Genicular Nerve Research Articles

Is conventional radiofrequency ablation of the superolateral branch, one of the three genicular nerves targeted as standard, necessary or not? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment modality in the symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of the superomedial and inferomedial genicular nerves (2 branches) with the superolateral, superomedial, and inferomedial genicular nerves (3 branches) and to show whether the 2-branch procedure is inferior to the 3-branch procedure. This study is a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical study. Eligible participants were randomized into 2 groups: group A, which applied the procedure to the superomedial and inferomedial genicular nerves, and group B, which applied it to the superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial genicular nerves. Pain was evaluated with the numerical rating scale, quality of life with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and disability with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index before, and at 1 and 3 months after the procedure. A total of 41 patients were included. There were no differences between the groups except for the SF-36 physical health sub-score at baseline. A significant improvement was seen in the numeric rating scale (NRS) score, SF-36 sub-scores, WOMAC Index total, as well as pain and physical function scores in both groups, though no significant difference was detected between the groups during follow-up. Although we were unable to establish the noninferiority of conventional radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) applied to 2 branches to CRFA applied to 3 branches, in this trial, significant and similar improvement was observed in NRS, WOMAC total, pain, and physical function and SF-36 scores in both groups.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Postoperative Analgesia: A Narrative Review.

Recent research has shown the effectiveness of peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS) in managing chronic pain conditions. Ongoing studies aim to explore its potential application in treating acute postoperative pain states. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the role of PNS in providing relief for postoperative pain. Clinical studies investigating the use of peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS) for analgesia following various surgeries, such as total knee arthroplasty, anterior cruciate ligament repair, ankle arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, hallux valgus correction, and extremity amputation, have shown promising results. Lead placement locations include the brachial plexus, sciatic, femoral, tibial, genicular, perineal, sural, radial, median, and ulnar nerves. These studies consistently report clinically significant reductions in pain scores, and some even indicate a decrease in opioid consumption following PNS for postoperative pain. PNS involves the subcutaneous placement of electrode leads to target peripheral nerve(s) followed by delivery of an electric current via an external pulse generator. While the precise mechanism is not fully understood, the theory posits that PNS modulates electrical stimulation, hindering the signaling of nociceptive pain. PNS presents itself as an alternative to opioid therapy, holding promise to address the opioid epidemic by offering a nonpharmacologic approach for both acute and chronic pain states.

Long term effect of ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis

Long term effect of ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis

Comprehensive Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain through Cryoneurolysis: A Promising Approach for Deep and Superficial Genicular Nerve Modulation - Case Report

Background Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent and debilitating condition characterized by joint pain, stiffness, and limited mobility. Conventional non-operative treatment approaches often do not provide adequate relief of the patient’s symptoms. Cryoneurolysis of the superficial genicular nerves is a growing and accepted technique used to treat knee pain, however, there is limited literature demonstrating the effectiveness of treating both the superficial and deep genicular nerves, as well as the use of subsequent repeat treatments. Case Report This case study reports on a 65 year-old male with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 tricompartmental bilateral knee osteoarthritis who underwent cryoneurolysis of the superficial and deep genicular nerves with the iovera° cryoneurolysis device followed by two subsequent repeat cryoneurolysis treatments. Conclusion The results demonstrated a complete resolution of the patient’s pain and enhanced quality of life following cryoneurolysis. Furthermore, subsequent repeat treatments sustained the pain reduction, offering the patient an extended period of improved mobility and reduced discomfort. This case study demonstrates that cryoneurolysis holds promise as a valuable addition to the armamentarium of interventions available for managing knee pain and improving the quality of life for patients suffering from osteoarthritis when they are unable or decide not to pursue surgical intervention.

