Gender Bias Research Articles

Does gender-fair language matter?

Abstract Gender-fair language (GFL), a linguistic practice that aims to avoid gender bias or discrimination by using gender-inclusive terms, has been increasingly recognized in various contexts. Despite this growing recognition, the question of how Filipinos view the use of GFL in the workplace remains underexplored. The present study contributes to this evolving discourse by investigating the perceptions of Filipino professional writers in English toward GFL, an area that has received relatively little attention in the literature, particularly in more restrictive cultural contexts such as the Philippines. Using a qualitative survey with 34 Filipino professional writers, ten of whom participated in follow-up email interviews, I examine the views of these writers on GFL and the aspects that influence them in using GFL in writing. The findings demonstrate that while GFL is seen as positive for social change, practical and contextual considerations affect its use. Factors that facilitate GFL adoption are identified, such as confidence and awareness, commitment to gender equality, and professional growth. In contrast, hindering factors include cultural and ideological resistance, practical and linguistic challenges, and the lack of comprehensive GFL guidelines and resources.

Disrupting harmful gender norms: Youth at the centre

Disrupting harmful gender norms: Youth at the centre Dr Claudia Mitchell, Director of the Participatory Cultures Lab, Department of Integrated Studies in Education (DISE). McGill University, tells us about the TRANSFORM project aimed at disrupting harmful gender norms and mobilizing for social change. Gender inequalities and discrimination persist glaringly around the globe. Gender-based violence stands out as one of the most widespread human rights violations. Forced and early marriage and female genital mutilation also continue to have an impact on the lives of young people. The United Nations has identified transforming harmful gender norms as a critical goal among its 17 Sustainable Development Goals for 2030.

The association between gender and industry payments to minimally invasive surgeons.

It is unknown if there are differential industry payments to surgeons based on gender. This study aims to examine differences by gender for industry relations with minimally invasive surgeons, using speakers at the SAGES Annual Meeting as a proxy for key thought leaders in minimally invasive surgery. We queried the Open Payments Database for payments made to US speakers from the 2023 SAGES meeting. All payments from the prior fiscal year prior were collected. The National Provider Identity (NPI) Registry was cross-referenced to determine surgeon's self-reported gender. Industry sponsors were analyzed based on differences in payments made. A total of 305 speakers were assessed, with 175 (57.4%) males and 130 (42.6%) females. Of the 305 speakers, 246 were listed in the OPD. There were 145/175 (82.8%) males who were received general payments, compared to 101/130 (77.6%) females (p = 0.326). The total amount of industry payments was $2,894,287 for males and $1,539,481 for females. Median payments were 2.8X higher for males ($4657, IQR $422-$15,798) than females ($1651, IQR $299-$9005) (p = 0.05). Despite efforts to decrease gender bias in surgery, there remains a significant and substantial difference in payments towards male and female surgeons via industry relationships. This has potential downstream effects on career development, consulting and research opportunities, and development of new devices.

Factors Influencing Girls' Education in Nepal: History and Perceptions of Participants

This study aims to explore the various ways in which gender discrimination reveals itself within the realm of education for girls, both within the school environment and at home. Additionally, the study seeks to identify the various factors that influence gender-related disparities in girls' education and examine the history of schooling for girls. In our society, socio-cultural norms and values that are biased towards gender are deeply ingrained, and this has prompted the Nepal government to initiate several measures aimed at fostering a gender-friendly environment within schools. Despite these interventions, the study finds that achieving gender parity in education remains elusive. As such, the study has prioritized examining how gender-based societal influences impede girls' education. The study is based on field data collected through direct interaction with participants to obtain insights grounded in real-world experiences.

