General Anesthesia In Neonates Research Articles

Effective dose of ephedrine for treatment of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia in neonates and infants less than 6 months of age: a multicentre randomised, controlled, open label, dose escalation trial

BackgroundThe recommended dose of ephedrine in adults (0.1 mg kg−1) frequently fails to treat hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia in neonates and infants less than 6 months of age. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of ephedrine in this population for the treatment of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane. MethodsWe conducted a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, controlled, dose-escalation trial. Subjects were randomised if presenting a >20% change from baseline in MAP. Six cohorts of 20 subjects each were enrolled. Ten subjects in the first cohort received 0.1 mg kg−1 i. v. (reference dose). For each subsequent cohort, 10 subjects were assigned to the next higher dose (consecutively 0.6, 0.8, 1, 1.2, and 1.4 mg kg−1 i. v.), and the other subjects were assigned to one or more doses already investigated in previous cohorts. The primary outcome was the return of MAP to >80% of baseline at least once within 10 min after ephedrine administration. ResultsA total of 119 infants (25% females), with a mean age (standard deviation) of 2.7 (1.3) months, received their allocated dose of ephedrine. The optimal dose of ephedrine was 1.2 mg kg−1, with a percentage of success of 65.5% (95% confidence interval, 35.6–86.4). The doses of ephedrine investigated did not induce adverse events. ConclusionsDoses of ephedrine much higher (∼10-fold) than those used in adults are necessary in neonates and infants for the treatment of hypotension after induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane. Clinical trial registrationNCT02384876.

Spinal Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia in Neonates Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgeries

Spinal Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia in Neonates Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgeries

Determination of the optimal dose of ephedrine in the treatment of arterial hypotension due to general anesthesia in neonates and infants below 6\u2009months old: the ephedrine study protocol for a randomized, open-label, controlled, dose escalation trial

BackgroundArterial hypotension induced by general anesthesia is commonly identified as a risk factor of morbidity, especially neurological, after cardiac or noncardiac surgery in adults and children. Intraoperative hypotension is observed with sevoflurane anesthesia in children, in particular in neonates, infants younger than 6 months, and preterm babies. Ephedrine is commonly used to treat intraoperative hypotension. It is an attractive therapeutic, due to its dual action on receptors alpha and beta and its possible peripheral intravenous infusion. There are few data in the literature on the use of ephedrine in the context of pediatric anesthesia. The actual recommended dose of ephedrine (0.1 to 0.2 mg/Kg) frequently leads to a therapeutic failure in neonates and infants up to 6 months of age. The use of higher doses would probably lead to a better correction of hypotension in this population.The objective of our project is to determine the optimal dose of ephedrine for the treatment of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia with sevoflurane, in neonates and infants up to 6 months of age.MethodsThe ephedrine study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled, dose-escalation trial. The dose escalation consists of 6 successive cohorts of 20 subjects. The doses studied are 0.6, 0.8, 1, 1.2, and 1.4 mg/kg. The dose chosen as the reference is 0.1 mg/kg, the actual recommended dose. Neonates and infants younger than 6 months, males and females, including preterm babies who undergo a surgery with general anesthesia inducted with sevoflurane were eligible. Parents of the subject were informed. Then, the subjects were randomized if presenting a decrease in mean blood pressure superior to 20% of their initial mean blood pressure (before induction of anesthesia), despite a vascular filling with sodium chloride 0.9%. The primary outcome is the success of the therapy defined as an mBP superior to 80% of the baseline mBP (prior to anesthesia) within 10 min post ephedrine administration. The subjects were followed-up for 3 days postanesthesia.DiscussionThis study is the first randomized, controlled trial intending to determine the optimal dose of ephedrine to treat hypotension in neonates and infants below 6 months old.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02384876. Registered on March 2015.

Feasibility, safety and outcome of inguinal hernia repair under spinal versus general anesthesia in preterm and term infants

BackgroundInguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common operation in preterm and term infants. Recently, spinal anesthesia (SA) has been proposed as an alternative to avoid exposure to general anesthesia (GA) during early life. The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of open IHR performed under SA versus GA in neonates and infants, and to detect criteria to predict the success or failure of SA. Materials and methodsThis is a 6-year, single center, nonrandomized interventional study (2013–2019). SA was performed with 0.5% bupivacaine. GA was given using propofol, fentanyl, sevoflurane, and laryngeal mask. Patient demographics, operative time, intraoperative events related to surgery or anesthesia, and complications were analyzed at short and long-term follow-up. Results68 infants (78 IHR) and 37 infants (44 IHR) received SA and GA at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, respectively. SA failure rate was 9%, and positively correlated with weight at surgery (p = 0.001; rp = 0.38). Conversion from SA to GA occurred in 4 (6%) patients owing to prolonged operative time (43.75 ± 4.8 vs 23.02 ± 11.3 min; p = 0.0006). There were no differences regarding operative time and intra- and postoperative complications among the two groups at mean follow-up of 18.53 ± 21.9 months. ConclusionsThis pilot study confirms that SA is safe, effective and not detrimental to surgical outcome of neonates and infants undergoing IHR. Additionally, it may help further define what patients may have a successful SA. Our experience suggests that SA is especially suitable in infants weighing <4000 g, and conversion to GA correlates with prolonged operative time. Level of evidenceLevel II.

Nasal cannula technique for ventilating during the administration of general anesthesia in neonates and pediatric patients

ABSTRACTObjective: Minor surgeries on the oral cavity, e.g., frenulectomies, are often performed under general mask anesthesia. The objective is to present the nasal cannula technique for ventilating step-by-step method for ventilating during general anesthesia for minor surgeries in neonates and pediatric patients.Technique: The nasal cannula technique for ventilating has been used in over 20 pediatric cases (neonates and toddlers), without the need to re-mask during the procedure and without complications or oxygen desaturations. After induction of general mask anesthesia, propofol with or without adjunctive ketamine is administered. The anesthesia mask is exchanged with a nasal cannula, using the largest sized prongs that accommodate the nares, and the nasal cannula is connected to the anesthesia circuit. This permits administration of inspired fractions of oxygen.Conclusion: The nasal cannula technique for ventilating provides a safe method for delivering general anesthesia and ventilating during minor surgeries for neonates and pediatric patients.

Is spinal anaesthesia in young infants really safer and better than general anaesthesia?

Concerns regarding the potential neurotoxic effects of general anaesthesia have seen resurgence in awake spinal anaesthesia in neonates and infants. This review includes recently published data from a large prospective randomized controlled trial with view to determining if spinal anaesthesia is safer and better than general anaesthesia in this population. Compared with general anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia results in less haemodynamic instability and fewer early (<30 min) apnoeic episodes in neonates and infants undergoing inguinal herniorraphy; the overall incidence of apnoeas in the first 12 h postoperatively was similar. Neurodevelopmental outcome 2 years postoperatively was similar. An appreciable failure rate for spinal anaesthesia was confirmed. Spinal anaesthesia represents a suitable alternative to general anaesthesia in neonates and infants undergoing minor surgery avoiding the need for endotracheal intubation and ventilation. Spinal anaesthesia has some advantages but a significant failure rat and has not been demonstrated to improve neurodevelopmental outcome.

Cerebrospinal fluid volume in neonates undergoing spinal anaesthesia: a descriptive magnetic resonance imaging study

BackgroundSpinal anaesthesia (SA) reduces the risk of postoperative apnoea after general anaesthesia in neonates. In 30% of patients, however, the duration of anaesthesia provided does not allow completion of surgery. When compared with term infants, formerly preterm neonates experience a shorter duration of anaesthesia after SA. A difference in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume between those two populations could explain this difference, but this has never been investigated. The study was designed to evaluate the relationship between the spinal CSF volume and patient characteristics in neonates. MethodsSixty-seven neonates, aged 30–60 weeks postconception, were included in this study. Their spinal CSF volumes were calculated using magnetic resonance imaging, and these volumes were plotted individually against sex, term at birth, birth weight, current gestational age, civil age, and weight. Correlations between CSF volume and these variables were investigated. ResultsFifty-four neonates completed the study. The CSF volume was found to be closely and linearly correlated with weight and postconceptional age. The relationship between spinal CSF volume and weight can be described as follows: CSF volume (ml)=1.94 weight (kg)+0.13. The CSF volume was not correlated with sex, weight, or term at birth, nor with civil age. ConclusionsThe amount of spinal CSF in neonates can be estimated as 2 ml kg−1 in both term and formerly preterm neonates. A difference in the CSF volume between them does not provide an explanation for a shorter duration of SA in the latter. Our findings reinforce weight-adjusted dosage of SA in neonates.

Arterial blood pressure in anesthetized neonates and infants: a retrospective analysis of 1091 cases.