Improved Pain and Function With Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release and Cryoneurolysis for Knee Osteoarthritis: Use of a New Real-World Registry

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) affects 19% of American adults aged more than 45 years and costs $27+ billion annually. A wide range of nonoperative treatment options are available. This study compared 6 treatments: cryoneurolysis with deep genicular nerve block (Cryo-Deep/Both), cryoneurolysis with superficial nerve block (Cryo-Superficial), intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) injections, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections (IA-NSAIDs), IA-corticosteroids (IA-CS) injections, or IA-triamcinolone extended release (IA-TA-ER) injections over 4 months for: (1) pain severity and analgesic use; and (2) physical function (from Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement). MethodsPatients who had unilateral knee OA and received nonoperative intervention were enrolled in the Innovations in Genicular Outcomes Research registry, a novel, multicenter real-world registry, between September 2021 and February 2024. A total of 480 patients were enrolled. Both pain and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline, weekly, and monthly, which were analyzed by overall trend, magnitude changes pretreatment to post-treatment, and distribution-based minimally clinically important difference (MCID) score. Multivariate linear regressions with adjustments for 7 confounding factors were used to compare follow-up outcomes among 6 treatment groups. ResultsUse of IA-TA-ER injections was associated with the lowest pain, greatest pain reduction, and highest prevalence of patients achieving MCID relative to other treatments (P < .001). Deep/Both-Cryo and IA-CS were associated with a higher prevalence of achieving MCID than IA-HA, IA-NSAIDs, and Cryo-Superficial (P ≤ .001). Use of IA-TA-ER was also associated with the greatest functional score, improvement from baseline, and highest prevalence of patients achieving MCID than other treatments (P ≤ .003). ConclusionsThe IA-TA-ER appears to outperform other treatments in terms of pain relief and functional improvement for up to 4 months following treatment. In addition, outcomes in the novel cryoneurolysis and conventional IA-CS were similar to one another and better than those in IA-HA and IA-NSAIDs.

Sonographic imaging of the genicular nerves of the knee

Introduction: The genicular nerves are sensory nerves around the knee. With the improvements in ultrasound imaging resolution, these nerves can be identified sonographically. Topic description: Due to their small size, genicular nerves are often underappreciated and overlooked during routine sonographic imaging. Chronic pain associated with knee osteoarthritis, or postsurgical knee pain can be relieved by ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablations or nerve blockades targeting the genicular nerves. Discussion: To sonographically image these nerves, or guide nerve blocks or ablations, knowledge of the sonographic anatomy, technique and normal appearances of the genicular nerves and their surrounding structures is required and is unpacked in this pictorial essay. Conclusion: Enhanced knowledge of the anatomy and a systematic approach to sonographically image and assess the genicular nerves of the knee can enhance the diagnosis of pathology, nerve injury or entrapment, and sonographic guidance of interventional procedures for pain relief.

Efficacy of Cooled-Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerve as Treatment for Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Study.

Chronic pain is one of the leading causes of reduced quality of life in the USA, with knee pain commonly reported. Multiple therapeutic modalities are traditionally utilized for pain management; however, some patients may have pain refractory to these techniques. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA) of the geniculate nerve is a growing and promising therapy offering a potentially long-term solution to chronic knee pain. This study assessed the efficacy, average duration of relief, and potential adverse events using a retrospective chart review of 406 procedures. A two-tailed paired ttest was used to assess the statistical significance between pre-RFA vs. post-RFA visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores self-reported by patients. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to evaluate for statistical differences in pre-RFA pain scores and post-RFA pain scores among the categories of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis group. The mean percent in pain improvement calculated was 65.5% with an average duration of relief of 7.20months. The average pre-RFA pain score on the VAS was 6.26 out of 10 and 2.59 out of 10 post-RFA. The ANOVA post-RFA pain scores demonstrated statistically significant differences among the categories of age and sex. A total of 54 adverse events were reported, including worsening pain, numbness, paresthesia, and knee swelling. The study demonstrated that c-RFA can potentially be utilized as an alternative safe therapy for chronic knee pain, providing pain relief with a relatively prolonged duration. Inherent challenges of retrospective studies remain a part of the limitations of this study.

