Gene-edited Pigs Research Articles

Gene Editing for Enhanced Swine Production: Current Advances and Prospects

Traditional pig breeding has improved production traits but faces limitations in genetic diversity, disease resistance, and environmental adaptation. Gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas9, base editing, and prime editing, enable precise genetic modifications, overcoming these limitations and expanding applications to biomedical research. Here, we reviewed the advancements in gene editing technologies in pigs and explored pathways toward optimized swine genetics for a resilient and adaptive livestock industry. This review synthesizes recent research on gene editing tools applied to pigs, focusing on CRISPR/Cas9 and its derivatives. It examines their impact on critical swine production traits and their role as human disease models. Significant advancements have been made in targeting genes for disease resistance, such as those conferring immunity to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses. Additionally, gene-edited pigs are increasingly used as models for human diseases, demonstrating the technology’s broader applications. However, challenges such as off-target effects, ethical concerns, and varying regulatory frameworks remain. Gene editing holds substantial potential for sustainable and productive livestock production by enhancing key traits and supporting biomedical applications. Addressing technical and ethical challenges through integrated approaches will be essential to realize its full potential, ensuring a resilient, ethical, and productive livestock sector for future generations

Is there a need for an alternative source of red blood cells for clinical transfusion and will gene-edited pigs fulfil that need?

Is there a need for an alternative source of red blood cells for clinical transfusion and will gene-edited pigs fulfil that need?

Evaluation of Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Assays for Gene-Edited Pig-to-Human Xenotransplantation.

Gene-edited pigs for xenotransplantation usually contain one or more transgenes encoding human complement regulatory proteins (CRPs). Because of species differences, human CRP(s) expressed in gene-edited pigs may have difficulty inhibiting the activation of exogenous rabbit complement added to a complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay. The use of human complement instead of rabbit complement in CDC experiments may more accurately reflect the actual regulatory activity of human CRP(s). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from one GTKO pig and two GTKO/hCD55 pigs with a high or low level of hCD55 expression. After incubation of heat-inactivated normal human sera (HINHS) with porcine PBMCs, CDC levels were measured after the addition of commercial rabbit complement or human complement. In addition, a modified one-step CDC method was established using pooled normal human sera (NHS) without the addition of exogenous complement. There was no significant difference in the binding of IgM/IgG to PBMCs from the three pigs. Both rabbit and human complement mediated a significant cytotoxic effect on GTKO pig PBMCs (98.97%vs. 82.73%). Even the high expression of hCD55 only had a very limited inhibitory effect on rabbit complement-mediated cytotoxicity (81.70%vs. 98.97%). However, regardless of whether the expression level was high or low, hCD55 had a very remarkable inhibitory effect on human complement-mediated cytotoxicity (2.94% and 23.83%vs. 82.73%; p<0.01). Similar results were obtained using the modified one-step CDC method. In addition, the inhibitory effect of hCD55 on C3c and C5b-9 deposition on pig PBMCs was positively correlated with the expression level of hCD55. The use of human complement instead of rabbit complement in CDC assays can better reflect the actual cytotoxic effect of human xenoantibodies against pig PBMCs expressing human CRP(s), and thus may have potential application to gene-edited pig-to-human xenotransplantation.

Use of Brain Death Recipients in Xenotransplantation: A Double-Edged Sword.

Organ transplants are used to treat many end-stage diseases, but a shortage of donors means many patients cannot be treated. Xenogeneic organs have become an important part of filling the donor gap. Many current studies of kidney, heart, and liver xenotransplantation have used gene-edited pig organs on brain-dead recipients. However, the endocrine system, immune system, and nervous system of brain-dead people are changed, which are different from that of real patients transplanted, and the current research results of brain death (BD) recipients are also different. So there are drawbacks to using brain-dead people for xenotransplantation. In addition, although the policy requires the use of non-human primate (NHP) experiments as the research standard for xenotransplantation, there are still differences between NHP and humans in terms of immunity. Therefore, to better study xenotransplantation, new models may be needed in addition to NHP and brain-dead individuals. Humanized animal models or organoids may be able to fill this gap.

