General Anesthesia For Dental Treatment Research Articles

Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a premedication for pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for dental treatment

BackgroundThe most important reason for pre-operative administration of medication is to reduce anxiety. Alleviation of fear and anxiety about surgery enables patients to remain comfortable during treatment. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a fast-acting drug that is used as a premedication in different circumstances because it has sedative and anti-anxiolytic effects, and stable hemodynamics. It also has the advantage of intranasal administration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects and hemodynamic stability of DEX by retrospectively analyzing cases in which DEX was administered nasally as a premedication.MethodsTen patients treated at Dankook University Dental Hospital, recruited between February and April 2015, received intranasal delivery of 2 µg/kg DEX, 30 minutes prior to general anesthesia. Anesthesia records of anxiety, blood pressure, respiration, pulse, estimated arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and partial pressure, or maximum concentration, of carbon dioxide (ETCO2) were analyzed.ResultsAdministration of DEX prior to a general anesthetic effectively relieved anxiety. Respiratory depression, the most severe adverse effect of other sedatives, was not observed. Hemodynamic stability under general anesthesia was maintained during treatment and a reduction in emergence delirium was observed upon completion of treatment.ConclusionsPremedication administration of DEX is safe for pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesia.

Dental sedation by anesthesiologist or dentists: A view from Turkey

Background: Except conscious sedation (with nitrous oxide/oxygen), sedation of dental patient has been applied by anesthesiologists in Turkey. But little is known about Anesthesiology and Reanimation Specialist (ARS)’s and Dental Medical Doctors (DMD)’s views about who manages the dental sedation. Using a survey, Turkish ARS’s and DMD’s opinions regarding sedation of dental patients, are examined. Methods: A questionnaire was conducted to ARS and DMD participants that are active in clinical practices in Turkey. The questionnaire consists of 5 point Likert Scale which contains the options; strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), unsure (3), agree (4), strongly agree (5) , and it aims to evaluate the perceptions of ARS and DMD participants, about 11 statements in relation to dental sedation which is performed by DMDs. Results: From 200 ARSs and 200 DMDs, a total of 400 questionnaires were obtained. The findings reveal that except 4.5%, most of the ARSs had performed sedation or general anesthesia for dental treatment rarely or never, and half of the ARSs strongly disagreed with the statement that DMDs can provide moderate sedation during dental treatment. Conclusions: Many ARSs in Turkey do not perform sedation of dental patients but they suspect that DMDs are able to do it. Sedation applications for dental treatments are real necessity for handicapped or anxious patient and children. Guidelines for education and management of the sedation should be presented to clarify who should be in charge of managing sedation of dental patients.

A Study on the Postoperative Course following General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment of Severely Mentally and Physically Disabled Patients

A Study on the Postoperative Course following General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment of Severely Mentally and Physically Disabled Patients

Independent predictors of delay in emergence from general anesthesia.

Some patients with intellectual disabilities spend longer than others in emergence from ambulatory general anesthesia for dental treatment. Although antiepileptic drugs and anesthetics might be involved, an independent predictor for delay of the emergence remains unclear. Thus, a purpose of this study is to identify independent factors affecting the delay of emergence from general anesthesia. This was a retrospective cohort study in dental patients with intellectual disabilities. Patients in need of sedative premedication were removed from participants. The outcome was time until emergence from general anesthesia. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis was used to extract independent factors affecting the outcome. Antiepileptic drugs and anesthetic parameters were included as predictor variables. The study included 102 cases. Clobazam, clonazepam, and phenobarbital were shown to be independent determinants of emergence time. Parameters relating to anesthetics, patients' backgrounds, and dental treatment were not independent factors. Delay in emergence time in ambulatory general anesthesia is likely to be related to the antiepileptic drugs of benzodiazepine or barbiturates in patients with intellectual disability.

Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for dental treatment in children and adolescents.

Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for dental treatment in children and adolescents.

Not a Disease Entity

Patients with underlying psychological disorders are highly significantly more likely to experience fear of dental treatment than healthy persons (1). For the affected patients, anesthesiological support with general anesthesia for dental treatment is often very important, as otherwise, avoidance behaviors may be expected to result in severe dental disorders with possible deterioration of the psychological disorder.

