General Surgery Patients Research Articles

The prevalence of hyperglycemia and its association with perioperative outcomes in gynecologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundPreoperative hyperglycemia has been associated with perioperative morbidity in general surgery patients. Additionally, preoperative hyperglycemia may indicate underlying impaired glucose metabolism. Thus, identification of preoperative hyperglycemia may provide an opportunity to mitigate both short-term surgical and long-term health risk. We aimed to study this phenomenon specifically in the gynecologic surgery population. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative hyperglycemia and perioperative complications in gynecologic surgery patients and to characterize adherence to diabetes screening guidelines.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 913 women undergoing major gynecologic surgery on an enhanced recovery pathway from January 2018 to July 2019. The main exposure was day of surgery glucose ≥ 140 g/dL. Multivariate regression identified risk factors for hyperglycemia and composite and wound-specific complications.ResultsSixty-seven (7.3%) patients were hyperglycemic. Diabetes (aOR 24.0, 95% CI 12.3–46.9, P < .001) and malignancy (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2–4.5, P = .01) were associated with hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia was not associated with increased odds of composite perioperative (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7–2.4, P = 0.49) or wound-specific complications (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7–1.5, P = 0.76). Of nondiabetic patients, 391/779 (50%) met the USPSTF criteria for diabetes screening; 117 (30%) had documented screening in the preceding 3 years. Of the 274 unscreened patients, 94 (34%) had day of surgery glucose levels suggestive of impaired glucose metabolism (glucose ≥ 100 g/dL).ConclusionIn our study cohort, the prevalence of hyperglycemia was low and was not associated with higher risk of composite or wound-specific complications. However, adherence to diabetes screening guidelines was poor. Future studies should aim to develop a preoperative blood glucose testing strategy that balances the low utility of universal glucose screening with the benefit of diagnosing impaired glucose metabolism in at-risk individuals.

The Adelaide Score: An artificial intelligence measure of readiness for discharge after general surgery.

This study aimed to examine the performance of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of discharge within 12 and 24 h to produce a measure of readiness for discharge after general surgery. Consecutive general surgery patients at two tertiary hospitals, over a 2-year period, were included. Observation and laboratory parameter data were stratified into training, testing and validation datasets. Random forest, XGBoost and logistic regression models were evaluated. Each ward round note time was taken as a different event. Primary outcome was classification accuracy of the algorithmic model able to predict discharge within the next 12 h on the validation data set. 42 572 ward round note timings were included from 8826 general surgery patients. Discharge occurred within 12 h for 8800 times (20.7%), and within 24 h for 9885 (23.2%). For predicting discharge within 12 h, model classification accuracies for derivation and validation data sets were: 0.84 and 0.85 random forest, 0.84 and 0.83 XGBoost, 0.80 and 0.81 logistic regression. For predicting discharge within 24 h, model classification accuracies for derivation and validation data sets were: 0.83 and 0.84 random forest, 0.82 and 0.81 XGBoost, 0.78 and 0.79 logistic regression. Algorithms generated a continuous number between 0 and 1 (or 0 and 100), representing readiness for discharge after general surgery. A derived artificial intelligence measure (the Adelaide Score) successfully predicts discharge within the next 12 and 24 h in general surgery patients. This may be useful for both treating teams and allied health staff within surgical systems.

Evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines after lung resection: a prospective, multicenter analysis.