Hypotension during general anesthesia in neonates and infants is considered to contribute to poor neurological outcome. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to determine the incidence of hypotension after induction of anesthesia and sustained hypotension (>10 min) during the anesthesia, and to determine factors contributing to the development of (sustained) hypotension. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1091 electronic anesthesia records from children <1 year. Patients were stratified for age (group 1: <1 month, group 2: 1-3 months, group 3: 4-6 months, group 4: >6 months). Hypotension was defined as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) <35 mmHg in patients ≤6 months and <43 mmHg in patients >6 months. The incidence of hypotension after induction was highest in group 1 (25.5%) [P = 0.009 vs group 2 (13.3%), P < 0.0001 vs groups 3 (3.4%) and 4 (1.0%)], in group 2, it was higher than in groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.0001), and in group 3, it was higher than in group 4 (P = 0.033). The incidence of sustained hypotension was highest in group 1 (43.6%) (P < 0.0001 vs groups 2-4), followed by group 2 (15.7%) [P < 0.0001 vs group 3 (3.4%) and P = 0.006 vs group 4 (8.8%)] and group 4 (P = 0.004 vs group 3). Hypotension after induction occurred more often in emergency procedures than in elective procedures in groups 1 (P = 0.002), 2 (P = 0.029), and 3 (P = 0.037). Hypotension, both postinduction and sustained during surgery, is a common phenomenon in anesthetized children under 1 year, peaking in neonates. Generally accepted lower limits of MAP in anesthetized infants urgently need to be defined, enabling us to develop anesthesia strategies avoiding cerebral hypoperfusion.

Disbudding of goat kids

Disbudding of goat kids is an elective procedure performed routinely. The procedure is considered an act of veterinary surgery (in accordance with the Veterinary Surgeons Act, 1966 ). Potential complications can arise as a result of the use of general anaesthesia in neonates, the low therapeutic index of local anaesthetics for small ruminants and potential risk of thermal necrosis of the brain if excessive pressure or duration of heat is applied. This article reviews the legislation, anaesthetics and techniques involved to reduce the risks for maximum efficacy and safety.

Combined use of neuraxial and general anesthesia during major abdominal procedures in neonates and infants

With the advent of ultrasound and improvements in equipment, the applications of regional anesthesia in the pediatric population have continued to expand. Although frequently used for postoperative analgesia or as a means of avoiding general anesthesia in patients with comorbid conditions, the adjunctive use of regional anesthesia during general anesthesia may effectively decrease the intraoperative requirements for intravenous and volatile agents, thereby providing a more rapid awakening and earlier tracheal extubation. More recently, the limitation of the requirements for volatile and other anesthetic agents may be desirable, given concerns regarding the potential impact of these agents on neurocognitive outcome in neonates and infants. Several authors have demonstrated the potential utility of combining a neuraxial technique (spinal or epidural anesthesia) with general anesthesia in neonates and infants undergoing intraabdominal procedures. We review the literature regarding the combined use of neuraxial and general anesthesia in neonates and infants during major abdominal surgery, discuss its potential applications in this population, and review the techniques of such practice.

Central venous cutdown in neonates: Feasibility as a bedside procedure without general anesthesia

Background/PurposeA silicone central venous catheter (CVC) is usually inserted using a percutaneous technique under general anesthesia. However, there are numerous reports on the postoperative adverse effects of general anesthesia in neonates. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of open surgical cutdown (OSC) for central venous access without general anesthesia. MethodsThe medical records of patients who underwent OSC at bedside under sedation and local anesthesia were reviewed. Chloral hydrate (100mg/kg) was given orally for the induction of moderate to deep sedation 15minutes before OSC; then the operative field was infiltrated with 1% lidocaine. When adequate sedation was not achieved, a bolus of phenobarbital (20mg/kg) was given intravenously. ResultsThirteen Broviac lines were inserted into 12 patients. At insertion, the median gestational age was 29weeks, birth weight was 1,140g and age was 33days. No patients required invasive ventilator care; 7 patients received nasal non-invasive ventilator care. Neither intubation nor inotropics were required during the intra- or postoperative period and no perioperative surgical complications occurred. The median catheter duration was 19.5days. ConclusionOSC at bedside for CVC insertion, using adequate sedation and local anesthesia, is a feasible procedure in neonates.