General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment in the Child with Aplastic Anemia

General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment in the Child with Aplastic Anemia

General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment of a Pediatric Patient with Marfan Syndrome

General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment of a Pediatric Patient with Marfan Syndrome

General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment in the Congenital Hypothyroidism and Psuedohypoparathyroidism

General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment in the Congenital Hypothyroidism and Psuedohypoparathyroidism

Midazolam Is Associated With Delay in Recovery and Agitation After Ambulatory General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment in Patients With Disabilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Some patients with intellectual disabilities (IDs) who undergo total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have complications associated with the anesthesia such as prolonged recovery. The purposes of this study were to estimate the frequency of TIVA complications among patients with IDs and to identify factors associated with TIVA complications. This study was designed as a retrospective cohort study. Study samples were selected from the clinical records of patients with IDs who underwent ambulatory general anesthesia in a special dental clinic at the Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan. Predictor variables were patient background, anesthesia-related variables, and dental treatment. Outcome variables were delayed recovery and the complication of agitation. Factors affecting delayed recovery and complications were examined with multivariable analysis. We enrolled 106 cases (81 male and 25 female patients) in this study. The mean age was 23.9 years. Serious complications were not observed in any cases. The amount of intravenous midazolam was an independent determinant of delayed recovery. Oral midazolam contributed to delayed recovery, although it is very useful for induction in patients with a high level of fear. Oral midazolam and a younger age were independent predictors of agitation. Intravenous midazolam may not have an advantage in ambulatory general anesthesia. Oral midazolam contributes to delayed recovery and is an independent predictor of agitation.

An Evaluation of Using Population Pharmacokinetic Models to Estimate Pharmacodynamic Parameters for Propofol and Bispectral Index in Children

To study propofol pharmacodynamics in a clinical setting a pharmacokinetic model must be used to predict drug plasma concentrations. Some investigators use a population pharmacokinetic model from existing literature and minimize the pharmacodynamic objective function. The purpose of the study was to determine whether this method selects the best-performing pharmacokinetic model in a set and provides accurate estimates of pharmacodynamic parameters in models for bispectral index in children after propofol administration. Twenty-eight children classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 who were given general anesthesia for dental treatment were studied. Anesthesia was given using target-controlled infusion of propofol based on the Kataria model. Propofol target plasma concentration was 7 μg/ml for 15 min, followed by 1 μg/ml for 15 min or until signs of awakening, followed by 5 μg/ml for 15 min. Venous blood samples were taken 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 min after each change in target. A classic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was estimated, and the methodology of other studies was duplicated using pharmacokinetic models from the literature and (re-)estimating the pharmacodynamic models. There is no clear relationship between pharmacokinetic precision and the pharmacodynamic objective function. Low pharmacodynamic objective function values are not associated with accurate estimation of the pharmacodynamic parameters when the pharmacokinetic model is taken from other sources. Minimization of the pharmacodynamic objective function does not select the most accurate pharmacokinetic model. Using population pharmacokinetic models from the literature instead of the 'true' pharmacokinetic model can lead to better predictions of bispectral index while incorrectly estimating the pharmacodynamic parameters.

Preoperative Assessment for Children Requiring Dental Treatment Under General Anesthesia

This study aimed to describe children <6 years requiring general anesthesia for dental treatment and factors associated with a change in medical management prior to surgery. This case series reviewed the past medical history and preoperative assessment of patients referred for dental preoperative evaluations at a single institution (2005-2008). A "deflection" was defined as a recommendation to change preoperative or operative care based on the preoperative assessment. The sample was analyzed using descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses. Of 648 subjects (aged 9 months to 6 years, mean 3.9 years), 63% had a past medical history abnormality and 38% had previous surgery. In total, 14% were deflected, most commonly because of the addition of infective endocarditis prophylaxis (29%). A history of coagulation disorder had the strongest association with deflection (P < .0001, odds ratio = 10.0, 95% confidence interval = 4.6-22.1), followed by cardiac anomalies. Preoperative assessments for pediatric dental treatment frequently identify medical problems resulting in treatment plan alterations.

Dental Sedation by Dentists: A View From Anesthesiologists Working in Central Western Brazil

Anesthesia care has been provided by diverse health professionals worldwide, but little is known about anesthesiologists' views about this. Using a survey, we sought the opinions of a group of Brazilian anesthesiologists regarding nitrous oxide/oxygen and oral minimal/moderate sedation performed by dentists. A 3-part postal questionnaire was sent to 206 physician anesthesiologists working in the state of Goias, in Central Western Brazil. Part 1 consisted of 4 questions describing respondents' characteristics: gender, time elapsed since completion of the residency program, and experience in providing sedation and general anesthesia for dental treatment. In Part 2, respondents were asked to give their opinions on 11 statements about sedation performed by dentists. Possible responses ranged from total disagreement to total agreement (minimum score = 11 and maximum score = 55). Part 3 was a section for general comments. Data were analyzed by k-means clusters, chi(2), and Student's t-test. The response rate was 53.8% (111 questionnaires). Most anesthesiologists (85.6%) had rarely or never provided sedation or general anesthesia for dental treatment, and 92.8% disagreed with the statement that dentists can administer moderate sedation in the dental office. Two clusters representing more favorable (n = 21) or less favorable (n = 90) opinions were established. Anesthesiologists in the "less favorable" group had more experience with dental sedation (P = 0.006) and dental general anesthesia (P = 0.008) than those in the "more favorable" group. Gender and time elapsed since residency completion did not significantly affect anesthesiologists' opinions. Many anesthesiologists in Central Western Brazil do not sedate dental patients and are not confident that dentists are able to do it. Dental sedation is an issue that still needs to be clarified in this region; the respective roles of physicians and dentists need to be determined to benefit the population.