Impacts of Gender Disparity and Socio-Educational Structure on Legal Awareness of Women Inmates: A Case Study of Prisons in Sindh, Pakistan

The study is an endeavor to undertake an in-depth analysis of the prevailing injustices faced by women inmates incarcerated in one of the merged prisons(merger of 2 districts)of Sindh Province Pakistan. It aims to explore how social norms, education system, and gender discrimination, collectively influence the women inmates' legal awareness and struggles for availing their legal rights and equitable treatment. By employing a mixed-method research design, including in-depth interviews with women inmates, questionnaires, and an interview guide with open-ended questions, the study uncovered the multifaceted barriers they encounter. The study also advocates fostering a more inclusive and gender-responsive criminal justice system and concludes that the intersectional nature of these challenges impacts legal awareness of women inmates and also has some significant implications for stakeholders and reformists in the context of entertaining the female inmates without gender discrimination as ensuring Article-4 of the 1973 constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Early Adolescents

This cross-sectional study examined the prevalence of sexual orientation discrimination and its sociodemographic correlates among a large, diverse sample of early adolescents in the US.

‘Because I am a woman, an old woman, I have no voice’: gendered ageism and disempowerment of older women in three African countries

Background and objectives: Gendered ageism refers to the intersectionality of age and gender bias and discrimination. It is widely prevalent and leads to inequality, injustice, oppression, exploitation and disempowerment of older women. In this study, we explore the impacts of gendered ageism on three areas of older women’s lives in three African countries. These areas are: (1) participation in public and political life and access to justice and law enforcement; (2) family relations, inheritance, and land and property ownership; and (3) violence, abuse and neglect. Research design and methods: Eighteen women aged 54–85 years were interviewed for this study. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify and explore disempowering impacts of gendered ageism on their lives and rights. Results: In all areas of the participants’ lives, their lack of voice in their inability to make choices, to claim their rights and to participate meaningfully in decision-making were highlighted. These manifested in the suppression of their interests, opinions and aspirations in public life; denial of justice; prejudice and discrimination within family settings; exploitation, harassment, abandonment and violence; and an overall devaluation, dehumanisation and silencing of older women. Discussion: Women often outlive men and experience marginalisation for a greater proportion of their lives. Yet, their lived experiences receive limited acknowledgement and redressal. In developing countries, older women face multiple forms of oppression arising from gendered ageism. This study highlights such experiences with the expectation that this will generate awareness, garner support from stakeholders and help inform policies for the protection and equal treatment of older women.

Upskilling India: The national policy on skill development and entrepreneurship

Background India’s National Policy for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (NPSDE) was designed to capture the demographic dividend and upskill India’s youth, creating an ‘Athmanirbhar Bharat’ (self-reliant India) and in the process, also drive economic growth. Policy and Implications The NPSDE’s dual focus on skill development and entrepreneurship was intended to create a framework for empowering India’s workforce and fostering a culture of innovation. However, the policy has encountered several issues, including the ineffective functioning of Sector Skill Councils (SSCs), inadequate infrastructure, and insufficiently skilled trainers. Additionally, the policy’s efforts to include marginalized groups, particularly women, have fallen short due to entrenched social barriers and gender biases, impacting the effectiveness of training programs. Recommendations To improve the effectiveness of the NPSDE, we propose the following recommendations -adopt an entrepreneurial ecosystem approach to enhance coordination and support within the skill development framework; explicitly define ‘skill’ and ‘skilling’ to better align with socio-political realities and address barriers faced by marginalized individuals; and design training initiatives with an empowerment perspective, focusing on access to resources, agency, and social change. We feel these steps can help direct the NPSDE to create a more inclusive and impactful skilling environment. Conclusions While the NPSDE represents a significant effort towards upskilling India and fostering self-reliance and entrepreneurship, its implementation has revealed critical limitations. The policy’s progress has been insufficient, with persistent issues in meeting industry needs and addressing socio-economic barriers. Future revisions of the policy should focus on systemic improvements, adopting a more inclusive approach to skilling, and addressing the socio-political dimensions of skill valuation to better support India’s developmental aspirations.

