The quest to refresh the writing of history continues unabated. During the last ten years, ‘transnational’ has found favour as an approach and is now to be applied to Ireland. This application builds on long study of the Irish diaspora and continuing arguments about the possible exceptionalism of Irish developments, as evident in the thrust of the recent Festschrift for Sean Connolly (Ourselves Alone? [2016]). This present collection, edited by Niall Whelehan, mixes the narrowly focused—the Piedmontese reformer Cavour’s observations on what might be learnt from England and Ireland, and responses to Russian rule over Poland during the 1860s—with pieces that encompass several localities and longer periods. Efforts to show how the transnational differs from sustained comparison may not always convince. The editor suggests that early modernists handling Ireland were precocious transnationalists; particularly as they boldly crossed the Atlantic, but also, arguably, thanks to an earlier preoccupation with the general crisis of the seventeenth century (which took them into central and south America and the Pacific). From the eighteenth century, the editor contends, explicit comparison between Irish and non-Irish experiences lessened, with the famine of the 1840s a notable casualty. Yet surprising exceptions are unearthed: Nicholas Mansergh’s Ireland in the Age of Reform and Revolution (1940) and (much less familiar) a survey by the leading Irish historian F.S.L. Lyons. However, Lyons’s Internationalism in Europe, published in 1963, did not compare Ireland directly with the rest of Europe, despite the author being well placed to do so.
Read full abstract