Effectiveness of the Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves in Patients with Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Background: Increasing evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy for genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) exists. However, no study has been conducted to eliminate the potential influence of a placebo effect associated with this procedure. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of cooled RFA compared with a sham procedure in patients with painful knees due to OA. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled study, participants were randomly assigned to receive cooled RFA of the knee (cooled RFA group, n = 20) or a sham procedure (sham group, n = 20). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful responders at the three-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were successful responders at one and six months; pain intensity of the knee; functional status; medication; and satisfaction at one, three, and six months after the procedures. Results: For the primary outcome, the successful responder rate was significantly higher in the cooled RFA group (76.5%) than in the sham group (33.3%) (p = 0.018). For the secondary outcome, more successful responders were observed in the cooled RFA group than in the sham group at one and six months after the procedure (p = 0.041 and 0.007, respectively). The decreased knee pain intensity was maintained throughout the six-month follow-up period in the cooled RFA group. No differences were observed in functional status, medication change, or satisfaction in both groups. Conclusions: The cooled RFA of genicular nerves offers significant pain relief and surpasses the effects attributable to a placebo.

Medial and Lateral Burns With Concomitant Infection After Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation: A Case Report

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis management might include medication, intraarticular injections, physical therapy, and surgical intervention. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective therapy for patients who do not receive benefit from conservative medical management and are not surgical candidates (secondary to medical comorbidity, patient preference, and other factors). Genicular nerve RFA is generally safe and has a low complication rate. However, there have been case reports of minor and major complications after RFA. We report a case of burns after genicular nerve RFA. CASE REPORT: A 49-year-old man (92 kg; body mass index [kg/m2] 28.3), with a history of coronary artery disease and chronic tobacco use, presented with 20 years of chronic knee pain. He previously had short-term relief with an intraarticular steroid knee injection. He was found to be a suitable candidate for genicular nerve RFA and underwent the procedure successfully without any immediate complications. His pain decreased from 9/10 before the procedure to 5/10 after his RFA. On postprocedure day 33, a 1 cm circular lesion with drainage was noted on the medial aspect of his knee. A lateral lesion was discovered at a subsequent follow-up appointment. He was treated with antibiotics, chlorhexidine cleansing, and dressing changes which resolved the lesions without any long-term sequelae. CONCLUSION: Our case represents an instance of full thickness skin burns with concomitant infection post genicular RFA, uniquely in both the medial and lateral sites. Our patient’s risk factors of low body mass index, smoking, and vascular disease may have led to a delayed healing response. In addition, needle depth may also have contributed to his injury. Ensuring adequate needle depth and patient selection can minimize these complications. KEY WORDS: Radiofrequency ablation, knee pain, osteoarthritis, chronic pain, genicular nerve, RFA, adverse event, complication

Comparison of genicular nerve block with adductor canal block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: A randomised controlled trial.

Genicular nerve block (GNB) is beneficial in early ambulation and faster patient discharge since it selectively blocks articular branches and is motor-sparing. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided GNB with adductor canal block (ACB) in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This randomised, double-blind study was conducted on 38 adults undergoing arthroscopic ACLR. Patients in Group GNB (n = 19) received US-guided GNB with 3 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2 mg dexamethasone. Patients in Group ACB (n = 19) received US-guided ACB with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 6 mg dexamethasone. Postoperative rescue analgesia was provided by intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with morphine. The primary outcome was Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores over 24 h. The secondary outcome was the duration of analgesia and 24-h morphine consumption. The Chi-square test was used to test the statistical significance between categorical variables. Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables. NRS scores at rest and physical activity at 24 h were similar in both the groups (P = 0.429 and P = 0.101, respectively). The mean time to rescue analgesia was comparable in both groups (Group GNB: 820.79 [483.65] min [95% confidence interval {CI}: 603.31-1038.27] and Group ACB: 858.95 [460.06] min [95% CI: 652.08, 1065.82], P = 0.805), and the mean 24-h morphine consumption was also comparable in both groups (P = 1.000). US-guided GNB has an analgesic efficacy similar to US-guided ACB for patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR.

