Combination Of Gemcitabine Research Articles

Combination of gemcitabine, pegaspargase, etoposide, and dexamethasone (GPED) in treatment of advanced extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.

Combination of gemcitabine, pegaspargase, etoposide, and dexamethasone (GPED) in treatment of advanced extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.

Surgery and hepatic artery infusion therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive tumor that commonly presents at an advanced stage requiring multimodal treatment. Surgical resection remains the only curative option; however, only 20% to 30% of patients present with resectable disease as these tumors remain asymptomatic at an early stage. Diagnostic workup for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma includes contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging (eg, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) to determine resectability and percutaneous biopsy for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy or with unresectable disease. Surgical treatment of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is centered on complete resection of the mass with negative (R0) margins while preserving sufficient future liver remnant. Intraoperative measures that aid in ensuring resectability include diagnostic laparoscopy to rule out peritoneal disease or distant metastases and ultrasound to evaluate for vascular invasion or intrahepatic metastases. Predictors of survival after surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma include margin status, vascular invasion, nodal disease, and tumor size and multifocality. Patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma may also benefit from systemic chemotherapy in either the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting; however, guidelines do not presently support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy outside of ongoing clinical trials. For unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has been the first-line chemotherapeutic option, but recent advancements in triplet regimens and immunotherapies may offer novel strategies. Hepatic artery infusion presents an efficacious adjunct to systemic chemotherapy as it takes advantage of the hepatic arterial blood supply that feeds intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas to deliver high-dose chemotherapy to the liver through a subcutaneous pump. Thus, hepatic artery infusion takes advantage of first-pass hepatic metabolism and provides liver-directed therapy while minimizing systemic exposure. In unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, using hepatic artery infusion therapy in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy has been associated with better overall survival and response rates when compared to systemic chemotherapy alone or other liver-directed therapies, such as transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization. This review focuses on surgical intervention for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and the utility of hepatic artery infusion for patients with unresectable disease.

Inhibitory effect and related mechanism of decitabine combined with gemcitabine on proliferation of NK/T cell lymphoma cells.

Background: EBV-associated lymphoma is a neoplasm with a poor prognosis, highly aggressive, and progressive rapidly. There is no standard clinical treatment protocol. Decitabine and gemcitabine are known to have anticancer properties against cells of various cancer, respectively. However, the effect of the combination medication on NK/T cell lymphoma cells and potential mechanisms have not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: Human NK/T cell lymphoma cells NK92MI were treated with decitabine and gemcitabine alone or in combination. Experiments, including the Cell Counting Kit-8 and flow cytometry, were performed to investigate how the combination of decitabine and gemcitabine affects the biological behavior of NK92MI cells in vitro. mRNA sequencing, RT-PCR, and western blotting were used to detect changes in the related signal pathway, mRNA, and protein expressions. Results: Decitabine and gemcitabine significantly inhibited the viability and proliferation of NK92MI cells in a dose-dependent manner. The combination index was less than 1 after treating with two drugs, which was a significant synergistic effect. The decitabine concentration with the best synergistic effect was 4.046µM, and the gemcitabine concentration was 0.005µM. Flow cytometry showed that combining two drugs could significantly promote apoptosis and arrest the cell cycle at the S phase. In the combined DAC and GEM group, caspase3 protein levels were higher than in either group alone or the control group. The transcriptome sequence, KEGG, and PPI analysis showed that the differential genes after combined treatment were mainly enriched in signal pathways related to cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration compared with using alone and control groups. Based on the sequencing results, we further investigated the role of DAC and GEM in ferroptosis-related signaling molecules using RT-PCR and Western blot techniques. RT-PCR and western blotting showed that the expression levels of HMOX1 and EBV cleavage gene BRLF1 were higher in the group with combined DAC and GEM than in the group alone and the control group, while the protein and mRNA expression levels of SLC7A11 were lower than the others. In addition, the GPX4 protein expression level in the combination group was lower than in the drug-alone and control groups. In addition, the combination treatment increased the ROS level of NK92MI cells. Conclusion: Our current findings suggested that decitabine had an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of NK92MI cells when co-treated with gemcitabine. This combination may increase the expression of ferroptosis-related signaling molecules, thus inhibiting the proliferation of NK92MI cells. It also promoted apoptosis in NK/T cell lymphoma. For patients with NK/T cell lymphoma, this novel combination may provide clinical benefits.