Prevalence, intensity and identity of bacteraemia following conservative dental procedures in children

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, intensity and microbial identity of bacteraemia following conservative dental procedures. The procedures were placement of rubber dam, use of the fast drill, use of the slow drill and placement of a matrix band and wedge. Two hundred and five children and adolescents undergoing general anaesthesia for dental treatment at the Eastman Dental Hospital were recruited. Each subject was randomly allocated to one of the procedure groups. A baseline blood sample was taken before any dental treatment was carried out. A second blood sample was taken 30 s after a single conservative procedure. The blood samples were processed using lysis filtration. All bacterial isolates were identified using comparative 16 S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Oral Streptococcus spp. and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. were further identified by comparative sodA gene sequencing. The prevalence of bacteraemia was significantly greater following placement of rubber dam (P = 0.01) and placement of matrix band and wedge, compared with baseline. The intensity of bacteraemia was significantly greater following placement of rubber dam (P = 0.001) and placement of matrix band and wedge (P = 0.0001). The most frequently isolated bacteria were Streptococcus spp. (56%), Actinomyces spp. (15%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (15%). Conservative dental procedures are a significant cause of bacteraemia.

Dental Treatment of a Patient with Cerebral Palsy under General Anesthesia

Dental Treatment of a Patient with Cerebral Palsy under General Anesthesia Jun-Min Chung, D.D.S., Kwang-Suk Seo, M.D., Young-Eun Yi, D.D.S., Hee-Jung Han*, R.N., Jin-Hee Han*, R.N., Hye-Jung Kim*, R.N., Teo-Jeon Shin, M.D., Hyun-Jeong Kim, M.D., Kwang-Won Yum, M.D., and Juhe Chang, D.D.S. Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Seoul National University, School of Dentistry, *Department of Dental Anesthesiology, † Clinic for Persons with Disabilities, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea Background: Cerebral palsy (CP) is non-progressive disorder of motion and posture. In CP patient, there are difficulties in dental treatment because of uncontrolled movement of limb and head, and conjoined disabilities such as cognitive impairment, sensory loss, seizures, communication and behavioral disturbances. It is reported that CP patients have high incidence in caries and a higher prevalence of periodontal disease. But, despite the need for oro-dental care, these patients often are unlikely to receive adequate treatment without sedation or general anesthesia because of uncontrolled movements of the trunk or head. Methods: We reviewed the 58 cases of 56 patients with CP who underwent outpatient general anesthesia for dental treatment at the clinic for the disabled in Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Results: The mean age was 19 (2-54) years. The number of male patient was 40 and that of female was 18. They all had severe spastic cerebral palsy and 22 had sever mental retardation, 15 epilepsy, 8 organic brain disorder, 1 blindness, 2 deafness and cleft palate. For anesthesia induction, 14 cases was needed physical restriction who had sever mental retardation and cooperation difficulty, but 44 cases showed good or moderate cooperation. Drugs used for anesthesia induction were thiopental (37 cases), sevoflurane (14 cases), ketamine (3 cases ) and propofol (4 cases). All patients except one were done nasotracheal intubation for airway management and 4 cases were needed difficult airway management and 1 patient already had tracheostomy tube. Mean total anesthetic time was 174 ± 56 min and staying time at PACU was 88 ± 39 min. There was no death or long term hospitalization because of severe complications. Conclusion: If general anesthesia is needed, pertinent diagnostic tests and workup about anomaly, and appropriate anesthetic planning are essential for safety. (JKDSA 2008; 8: 22~28) 󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏󰠏

Five Year Outcomes Study of Dental Rehabilitation Conducted Under General Anesthesia for Special Needs Patients