Opioid prescribing guidelines have significantly decreased overprescribing and post-discharge use after cardiac surgery; however, limited recommendations exist for general thoracic surgery patients, a similarly high-risk population. We examined opioid prescribing and patient-reported use to develop evidence-based, opioid prescribing guidelines after lung cancer resection. This prospective, statewide, quality improvement study was conducted between January 2020 to March 2021 and included patients undergoing surgical resection of a primary lung cancer across 11 institutions. Patient-reported outcomes at 1-month follow-up were linked with clinical data and Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database records to characterize prescribing patterns and post-discharge use. The primary outcome was quantity of opioid used after discharge; secondary outcomes included quantity of opioid prescribed at discharge and patient-reported pain scores. Opioid quantities are reported in number of 5-mg oxycodone tablets (mean ± standard deviation). Of the 602 patients identified, 429 met inclusion criteria. Questionnaire response rate was 65.0%. At discharge, 83.4% of patients were provided a prescription for opioids of mean size 20.5±13.1 pills, while patients reported using 8.2±13.0 pills after discharge (P<0.001), including 43.7% who used none. Those not taking opioids on the calendar day prior to discharge (32.4%) used fewer pills (4.4±8.1 vs. 11.7±14.9, P<0.001). Refill rate was 21.5% for patients provided a prescription at discharge, while 12.5% of patients not prescribed opioids at discharge required a new prescription before follow-up. Pain scores were 2.4±2.5 for incision site and 3.0±2.8 for overall pain (scale 0-10). Patient-reported post-discharge opioid use, surgical approach, and in-hospital opioid use before discharge should be used to inform prescribing recommendations after lung resection.

Time to development of surgical site infection and its predictors among general surgery patients admitted at specialized hospitals in Amhara region, northwest Ethiopia: a prospective follow-up study

BackgroundSurgical site infection is an infection occurring within 30 days after surgery. It is recently reported that evidence-based information on the specific time when the majority of surgical site infections would develop is a key to early detect the infection as well as to preventing and early intervene against their pressing and fatal complications. Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, and time to development of surgical site infection among general surgery patients at specialized hospitals in the Amhara region.MethodAn institution-based prospective follow-up study was conducted. The two-stage cluster sampling procedure was used. A systematic sampling technique with a K interval of 2 was applied to prospectively recruit 454 surgical patients. Patients were followed up for 30 days. Data were collected using Epicollect5 v 3.0.5 software. Post-discharge follow-up and diagnosis were done by telephone call follow-up. Data were analyzed using STATA™ version 14.0. Kaplan–Meier curve was used to estimate survival time. Cox proportional regression model was used to determine significant predictors. Variables with a P-value less than 0.05 in the multiple Cox regression models were independent predictors.ResultThe incidence density was 17.59 per 1000 person-day-observation. The incidence of post-discharge Surgical site infection was 70.3%. The majority of surgical site infections were discovered after discharge between postoperative days 9 to 16. Being male (AHR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.201 – 3.277, diabetes Mellitus (AHR: 1.819, 95% CI: 1.097 – 3.016), surgical history (AHR: 2.078, 95% CI: 1.345, 3.211), early antimicrobial prophylaxis (AHR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.676, 4.039), American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ III AHR: 6.710, 95% CI: 4.108, 10.960), duration of the surgery (AHR: 1.035 95% CI: 1.001, 1.070), Age (AHR: 1.022 95% CI: 1.000, 1.043), and the number of professionals in the Operation Room (AHR: 1.085 95% CI: 1.037, 1.134) were found to be the predictors of time to development of Surgical site infection.ConclusionThe incidence of surgical site infection was higher than the acceptable international range. The majority of infections were detected after hospital discharge between 9 to 16 postoperative days. The main predictors of Surgical site infection were Age, Sex, Diabetes Mellitus, previous surgical history, the timing of Antimicrobial prophylaxis, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, pre-operative hospital stay, duration of surgery, and the number of professionals in the operation room. Hence, hospitals should give great emphasis on pre-operative preparation, post-discharge surveillance, modifiable predictors, and high-risk patients, as they found in this study.

