Abstract Background The most effective approach to prevent coronary artery disease (CAD) in the general population remains to quantify the individual risk of CAD followed by controlling risk factors. There has been a lot of curiosity to investigate several scores individually for improving risk prediction. However, whether one would be better than the other in the same population is still unclear. Aim To evaluate the performance of the three individual scores, European SCORE2, Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and a Genetic risk score (GRS), in predicting and discriminating cardiovascular (CV) events in an asymptomatic Portuguese population. Methods Prospective, observational population-based study, including 1002 asymptomatic subjects (mean age 53.1±6.8 years, 73.8% male) selected from a normal Portuguese population, without apparent CAD and diabetes at baseline. Data were recorded at the end of an extended follow-up (average 6.5±4.9 years). The European SCORE2, a computed tomography CACS, and a GRS were created to evaluate CV events’ predictive and discriminative ability through Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis and Harrell’s C-statistics. Results ROC curve analysis showed 0.723 for SCORE2, 0.815 for CACS and 0.649 for GRS. Harrell’s C-statistics were 0.731 in the SCORE2, 0.785 for CACS and 0.684 for GRS. Conclusion The CAC score was the best individual score to predict and discriminate CV events in our asymptomatic population. Its capacity to identify high-risk individuals and those asymptomatic with subclinical atherosclerosis may improve CV risk management strategies to prevent future cardiovascular events. This result can be explained because CAC score, more than a risk marker, represents the existence of disease in the vessel wall.