding 183 subtype A6/A1 sequences to 244 sequences interpreted as resistant to rilpivirine led to 427 (10.1%) sequences combining both baseline virological risk factors for cabotegravir + rilpivirine dual-therapy failure. Among large sequence databases, when adding prevalence of rilpivirine-resistant viruses and HIV-1 subtype A6/A1 sequences, 10.1% of patients would not be eligible for cabotegravir + rilpivirine dual therapy. These data re-emphasize the need for a pre-therapeutic genotypic resistance test to detect polymorphisms and transmitted drug resistance and to define HIV-1 subtype.

Is there a role for doravirine in African HIV treatment programmes? A large observational resistance study in South Africa.

IntroductionDolutegravir has replaced efavirenz in most low‐ and middle‐income countries, due to better tolerability and formidable resistance profile, but dolutegravir side effects suggest alternatives are needed. We evaluated doravirine resistance in South Africa as a first step to assess whether doravirine may replace dolutegravir.MethodsA retrospective dataset was analysed for predicted doravirine susceptibility, including sequences obtained from three patient groups. First, data from 277 patients initiating antiretroviral treatment (ART) were collected between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Second, data from 788 patients experiencing NNRTI‐based ART failure were obtained between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Third, data derived from 584 patients who had genotypic drug resistance testing requested after NNRT‐based failure as part of individual patient management between January 2016 and December 2019. Pol sequences were generated using validated population‐based in‐house genotyping and submitted to Stanford HIVdb v8.9.Results and discussionLess than 5% of patients initiating ART presented with genotypic doravirine resistance, whereas most patients experiencing NNRTI‐based ART failure presented with predicted intermediate (41.0%) or high‐level resistance (43.8%) to doravirine. High‐level resistance to doravirine was commonly predicted by the presence of at least three DRMs (79.7%). The predicted resistance profile to doravirine in ART‐naïve patients is promising, but less so in those experiencing failure to first‐generation NNRTIs. Accumulation of NNRTI DRMs seems to be an important factor in the poor resistance prediction for doravirine.ConclusionsAlthough doravirine is approved as initial therapy in patients who are ART‐naïve, it is currently recommended to obtain a genotype prior to the initiation of ART. Clinical studies are needed to ascertain whether predicted resistance profiles in ART naïve and NNRTI‐treated patients translate into poor clinical outcomes, especially in settings where genotypic resistance testing is not available.

HIV-1 Subtype C Drug Resistance Mutations in Heavily Treated Patients Failing Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Botswana.

There are limited real-world mutational and virological outcomes data of treatment-experienced persons diagnosed with HIV-1 subtype C (HIV-1 C) who are failing Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-based regimens. Requisition forms sent for HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing (GRT) between May 2015 and September 2019 were reviewed and participants experiencing virologic failure while on dolutegravir (DTG) or raltegravir (RAL) cART at sampling recruited. Sanger sequencing of the HIV-1 Pol gene was performed from residual plasma samples and drug resistance mutational (DRM) analysis performed using the Stanford University HIV drug resistance database. 40 HIV-1C integrase sequences were generated from 34 individuals, 24 of whom were on DTG cART, three on RAL cART and seven on an unknown (DTG or RAL)-anchored cART at time of GRT. 11/34 (32%) individuals had DRMs to DTG and other integrase inhibitors. 7/11 (64%) patients had exposure to a RAL-based cART at the time of sampling. Out of the 11 individuals with DRMs, one (9%) had 2-class, 6 (55%) had 3-class, and 4 (36%) had 4-class multidrug-resistant HIV-1C. 7/11 individuals (64%) are currently virologically suppressed. Of the four individuals not virologically suppressed, three had extensive DRMs involving 4-classes of ARV drugs and one individual has demised. Resistance to DTG occurs more often in patients exposed to RAL cART. Individuals with 4-class DRMs plus integrase T97 and E157Q mutations appear to have worse outcomes. There is a need for frequent VL monitoring and GRT amongst treatment-experienced HIV-1C diagnosed individuals.

Increased acquired protease inhibitor drug resistance mutations in minor HIV-1 quasispecies from infected patients suspected of failing on national second-line therapy in South Africa

BackgroundHIV-1C has been shown to have a greater risk of virological failure and reduced susceptibility towards boosted protease inhibitors (bPIs), a component of second-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in South Africa. This study entailed an evaluation of HIV-1 drug resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) among minor viral populations through high-throughput sequencing genotypic resistance testing (HTS-GRT) in patients on the South African national second-line cART regimen receiving bPIs.MethodsDuring 2017 and 2018, 67 patient samples were sequenced using high-throughput sequencing (HTS), of which 56 samples were included in the final analysis because the patient’s treatment regimen was available at the time of sampling. All patients were receiving bPIs as part of their cART. Viral RNA was extracted, and complete pol genes were amplified and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq2500, followed by bioinformatics analysis to quantify the RAMs according to the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database.ResultsStatistically significantly higher PI RAMs were observed in minor viral quasispecies (25%; 14/56) compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (9%; 5/56; p = 0.042) and integrase inhibitor RAM (4%; 2/56; p = 0.002). The majority of the drug resistance mutations in the minor viral quasispecies were observed in the V82A mutation (n = 13) in protease and K65R (n = 5), K103N (n = 7) and M184V (n = 5) in reverse transcriptase.ConclusionsHTS-GRT improved the identification of PI and reverse transcriptase inhibitor (RTI) RAMs in second-line cART patients from South Africa compared to the conventional GRT with ≥20% used in Sanger-based sequencing. Several RTI RAMs, such as K65R, M184V or K103N and PI RAM V82A, were identified in < 20% of the population. Deep sequencing could be of greater value in detecting acquired resistance mutations early.