Revisiting targeted therapy and immunotherapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare and aggressive type of malignant tumor. In the past few years, there has been an increase in the incidence of CCA. Surgery is the only effective treatment but is only suitable for a small percentage of patients. Comprehensive treatment is the normal therapy for terminal CCA patients, depending basically on gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy. In the past decade, the emergence of next-generation sequencing technology can be used for the identification of important molecular features of CCA, and several studies have demonstrated that different CCA subtypes have unique genetic aberrations. Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (EGFR2) are emerging targeted therapies. In addition, researches have indicated that immunotherapy has a key function in CCA. There is ongoing research on programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors (PD-1), chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and tumor-infiltrating leukocyte (TILs). Researches have shown that targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and conventional chemotherapy in CCA had certain mechanistic links, and the combination of those can greatly improve the prognosis of advanced CCA patients. This study aimed to review the research progress of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for CCA.

Targeting UBE2T Potentiates Gemcitabine Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer by Regulating Pyrimidine Metabolism and Replication Stress

Although small patient subsets benefit from current targeted strategies or immunotherapy, gemcitabine remains the first-line drug for pancreatic cancer (PC) treatment. However, gemcitabine resistance is widespread and compromises long-term survival. Here, we identified ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2T (UBE2T) as a potential therapeutic target to combat gemcitabine resistance in PC. Proteomics and metabolomics were combined to examine the effect of UBE2T on pyrimidine metabolism remodeling. Spontaneous PC mice (LSL-KrasG12D/+, LSL-Trp53R172H/+, Pdx1-Cre; KPC) with Ube2t-conditional knockout, organoids, and large-scale clinical samples were used to determine the effect of UBE2T on gemcitabine efficacy. Organoids, patient-derived xenografts (PDX), and KPC mice were used to examine the efficacy of the combination of a UBE2T inhibitor and gemcitabine. Spontaneous PC mice with Ube2t deletion had a marked survival advantage after gemcitabine treatment, and UBE2T levels were positively correlated with gemcitabine resistance in clinical patients. Mechanistically, UBE2T catalyzes really interesting new gene 1 (RING1)-mediated ubiquitination of p53 and relieves the transcriptional repression of ribonucleotide reductase subunits M1 and M2, resulting in unrestrained pyrimidine biosynthesis and alleviation of replication stress. Additionally, high-throughput compound library screening using organoids identified pentagalloylglucose (PGG) as a potent UBE2T inhibitor and gemcitabine sensitizer. The combination of gemcitabine and PGG diminished tumor growth in PDX models and prolonged long-term survival in spontaneous PC mice. Collectively, UBE2T-mediated p53 degradation confers PC gemcitabine resistance by promoting pyrimidine biosynthesis and alleviating replication stress. This study offers an opportunity to improve PC survival by targeting UBE2T and develop a promising gemcitabine sensitizer in clinical translation setting.

Sulforaphane Potentiates Gemcitabine-Mediated Anti-Cancer Effects against Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Inhibiting HDAC Activity

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), the second most common primary liver cancer, has high mortality rates because of its limited treatment options and acquired resistance to chemotherapy. Sulforaphane (SFN), a naturally occurring organosulfur compound found in cruciferous vegetables, exhibits multiple therapeutic properties, such as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition and anti-cancer effects. This study assessed the effects of the combination of SFN and gemcitabine (GEM) on human iCCA cell growth. HuCCT-1 and HuH28 cells, representing moderately differentiated and undifferentiated iCCA, respectively, were treated with SFN and/or GEM. SFN concentration dependently reduced total HDAC activity and promoted total histone H3 acetylation in both iCCA cell lines. SFN synergistically augmented the GEM-mediated attenuation of cell viability and proliferation by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in both cell lines, as indicated by the cleavage of caspase-3. SFN also inhibited cancer cell invasion and decreased the expression of pro-angiogenic markers (VEGFA, VEGFR2, HIF-1α, and eNOS) in both iCCA cell lines. Notably, SFN effectively inhibited the GEM-mediated induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). A xenograft assay demonstrated that SFN and GEM substantially attenuated human iCCA cell-derived tumor growth with decreased Ki67+ proliferative cells and increased TUNEL+ apoptotic cells. The anti-cancer effects of every single agent were markedly augmented by concomitant use. Consistent with the results of in vitro cell cycle analysis, G2/M arrest was indicated by increased p21 and p-Chk2 expression and decreased p-Cdc25C expression in the tumors of SFN- and GEM-treated mice. Moreover, treatment with SFN inhibited CD34-positive neovascularization with decreased VEGF expression and GEM-induced EMT in iCCA-derived xenografted tumors. In conclusion, these results suggest that combination therapy with SFN with GEM is a potential novel option for iCCA treatment.

Efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: A retrospective single institution review.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who were treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel from 2012 to 2018 at the Mayo Clinic in Florida. Twenty patients were identified and the median PFS for patients treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was 9months (95% CI, 5.7-20.7). Overall, 17 of the 20 patients (85%) achieved a clinical benefit (complete response 5%, partial response 55%, or stable disease at 3months 25%). For platinum-sensitive disease and platinum-resistant disease, the median OS were 38.7months (95% CI, 5.8-63.1) and 31.2months (95% CI, 12.8-51.8), respectively (p= 0.4306). This well-tolerated regimen shows promising activity in recurrent ovarian cancer and is a viable option for patients who are intolerant to paclitaxel or carboplatin because of allergic reactions.

The inhibitory effects of lobaplatin, or in combination with gemcitabine on triple-negative breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

Abstract Objectives To study the therapeutic effects of lobaplatin in combination with conventional chemotherapy drugs on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. Methods We used the CCK-8 assay, flow cytometry, western blotting, and immunofluorescence staining methods to detect the effects of lobaplatin or in combination with gemcitabine on the survival, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression of TNBC cells. A cell-derived xenograft mouse model was used to verify the antitumor effects of lobaplatin alone or in combination with gemcitabine. Results Lobaplatin significantly inhibited MDA-MB-468 cell growth in vitro, either alone or in combination with gemcitabine. Lobaplatin arrested the cell cycle at the S phase, induced nuclear cell damage, and promoted apoptosis. Also, the percentage of apoptotic cells was greatly increased when lobaplatin was combined with gemcitabine. Cleaved Caspase-3 and Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP-1) fragments indicated that lobaplatin promoted apoptosis through the classical pathway. Lobaplatin effectively inhibited the growth of tumors in vivo. Compared with the vehicle group (567.6 ± 126.2 mm3), the tumor volume of the lobaplatin group (302.7 ± 131.6 mm3) was significantly reduced (p<0.01). The combination of lobaplatin and gemcitabine (207.7 ± 83.94 mm3) was a little better than lobaplatin alone in the inhibition of the transplanted tumor (p>0.05). Conclusions Lobaplatin alone or in combination with gemcitabine had significant inhibitory effects on MDA-MB-468 cells in vitro. Lobaplatin also significantly inhibited the growth of nude mice xenografts. The synergistic effect between lobaplatin and gemcitabine in vivo was minimal, perhaps due to the low dose of gemcitabine used.

Targeting chemoresistant senescent pancreatic cancer cells improves conventional treatment efficacy

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers owing to its late diagnosis and of the strong resistance to available treatments. Despite a better understanding of the disease in the last two decades, no significant improvement in patient care has been made. Senescent cells are characterized by a stable proliferation arrest and some resistance to cell death. Increasing evidence suggests that multiple lines of antitumor therapy can induce a senescent-like phenotype in cancer cells, which may participate in treatment resistance. In this study, we describe that gemcitabine, a clinically-used drug against pancreatic cancer, induces a senescent-like phenotype in highly chemoresistant pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in xenografted tumors in vivo. The use of ABT-263, a well-described senolytic compound targeting Bcl2 anti-apoptotic proteins, killed pancreatic gemcitabine-treated senescent-like cancer cells in vitro. In vivo, the combination of gemcitabine and ABT-263 decreased tumor growth, whereas their individual administration had no effect. Together these data highlight the possibility of improving the efficacy of conventional chemotherapies against pancreatic cancer by eliminating senescent-like cancer cells through senolytic intervention. Further studies testing different senolytics or their combination with available treatments will be necessary to optimize preclinical data in mouse models before transferring these findings to clinical trials.

Prognostic value of circulating T-lymphocyte subsets in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine.

Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is commonly treated with a chemotherapy combination of mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine. However, predictive and prognostic factors for choosing a more appropriate treatment strategy are still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate how chemotherapy changes immune system parameters and whether these changes influence survival outcomes. We sought to identify an easily accessible marker to help choose the appropriate treatment. Patients with PDAC who were suitable for systemic chemotherapy were eligible for the study. Peripheral blood samples were obtained at baseline and after two months of treatment. Lymphocyte subsets were measured using flow cytometry. Correlation with clinical features and survival analyses were performed. In total, 124 patients were enrolled in this study. Seventy patients were treated with mFOLFIRINOX and 50 with gemcitabine monotherapy. Four patients could not be treated because of rapid deterioration. During overall survival analysis (OS), significant factors included age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, differentiation grade G3, carcinoma antigen (CA) 19-9 more than 100 kU/L, absolute white blood cell count, CD3+CD8+, and CD8+CD57-T lymphocytes. Natural killer CD3-CD56+CD16+and CD3-CD56+CD16- and T regulatory CD4+FOXP3+and CD3+CD56+cells differed during treatment, but these differences did not influence the survival results. At baseline, CD8+CD57- T lymphocyte count demonstrated a clear independent impact on progression-free survival and OS. Gemcitabine showed better survival in patients with extremely low baseline CD8+CD57- levels. Therefore, circulating CD3+CD8+and CD8+CD57- cells measured before treatment in PDAC may be considered prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

