Sexual concordance refers to the relationship between physiological responses(e.g.,genitalvasocongestion)andself-reported responses (e.g., feelings of sexual arousal or self-reported perceptions of genital responses) to sexual stimuli. Even though there is variability in women’s sexual concordance (Chivers, Seto, Lalumiere, Laan, & Grimbos, 2010; Kukkonen, Binik, Amsel, & Carrier, 2010; Suschinsky & Lalumiere, 2012), on average women exhibit substantially lower sexual concordance than men (Chivers et al., 2010). This is a widely replicated finding confirmed by meta-analysis. In the article discussed by Brody (2012), we explored a potential explanation for this sex difference, one that implicates interoceptive ability, or one’s awareness of physiological states and responses (Suschinsky & Lalumiere, 2012). In laboratorysettings,womenare lessaccurateat trackingand reporting a host of non-sexual responses (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure, blood glucose, stomach contractions) (reviewed in Suschinsky & Lalumiere, 2012). In our study, we assessed whetherwomen’slowersexualconcordancewasamanifestation of their lower awareness of physiological responses generally. Althoughwomeninourstudyshowed lowersexualconcordance and poorer interoception than men did, we did not obtain a significant relationship between sexual concordance and interoceptive awareness in either sex. Therefore, our hypothesis regarding the relationships between sexual concordance, interoception, and gender was not supported. Brody (2012) brought up several questions and concerns regarding our study. These included the measures of interoception that we used, issues of socially desirable responding, high sexual concordance in some samples of women (including those with high orgasm consistency during certain sexual activities), and statistical issues. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify these issues here.