Genicular Nerve Research Articles

MRI-guided neurolysis for the treatment of chronic refractory knee pain: a case report.

Chronic refractory pain poses a significant challenge in knee joint pathologies, especially after exhaustion of conservative, arthroscopic, and endoprosthetic therapy options. This case report illustrates an innovative approach using MRI-assisted chemical neurolysis of a genicular nerve to manage persistent knee pain after arthroscopy. A 62-year-old male patient with chronic refractory knee pain, primarily localized at the inferomedial part of the knee, underwent high-resolution MRI to visualize the genicular nerves. This allowed for targeted ethanol-based neurolysis of the inferomedial genicular nerve. Following the procedure, the patient experienced substantial pain reduction for the follow-up duration of 4months. The successful use of MRI-assisted chemical neurolysis offers a promising alternative treatment for patients with refractory knee pain, providing long-lasting pain relief without major side effects. This technique has the potential to improve the quality of life for patients suffering from chronic knee pain While these initial results are encouraging, it is important to note that further research, including both short-term and long-term studies, as well as randomized controlled trials, is warranted to establish the efficacy and safety of this treatment method in broader populations before it can be considered for routine incorporation into pain management practices.

Quantitative Analysis of Genicular Nerve Block Spread and Variability: Anatomical Correlations and Clinical Implications

BackgroundDespite advancements in anaesthesiology and regional anaesthesia, the three-dimensional spread of local anaesthetics is still poorly understood. This study investigates the pericapsular spread of radiopaque contrast after ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block in cadaveric knees using CT reconstruction. The aim is to assess the reproducibility, accuracy, and variability of this technique in order to improve safety and effectiveness. MethodsWe used a four-stage methodology that involved performing genicular nerve block on cadaveric knees, acquiring data using high-resolution ultrasound and helical CT imaging, performing segmentation and surface reconstruction of the CT images, and analysing the data quantitively to determine the spread of the infiltrate in each genicular nerve region. Coefficients of variation were calculated to estimate the spread and reproducibility of each genicular nerve block. ResultsOur results revealed significant variability in spread in all genicular nerve blocks, particularly around the recurrent genicular nerve. Despite this variability, the spread—particularly along the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior axes—showed moderate consistency. Furthermore, the regions covered by 80% of the spread closely matched the pericapsular distribution of the genicular nerves of the knee. ConclusionsNotable variability in spread was observed in genicular nerve blocks, particularly around the recurrent genicular nerve. However, the spread showed moderate consistency and aligns closely with the pericapsular nerve distribution of the knee. Future studies should combine quantitative analysis with anatomical dissection to further investigate the involvement of the deep peroneal motor branch.

Viewpoint: Genicular Nerve Hydrodissection for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain Management

Knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis is one of the most common reasons for consultation in patients 50 years old and above. Due to limitations of current management options for knee osteoarthritis, studies seeking alternative treatment techniques have emerged, including procedures targeting knee innervation. The effectiveness of nerve hydrodissection for managing neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome has been demonstrated but has not been applied to nerves that innervate the knee to manage osteoarthritis. This article discusses the potential application of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection to the anterior innervation of the knee, known as the genicular nerves, for pain management in patients with osteoarthritis. Keywords: Knee osteoarthritis, knee pain, nerve hydrodissection, genicular nerves, genicular nerve hydrodissection

Chemical neurolysis of genicular nerves for chronic non-cancer knee pain: A scoping review.

Chemical neurolysis of the genicular nerves is a treatment option for intractable non-cancer knee pain. This scoping review synthesizes the available literature on the effectiveness, adverse effects and procedural techniques of chemical neurolysis of genicular nerves for the management of knee pain. Scoping review. All clinical and research settings. Adult participants with chronic non-cancer knee pain undergoing chemical neurolysis of genicular nerves. A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was conducted up to 4 September 2023. Articles were searched via terms and keywords relating to "knee", "pain", "knee osteoarthritis", "ablation", "alcohol", "phenol" and "chemical neurolysis". Included articles were full text primary studies and in English. Data was extracted using an electronic database by 2 independent reviewers. There were 8 studies included in this review (including 1 randomized controlled trial), comprising 192 patients. There were 4 studies that used phenol, 3 studies that used alcohol, and 1 study that used either alcohol or phenol for chemical neurolysis. Both fluoroscopy and/or ultrasound guidance were utilized for nerve target identification. All studies demonstrated that chemical neurolysis resulted in improved pain and/or functional outcomes, with no serious adverse events reported. Chemical neurolysis of the genicular nerves is a promising treatment strategy for chronic knee pain. Interpretation of the available studies are limited by study heterogeneity and small sample sizes. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the selection of appropriate nerve targets, choice of image guidance, and to compare with other ablative modalities.