Gangrenous Bowel Obstruction Managed With Local Tumescent Anesthesia and MAC

Since the mid-1980s, Klein’s tumescent anesthesia has been used routinely in different surgical specialties such as cosmetic surgery, dermatology, vascular surgery, reconstructive plastic surgery, and breast surgery. The tumescent anesthesia technique was developed by Dr Jeffrey Klein, a board-certified dermatologist. The technique was first published in 1987. Tumescent means “swelling.” This technique involves injection of an ultra-dilute lidocaine and epinephrine solution into the surgical planes offering multiple advantages including, but not limited to, postoperative analgesia, reduced blood loss, and avoidance of general anesthesia. The standard liter of Klein’s solution contains lidocaine 1 g, epinephrine 1 mg, and sodium bicarbonate 12.5 mg. Multiple modifications and variations have been implemented and used over the years, an evolution from Klein’s original description. While tumescent anesthesia started in liposuction procedures, its application has now extended into a wider variety of procedures and specialties. In this article, we present a case of tumescent anesthesia in a critically ill general surgery patient who presented with an acute life-threatening surgical emergency. The patient was assessed to be a very high risk for general anesthesia, and after collaborative discussion between the surgical and anesthesia teams and taking informed consent from the patient, the decision was made to proceed with surgery under monitored intravenous sedation with tumescent anesthesia. The patient had an uneventful recovery and survived a very high mortality surgical emergency. He was subsequently discharged back to his nursing home in stable condition. Tumescent anesthesia has become tremendously popular in cosmetic surgery. Tumescent anesthesia allows patients to have surgical procedures in an ambulatory setting, avoid general anesthesia, and allow for better pain control postoperatively. While tumescent anesthesia is used in other specialties, the field of general surgery has not widely adopted tumescent anesthesia. Many general surgeons and anesthesiologists are not familiar with the technique and how to implement it in their practice. It is of utmost importance to understand the pharmacokinetics of tumescent solution and safe implementation. Tumescent anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care is here reported as an alternative to general anesthesia in the care of a moribund patient with multiple comorbidities requiring open abdominal surgery. Close cooperation between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist made the successful conduct of this case possible.

Experiences with targeting inpatient advance care planning for emergency general surgery patients: A resident-led quality improvement project

BackgroundFor patients who may permanently or temporarily lose their ability to communicate preferences, advance care planning is a critical mechanism to guide medical decision-making but is currently underused among surgical patients. MethodsA resident-led quality improvement project, including education and performance measurement, was conducted on an emergency general surgery service to increase the completion of inpatient advance care planning notes using a specialized template in the electronic health record. Advance care planning documentation was defined as either preadmission advance care planning documentation (eg, advance directive) or inpatient advance care planning (use of the electronic health record template). Data from patients admitted to the emergency general surgery service for 12+ hours were analyzed, and baseline data (July 2020 to June 2021) were compared with data from the intervention period (July 2021 to June 2022). The chart review evaluated the content of the inpatient advance care planning documentation from the intervention period. ResultsThe frequency of inpatient advance care planning documentation increased (9.3%, n = 56 to 16.6%, n = 92, P < .001) with a greater contribution of inpatient advance care planning notes by the surgery team (16.7% to 55.4%) in the intervention period. Content analysis indicated that 79.0% of inpatient advance care planning notes listed preferences for life-sustaining therapy, 78.3% listed surrogacy, 57.3% listed overall health goals, and 50.3% listed treatment goals specific to the surgical encounter. ConclusionAlthough a resident-led quality improvement project contributed to greater adoption of standardized inpatient advance care planning documentation on an emergency general surgery service, progress was slow, and integration into standard work was not achieved. Future efforts are needed to better understand the integration of essential advance care planning elements into workflows and to establish inclusive educational programming to prepare all team members for conducting and documenting advance care planning conversations.

Nonmedical Delays in Discharge (NMDD) Among Emergency General Surgery (EGS) And Trauma Patients: A Prospective Assessment of Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) And Civil Legal Needs (CLN)

Bathan, Karen; DePolo, Nicole MD; Tran, Zachary MD; Peng, Jiahao MD, MPH; Singh, Pramil DrPh; Srikureja, Daniel P MD, FACS; Yung, Wing Sze Esther MD, FACS Author Information

Management of Small Bowel Obstructions in Emergency General Surgery Patients Is Not Affected by an In-House Acute Care Surgical Model: An Adjusted Patient Comparison

Baimas-George, Maria MD, MPH; Paton, Lauren MD, FACS; Yang, Hongmei PhD; Reinke, Caroline E MD, FACS; Barbat, Selwan MD, FACS; Matthews, Brent Duane MD, FACS; Schiffern, Lynnette Marie MD, FACS Author Information

Anti-Factor Xa Monitoring of Enoxaparin Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Emergency General Surgery Patients.

Rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain high in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients despite chemical VTE prophylaxis. Emerging literature supports anti-factor Xa (AFXa) monitoring for patients on enoxaparin (LMWH), although a significant knowledge gap remains regarding the optimal dosing and monitoring in EGS patients. We hypothesize that standard dose VTE prophylaxis regimens provide inadequate VTE prophylaxis in EGS patients. A prospective cohort study of all adult EGS patients at a single institution between August 2021 and February 2022 receiving standard dose LMWH for VTE prophylaxis was performed. AFXa levels were obtained 4 hours after the third dose of enoxaparin with a target range of 0.3 to 0.5 IU/mL. Adjustment to dosing and repeat AFXa measurement after the adjusted third dose was obtained. A total of 81 patients underwent AFXa monitoring, the majority (75%) of whom were started on 40 mg LMWH daily. Initial peak AFXa measurement was low in 87.7% of patients (mean 0.16 IU/mL). Of patients who had an initial low AFXa, remained admitted, and underwent dosing adjustment and AFXa reassessment (27%), the majority were adjusted to either 30 or 40 mg of LMWH twice daily (23.7% and 55%, respectively), with 82% of patients remaining low. There were no significant differences in demographics or BMI between those with low vs adequate AFXa levels at either initial or subsequent measurement. Standard LMWH dosing provides inadequate AFXa inhibition for adequate VTE prophylaxis. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing AFXa monitoring and the need to establish clinical protocols to improve VTE prophylaxis in EGS patients.

Chest X-ray Overuse in Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit per American College of Radiology Criteria

BackgroundA routine chest radiograph (CXR) is frequently incorporated into postoperative clinical pathways. Whereas prior studies evaluated CXR use for specific indications, overall CXR "stewardship" within cardiothoracic surgery remains undescribed. We characterized CXR use within a cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) and quantified X-ray–driven changes in patient management. MethodsAll CXRs performed during 3 months in the cardiothoracic ICU of an academic 900-bed tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Attending radiologist CXR reports and clinical history from ordering providers were manually reviewed to classify CXRs as indicated or not indicated by American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria. Multiple resident-level providers further reviewed CXRs to determine whether the image demonstrated any actionable or unexpected findings. ResultsBetween October 1, 2021, and January 3, 2022, 1273 CXRs were performed on adult cardiac and general thoracic surgery patients; the most common indication was routine daily (55.9%), followed by support device monitoring (12.4%) and new ICU transfer (10.4%). Only 34.3% of performed CXRs met ACR Appropriateness Criteria; 65.7% did not (P = .002). Only 3.8% of not indicated CXRs had actionable or significant findings vs 13.0% of indicated CXRs (P = .02). Of the 32 not indicated CXRs with actionable findings, 37.5% recommended endotracheal tube repositioning and 28.1% recommended other line or tube repositioning. ConclusionsCXRs are overused in the cardiothoracic ICU according to ACR Appropriateness Criteria. CXRs performed outside these guidelines have significantly fewer actionable or meaningful findings. Optimizing CXR use can improve resource utilization and efficiency in care of cardiothoracic surgical patients.