Recent progress in xenotransplantation and its application to pediatric kidney disease.

Patients with kidney failure require dialysis or kidney transplantation. Kidney transplantation offers great benefits, including reduced mortality; however, many patients who wish to undergo kidney transplantation are unable to do so due to a shortage of donor organs. This shortage is a global issue, and xenotransplantation has emerged as a potential solution. The history of xenotransplantation is characterized by overcoming the immunological challenge of hyperacute rejection. Recently, breakthroughs such as gene-edited pigs and novel immunosuppressants have successfully lowered rejection rates. Recent clinical studies have reported transplants in patients diagnosed with brain death, and in March 2024, a gene-edited pig kidney was transplanted into a patient with kidney failure at Massachusetts General Hospital, marking the first instance of a gene-edited xenotransplantation into a living patient. Our research focuses on applying xenotransplantation in pediatric and obstetric fields, specifically exploring fetal therapy using pig fetal kidneys. We have long been researching the development of a novel kidney replacement therapy involving the transplantation of fetal pig kidneys. Fetal pig kidneys have the advantage of not requiring vascular anastomosis and are less likely to be rejected compared to adult pig kidneys. Currently, we are advancing nonhuman primate studies aimed at clinical trials of pig fetal kidney transplant therapy for fetuses diagnosed with Potter syndrome, characterized by bilateral kidney agenesis. We sincerely hope that xenotransplantation will soon become a viable treatment option for adult, pediatric, and fetal patients with kidney failure.

The generation and evaluation of TKO/hCD55/hTM/hEPCR gene-modified pigs for clinical organ xenotransplantation.

Genetically edited pigs, modified using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, hold promise as potential sources for xenotransplantation. However, the optimal combination of genetic modifications and their expression levels for initial clinical trials remains unclear. This study investigates the generation of TKO/hCD55/hTM/hEPCR (6GE) pigs and evaluates their compatibility with human immune and coagulation systems. The 6GE pigs were generated through iterative genome editing and F1 generation breeding. Genotyping, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry confirmed the knockout of GGTA1, CMAH, and B4GALNT2. Expression levels of human genes (hCD55, hTM, hEPCR) were quantified. In vitro assays using aortic endothelial cells (pAECs) from 6GE pigs assessed human serum IgM and IgG binding, complement cytotoxicity, and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex levels. Blood from gene-edited pigs was used for pathophysiological analysis. Complete knockout of GGTA1, CMAH, and B4GALNT2 was confirmed in 6GE pigs. The expression of hCD55 and hTM was approximately seven and thirteen times higher than in humans, respectively, while hEPCR levels were comparable to those in humans. In vitro, 6GE pAECs showed significantly reduced binding of human IgM and IgG compared to wild-type pAECs (IgG p<0.01, IgM p<0.0001). Similar to TKO/hCD55 pAECs, 6GE pAECs exhibited a substantial reduction in complement-mediated cytotoxicity (p<0.001) compared to TKO pAECs. Co-expression of hTM and hEPCR in 6GE pigs led to a significant decrease in thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex levels in co-culture with human whole blood, compared to WT (p<0.0001), TKO (p<0.01), and TKO/hCD55/hTM pigs (p<0.05). Pathophysiological analysis demonstrated excellent compatibility of 6GE pig kidneys and livers with human immune and coagulation systems. However, 6GE pigs showed increased susceptibility to infection compared to other gene-edited pigs, while TKO/hCD55 pigs were considered safe when they were all bred in a general environment. Highly expressing hCD55, along with the co-expression of hEPCR and hTM genes, is expected to effectively reduce human complement cytotoxicity and enhance anticoagulant efficacy in genetically modified pigs. The 6GE pigs exhibited robust compatibility with human physiological and immune systems, fulfilling the criteria for clinical trials. Furthermore, it is imperative to rear donor pigs in pathogen-free (DPF) facilities to mitigate infection risks and prevent the transmission of porcine pathogens to humans.