MRI genicular nerve mapping: a novel approach to sagittal genicular nerve localization

Background and objectivesChronic knee pain, including postarthroplasty knee pain, is a major cause of morbidity. Radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerve branches is a treatment option. The literature to date has...

Retraction: Comparison of the efficacy of genicular nerve phenol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Retraction: Comparison of the efficacy of genicular nerve phenol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Advanced 3D Anatomical Mapping of Saphenous and Inferior Medial Genicular Nerve Branching: Enhancing Precision in Knee Joint Denervation.

Radiofrequency ablation is a common non-opioid treatment to manage chronic knee pain. The inferior medial genicular nerve is conventionally targeted. It has been suggested that the infrapatellar branch(saphenous nerve) should also be targeted. There is controversy regarding the contribution of the infrapatellar branch to the innervation of the knee joint capsule. 1) Identify the frequency of the branching pattern(s) of the infrapatellar branch in 3D; 2) Assess spatial relationships of branches of infrapatellar branch to the inferior medial genicular nerve; 3) Determine if capturing infrapatellar branch could result in additional benefit to the existing protocol. Anatomical Study. The infrapatellar branch and inferior medial genicular nerve were serially dissected, digitized, and modelled in 3D in 7 specimens(mean age 57.8 ± 2.0; 2F/5M) and their relationship documented. The spatial relationship of the nerves was used to assess the anatomical efficacy of including the infrapatellar branch in the protocol. The infrapatellar branch is most frequently a cutaneous nerve. This nerve was variable and found to be unbranched or have 2-3 branches and in all specimens was located superficial to the branches of inferior medial genicular nerve. When the infrapatellar branch (1) coursed more distally, the strip lesion would not capture the infrapatellar branch but would capture inferior medial genicular nerve consistently;(2) overlapped with the inferior medial genicular nerve, the strip lesion would capture both nerves. Proposed protocol targeting the infrapatellar branch is likely to capture the inferior medial genicular consistently regardless of the anatomical variation of the infrapatellar branch.

Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study was to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block for patients who underwent knee arthroscopy. Patients were randomized into two groups: 1. nerve block group: ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block (superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial genicular nerve, 2-ml 0.5% ropivacaine each nerve.) prior to the general anesthesia, 2. control group: no intervention prior to the general anesthesia. The measurements were pain severity at 3,6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery at rest and at activity(Pain severity was primary outcome at 3 hours after surgery at rest); the time for first ambulation; straight leg raise; mechanical pain threshold of the block areas; time of the surgery, anesthesia and extubation; the use of analgesics in the perioperative period and 72 hours after the surgery; the number of patients awakening from pain on the first two nights after the surgery; the length of hospital stay; postoperative adverse effects. The pain severity was performed by VAS (A 10-point visual analogue scale, 0 points painless, 10 points severe pain) and median (interquartile range; IQR). A total of 70 patients (median age: 53 y, 32 men; 35 per group) were included. Compared to the control group, the nerve block group had a lower pain VAS score at rest (2[2-2] vs. 3[2-4], P<0.01) at 3 hours, and lower pain VAS score at rest persisted for 24 hours and activity persisted for 12 hours after the surgery, also had lower intraoperative dosage of sufentanil (20±4.8 vs. 28.5±5.1 mg; P<0.001), lower requirement for analgesics for pain and lower PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting) throughout the 72-hour observation period. There were no significant difference for the incidence of postoperative adverse effects and straight leg raise. In conclusion, ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block could reduce the pain severity after knee arthroscopy and decrease the use of intraoperative sufentanil without affecting motor function.

Different peripheral nerve blocks for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To comprehensively compare the effect of different peripheral nerve blocks for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. The outcomes included postoperative pain, postoperative function, adverse events, oral morphine equivalent (OME), and perioperative indicators. Network plots, forest plots, league tables and rank probabilities were drawn for all outcomes. Totally 30 studies were included. For postoperative pain, continuous adductor canal block (cACB) + genicular nerve block (GNB) was most likely to be the most effective block regarding rest pain score at 24h; cACB + GNB was most likely to result in the lowest rest pain score at 48h; patients undergoing cACB + infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) + GNB was most likely to have the lowest motion pain score at 24h; patients undergoing cACB + GNB was most likely to have the lowest motion pain score at 48h. For postoperative function, patients undergoing cACB + IPACK + GNB had the highest likelihood to exhibit the shortest time in Timed Up and Go test (TUG); cACB + tibial nerve block (TNB) was most likely to be the most effective block in terms of range of motion (ROM); cACB + IPACK was most likely to be the optimal block concerning the ambulation distance. cACB combined with IPACK/GNB may be the most favorable block after TKA, continuous blocks may be better than single-shot blocks, and combined blocks may be better than separate blocks.

