Sir: During life, up to 76 percent of women experience decreased genital sensation,1 most commonly with a feeling of a widened vagina. Occasionally, traditional colporrhaphies have been performed, showing an improvement in 94 percent of cases.2 Several studies3,4 would suggest that a lateral colporrhaphy could be more effective in reducing the size of the vagina without placing scars within the areas of highest sensitivity. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a simple bilateral mucosal tightening of the caudal part of the vagina could improve the sensation of wide vagina. Forty women underwent cosmetic vaginal tightening from July of 2005 to January of 2007. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 45 years (mean, 36.075 years; median, 37 years). A bilateral vaginal mucosal ellipse was excised in all cases (Fig. 1). The resulting wound was closed in layers with absorbable sutures (Fig. 2). Follow-up consultations were planned at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Six months after the procedure, patients were asked to grade the improvement with the sensation of wide vagina, and both patients and their partners where asked to grade the sexual sensation during intercourse.Fig. 1.: Schematic representation of the mucosal ellipses removed during the cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening. The ellipses can occasionally have slightly different sizes, to obtain the desired level of tightening.Fig. 2.: Schematic representation of the position of the final sutures after a cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening.With regard to vaginal sensitivity after 6 months, two patients (5 percent) did not notice any improvement, 16 (40 percent) noticed some improvement, and 22 (55 percent) noticed a significant improvement. Two patients (5 percent) did not notice any improvement in the sensation of wide vagina after 6 months, and 38 (95 percent) noticed a significant improvement. Eight partners (20 percent) did not notice any improvement after 6 months, 15 (37.5 percent) noticed some improvement, and 17 (42.5 percent) noticed a significant improvement. With regard to complications, there were two cases of localized infection (5 percent) that required treatment. One patient experienced vaginal bleeding on the fourth postoperative day. Traditional anterior and posterior colporrhaphies are occasionally performed in cosmetic patients, and this approach is generating significant criticism.5 Nevertheless, the results obtained with traditional techniques are encouraging and have shown that it is possible to improve the sensation of wide vagina. The cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening, or bilateral colporrhaphy, optimizes the position of the surgical incisions, avoiding the areas of higher sensitivity of the vagina, mainly on the upper anterior wall and the lower posterior one, and reducing the risks for complications. Cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening proved very effective in treating the sensation of wide vagina, with 95 percent of the patients reporting an improvement at 6 months and with 95 percent of them also reporting improved sexual sensitivity. Some limitations of our study will deserve further investigation in the future. It is not possible at the moment to predict how long the results of the vaginal tightening will last, and it may be safe to assume that the results will not be permanent, as with any rejuvenating procedure. Without direct measurements of vaginal dimensions, it is not possible to suggest specific correlations between reduction of vaginal size and improvement in sensation. Implications of cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening for patients who elect to have children after the procedure are not known. The cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening proved reliable, safe, and very effective in improving the sensation of wide vagina experienced by many women. Cosmetic mucosal vaginal tightening also produced improvement of erotic sensitivity in 95 percent of the patients undergoing the procedure and in 80 percent of their partners. Ciro Adamo, M.D., Ph.D. Monica Corvi, M.D. Xthetic Cosmetic Surgery Group Avellino, Italy