Genetically engineered pig heart transplantation in non-human primates

BackgroundImprovement in gene modifications of donor pigs has led to the prevention of early cardiac xenograft rejection and significantly prolonged cardiac xenograft survival in both heterotopic and orthotopic preclinical non-human primate (NHP) models. This progress formed the basis for FDA approval for compassionate use transplants in two patients.MethodsBased on our earlier report of 9-month survival of seven gene-edited (7-GE) hearts transplanted (life-supporting orthotopic) in baboons, we transplanted 10 gene-edited pig hearts into baboons (n = 4) using non-ischemic continuous perfusion preservation (NICP) and immunosuppression regimen based on co-stimulation blockade by anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. This pivotal study expands on the 7-GE backbone, with 3 additional gene edits, using 10-GE pigs as donors to baboon recipients.Results10 GE cardiac xenografts provide life-supporting function up to 225 days (mean 128 ± 36 days) in a non-human primate model. Undetectable or latent porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) does not influence cardiac xenograft survival in this study but still needs more exploration with a larger cohort. Xenograft histology demonstrates adipose (Fat) deposition (n = 1), chronic vasculopathy (n = 1), micro and macro thrombosis, and acute cellular rejection (n = 1).ConclusionsThese data demonstrate that 10 GE cardiac xenografts have variable cardiac xenograft survival in NHP due to perhaps presence of 4th antigen and require further study. However, these 10GE organs may be suitable for clinical cardiac xenotransplantation and have already been utilized in two human cases.

CRISPR Technology Acts as a Dual-Purpose Tool in Pig Breeding: Enhancing Both Agricultural Productivity and Biomedical Applications.

Pigs have long been integral to human society for their roles in agriculture and medicine. Consequently, there is an urgent need for genetic improvement of pigs to meet human dual needs for medicine and food. In agriculture, gene editing can improve productivity traits, such as growth rate and disease resistance, which could lower farming costs and benefit consumers through enhanced meat quality. In biomedical research, gene-edited pigs offer invaluable resources as disease models and in xenotransplantation, providing organs compatible with human physiology. Currently, with CRISPR technology, especially the CRISPR/Cas9 system emerging as a transformative force in modern genetics, pigs are not only sources of sustenance but also cornerstones of biomedical innovation. This review aims to summarize the applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in developing pigs that serve dual roles in agriculture and biomedical applications. Compared to ZFNs and TALENs, the CRISPR/Cas9 system offers several advantages, including higher efficiency, greater specificity, ease of design and implementation, and the capability to target multiple genes simultaneously, significantly streamlining the process of genetic modifications in complex genomes. Therefore, CRISPR technology supports the enhancement of traits beneficial for agricultural productivity and facilitates applications in medicine. Furthermore, we must acknowledge the inherent deficiencies and technical challenges of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology while also anticipating emerging technologies poised to surpass CRISPR/Cas9 as the next milestones in gene editing. We hypothesize that with the continuous advancements in gene editing technologies and successful integration of traits beneficial to both agricultural productivity and medical applications, the goal of developing dual-purpose pigs for both agricultural and medical use can ultimately be achieved.

Deletion of maternal CD163 PSTII-domain-coding exon 13 protects fetuses from infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)

Following infection of a porcine dam with PRRSV around 90 days of gestation, the virus crosses the placenta and starts to infect fetuses. This can lead to consequences such as abortions, stillbirths, and respiratory issues in newborn piglets. CD163 is an essential cellular viral entry receptor for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). CD163 contains nine scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) and two proline-serine-threonine (PST) domains. Gene-edited pigs possessing a complete deletion of CD163 are resistant to PRRSV infection. Recently, we demonstrated that pigs harboring a clean deletion of CD163 exon 13 (ΔExon13 CD163 pigs) which encodes the first 12 amino acids of the CD163 PSTII domain were not susceptible to PRRSV infection. In this study, ΔExon13 CD163 (−/−) gilts were bred with wildtype CD163 (+/+) boars producing heterozygous, CD163 (+/−) fetuses. We found that fetuses with a wildtype CD163, recovered between day 103 of gestation or 17 days after the maternal infection with PRRSV, were fully protected from PRRSV in dams containing a clean deletion of CD163 exon 13. These findings suggest a feasible approach for eliminating PRRSV-related reproductive illness, which is a significant cause of economic losses in agriculture.