Increased Surgical Delays Seen During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Regional Referral Hospital in Soroti, Uganda: Perspective from a Low-Resource Setting

IntroductionThe impact of COVID-19 on low-resource surgical systems is concerning but there are limited studies examining the effect in low- and middle-income countries. This study assesses changes in surgical capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic at Soroti Regional Referral Hospital, a tertiary healthcare facility in Soroti, Uganda.MethodsPatients from a prospective general surgery registry at SRRH were divided into cohorts admitted prior to the pandemic (January 2017 to February 2020) and during the pandemic (March 2020 to May 2021). Demographics, pre-hospital characteristics, in-hospital characteristics, provider-reported delays in care, and adverse events were compared between cohorts.ResultsOf the 1547 general surgery patients, 1159 were admitted prior to the pandemic and 388 were admitted during the pandemic. There was no difference in the median number of elective (24.5 vs. 20.0, p value = 0.16) or emergent (6.0 vs. 6.0, p value = 0.36) surgeries per month. Patients were more likely to have a delay in surgical care during the pandemic (22.6% vs. 46.6%, p < 0.01), particularly from lack of operating space (16.9% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.01) and lack of a surgeon (1.6% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.01). Increased proportion of delays in care appear correlated with waves of COVID-19 cases at SRRH. There were no changes in rates of adverse events (5.7% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.18).DiscussionThe COVID-19 pandemic caused significant increases in surgical care delays and emergency surgery at SRRH. Strengthening surgical systems when not in crisis and including provisions for safe, timely surgical delivery during epidemic resource allocation is needed to strengthen the overall healthcare system.

Myosteatotic and sarcopenic obesity impact postoperative outcomes more robustly than visceral obesity in general surgery patients, with differences by sex

Computed tomography (CT) defined myosteatotic, sarcopenic, and visceral obesity are associated with adverse surgical outcomes and mortality in patients with malignancies. These occult conditions may also be widely prevalent in today's general surgery patients who tend to be overweight/obese. This study identified the predominant obesity phenotypes in 906 patients aged 18-85 years who were scheduled for laparoscopic resection for benign abdominal or colorectal disease at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between 2010 and 2017. Sex and body mass index (BMI) specific cut-points were used to identify myosteatotic, sarcopenic, and visceral obesity phenotype from abdominal CT scan morphometrics. Multivariable regression modeling determined relationships between sex, obesity phenotype, and postoperative outcomes. The myosteatostic+sarcopenic obesity phenotype associated with longer surgery duration and increased the likelihood for major complication (OR 1.34, 95%CI 1.01-1.74) and ICU admission (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.04-1.90). Having myosteatotic obesity doubled the likelihood for hospital stay >7 days and discharge to a nursing home (OR 2.11, 95%CI 1.43,3.11), increasing the likelihood for readmission within 90 days. Obesity was more prevalent in females, but myosteatotic, sarcopenic, and visceral obesity were more prevalent in males, regardless of age or BMI. Males had more major complications (23.6% vs 17.7%, P=0.03), particularly wound dehiscence or infection, and a 2-day longer hospital stay. This study shows that sarcopenic and myosteatotic obesity phenotypes are highly prevalent, especially in male general surgery patients, regardless of age or BMI. Importantly, sarcopenic and myosteatostic obesity may be more detrimental than visceral obesity; these phenotypes robustly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. Future work could use these findings for design of phenotype-specific interventions to reduce patient risk and prevent outcomes that are harmful and costly.

Feasibility of intraoperative continuous glucose monitoring: An observational study in general surgery patients