Ultrasound-guided thermal radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves after total knee replacement

The rate of refractory chronic pain after total knee replacement (TKR) is 20–25%, with no identifiable etiology in 6% of cases. Without an etiologic diagnosis, the surgeon is unlikely to consider revision, but pain poses a therapeutic challenge for achieving satisfaction and an acceptable quality of life. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) was recently developed as a non-drug analgesic option. It is minimally invasive and safe, with few adverse effects, opening a new perspective for management of refractory chronic pain after TKR. Level of evidenceIV.

Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Arthroscopy. Comparing using Bupivacaine Alone Versus Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine for Acute Post Operative Pain Management: A Comparative Controlled Study

Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Arthroscopy. Comparing using Bupivacaine Alone Versus Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine for Acute Post Operative Pain Management: A Comparative Controlled Study

Cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: 12-month and cost-effectiveness results from the multicenter COCOGEN trial

BackgroundRadiofrequency (RF) treatment of the genicular nerves reduces chronic knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this...

Complications and opioid-prescribing patterns following genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation versus intra-articular injection: a matched cohort study.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an emerging procedure used to relieve pain from severe knee osteoarthritis. While there have been rare reports of significant complications, their incidence has not been well established. The objective of this study was to examine complication rates at 30 and 90 days post treatment as well as characterize opioid-prescribing patterns before and after treatment. A large national database was queried to identify patients undergoing GNRFA from 2015 to 2022 and matched to control cohorts composed of patients receiving either intra-articular corticosteroid (CSI) or hyaluronic acid injection (HAI) of the knee. Complication rates at 30 and 90 days were analyzed. Opioid utilization was assessed in the 6 months before and after treatment. Rates of infection (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), septic arthritis (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%, CI 1.3% to 2.7% vs 1.6%, CI 1.0% to 2.2%), pulmonary embolism (1.2%, CI 0.6% to 1.7% vs 1.3%, CI 1.1% to 2.5%), bleeding (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), seroma (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%) and thermal injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%) were not different between CSI and GNRFA cohorts at 30 days. Rate of swelling was significantly greater in the GNRFA cohort (9.4%, CI 7.6% to 10.4% vs 6.4%, CI 4.8% to 7.2%, p=0.003) at 30 days. At 90 days, rates of septic arthritis (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.3%, CI 0.08% to 0.7%), deep vein thrombosis (3.1%, CI 2.1% to 3.8% vs 3.1%, CI 2.2% to 3.9%), pulmonary embolism (1.5%, CI 0.9% to 2.1% vs 1.8%, CI 1.2% to 2.5%), and nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs <0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4%) were not significantly different.Between HAI versus GNRFA cohorts, no significant differences were seen in rates of infection (0.3%, CI 0.08% to 0.07% vs 0.7%, CI 0.3% to 1.2%), septic arthritis (0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6% vs 0.4%, CI 0.2% to 0.9%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%, CI 1.3% to 2.7% vs 1.9%, CI 1.2% to 2.7%), pulmonary embolism (1.5%, CI 0.9% to 2.2% vs 1.7%, CI 1.1% to 2.5%), bleeding (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), seroma (<0.1%, CI 0.03% to 0.4% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), swelling (14.0%, CI 11.6% to 15.1% vs 12.0%, CI 10.3% to 13.6%), and thermal injury (<0.1%, CI 0.03% to 0.4% vs <0.01%, CI 0.3% to 0.4%) at 30 days. Rates of infection (0.7%, CI 0.3% to 1.2% vs 1.4%, CI 0.9% to 2.1%), septic arthritis (0.3%, CI 0.1% to 0.8% vs 0.5%, CI 0.2% to 1.1%), deep vein thrombosis (3.6%, CI 2.6% to 4.4% vs 3.1%, CI 2.2% to 4.0%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%, CI 1.5% to 3.0% vs 2.1%, CI 1.4% to 3.0%) and nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5%) were not significantly different at 90 days.There were no significant differences in level of pretreatment opioid utilization although overall consumption in mean daily morphine equivalents was greater in the GNRFA cohort. Opioid utilization significantly increased in the first 30 days after ablation in patients with no prior opioid use compared to controls. In patients with some and chronic prior opioid use, opioid requirements were generally decreased in all treatment groups at 6 months with no clearly superior treatment in reducing opioid consumption. Our study demonstrated that GNRFA possesses a safety profile similar to that of intra-articular injections although significant adverse events such as venous thromboembolism and septic arthritis may occur rarely. Although opioid utilization generally increased in the 30 days after ablation compared with intra-articular injection, similar reduction in opioid consumption at 6 months was seen in patients with prior opioid use in the ablation and control cohorts.