PSI-7 Creation of gene-edited pigs for functional analysis of growth hormone receptor promoters in swine

Abstract Growth hormone (GH; somatotropin) has a central role in animal growth, reproduction, and lactation. The biological actions of GH are dependent on the GH receptor (GHR) that is found in important target tissues such as liver, muscle, adipose tissue, and bone. It is widely accepted that GH is the primary hormone controlling animal growth and that its actions are mediated by the GHR. In humans, laboratory species, and farm animals there are two promoter complexes that control GHR expression. The first promoter complex (P1) controls the liver-specific inducible expression of the GHR1A mRNA. The second promoter complex (P2) controls the non-tissue specific constitutive expression of GHR1B mRNA. Despite the central role that GH and the GHR have in animal growth, the independent function of each promoter complex has not yet been tested in any species. The objective was to perform a germ-line deletion of each GHR promoter complex to test their function in a porcine model. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to delete the P1 and P2 promoter complexes in porcine fetal fibroblasts and cloned to create two independent lines for each promoter deletion. Adult animals that were heterozygous (het) for the GHRP1 and GHRP2 deletions were mated to create litters of +/+ (wildtype, WT), +/- (het), and -/- (knockout, KO) pigs for the respective promoters. An RTPCR of liver and muscle confirmed that deletion of GHRP1 and GHRP2 effectively knocked out GHR1A and GHR1B mRNA. Piglets were weighed at birth and approximately monthly until 2 (GHRP1) or 5 (GHRP2) mo of age. Piglets from the GHRP1 line were +/+ (n = 3), +/- (n = 10), and -/- (n = 2) across two litters. Birthweights (1.5 ± 0.1, 1.4 ± 0.1, and 1.5 ± 0.2 kg, respectively) and body weight (BW) at 2 mo of age (32.7 ± 2.9, 27.0 ± 1.6, and 27.0 ± 3.5 kg, respectively) were similar (P &amp;gt; 0.10) for GHRP1 piglets. Piglets from the GHRP2 line were +/+ (n = 2), +/- (n = 6), and -/- (n = 9) across two litters. Birthweights were similar (1.4 ± 0.3, 1.3 ± 0.1, and 1.0 ± 0.1 kg, respectively) but GHRP2-/- pigs weighed less (P &amp;lt; 0.01) at weaning compared with GHRP2+/+ or GHRP2+/- piglets (6.4 ± 0.8, 6.5 ± 0.4, and 4.5 ± 0.4 kg, respectively). Monthly BW for the GHRP2-/- piglets were less (P &amp;lt; 0.001) when compared with GHRP2+/+ or GHRP2+/- piglets. At 5 mo of age, the GHRP2-/- piglets were approximately 50% of the BW of GHRP2+/+ or GHRP2+/- (89.6 ± 6.7, 89.6 ± 3.9, and 43.1 ± 3.2 kg, respectively). In conclusion, the deletion of GHRP2 (and GHR1B mRNA) had a profound effect on pig growth. The GHRP1 deletion (GHR1A mRNA) did not affect growth with the caveat that the GHRP1 litters had not reached maturity. This work was supported by USDA NIFA 2019-67015-29484.

The Time Has Come: The Case for Initiating Pilot Clinical Trials of Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation.