BackgroundPerioperative hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in surgical patients, and major societies recommend intraoperative monitoring and treatment targeting glucose <180–200 mg/dL. However, compliance with these recommendations is poor, in part due to fear of unrecognized hypoglycemia. Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) measure interstitial glucose with a subcutaneous electrode and can display the results on a receiver or smartphone. Historically CGMs have not been utilized for surgical patients. We investigated the use of CGM in the perioperative setting compared to current standard practices. MethodThis study evaluated the use of Abbott Freestyle Libre 2.0 and/or Dexcom G6 CGMs in a prospective cohort of 94 participants with diabetes mellitus undergoing surgery of ≥3 h duration. CGMs were placed preoperatively and compared to point of care (POC) BG checks obtained by capillary samples analyzed with a NOVA glucometer. Frequency of intraoperative blood glucose measurement was at the discretion of the anesthesia care team, with a recommendation of once per hour targeting BG of 140–180 mg/dL. Of those consented, 18 were excluded due to lost sensor data, surgery cancellation, or rescheduling to a satellite campus resulting in 76 enrolled subjects. There were zero occurrences of failure with sensor application. Paired POC BG and contemporaneous CGM readings were compared with Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. ResultsData for use of CGM in perioperative period was analyzed for 50 participants with Freestyle Libre 2.0, 20 participants with Dexcom G6, and 6 participants with both devices worn simultaneously. Lost sensor data occurred in 3 participants (15%) wearing Dexcom G6, 10 participants wearing Freestyle Libre 2.0 (20%) and 2 of the participants wearing both devices simultaneously. The overall agreement of the two CGM's utilized had a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.731 in combined groups with 0.573 in Dexcom arm evaluating 84 matched pairs and 0.771 in Libre arm with 239 matched pairs. Modified Bland-Altman plot of the difference of CGM and POC BG indicated for the overall dataset a bias of −18.27 (SD 32.10). ConclusionsBoth Dexcom G6 and Freestyle Libre 2.0 CGMs were able to be utilized and functioned well if no sensor error occurred at time of initial warmup. CGM provided more glycemic data and further characterized glycemic trends more than individual BG readings. Required time of CGM warm up was a barrier for intraoperative use as well as unexplained sensor failure. CGMs had a fixed warm of time, 1 h for Libre 2.0 and 2 h for Dexcom G6 CGM, before glycemic data obtainable. Sensor application issues did not occur. It is anticipated that this technology could be used to improve glycemic control in the perioperative setting. Additional studies are needed to evaluate use intraoperatively and assess further if any interference from electrocautery or grounding devices may contribute to initial sensor failure. It may be beneficial in future studies to place CGM during preoperative clinic evaluation the week prior to surgery. Use of CGMs in these settings is feasible and warrants further evaluation of this technology on perioperative glycemic management.

Incidence rate and risk factors of surgical wound infection in general surgery patients: A cross-sectional study.

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are considered a major challenge in health care systems. One of the main HAIs, playing an important role in increased morbidity and mortality, is surgical wound infection. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the incidence rate and risk factors of surgical wound infection in general surgery patients. This cross-sectional study was performed on 506 patients undergoing general surgery at Razi hospital in Rasht from 2019 to 2020. Bacterial isolates, antibiotic susceptibility pattern, antibiotic administration, and its type, operation duration and shift, the urgency of surgery, people involved in changing dressings, length of hospitalisation, and levels of haemoglobin, albumin, and white blood cells after surgery were assessed. The frequency of surgical wound infection and its association with patient characteristics and laboratory results were evaluated. The SPSS software package (version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyse the data. Quantitative and qualitative variables were presented using mean (standard deviation) and number (percentage). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of the data in this study. The data did not have a normal distribution. Hence, χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate the relationship between variables. Surgical wound infection occurred in 4.7% (24 cases) of patients with a mean age of 59.34 (SD=14.61) years. Preoperative (>3 days) and postoperative (>7 days) hospitalisation, history of immunodeficiency (P< 0.001), and interns responsible for changing dressings (P= 0.021) were associated with surgical wound infection incidence. About 9.5% and 4.4% of surgical wound infection cases were significantly associated with pre- and postoperative antibiotic use. Gram-positive cocci were the most prevalent strains isolated from 24 surgical wound infection cases (15/24, 62.5%). Among these, Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant species, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci. In addition, the most common Gram-negative isolates identified were Escherichia coli bacteria. Overall, administration of antibiotics, emergency surgery, surgery duration, and levels of white blood cells and creatinine were identified as surgical wound infection-associated risk factors. Identifying important risk factors could help control or prevent surgical wound infections.