How I do it: implementing virtual reality for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation

How I do it: implementing virtual reality for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation

Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in chronic knee pain: A novel technique for more complete sensory denervation.

Monopolar radiofrequency ablation (MRFA) of the genicular nerves has been considered the main interventional treatment for chronic knee pain. However, the variable locations of these nerves could suggest that traditional MRFA of genicular nerves may be insufficient to cover the area needed to provide complete sensory denervation. For these reasons, some alternatives have been proposed to achieve an increase in the lesion area that offers better outcomes such a bipolar radiofrequency ablation (BRFA). To describe the efficacy and safety of the bipolar radiofrequency ablation (BRFA) of the genicular nerves in the patients with chronic knee pain. A retrospective study was conducted in the Pain Medicine Department. Institutional review board approval from the Hospital Ethical Committee and informed consent were obtained. We reviewed our database for BRFA of genicular nerves from January 2018 to December 2021 for patients with chronic knee pain. The cannulas were placed using ultrasound guidance (10cm, 22-gauge and 10mm active curved tip), and each pair of cannulas were subjected to BRFA for 90 seconds at 80∘C. Data analysis was conducted using T-test for paired variables (Visual analogue scale and EuroQol, an instrument intended to complement other forms of quality-of-life measures). Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria after excluding 7 based on the study design. The mean improvement of our patients according to the VAS was -3.98 (95%CI: -4.37 to -3.59) p< 0.0001 and EuroQol +0.416 (95%CI: 0.364 to 0.468) p< 0.0001. The mean duration of improvement was 8 (6-11) months after BRFA. There were no reported serious adverse events related to the procedure, only local pain for 24 to 48 hours in 3 patients. We can conclude that BRFA reduces procedural pain and increases the treatment area, providing more complete sensory denervation and improved clinical outcomes.

Combined genicular artery embolization and genicular nerve block to treat chronic pain following total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundChronic knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common complication that is difficult to treat. This report aims to highlight the benefit of combining embolotherapy and neurolysis intervention for symptomatic relief of post-TKA pain in a patient with long-standing pain refractory to conservative management.Case presentationA 77-year-old man who had previously undergone left knee arthroplasty has been grappling with worsening knee effusion and debilitating pain, resulting in limited mobility and progressive musculature deconditioning over a 20-year period. Diagnostic arteriography showed marked diffuse periarticular hyperemia around the medial and lateral joint spaces of the left knee, along with capsular distention. The patient initially underwent microsphere embolization to selectively target multiple branches of the genicular arteries, achieving a 50% reduction in pain at the one-month follow-up. Subsequently, the patient underwent image-guided genicular nerve neurolysis, targeting multiple branches of the genicular nerves, which led to further pain reduction (80% compared to the initial presentation or 60% compared to post-embolization) at the one-month follow-up. This improvement facilitated weight-bearing and enabled participation in physical therapy, with sustained pain relief over the 10-month follow-up period.ConclusionThe combination of genicular artery embolization and genicular nerve block may be a technically safe and effective option for alleviating chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty.