In vitro studies indicate that kidney transplantation from gene-edited pigs in which expression of all three of the known glycan xenoantigens has been deleted may be more challenging in nonhuman primates (NHPs) than it will be in human recipients. Furthermore, pig-to-human xenotransplantation offers several other advantages - (i) the patient can communicate with the surgical team; (ii) recipient microbiological monitoring and environment will be clinical-grade; and (iii) sophisticated graft monitoring and imaging techniques, (v) therapeutic interventions, e.g., dialysis, plasmapheresis, and (v) intensive care can be deployed that are not easily available in NHP laboratory models. We suggest, therefore, that progress to develop safe, informative human clinical trials will be accelerated if pilot clinical cases are initiated. The selection of patients for kidney xenotransplantation can include those who are at high risk of dying imminently, e.g., those experiencing increasing vascular access challenges with no realistic alternative therapy available, and those who have been accepted onto the waitlist for an allograft, but who are unlikely ever to receive one. Patients with an increased risk of dying include those with (i) age >60 years, (ii) blood groups O or B, and (iii) diabetic nephropathy. UNOS data indicate that an average of 25 patients on the kidney waitlist in the USA die or are removed from the list every day (i.e., >9,000 each year). Given the improved xenograft survival observed in preclinical studies, we suggest that it is time to plan a small pilot clinical trial for healthy dialysis patients who understand the risks and potential benefits of kidney xenotransplantation.

Extended survival of 9- and 10-gene-edited pig heart xenografts with ischemia minimization and CD154 costimulation blockade-based immunosuppression

BackgroundXenotransplantation has made significant advances recently using pigs genetically engineered to remove carbohydrate antigens, either alone or with addition of various human complement, coagulation, and anti-inflammatory ‘transgenes’. Here we evaluated results associated with gene-edited (GE) pig hearts transplanted in baboons using an established costimulation-based immunosuppressive regimen and a cold-perfused graft preservation technique. MethodsEight baboons received heterotopic abdominal heart transplants from 3-GE (GalKO.β4GalNT2KO.hCD55, n=3), 9-GE (GalKO.β4GalNT2KO.GHRKO.hCD46.hCD55. TBM.EPCR.hCD47.HO-1, n=3) or 10-G (9-GE+CMAHKO, n=2) pigs using Steen’s cold continuous perfusion for ischemia minimization. Immunosuppression (IS) included induction with anti-thymocyte globulin and αCD20, ongoing αCD154, MMF, and tapered corticosteroid. ResultsAll three 3-GE grafts functioned well initially, but failed within 5 days. One 9-GE graft was lost intraoperatively due to a technical issue and another was lost at POD 13 due to antibody mediated rejection (AMR) in a baboon with a strongly positive pre-operative cross-match. One 10-GE heart failed at POD113 with combined cellular and antibody mediated rejection. One 9-GE and one 10-GE hearts had preserved graft function with normal myocardium on protocol biopsies, but exhibited slowly progressive graft hypertrophy until elective necropsy at POD393 and 243 respectively. Elevated levels of IL-6, MCP-1, C-reactive protein, and human thrombomodulin were variably associated with conditioning, the transplant procedure, and clinically significant postoperative events. ConclusionRelative to reference genetics without thrombo-regulatory and anti-inflammatory gene expression, 9- or 10-GE pig hearts exhibit promising performance in the context of a clinically applicable regimen including ischemia minimization and αCD154-based IS, justifying further evaluation in an orthotopic model.

Gene editing of pigs to control influenza A virus infections

ABSTRACT Proteolytic activation of the haemagglutinin (HA) glycoprotein by host cellular proteases is pivotal for influenza A virus (IAV) infectivity. Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses possess the multibasic cleavage site of the HA which is cleaved by ubiquitous proteases, such as furin; in contrast, the monobasic HA motif is recognized and activated by trypsin-like proteases, such as the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2). Here, we aimed to determine the effects of TMPRSS2 on the replication of pandemic H1N1 and H3N2 subtype IAVs in the natural host, the pig. The use of the CRISPR/Cas 9 system led to the establishment of homozygous gene edited (GE) TMPRSS2 knockout (KO) pigs. Delayed IAV replication was demonstrated in primary respiratory cells of KO pigs in vitro. IAV infection in vivo resulted in a significant reduction of virus shedding in the upper respiratory tract, and lower virus titers and pathological lesions in the lower respiratory tract of TMPRSS2 KO pigs as compared to wild-type pigs. Our findings support the commercial use of GE pigs to mitigate influenza A virus infection in pigs, as an alternative approach to prevent zoonotic influenza A transmissions from pigs to humans.