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE APPENDICITIS WITH PERFORATION

Background: Aims Laparoscopic Appendicectomy is the preferred way of managing an appendicitis with perforation. &amp;objectives: This prospective study aims at knowing the role of laparoscopic appendicectomy in acute appendicitis with perforation. Prospective study. General Surgery In patients, Government General Materials &amp; Methods: Study design: Source of study: Hospital, Anantapur. Duration Of study 18 months starting from December 2020 to May 2022. 50. Number of patients: Inclusion criteria- Both males and females of age 12-60 years presenting with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis with radiological conrmation of appendicular perforation through USG/CT and consenting for treatment. Age above 60 years, acute appendic Exclusion criteria: itis with diffuse peritonitis features and with mass formation, Pregnant females , Patients not giving consent. Data were presented in the form of graphs, tables, pie Results: charts, and bar charts in the form of signs symptoms, radiological evidence, intraoperative ndings, complications and length of stay in hospital. Conclusion: - LA has been more frequently used for perforated appendicitis in adults and children by surgeons experienced in laparoscopy. laparoscopic appendicectomy in patients with perforated appendicitis is advantageous in reducing post operative morbidity and early recovery of the patient. Study proved laparoscopic appendectomy is the BEST approach in perforated appendicitis.

Geographic Variation in Operative Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction

IntroductionVariation in surgical management exists nationally. We hypothesize that geographic variation exists in adhesive small bowel obstruction (aSBO) management. Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis of a national commercial insurance claims database (MarketScan) sample (2017-2019) was performed in adults with hospital admission due to aSBO. Geographic variation in rates of surgical intervention for aSBO was evaluated by state and compared to a risk-adjusted national baseline using a Bayesian spatial rates Poisson regression model. For individual-level analysis, patients were identified in 2018, with 365-d look back and follow-up periods. Logistic regression was performed for individual-level predictors of operative intervention for aSBO. ResultsTwo thousand one hundred forty-five patients were included. State-level analysis revealed rates of operative intervention for aSBO were significantly higher in Missouri and lower in Florida. On individual-level analysis, age (P < 0.01) and male sex (P < 0.03) but not comorbidity profile or prior aSBO, were negatively associated with undergoing operative management for aSBO. Patients presenting in 2018 with a history of admission for aSBO the year prior experienced a five-fold increase in odds of representation (odds ratio: 5.4, 95% confidence interval: 3.1–9.6) in 2019. Patients who received an operation for aSBO in 2018 reduced the odds of readmission in the next year by 77% (odds ratio: 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.1–0.5). The volume of operations performed within a state did not influence readmission. ConclusionsSurgical management of aSBO varies across the continental USA. Operative intervention is associated with decreased rates of representation in the following year. These data highlight a critical need for standardized guidelines for emergency general surgery patients.

Disparities in advance care planning rates persist among emergency general surgery patients: Current state and recommendations for improvement.

Unanticipated changes in health status and worsening of chronic conditions often prompt the need to consider emergency general surgery (EGS). Although discussions about goals of care may promote goal-concordant care and reduce patient and caregiver depression and anxiety, these conversations, as well as standardized documentation, remain infrequent for EGS patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from patients admitted to an EGS service at a tertiary academic center to determine the prevalence of clinically meaningful advance care planning (ACP) documentation (conversations and legal ACP forms) during the EGS hospitalization. Multivariable regression was performed to identify patient, clinician, and procedural factors associated with the lack of ACP. Among 681 patients admitted to the EGS service in 2019, only 20.1% had ACP documentation in the electronic health record at any time point during their hospitalization (of those, 75.5% completed before and 24.5% completed during admission). Two thirds (65.8%) of the total cohort had surgery during their admission, but none of them had a documented ACP conversation with the surgical team preoperatively. Patients with ACP documentation tended to have Medicare insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 5.06; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-12.23; p < 0.001) and had greater burden of comorbid conditions (adjusted odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 2.55-6.88; p < 0.001). Adults experiencing a significant, often abrupt change in health status leading to an EGS admission are infrequently engaged in ACP conducted by the surgical team. This is a critical missed opportunity to promote patient-centered care and to communicate patients' care preferences to the surgical and other inpatient medical teams. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Malnutrition via GLIM Criteria in General Surgery Patients