We assessed the safety of general anesthesia for dental treatment of special needs patients as it related to American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status (ASAPS) classification, procedure, and other factors. After Institutional Review Board review and approval, special needs patients who were admitted to the outpatient surgical operating room for comprehensive dental rehabilitation (CDR) under general anesthesia within a period of 5 years had their medical records evaluated retrospectively for intraoperative and postoperative complications both related to anesthesia and surgery. All records were evaluated by an independent evaluator who tabulated the patients' age, gender, ASAPS, and duration of procedure. N = 363, age mean = 46.93 +/- 16.835 years, age median = 48 years, male patients = 180, female patients = 183, ASAPS I =183, ASAPS II = 127, ASAPS III = 53, duration of surgery mean = 140.631 +/- 23.104 minutes, duration of surgery median time = 142.000 minutes, and number of complications = 2. One complication resulted in an ASAPS I 16-year-old boy, which was airway related, and a second was an ASAPS III 22-year-old woman, which was surgically related. Both led to unplanned inpatient admissions and were treated successfully with no residual morbidity. Dental rehabilitation of special needs patients under general anesthesia is safe. While morbidity is very low, larger studies are needed to establish risk versus benefit stratification among this patient population.

Intravenous conscious sedation in children for outpatient dentistry

The use of general anaesthesia for dental treatment in the NHS outside hospitals has changed over time. Although deaths are uncommon during or immediately after general anaesthesia for dental treatment, they are more likely to occur than with other methods of pain and anxiety reduction, such as local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Inquiries into recent anaesthetic deaths in dental practice have been critical of the standard of care provided in areas such as pre-operative assessment, monitoring, resuscitation and transfer to specialist critical care facilities.

General anesthesia for dental treatment in a Williams syndrome patient with severe aortic and pulmonary valve stenosis: suspected episode of postoperatively malignant hyperthermia

A 28-month-old boy (height, 76 cm; weight, 9.4 kg) diagnosed as having Williams syndrome presented for dental care. We report a case of postoperatively suspected malignant hyperthermia after the administration of general anesthesia for dental treatment in this patient with severe supravalvular aortic stenosis and pulmonary artery hypoplasia. Anesthesia was maintained through the inhalation of nitrous oxide and sevoflurane with oxygen. The patient was hemodynamically stable and no other abnormalities were observed. After the completion of the dental treatment, he was transferred to the pediatric ward. On arrival at the ward, the patient's core temperature increased to 39.5 degrees C and tachypnea (RR, 30 breaths/min) was observed. The SPO2 during inhalation was slightly low (92%-93%). Serum biochemistry revealed an elevated CK level (1345 U/L) but no other abnormal findings. Twelve hours after the dental treatment, the patient's core temperature fell to 37.4 degrees C. After hospitalization for 4 days, the patient was discharged in good condition. In the present case, general anesthesia was employed for dental treatment despite severe supravalvular aortic stenosis and peripheral pulmonary artery hypoplasia, because conventional dental therapy was very difficult as a result of the patient's mental retardation and hyperkinesia. The present case suggests that the use of volatile agents that could trigger malignant hyperthermia should be avoided wherever possible.

Intravenous conscious sedation for dental treatment: am I my brother's keeper?

Intravenous conscious sedation for dental treatment: am I my brother's keeper?

Effects of Video Information on Parental Preoperative Anxiety Level and Their Perception of Conscious Sedation vs. General Anesthesia for the Dental Treatment of Their Young Child

To investigate the impact of video information on parental preoperative anxiety and perception and their preference of conscious sedation versus general anesthesia for the dental treatment of young patients. Parents were given a verbal explanation regarding the two treatment options and were then asked to fill out a prescreening questionnaire. Their preference for mode of treatment was obtained and their preoperative anxiety level was measured on a visual analog scale (VAS). A video film depicting two children under going dental treatment with conscious sedation (CS) and a third child undergoing general anesthesia (GA) for dental treatment was shown to the parent. Following the viewing of the video film a post-screening questionnaire was given. Parents' post screening anxiety was measured and they were asked if their perception and preference of the two modes of treatment remained the same or changed. 40 parents were included and completed the trial. The prescreening anxiety level of parents was 2.79 (+/-1.05, SD) and was not significantly different than the post screening anxiety level of 2.91 (+/- .99 SD, paired t- test p=0.432). The majority of parents preferred CS to GA for the treatment of their child prior to screening of the video. Among the few who chose GA (n=5) all but one changed their choice after viewing the video to CS. However, this difference was not found to be statistically significant due to the small number of subjects in this group (McNemar test, p = 0.125). Most parents voiced the opinion that the video film contributed to their knowledge and also considered GA as having more risks than CS. An interesting finding was that a statistically significant difference was found regarding parent's perception of the two procedures and what they actually saw in the video. The majority of parents stated that their initial perception of GA was not similar to their viewing experience, conversely, CS matched their expectations. Parents' anxiety regarding their child's dental treatment under GA or CS is not affected by the viewing of a video film depicting either method. Parent's perception of GA is different than the actual procedure and may affect their choice of treatment.