Editorial Comment: Clinical Application of Cost-Effectiveness Data on GAE, Genicular Nerve RFA, and Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.

Editorial Comment: Clinical Application of Cost-Effectiveness Data on GAE, Genicular Nerve RFA, and Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.

ID: 327285 Role of Genicular Nerve Blocks in Elderly Patient with Distal Femur Fractures: A Case Report

ID: 327285 Role of Genicular Nerve Blocks in Elderly Patient with Distal Femur Fractures: A Case Report

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Pulse Radiofrequency and Fluoroscopy-Guided Intra-Articular Pulse Radiofrequency for Knee Osteoarthritis-Related Pain.

To compare two different algological intervention technique outcomes with ultrasound-guided genicular pulse radiofrequency (PRF) and fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular pulse radiofrequency for knee osteoarthritis-related pain. Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Izmir Bakircay University, Cigli Training and Research Hospital and Health Science University Tepecik, Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkiye, between March 2022 and May 2023. Patients aged 60 years and above with stage 3 and 4 knee osteoarthritis, experiencing knee pain for more than six months, and non-responsive to conservative treatments were included. Patients with recent knee surgery or intra-articular injections and those ineligible for radiofrequency application were excluded. Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve PRF and fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular PRF were administered to the included patients. Pain and quality of life were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores before and after the procedures. The study included 64 patients. Both ultrasound-guided genicular PRF and fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular PRF resulted in significant reductions in VAS and WOMAC scores at 1 and 3 months after the procedures. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the two techniques. Ultrasound-guided genicular PRF and fluoroscopy-guided intra-articular PRF are effective and safe options for managing knee osteoarthritis-related pain. Osteoarthritis, Pulse radiofrequency, Ultrasound, Fluoroscopy, Pain.

Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Genicular nerve block (GNB) has emerged as a novel nonsurgical therapy for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The objective was to evaluate GNB versus placebo and other intra-articular (IA) therapies. The Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched from their inception to January 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. A random-effects model and the generic inverse variance method were used for quantitative data synthesis. Heterogeneity was tested with the I2 index. Regarding pain statistically significant scores were demonstrated at 1 and 3 months overall total effect of 1.43 (95% CI, 0.86, 1.99; P= 0.00001; I2 =85%). Similarly, for knee function a total effect of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.35, 1.06; P= 0.00001; I2 =69%) at 1 and 3 months, statistically significant. The minimal clinically important difference regarding pain was achieved at 1 and 3 months. Although, GNB achieved the MCID for KOA pain and statistically significant results for knee functions. We cannot recommend its routine use besides being a safe procedure so far, evidence is fair on GNB for primary KOA due to study heterogeneity and limited follow-up.

ID: 335746 Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of Genicular Nerve for Treatment of Post-Operative Knee Pain

ID: 335746 Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of Genicular Nerve for Treatment of Post-Operative Knee Pain

The Success of Treatment for Osteoarthritis with a Genicular Nerve Block is Associated with Patients’ Body Mass Index

Background: While the mainstay of treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the knee has been total knee arthroplasty, a prognostic genicular nerve block (GNB) followed by cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has been shown to provide long term relief of osteoarthritic knee pain and its disability. The goal of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the demographic makeup of those who had a successful prognostic genicular nerve block compared to those who did not. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 224 genicular nerve blocks was completed. The nerve block was considered successful if the patient reported a 50% or greater pain reduction for a week or more at follow up. Demographic cohorts that were compared include sex, age, race, and BMI. Results: Those who were categorized as non-obese, 36 out of 69 (52.2%) had unsuccessful blocks while 33 out of 69 (47.8%) in this BMI category had successful blocks. Of those who were categorized as obese, 25 out of 75 (33.3%) had unsuccessful blocks while 50 out of 75 (66.7%) in this BMI category had successful blocks. Of those who were deemed morbidly obese, 22 out of 75 (29.3%) had unsuccessful blocks while 53 out of 75 (70.7%) in this BMI category had successful blocks. These results were found to be statistically significant with a p-value of .011. Furthermore, GNB success was not found to be significantly impacted by patient age, race, or gender. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the utility of prognostic genicular nerve blocks in all patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, but, in particular, the obese patient, who experiences a greater chance of pain relief on average.