Purpose: The purposes are to determine malnutrition in elective general surgery patients via GLIM criteria, compare GLIM criteria with NRS2002 and to determine the effect of malnutrition on Length of Stay (LoS). &#x0D; Materials and Methods: Malnutrition was detected with NRS2002 and GLIM. GLIM was evaluated in two different ways as 1-NRS2002 (first four questions) was used as a preliminary malnutrition screening tool for GLIM and 2-All patients were evaluated with GLIM without a preliminary assessment. Reduced muscle mass in GLIM, was assessed using different anthropometric measurements and cut-off points. In total, 10 different GLIM models were constituted. Data were collected within 48 hours of admission. Agreement between malnutrition tools was determined via Kappa. Logistic regression models were established to present the effect of malnutrition on long LoS. p

Impact of Postsurgical Opioid Prescription Reduction in General Surgery Patients.

Purpose: Recent studies suggest a large percentage of post-surgical opioid prescriptions are not utilized. This surplus of opioids provides supply for diversion or entry into the waste cycle. Recommendations are available for general surgery procedures which may optimize prescribed quantity while maintaining patient satisfaction which this work was initiated to investigate. Methods: This retrospective patient survey was conducted with Institutional Review Committee approval following adjustments to discharge opioid prescription quantities in an individual General Surgeon practice. Patients were contacted via phone to assess the impact of the reduced opioid quantities. Patients were categorized based on whether they utilized the entire prescription or opioid remained. Data collected include baseline demographics, inpatient stay characteristics, opioid use patterns, and satisfaction with overall pain control. The primary endpoint was to determine if patients were satisfied with their pain control based on response. Secondary endpoints included if patient characteristics could be identified that signal larger opioid quantity use, and whether unused opioids were disposed. Results: Thirty patients utilized all opioid prescribed, 60 had some quantity remaining. Baseline data appear similar aside from age with younger patients using more opioid. Patients were satisfied with their overall pain control in 93% of respondents. A total of 960 opioid tablets (11.4 ± 4.8 tabs/patient) were not prescribed, 8% required refill. Opioid disposal yet to occur in 85% of patients. Conclusion: An evidence-based reduction in opioid discharge prescriptions following general surgery procedures resulted in nearly 1000 opioid tablets not being dispensed without having a negative impact on patient satisfaction.

Laparoscopy in high-risk emergency general surgery reduces intensive care stay, length of stay and mortality.

Emergency general surgery patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery are at reduced risk of mortality and may require reduced length of critical care stay. This study investigated the effect of laparoscopy on high-risk patients' post-operative care requirements. Data were retrieved for all patients entered into the NELA database between 2013 and 2018. Only high-risk surgical patients (P-POSSUM predicted mortality risk of ≥ 5%) were included. Patients undergoing laparoscopic and open emergency general surgical procedures were compared using a propensity score weighting approach. Outcome measures included total length of critical care (level 3) stay, overall length of stay and inpatient mortality. A total of 66,517 high-risk patients received emergency major abdominal surgery. A laparoscopic procedure was attempted in 6998 (10.5%); of these, the procedure was competed laparoscopically in 3492 (49.9%) and converted to open in 3506 (50.1%). Following inverse probability treatment weighting adjustment for patient disease and treatment characteristics, high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had a shorter median ICU stay (1day vs 2days p < 0.001), overall hospital length of stay (11days vs 14days p < 0.001) and a lower inpatient mortality (16.0% vs 18.8%, p < 0.001). They were also less likely to have a prolonged ICU stay with an OR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.83, p < 0.001). The results of this study suggest that in patients at high risk of post-operative mortality, laparoscopic emergency bowel surgery leads to a reduced length of critical care stay, overall length of stay and inpatient mortality compared to traditional laparotomy.