New Age Mages: An Interactive Way to Explore and Subvert Gender Biases

From a young age, children are exposed to societal standards of gender and gender roles and, by extension, inherent sex-based biases, which can become inculcated into their worldview. These biases affect their daily lives negatively in ways that can seem almost natural unless specifically pointed out. Table Top Role Playing Games (TTRPGs) are pen-and-paper games that revolve around collaborative storytelling in a shared, collectively imagined and built world, usually involving 2 to 5 players. TTRPGs provide a safe, controlled environment to mimic social interactions in a way that video games and other forms of media cannot. This paper introduces a new TTRPG, New Age Mages, aimed at a younger audience, with the goal of introducing the concept of biases and helping them to see things from a different perspective. In New Age Mages, players interact with a world where magic is commonplace as students that have recently unlocked their magic, while a Game Master (GM) narrates the world as determined by the players’ choices. The game’s magic system allows it to mimic the influence and/or impact of modern-day gender roles and biases without referring to them directly while remaining simple and easy to learn for a new player. The game also aims to subtly incentivise the Players to make decisions that would be different from what they might usually make, and promote trying to understand the others’ points of view. We believe this game will be useful for those seeking to help children gain a better understanding of gender roles and their subversion. We use a questionnaire based on the Gender Role Attitudes Scale (GRAS) to measure the impact gameplay has on players’ ideas of gender roles. We also test the game with some initial gameplay experiments among a smaller audience that is more familiar with TTRPGs and present the results. Our work explores not only the ability of TTRPGs to influence perspectives and opinions, but also doing so specifically in the space of understanding gender roles among a younger audience.

Gender Differences in Perception of Neurosurgery as a Career Choice in Pakistan: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey

A low neurosurgeon-to-patient ratio persists to be a problem in many developing nations including Pakistan. Concurrent gender disparities further exacerbate the challenges posed by the already limited workforce. An understanding of the perceptions of neurosurgery among female early career doctors is crucial in the evolution of the field in terms of both, workforce strength and inclusivity. A cross-sectional study was conducted across public and private medical schools of Pakistan. A close-ended self-administered questionnaire was employed to assess subject-reported challenges and perceptions regarding neurosurgery. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 28, and p< 0.05 was considered significant. The influence of these perceptions on the choice of neurosurgery as a career was determined by binary logistic regression analysis. Of the 387 responses received from over 45 institutions across the country, 55.6% were females and 44.4% were male respondents. Compared to men, women were more likely to opt out of neurosurgery due to fear of problems with parenting (p<0.001), absence of daycare facilities (p<0.001), lack of female role models (p=0.001), fear of gender discrimination (p<0.001), and the mental (p=0.04) and physical distress (p=0.008) associated with neurosurgery. Binary logistic regression revealed that these concerns were responsible for an increased likelihood of opting out of neurosurgery among female medical students and intern doctors. Significant differences exist in how male and female medical students perceive neurosurgery as a career choice. Interventions including availability of day care facilities for children, creation of inclusive workplace environment, and promotion of mentorship programs catering to women can help bridge this gap and contribute to evolution of the field of neurosurgery in the developing world.

Exploring the Discursive Representation of Pakistani Female Politicians in Print and Electronic Media: A Qualitative Study of Narrative and Framing

This study uses a qualitative discourse analysis approach to investigate Pakistani female politicians' discursive representation in print and electronic media. Specifically, the research focuses on the narratives and framing strategies employed by the media to construct and portray the public image of these political figures. By employing Corpus-Assisted Diachronic Discourse Analysis (CADDA), the study traces the changes in media discourse over time, uncovering how gender biases, societal norms, and power dynamics shape the representation of women in Pakistani politics. The findings reveal significant trends in gendered framing, highlighting how media portrayal fluctuates between marginalization and recognition of female politicians' contributions, though gender stereotypes remain deeply embedded in these narratives. The findings of this study have important implications for future media reform initiatives, advocating for a more equitable and balanced representation of women in politics. The insights gained can also inform gender advocacy strategies and policy efforts to enhance women's visibility and leadership roles in traditional and digital media.