Virological response and resistance profile in highly treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients switching to dolutegravir plus boosted darunavir in clinical practice.

We evaluated the virological response and resistance profile in combined antiretroviral therapy (cART)-experienced HIV-1-infected patients starting a dual therapy with dolutegravir (DTG) and boosted darunavir (bDRV) for the first time. Survival analyses were used to evaluate virological success (VS) and virological rebound (VR) in viraemic and virologically suppressed patients, respectively. Major resistance mutations (MRMs) and genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) were evaluated at baseline and after switch. Overall, 130 patients [62 (47.7%) viraemic; 68 (52.3%) virologically suppressed] were retrospectively analysed. At the moment of switch, 81.5% accumulated one or more MRM [protease inhibitor (PI), 35.7%; nucleoside(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), 77.5%; non-NRTI, 69.0%; integrase inhibitor (INI), 10.1%), but 77.7% harboured strains fully susceptible to DTG+bDRV. In viraemic patients, the overall probability of VS by 12months of treatment was 91.7%. In virologically suppressed patients, the overall probability of VR was 10.5% by 24months after therapy start. Patients with previous time under virological suppression≤6months showed a higher VR probability compared with others (37.5% vs. 6.7%, P<0.002). Among 13 non-responding patients for whom a genotypic resistance test result at failure was available, only two (15.4%) accumulated further resistance in integrase (Y143C/H/R; S147G and N155H) and protease (V32I, L33F, I54L). In highly treatment-experienced patients, the use of dual therapy based on DTG+bDRV appears to be a very good regimen for switch therapy, with a high rate of virological control in both viraemic and virologically suppressed patients. Among non-responding patients, the selection of further resistance is a rare event.

HIV-2 Drug Resistance Genotyping from Dried Blood Spots.

The treatment of HIV-2 in resource-limited settings (RLS) is complicated by the limited availability of HIV-2-active antiretroviral drugs and inadequate access to HIV-2 viral load and drug resistance testing. Dried blood spots (DBS)-based drug resistance testing, widely studied for HIV-1, has not been reported for HIV-2 and could present an opportunity to improve care for HIV-2-infected individuals. We selected 150 DBS specimens from ongoing studies of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-2 infection in Senegal and subjected them to genotypic drug resistance testing. Total nucleic acid was extracted from DBS, reverse transcribed, PCR amplified, and analyzed by population-based Sanger sequencing, and major drug resistance-associated mutations (RAM) were identified. Parallel samples from plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were also genotyped. We obtained 58 protease/reverse transcriptase genotypes. Plasma viral load was significantly correlated with genotyping success (P < 0.001); DBS samples with corresponding plasma viral load >250 copies/ml had a success rate of 86.8%. In paired DBS-plasma genotypes, 83.8% of RAM found in plasma were also found in DBS, and replicate DBS genotyping revealed that a single test detected 86.7% of known RAM. These findings demonstrate that DBS-based genotypic drug resistance testing for HIV-2 is feasible and can be deployed in RLS with limited infrastructure.

Genotyping and antiretroviral drug resistance of human immunodeficiency Virus-1 in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Determination of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) genotypes and identification of antiretroviral drug-resistant mutations. Among treatment naïve HIV patients in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. HIV is a major public health problem. HIV genotyping and antiretroviral resistance testing is an important guide for better management of treatment-naive. Antiretroviral resistance testing before starting of treatment regimen leads to a better virological response. A total of 57 samples of treatment-naive patients were collected from King Fahd Central Hospital in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Samples were tested for HIV-1 antibodies, western blot, viral load, HIV-1 genotypes through direct sequencing, and antiretroviral resistance testing. The HIV-1 Genotypes were as follow; C: 66.6%, D: 10.5%, G: 8.8%, B: 7.0%, CRF01_AE: 3.5%, A and CRF02_AG: 1.8% each. 77.2% of cases showed susceptibility to the 3 major classes of antiretroviral drugs; Protease inhibitor (PI), Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI); while 8.8% had mutations conferring resistance to NRTI. Mutations conferring resistance to PI were detected in 7.0% of cases, and 1.8% of cases had mutations conferring resistance to both NRTI and PI. Mutations conferring resistance to NNRTI were detected in 5.3% of cases. Mutations associated with antiretroviral drugs include (V82A+I84IV), (L10F+Q58E), (L10F+V82Y), L10FV, L33LF, L89LMV, M184V, E138A, V106I, and V179VD. The prevalence of HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance mutations is 22.8% in the studied population, which may warrant antiretroviral drug resistance testing as a pretreatment to help and guide physicians for the proper HIV treatment.

