The medical problem, more technical in nature, of modifying the defective gene(s) in an individual gamete or zygote by gene therapy and implanting the replaced or repaired genes into the mother thereby producing a healthy child have not yet been surmounted. However, assuming such protocols can be successfully performed, gene therapy will probably be sanctioned universally by health authorities as a legitimate implementation of the mandate on physicians to treat the disabled. Another argument favoring the permissibility of gene therapy or genetic manipulation is the fact that the gamete or even the fertilized zygote is not a person per se. Thus, gene manipulation is not considered as tampering with an existing or even potential human being (foetus). One can also argue that any surgery performed on a live human being must certainly be permitted on a gamete or fertilized zygote. For example, if a cure for hemophilia, Tay Sachs disease or Huntington’s disease were possible, it should surely be permissible and promoted. It seems clear that genetic engineering and gene therapy can and should be used to treat, cure or even prevent diseases. But should these techniques be allowed to alter human traits such as eye color, height, personality, intelligence and facial features? Obviously not. Should we create piano players with three hands? Should we create supermicroorganisms for agricultural purposes? Perhaps, but they may also be used for germ warfare and should therefore be discouraged. To attempt to clone a human being is not legally prohibited in many cultures (Judaism) but is probably morally inappropriate. The possible deleterious effects of genetic engineering and gene therapy are not yet fully known. Can such genetic manipulation unmask inactive cancer gene or alternatively, activate tumor suppressor genes? In addition to the medical and scientific aspects of genetic engineering and DNA recombinant research, the spiritual and theological aspects also require justification. Genetic engineering in medicine has been long researched for transplantation purposes, for example, to make organs or body parts like valves for the heart from pigs. There are still safety concerns about large organ transfer from other species (xenotransplants). The most controversial form of genetic engineering in medicine is the use of cloning technology to create organs for transplantation purposes so that they are immunologically compatible. There are fears that it could be misused for cloning human beings or making genetically enhanced “designer babies”, so that parents can select, chose and improve the characteristics of their babies like blue eyes, fair skin, tallness, gender etc. However, the success rate of cloning is very low and its applications are still in very early stages of research. These concerns are based on the doubts about the technology, its potentiality, newness, and applicability to all life forms. The people in favor of this technology think that genetic modification provides a great opportunity for solving hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition in the world since it can be adapted to all environmental conditions and help in increasing quantity and quality of food. At the same time, there are fears raised about the safety of the food in eating and also risks to ones health since it is considered as a new technology and people fear that some “rogue” genes will be transmitted to them. Also many people think genetic engineering is unnatural and call it as Franken foods and genetic modification will result in “superweeds” resistant to herbicides. The intrinsic concerns on this technology at large are based on how people view life, nature, religion, their personal emotions and values. There is a feeling that jumbling with genes in the organisms for our use is “playing God” and human beings should not intervene in God’s realm. Crossing natural species boundaries is creation of new life forms and inventing a new world through technology. However, at the same time we can say that high tech medicines involves playing with God and agriculture was started by disrupting nature. Also hybrid plants and animals like mules are cross-species organisms and they do exist in nature. In fact, mules have been cloned and can reproduce in that way!
Read full abstract