Experience with remifentanil–sevoflurane balanced anesthesia for abdominal surgery in neonates and children less than 2 years

Few data report remifentanil use in the neonatal population. We described here our experience with remifentanil-sevoflurane balanced anesthesia in neonates and children less than 2 years who underwent general anesthesia for abdominal surgery. We retrospectively studied the pattern of remifentanil infusion associated with sevoflurane inhalation in preterm neonates (PTN; n = 18) (born before 37 weeks of gestation and <45 weeks of postmenstrual age), full-term neonates (FTN; n = 21) (born after 37 weeks of gestation and less than 29 days old) and older children up to 2 years (CUT; n = 24). We recorded heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean remifentanil dose and sevoflurane concentration before incision and at 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 105 min after incision. We observed that remifentanil doses used during surgery were lower in PTN than in both FTN and CUT and lower in FTN than in CUT. This was because of a progressive decrease in remifentanil dose during anesthesia in PTN and FTN. Conversely, remifentanil doses increased in CUT during anesthesia. Sevoflurane concentrations were higher in CUT group than in PTN and FTN groups. MAP and HR did not vary in the three groups during anesthesia. Remifentanil-sevoflurane anesthesia can be used for general anesthesia in neonates. We observed that anesthetists used lower doses of remifantanil and lower concentrations of sevoflurane in neonates compared with the older children.

Continuous Caudal Anaesthesia with Chloroprocaine as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia in Neonates

TOBIAS, J. D.; RASMUSSEN, G. E.; HOLCOMB, G. W.; BROCK, J. W. III; MORGAN, W. M. Author Information

Continuous caudal anaesthesia with chloroprocaine as an adjunct to general anaesthesia in neonates.

The authors prospectively evaluated the use of a continuous caudal epidural infusion of chloroprocaine as an adjunct to general anaesthesia during intra-abdominal surgery in neonates. The technique was used in 25 neonates ranging in age from 1 to 28 days and in weight from 2.2 to 4.9 kg. Following anaesthetic induction and tracheal intubation, an initial bolus dose of chloroprocaine 3% (1 or 1.5 ml.kg-1) was followed by a continuous infusion of 1 or 1.5 ml.kg-1.hr-1 administered through a caudal epidural catheter. No parenteral opioids were administered. The duration of the surgical procedures varied from one hour five minutes to three hours 15 min. The first three neonates received a bolus dose of 1.0 ml.kg-1 followed by an infusion of 1.0 ml.kg-1.hr-1 chloroprocaine 3%. These three neonates required an additional bolus dose followed by an increase in the infusion to 1.5 ml.kg-1.hr-1 to provide surgical anaesthesia. Adequate intraoperative anaesthesia was achieved in all 25 neonates with an infusion of 1.5 ml.kg-1.hr-1 of chloroprocaine 3%. This was evidenced by a lack of haemodynamic response to surgical manipulation. No neonate required more than 0.2% isoflurane or 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. No episodes of haemodynamic instability (decreased blood pressure/bradycardia) related to the caudal epidural anaesthesia were noted. Twenty-three of 25 of the neonates' tracheas were extubated immediately (within 10 minutes) following the surgical procedure. Caudal anaesthesia with a continuous infusion of chloroprocaine can be used as an adjunct to general anaesthesia during abdominal surgery in neonates. Our initial experience suggests that the combined technique may eliminate the need for parenteral opioids and limit the intraoperative requirements for inhalational anaesthetic agents.

Continuous regional anaesthesia in infants.

Physiological immaturity of the respiratory musculature and central respiratory control centres leads to an increased risk of apnoea and respiratory complications following general anaesthesia in neonates. Regional anaesthetic techniques may obviate the need for general anaesthesia and lessen the risks of perioperative morbidity. Although these techniques have been described in infants, previous reports have dealt with single-shot techniques for brief surgical procedures (< 60 min). Experience with prolonged operative cases using regional anaesthesia via indwelling catheters in infants is limited. We present our experience with four infants in whom either caudal epidural or spinal anaesthesia was administered via indwelling catheters for operative procedures that lasted 90 to 180 min. We believe this technique is an alternative to general anaesthesia in these patients.

Fiberoptic laryngoscopy under general anesthesia in neonates

In the Sophia Children's Hospital we perform fiberoptic laryngoscopy in neonates under general anesthesia without the use of muscle relaxants in the diagnostics of functional laryngeal disorders. The necessary diagnostic and anesthetic equipment is described. Special attention is paid to the way in which the fiberscope is introduced into the breathing circuit and into the child's airway. Several advantages over other methods are discussed. The procedure has proved to be easy, safe and informative.