Effective inhibition of PDCoV infection in chimeric APN gene-edited neonatal pigs.

Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), an emerging enteropathogenic coronavirus, causes diarrhea in piglets and possesses the potential to infect humans. However, there are currently no effective measures for the prevention or control of PDCoV infection. Here, we have developed PK-15 cells, LLC-PK1 cells, and primary intestinal epithelial cells expressing chimeric APN, and viral challenge of these cells led to decreased PDCoV infection. Furthermore, virally challenged chimeric APN neonatal piglets displayed reduced viral load, significantly fewer microscopic lesions in the intestinal tissue, and no diarrhea. These data show that chimeric APN is a promising strategy to combat PDCoV infection.

Novel off-Targeting Events Identified after Genome Wide Analysis of CRISPR-Cas Edited Pigs.

CRISPR-Cas technology has transformed our ability to introduce targeted modifications, allowing unconventional animal models such as pigs to model human diseases and improve its value for food production. The main concern with using the technology is the possibility of introducing unwanted modifications in the genome. In this study, we illustrate a pipeline to comprehensively identify off-targeting events on a global scale in the genome of three different gene-edited pig models. Whole genome sequencing paired with an off-targeting prediction software tool filtered off-targeting events amongst natural variations present in gene-edited pigs. This pipeline confirmed two known off-targeting events in IGH knockout pigs, AR and RBFOX1, and identified other presumably off-targeted loci. Independent validation of the off-targeting events using other gene-edited DNA confirmed two novel off-targeting events in RAG2/IL2RG knockout pig models. This unique strategy offers a novel tool to detect off-targeting events in genetically heterogeneous species after genome editing.

Current challenges in xenotransplantation.

In recent years, the xenotransplantation science has advanced tremendously, with significant strides in both preclinical and clinical research. This review intends to describe the latest cutting-edge progress in knowledge and methodologies developed to overcome potential obstacles that may preclude the translation and successful application of clinical xenotransplantation. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that it is now possible to extend beyond two years survival of primate recipients of life saving xenografts. This has been accomplished thanks to the utilization of genetic engineering methodologies that have allowed the generation of specifically designed gene-edited pigs, a careful donor and recipient selection, and appropriate immunosuppressive strategies.In this light, the compassionate use of genetically modified pig hearts has been authorized in two human recipients and xenotransplants have also been achieved in human decedents. Although encouraging the preliminary results suggest that several challenges have yet to be fully addressed for a successful clinical translation of xenotransplantation. These challenges include immunologic, physiologic and biosafety aspects. Recent progress has paved the way for the initial compassionate use of pig organs in humans and sets the scene for a wider application of clinical xenotransplantation.

Spatiotemporal immune atlas of a clinical-grade gene-edited pig-to-human kidney xenotransplant

Pig-to-human xenotransplantation is rapidly approaching the clinical arena; however, it is unclear which immunomodulatory regimens will effectively control human immune responses to pig xenografts. Here, we transplant a gene-edited pig kidney into a brain-dead human recipient on pharmacologic immunosuppression and study the human immune response to the xenograft using spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA sequencing. Human immune cells are uncommon in the porcine kidney cortex early after xenotransplantation and consist of primarily myeloid cells. Both the porcine resident macrophages and human infiltrating macrophages express genes consistent with an alternatively activated, anti-inflammatory phenotype. No significant infiltration of human B or T cells into the porcine kidney xenograft is detectable. Altogether, these findings provide proof of concept that conventional pharmacologic immunosuppression may be able to restrict infiltration of human immune cells into the xenograft early after compatible pig-to-human kidney xenotransplantation.

Visual screening of CRISPR/Cas9 editing efficiency based on micropattern arrays for editing porcine cells.