Effects of Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel and DMAPT in PDAC Cachexia in vivo and in vitro

Cachexia is the involuntary wasting of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, affecting over 80% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNP) combination are commonly given as first-line treatments for PDAC. Data from our lab showed GemNP reduced tumor growth and prevented muscle and fat wasting. Dimethylaminoparthenolide (DMAPT), a small molecule inhibitor, prevented muscle wasting and prolonged survival in a genetic murine model of breast cancer. It has yet to determine if GemNP in combination with DMAPT can improve indices of cachexia and overall survival. Therefore, I hypothesize that GemNP in combination with DMAPT will improve indices of cachexia and overall survival in a murine model of pancreatic cancer. Male 10-week-old C57BL/6J mice underwent orthotopic injection of 5x104 KPC cells or SHAM surgery. Mice were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups (N=10/group): SHAM+Vehicle, KPC+Vehicle, KPC+GemNP, KPC+GemNP+DMAPT. Gemcitabine (120mg/kg) and Nab-paclitaxel (10mg/kg) were injected intraperitoneally starting on day 4 and continued every 6 days. DMAPT (100mg/kg) was administered by gavage Monday-Friday. To determine the role of GemNP and DMAPT in vitro, KPC cells were treated with GemNP and/or DMAPT and cell viability evaluated. Additionally, we treated myotubes with GemNP with/without DMAPT to assess myotube diameter in an established KPC conditioned media. In KPC mice, GemNP (24.4days) increased survival compared to Vehicle (16.8days, p=.0007). However, the combination GemNP+DMAPT did not extend survival over GemNP alone (25.4days, p=.693). Tumor mass was similar between all groups (p=0.411). Interestingly, at the time of sacrifice, all KPC treated mice independent of treatment had similar reduction in adipose tissue and muscle mass compared to SHAM. In conclusion, the addition of DMAPT to GemNP did not extend survival over GemNP alone in an aggressive pancreatic tumor cell line. Future studies should determine if less aggressive tumor cell lines might benefit from GemNP and DMAPT.

A microfluidic-based PDAC organoid system reveals the impact of hypoxia in response to treatment

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is estimated to become the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2030 with mortality rates of up to 93%. Standard of care chemotherapeutic treatment only prolongs the survival of patients for a short timeframe. Therefore, it is important to understand events driving treatment failure in PDAC as well as identify potential more effective treatment opportunities. PDAC is characterized by a high-density stroma, high interstitial pressure and very low oxygen tension. The aim of this study was to establish a PDAC platform that supported the understanding of treatment response of PDAC organoids in mono-, and co-culture with pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) under hypoxic and normoxic conditions. Cultures were exposed to Gemcitabine in combination with molecules targeting relevant molecular programs that could explain treatment specific responses under different oxygen pressure conditions. Two groups of treatment responses were identified, showing either a better effect in monoculture or co-culture. Moreover, treatment response also differed between normoxia and hypoxia. Modulation of response to Gemcitabine was also observed in presence of a Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) inhibitor and HIF inhibitors. Altogether this highlights the importance of adjusting experimental conditions to include relevant oxygen levels in drug response studies in PDAC.

Clinical outcomes of second‑line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S‑1 treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in the KHBO1401‑3A study.

Since the completion of the KHBO1401 study, which evaluated the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (GC) compared with GC plus S‑1 (GCS), GCS has become a standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, there are currently no data revealing second‑line therapy options after GCS. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients receiving second‑line chemotherapy for advanced BTC, refractory or intolerant to GCS, using data from the KHBO1401 study. Patients who received a second‑line treatment after GCS chemotherapy between July 2014 and February 2016 were retrospectively studied. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the day of GCS treatment failure or the first day of second‑line chemotherapy to the final follow‑up date or until death from any cause. Among 83patients refractory or intolerant to GCS chemotherapy, 51 (61%) received second‑line chemotherapy, including GCS (n=8), GC (n=15), GEM (n=6), GEM plus S‑1 (GS) (n=4) and S‑1 (n=18). The 6‑ and 12‑month OS rates were 66.7 and 44.4%, respectively, following second‑line chemotherapy, and 6.3 and 3.1%, respectively, in the best supportive care group (P<0.0001). In addition, the 12‑ and 24‑month OS rates were 59.3 and 36.2%, respectively, in the multidrug chemotherapy group, and 26.9 and 9.0%, respectively, in the single‑agent chemotherapy group (P=0.0191). These results suggested that second‑line combination chemotherapy is a viable treatment option for patients with advanced BTC that is refractory or intolerant to first‑line GCS therapy.