An exploratory experiment investigating teachers’ attributional race and gender bias and the moderating effects of personal experience of racial discrimination

The factors to which teachers attribute students’ successes and failures have important consequences for teachers’ instructional decisions as well as their expectations of students. Yet few, if any, experimental studies have been conducted to investigate the role that students’ race and gender play in how teachers make sense of students’ academic performance. In this exploratory experimental study, conducted with 413 mathematics teachers across the United States, we investigated the extent to which teachers attributed students’ performance disparities in mathematics to internal and external factors based on the students’ race and gender and explored the extent to which teachers’ beliefs and dispositions moderated their attributions. To do so, teachers were first given a collection of the student solutions with no gender or racial performance disparities. They were then randomly assigned to one of four conditions in which they were told that on this particular assessment: boys outperformed girls, girls outperformed boys, Black and Hispanic students outperformed White and Asian students, or that White and Asian students outperformed Black and Hispanic students. They were asked to report the reasons behind the disparities in math performance of these groups. We found that teachers attributed gender disparities in student performance to innate math ability, effort, and external social factors, whereas they attributed racial disparities in student performance to biological influences on intelligence, effort, external social factors or the assessment context. Teachers’ self-reported personal experience with racial discrimination moderated race differences in teacher attributions.

7795 Gender based differences in peripubertal growth patterns may offer insight into the twofold representation of boys compared to girls among children referred for growth hormone stimulation tests

Abstract Disclosure: Y. Dekel: None. L. Horowitz : None. R. Gendelman: None. M. Cohen: None. Background: Growth hormone (GH) stimulation tests are essential in the diagnostic assessment of pediatric GH deficiency (GHD). However, the tests bare multiple limitations, resulting from both intrinsic and child-related factors. Thus, referral decisions are key in making a correct diagnosis. Several studies demonstrated a gender bias in referral for short stature evaluation with a higher proportion of boys referred and diagnosed with GHD. Moreover, the boys had higher height z-scores upon referral. About 100 GH stimulation-tests are conducted annually at our pediatric endocrinology unit. We aimed to characterize the children that underwent GH stimulation-testing between 2017-2021, specifically focusing on differences based on: 1) gender 2) GH secretion status (deficient vs. sufficient). Methods: A retrospective review of charts of children aged 0-18 years that performed GH stimulation-tests at the Rambam pediatric endocrinology unit between the years 2017-2021 was conducted. Children followed at an outside clinic that had a first GH stimulation-test elsewhere, were excluded. Data was collected through the electronic database and by manually screening medical charts. The IBM SPSS statistics package 21 version was used for analysis. Results: Four-hundred children were included in the study, 266 boys (66.5%) and 134 girls (33.5%). Mean age 8.8±4.2 years, mean height z-score -2.3±0.7 and mean mid-parental height standard-deviation-scores (MPH-SDS) -0.6±0.7. The mean difference between MPH-SDS and child height-z-score was 1.7±0.8 SDS. Mean age was younger in girls compared with boys, 7.3±3.3 and 9.6±4.4 years respectively (p&amp;lt;0.001). Age distribution differed between genders, while refferals peaked between 3-4 years of age in both girls and boys, a second peak at 13-14 years of age was evident only in boys. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between boys and girls in height z-score, difference from MPH-SDS or rates of GHD. Overall, 93 (23.3%) children were diagnosed with GHD, 32 girls (24%) and 61 boys (23%). Children with GHD were younger and had higher BMI-SDSs compared to GH sufficient children, age 7.8±3.8, 9.2±4.3 years respectively (p=0.003), BMI z-score 0.17±1.38, -0.47±1.15 respectively (p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion: Twice as many boys than girls were referred for GH stimulation tests in our cohort. Based on differences in age distribution, the peripubertal physiologic growth deceleration that occurs later in boys, likely contributes to this finding. This male-to-female ratio is similar to ratios reported in the literature regarding short stature referrals; however, in contrast to the literature, in our cohort it could not be explained by an anthropometric bias in referral criteria. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Exploring Gender Discrimination Faced by Women in Indian Sports

Exploring Gender Discrimination Faced by Women in Indian Sports

Gender bias of antisocial and borderline personality disorders among psychiatrists.

Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) challenge mental health professionals with similar maladaptive behaviors. However, these two disorders differ regarding available evidence-based treatments. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has been criticized as being gender-biased diagnostic construct. The present study aimed to determine the gender bias of ASPD and BPD among Turkish psychiatrists. Three case vignettes were randomly presented as male or female to the psychiatrists online. The first case was a patient with schizophrenia case to confirm the participant's ability to diagnose. The second case was a patient with ASPD, and the third one was a patient with BPD. Two hundred fifty participants diagnosed the first case correctly (n = 250). The results with statistical significance demonstrated that a female case with ASPD was 5.1 times more likely to get misdiagnosed than a male case with ASPD (p˂0.0001). Categorical classification of personality disorders in DSM leads to gender bias in in the diagnosis of ASPD and BPD. The present study shows that female cases with ASPD are misdiagnosed as BPD which may result in treatment attempts without evidence.

Gender and age biases in the assessment of speech accuracy: A study of speech-language clinicians' ratings of /s/ accuracy.

Typically developing children assigned male at birth (AMAB) and children assigned female at birth (AFAB) produce the fricative /s/ differently: AFAB children produce /s/ with a higher spectral peak frequency. This study examined whether implicit knowledge of these differences affects speech-language pathologists'/speech and language therapists' (SLPs'/SLTs') ratings of /s/ accuracy, by comparing ratings made in conditions where SLPs/SLTs were blind to children's sex assigned at birth (SAB) to conditions in which they were told this information. SLPs (n = 95) varying in clinical experience rated the accuracy of word-initial /s/ productions (n = 87) of eight children with speech sound disorder in one of four conditions: one in which no information about the children was revealed, one in which children's SAB was revealed, one in which children's age was revealed, and one in which both were revealed. Despite there being no statistically significant differences between AFAB and AMAB children's /s/ production in researcher-determined accuracy or in one acoustic characteristic, spectral centroid, SLPs in all four conditions judged the /s/ productions of AFAB children as more accurate than AMAB children. Listeners were significantly less likely to judge the productions of AMAB children to be inaccurate in the conditions in which age or age and SAB were revealed. These effects were consistent across SLPs with greatly varying levels of clinical experience. Knowing or imputing children's age and SAB can affect ratings of /s/ accuracy. Clinicians should be mindful of these potential effects. Future research should understand how expectations about sociolinguistic variation in speech affect appraisals of their speech and language. What is already known on the subject Adult men and women produce /s/ differently. A consensus is that these differences reflect sociolinguistic gender marking, rather than being the passive consequence of vocal-tract differences. Recent studies have shown that children assigned female at birth (AFAB) and those assigned male at birth (AMAB) produce /s/ differently in ways that mirror the differences between adult men and women, and which presumably reflect gender marking. What this paper adds to existing knowledge We asked whether US-based speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) ratings of the accuracy of /s/ differ depending on whether they are rating an AFAB or an AMAB child, and whether these differences are greater in conditions in which people are told the sex assigned at birth of the child being rated. We found that SLPs were more likely to judge AFAB children's /s/ productions to be more accurate than AMAB children's, even though the productions from the AMAB and AFAB children that were used as stimuli were matched for accuracy as determined by trained researchers. What are the clinical implications of this work? SLPs/speech-language therapists should be sensitive to the influence of social variables when assessing /s/. SLPs/speech-language therapists might rate children's productions differently depending on whether they believe they are rating an AFAB or an AMAB child.