Prevalence and factors associated with HIV-1 multi-drug resistance over the past two decades in the Italian ARCA database

Despite successful antiretroviral therapy (ART), patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can develop multi-class drug resistance (MDR). This retrospective study aimed to explore the prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance over the past two decades by focusing on HIV-MDR and its predictors. ART-experienced patients with HIV with results from at least one plasma genotypic resistance test (GRT) from 1998 to 2018, from the Antiviral Response Cohort Analysis database, were included in this study. The temporal trend of resistance to any drug class was evaluated by considering all GRTs. Prevalence and predictors of HIV-MDR were analysed by consideration of cumulative GRTs. Among 15 628 isolates from 6802 patients, resistance to at least one drug class decreased sharply from 1998 to 2010 (1998–2001: 78%; 2008–2010: 59%; P<0.001) and then remained relatively constant at approximately 50% from 2011 to 2018, with the proportion of isolates with HIV-MDR also stable (approximately 9%).By evaluating factors associated with cumulative HIV-MDR, the following factors were found to be associated with increased risk of HIV-MDR on multi-variate analysis: male gender; sexual and vertical transmission; number of previous protease inhibitors, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-NRTIs; previous exposure to integrase strand transfer inhibitors, enfuvirtide and maraviroc; and co-infection with hepatitis B virus. In contrast, a nadir CD4 cell count ≥200 cells/mm3, starting first-line ART in 2008 or later and co-infection with hepatitis C virus were associated with lower risk of HIV-MDR. In conclusion, this study revealed that HIV-1 drug resistance has been stable since 2011 despite its dramatic decrease over the past two decades. HIV-MDR is still present, although at a lower rate, suggesting the need for continuous surveillance and accurate management of ART-experienced patients with HIV.

A Low Level of Darunavir Resistance-Associated Mutation Emergence in Patients With Virological Failure During Long-term Use of Darunavir in People With HIV. The ANRS CO3 Aquitaine Cohort.

BackgroundRitonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) is a protease inhibitor (PI) indicated for the treatment of naïve and pretreated HIV-infected patients since 2007. Our study aims to describe DRV/r-treated patients experiencing virological failure (VF) documented with HIV resistance testing.MethodsData from patients belonging to the ANRS CO3 Aquitaine Cohort treated with a regimen including DRV/r between February 2007 and December 2015 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics of patients experiencing VF (defined by 2 consecutive plasma viral loads >50 copies/mL) were compared with those without VF. We then described factors associated with VF as emergence of IAS DRV resistance–associated mutations (RAMs).ResultsAmong the 1458 patients treated at least once with a DRV/r-based regimen, 270 (18.5%) patients experienced VF during follow-up, including 240 with at least 1 genotype resistance test (GRT). DRV RAMs were detected in 29 patients (12%). Among them, 25/29 patients had ≥2 DRV RAMs before DRV/r initiation, all of whom had experienced VF during previous PI treatments. For 18/29, DRV/r was maintained after VF, and controlled viremia was restored after modification of DRV-associated antiretroviral molecules or increased DRV dose. Finally, only 6/29 patients selected new DRV RAMs after DRV/r initiation. All of these experienced previous VFs while on other PIs.ConclusionsThese results highlight the efficacy and robustness of DRV/r, as the emergence of DRV RAMs appeared in <0.4% of patients receiving a DRV/r-based regimen in our large cohort.

Determination of reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations in HIV-1 infected children in Côte d'Ivoire.

Treatment scale-up is leading to a progressive increase in HIV resistance to antiretrovirals, especially in children. To assess resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) in HIV-1 infected children in Côte d'Ivoire, genotypic resistance tests were performed and interpreted using the ANRS algorithm (www.hivfrenchresistance.org). Phylogenetic trees were created using BioEdit v7 and Mega7 software. The frequency of resistance to at least one RTI was 79%. It was 88% for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 71% for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and 63% for both classes (NRTI + NNRTI). The frequency of resistance was 50% for the ZDV + 3TC + EFV combination, 42% for the ABC + 3TC + EFV combination, and 8% for the TDF + 3TC + EFV combination. Frequently encountered resistance mutations were for NRTIs: M184V (88%), TAMs (67%), T215F/I/V/Y (33%), and L74I/V (24%); for NNRTIs: K103N/S (74%), P225H (26%), and G190A/E/Q (24%). The synthesis of phylogenetic analyses showed the predominance of the viral subtype CRF02_AG (85%). These results show a high prevalence of resistance to RTIs in children infected with HIV-1. Hence the interest of a more accessible monitoring of viral load and genotypic resistance tests in HIV-1 infected children undergoing treatment in Côte d'Ivoire.