ULTRASOUND-GUIDED GENICULAR NERVE BLOCK FOR KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A CASE SERIES.

Knee genicular nerve blocks have been a topic of discussion among various types of treatment for knee osteoarthritis. This study aims to evaluate the pain and function of patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis after undergoing ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blockade using pharmacological agents. The study included 36 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis, comprising 17 bilateral cases, totaling 53 knees undergoing UGNB using a mixture of triamcinolone, ropivacaine, and lidocaine under ultrasound guidance. Epidemiological data, pain outcomes measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and function assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score were evaluated before and after 12 weeks of the procedure. The mean age was 75.5 years (standard deviation of 9.4 years), with a predominance of females and right-sided involvement. There was a mean reduction of 3.0 points in VAS (p < 0.001) and 15.4 points in WOMAC (p < 0.001). Two cases reported only minor and transient complications related to the procedure (skin anesthesia and edema). Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blockade using pharmacological agents demonstrated pain reduction and improved function with a low complication rate after 12 weeks in patients with knee gonarthrosis. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

A retrospective assessment of the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chronic pain caused by advanced knee osteoarthritis.

Patients suffering from severe chronic pain often have problems finding an appropriate combination of painkillers. We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of pulsed radiofrequency ablation (pRFA) of the genicular nerves in 96 patients with knee osteoarthritis (KO). We hypothesized that age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) may influence the quality of the pRFA treatment. A diagnostic blockade with total volume of 9 ml of 1% lidocaine (WZF, Poland) combined with 4 mg of dexamethasone with subsequent pRFA with a radio frequency of 300-500 kHz under ultrasound guidance was used during the procedure. The study participants were assessed during regular monthly visits until 12 months. The nerves' ultrasound identification was successful in 90.62% of the cases. According to the numeric rating scale (NRS), pain was reduced by 50% or more in 64.06% of the cases. The average pain relief period lasted just over 7 and a half months. There were no pRFA-related complications or side effects of the drugs used. pRFA seems to be safe and effective for the treatment of chronic pain in KO. The outcome of the treatment may be related to the patient's age (block duration increased with patient age) and sex (in women, the therapeutic effect was more effectively prolonged) in our study group. There was also higher effectiveness of pRFA in high-BMI patients, which was close to statistical significance ( P = 0.053).

Is radiofrequency ablation effective in treating patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the short-term and long-term efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and explore the role of diagnostic genicular nerve blocks in predicting treatment outcomes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, and nine randomized controlled trials involving 714 participants were included in the analysis. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and subgroup analyses were performed. The primary outcome measures were pain scores at 6 and 12 months, assessed using visual analogue scale and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The meta-analysis revealed that RFA demonstrated a significant short-term efficacy in reducing pain compared to the control group at 6 months, as indicated by the pain scores [weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.69, 95% CI: -3.99, -1.40]. Similarly, WOMAC scores at 6 months favored the RFA group (WMD: -4.40, 95% CI: -7.12, -1.68). However, the long-term efficacy of RFA at 12 months remained uncertain for both pain scores (WMD: -0.88, 95% CI: -2.36, 0.61) and WOMAC (WMD: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.25, 0.32). Subgroup analysis suggested that a positive result from the diagnostic genicular nerve blocks test was associated with a more favourable short-term outcome. This meta-analysis provides moderate-quality evidence supporting the short-term efficacy of RFA in reducing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The inclusion of a diagnostic genicular nerve blocks test prior to RFA may help identify patients likely to benefit from the procedure. But it still needs more large sample studies to verify the results. However, further research is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of RFA in managing knee osteoarthritis pain.