The Effect of Gender Discrimination on Labor Supply

The Effect of Gender Discrimination on Labor Supply

Divergence of rhizosphere microbial communities between females and males of the dioecious Hippophae tibetana at different habitats.

Females and males of dioecious plants have evolved sex-specific characteristics in terms of their morphological and physiological properties. However, little is known about the difference in rhizosphere microbes in dioecious plants. In this study, we used amplicon sequencing to analyze the differences in rhizosphere microbial diversity and community composition of males and females of dioecious Hippophae tibetana at different habitats, and their key factors in driving the differences were investigated. The results showed that there were differences in the diversity, community composition, and connectivity and complexity of the co-occurrence network of rhizosphere microbes between females and males of the dioecious H. tibetana at different habitats. Zoopagomycota is a unique phylum of rhizosphere fungi in the males of the dioecious H. tibetana, while Dependentiae is a unique phylum of rhizosphere bacteria in the females of the dioecious H. tibetana. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis indicated significant enrichment of species at different levels, suggesting that these species could be potential biomarkers for females and males of H. tibetana. Spearman's analysis showed that the dominant genera of rhizosphere fungi were significantly positively correlated with soil physicochemical properties (total nitrogen and phosphorus; organic matter; available phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen; salt content; water content). PICRUSt and FUNGuild predictive analysis indicated that the function of rhizosphere fungi was different between females and males of the dioecious H. tibetana at different habitats, while metabolites were the dominant functions of rhizosphere bacteria in all samples. These results highlighted the sexual discrimination of rhizosphere microbes on the dioecious plants and provided important knowledge for females and males of the dioecious plant-microbe interaction.IMPORTANCEThis study explores the differences in rhizosphere microbes of dioecious Hippophae tibetana at different habitats and their key factors in driving the differences. Through employing amplicon sequencing techniques, we found that rhizosphere microbial communities and diversity were different between females and males of the dioecious H. tibetana at different habitats, and there notably existed unique phylum and potential biomarkers of rhizosphere microbes between females and males of the dioecious H. tibetana. Rhizosphere fungi were significantly positively correlated with soil physicochemical properties. This study reveals the differences in rhizosphere microbes of dioecious H. tibetana at different habitats and driving factors; it also contributes to our understanding of the dioecious plant-microbe interaction.

An eye tracking study of gender biased information acquisition in candidate evaluation

AbstractGender stereotypes may impact voters' candidate choices. But do gender stereotypes impact voters' attention when learning about candidates? This paper explores whether citizens take part in gender biased information acquisition when learning about women and men candidates. In an experiment, I use eye tracking to measure respondents' attention to gender stereotype‐consistent and inconsistent information. The results indicate that citizens do not differ in their attention to different candidate information according to candidate gender. Additionally, respondents' own sex does not make a difference in their attention to masculine‐ and feminine‐stereotyped information for women or men candidates. These findings provide an important specification of the mechanism behind gender bias in candidate choices: the bias appears to be different standards of judgment for candidates of different genders, not different compositions of information being judged for candidates of different genders.

Bias-aware face mask detection dataset

AbstractIn December 2019, a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) spread so quickly around the world that many countries had to set mandatory face mask rules in public areas to reduce the transmission of the virus. To monitor public adherence, researchers aimed to rapidly develop efficient systems that can detect faces with masks automatically. However, the lack of representative and novel datasets posed challenges for training efficient models. Early attempts to collect face mask datasets did not account for potential race, gender, and age biases. Therefore, the resulting models show inherent biases toward specific race groups, such as Asian or Caucasian. In this work, we present a novel face mask detection dataset that contains images posted on Twitter during the pandemic from around the world. Unlike previous datasets, the proposed Bias-Aware Face Mask Detection (BAFMD) dataset contains more images from underrepresented races and age groups to mitigate the problem of the face mask detection task. We perform experiments to investigate potential biases in widely used face mask detection datasets and illustrate that the BAFMD dataset yields models with better performance and generalization ability. The dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/Alpkant/BAFMD.