CRISPR/Cas9 technology, combined with somatic cell nuclear transplantation (SCNT), represents the primary approach to generating gene-edited pigs. The inefficiency in acquiring gene-edited nuclear donors is attributed to low editing and delivery efficiency, both closely linked to the selection of CRISPR/Cas9 forms. However, there is currently no direct method to evaluate the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing in porcine genomes. A platform based on fluorescence reporting signals and micropattern arrays was developed in this study, to visually assess the efficiency of gene editing. The optimal specifications for culturing porcine cells, determined by the quantity and state of cells grown on micropattern arrays, were a diameter of 200µm and a spacing of 150µm. By visualizing the area of fluorescence loss and measuring the gray value of the micropattern arrays, it was quickly determined that the mRNA form targeting porcine cells exhibited the highest editing efficiency compared to DNA and Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) forms of CRISPR/Cas9. Subsequently, four homozygotes of the β4GalNT2 gene knockout were successfully obtained through the mRNA form, laying the groundwork for the subsequent generation of gene-edited pigs. This platform facilitates a quick, simple, and effective evaluation of gene knockout efficiency. Additionally, it holds significant potential for swiftly testing novel gene editing tools, assessing delivery methods, and tailoring evaluation platforms for various cell types.

Progress in Research and Prospects for Application of Precision Gene-Editing Technology Based on CRISPR–Cas9 in the Genetic Improvement of Sheep and Goats

Due to recent innovations in gene editing technology, great progress has been made in livestock breeding, with researchers rearing gene-edited pigs, cattle, sheep, and other livestock. Gene-editing technology involves knocking in, knocking out, deleting, inhibiting, activating, or replacing specific bases of DNA or RNA sequences at the genome level for accurate modification, and such processes can edit genes at a fixed point without needing DNA templates. In recent years, although clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 system-mediated gene-editing technology has been widely used in research into the genetic breeding of animals, the system’s efficiency at inserting foreign genes is not high enough, and there are certain off-target effects; thus, it is not appropriate for use in the genome editing of large livestock such as cashmere goats. In this study, the development status, associated challenges, application prospects, and future prospects of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precision gene-editing technology for use in livestock breeding were reviewed to provide a theoretical reference for livestock gene function analysis, genetic improvement, and livestock breeding that account for characteristics of local economies.

One-step in vivo gene knock-out in porcine embryos using recombinant adeno-associated viruses.

Introduction: Gene-edited pigs have become prominent models for studying human disease mechanisms, gene therapy, and xenotransplantation. CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/CRISPR-associated 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technology is a widely employed tool for generating gene-edited pigs. Nevertheless, delivering CRISPR/Cas9 to pre-implantation embryos has traditionally posed challenges due to its reliance on intricate micromanipulation equipment and specialized techniques, resulting in high costs and time-consuming procedures. This study aims to introduce a novel one-step approach for generating genetically modified pigs by transducing CRISPR/Cas9 components into pre-implantation porcine embryos through oviductal injection of recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAV). Methods: We first used rAAV-1, rAAV-6, rAAV-8, rAAV-9 expressing EGFP to screen for rAAV serotypes that efficiently target porcine embryos, and then, to achieve efficient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 in vivo for a short period, we packaged sgRNAs targeting the GHR genes to self-complementary adeno-associated virus (scAAV), and Cas9 proteins to single-stranded adeno-associated virus (ssAAV). The efficiency of porcine embryos -based editing was then validated in vitro. The feasibility of this one-step method to produce gene-edited pigs using rAAV-CRISPR/Cas9 oviductal injection into sows within 24h of conception was then validated. Results: Our research firstly establishes the efficient delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 to pig zygotes, both in vivo and in vitro, using rAAV6. Successful gene editing in pigs was achieved through oviductal injection of rAAV-CRISPR/Cas9. Conclusion: This method circumvents the intricate procedures involved in in vitro embryo manipulation and embryo transfers, providing a straightforward and cost-effective approach for the production of gene-edited pigs.