Minimally Invasive Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by articular cartilage degeneration and chronic inflammation, affecting one in five people over 40 years old. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of traditional and novel minimally invasive treatment options and role of artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline the diagnostic process of KOA. This literature review provides insights into the mechanisms of action, efficacy, complications, technical approaches, and recommendations to intra-articular injections (corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and plate rich plasma), genicular artery embolization (GAE), and genicular nerve ablation (GNA). Overall, there is mixed evidence to support the efficacy of the intra-articular injections that were covered in this study with varying degrees of supported recommendations through formal medical societies. While GAE and GNA are more novel therapeutic options, preliminary evidence supports their efficacy as a potential minimally invasive therapy for patients with moderate to severe KOA. Furthermore, there is evidentiary support for the use of AI to assist clinicians in the diagnosis and potential selection of treatment options for patients with KOA. In conclusion, there are many exciting advancements within the diagnostic and treatment space of KOA.

Adductor canal block combined with genicular nerve block versus local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized noninferiority trial

ObjectiveThis randomized controlled and double-blind study aimed to investigate whether the analgesic effect of the adductor canal block (ACB) combined with the genicular nerve block (GNB) after total knee arthroplasty is noninferior to that of the adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia (LIA).MethodsA total of 102 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia were included and randomly divided into: ACB + GNB and ACB + LIA groups; the ACB + LIA group received 80 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with adrenaline 10 µg/mL for LIA, whereas the ACB + GNB group received 4 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for the blockade of five peri-knee nerves. The primary outcome was the median difference in the visual analog scale scores at rest at 24 h between the two groups. Secondary outcomes involved the median differences in the pain scores at other time points. Other outcomes included the cumulative dosage of opioids calculated in morphine equivalents in the first 24 h and indicators related to knee joint functional recovery.ResultsIn total, 36 and 38 patients were included in the ACB + GNB and ACB + LIA groups, respectively. We found that the median difference (95% confidence internal) in postoperative rest pain at 24 h (noninferiority criteria, △ = 1) was − 0.5 (− 1 to 0, p = 0.002). The median difference in cumulative opioid consumption was 1 mg (− 1 to 3, p = 0.019), meeting the noninferiority criteria, △ = 7.7 mg.ConclusionsACB combined with GNB provides noninferior analgesia compared to ACB with LIA on the first day after total knee arthroplasty while significantly reducing local anesthetic use.Trial registrationName of the Registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2300074274; Date of Registration. August 2, 2023.

Intraoperative landmark-based genicular nerve block versus periarticular infiltration for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized non-inferiority trial

IntroductionGenicular nerve blocks (GNBs) are an emerging technique that have been used as a part of multimodal analgesia for total knee arthroplasty. The efficacy of intraoperative landmark-based GNBs, a recently...

9. Chronic knee pain.

Chronic knee pain is defined as pain that persists or recurs over 3 months. The most common is degenerative osteoarthritis (OA). This review represents a comprehensive description of the pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of OA of the knee. The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic knee pain was retrieved and summarized. A modified Delphi approach was used to formulate recommendations on interventional treatments. Patients with knee OA commonly present with insidious, chronic knee pain that gradually worsens. Pain caused by knee OA is predominantly nociceptive pain, with occasional nociplastic and infrequent neuropathic characteristics occurring in a diseased knee. A standard musculoskeletal and neurological examination is required for the diagnosis of knee OA. Although typical clinical OA findings are sufficient for diagnosis, medical imaging may be performed to improve specificity. The differential diagnosis should exclude other causes of knee pain including bone and joint disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondylo- and other arthropathies, and infections. When conservative treatment fails, intra-articular injections of corticosteroids and radiofrequency (conventional and cooled) of the genicular nerves have been shown to be effective. Hyaluronic acid infiltrations are conditionally recommended. Platelet-rich plasma infiltrations, chemical ablation of genicular nerves, and neurostimulation have, at the moment, not enough evidence and can be considered in a study setting. The decision to perform joint-preserving and joint-replacement options should be made multidisciplinary. When conservative measures fail to provide satisfactory pain relief, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended including psychological therapy, integrative treatments, and procedural options such as intra-articular injections, radiofrequency ablation, and surgery.

Ultrasonography- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Technique for Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves for Knee Joint Pain

Ultrasonography- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Technique for Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves for Knee Joint Pain