In Vitro Carbon Ion Beam and Gemcitabine Chemoradiation in a Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Cell Line.

To determine the interaction of gemcitabine in chemoradiotherapy with heavy carbon ions in vitro in a mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) cell line. The human lymphatic MEC metastasis cell line NCI-H292 was used. The cells were treated with photons, carbon ions, and gemcitabine. Survival fractions (SF), apoptosis, and cell cycle progression were analyzed. A paired two-sided t-test was used. Significance was defined as p<0.05. Cell proliferation assays showed a significant reduction in SF for combined photon chemoradiation versus photons only. The linear-quadratic fits of combined therapy with carbon ion dose of 0 to 2.5 Gy led to reductions of mean 15% in SF. The LD50 (lethal radiation dose required to reduce cell survival by 50%) for carbon ions only was 0.7 Gy and for carbon ions with gemcitabine 0.6 Gy. The LD50 for photons (with gemcitabine) was 2.8 Gy (2.0 Gy) and for carbon ions (with gemcitabine) 0.7 Gy (0.6 Gy), resulting in a relative biological effectiveness at 10% cell survival (RBE10) of 3.0 (2.7). Carbon ions and photons reduced S phase and increased G2/M phase cell distribution. Isolated treatment with gemcitabine as well as combination with photons led to prolonged S phase transit, whereas combined treatment with carbon ions led to early accumulation in G2/M phase. A significant increase in the sub-G1 population as a hint of relevant number of apoptotic cells was not observed. Gemcitabine showed radiosensitizing effects in combination with photons. The combination of gemcitabine and carbon ions had independent additive effects. Carbon ions only had a RBE10 of 3.0, compared to photons only. The combination of gemcitabine, photon, and carbon ions in patients with MEC seems promising and warrants further investigation.

A systematic review on the available treatment modalities for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive carcinoma in situ and tumors in patients who are ineligible for or decline radical cystectomy.

Globally, urothelial bladder carcinoma is a disease which carries a poor prognosis. There are various treatment modalities for urothelial bladder carcinoma with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy being the most efficacious intravesical therapy and the treatment of choice for patients with carcinoma in situ. A number of chemotherapeutic drugs are also available for the management of Ta/T1 tumors such as mitomycin C and epirubicin. However, relapse and progression is quite common. The optimal management of patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive disease remains to be a challenge. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the treatment modalities available for the management of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive carcinoma in situ and urothelial bladder carcinoma in patients who are ineligible or decline radical cystectomy. Two authors independently searched three databases on the treatment modalities available for the management of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive carcinoma in situ and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive urothelial bladder carcinoma. The systematic search resulted in 15 studies. We recommend the use of intravesical CG0070 adenovirus or hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy mitomycin C in patients with carcinoma in situ only disease. In patients with carcinoma in situ ± Ta/T1 disease, we recommend the use of intravesical radiofrequency-induced chemohyperthermia or electromotive drug administration of mitomycin C. In patients who have Ta/T1 disease, we recommend the use of either hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy epirubicin or electromotive drug administration mitomycin C followed by chemohyperthermia mitomycin C. If any of these second line therapies fail, an alternative regimen would be a combination of gemcitabine, cabazitaxel, and cisplatin. This recommendation is subject to the available resources and clinical expertise available in different hospitals. More studies using study designs such as randomized controlled trials comparing multiple drugs with larger sample sizes and regular follow-up intervals should be performed to accurately assess the different medications and aid in designing guidelines to guide the management of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive non-muscle invasive intravesical bladder cancer.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination for patients with previously treated advanced primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a retrospective single-arm cohort study.

Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a rare and unique subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Studies reporting on salvage treatment for pretreated PLELC are limited. Positive interactions between gemcitabine (GEM) and capecitabine (CAP) have been demonstrated in preclinical studies. In addition, the clinical benefit of the combination has been reported for other malignancies. However, the efficacy and safety of the combination for pretreated PLELC remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to examine the activity and safety of gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM/CAP) combination for previously treated PLELC. Patients with PLELC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who received GEM combined with CAP between May 2013 and January 2021 as the second-line therapy or beyond were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment consisted of intravenous GEM (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and oral CAP (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) every 3 weeks. Evaluation of response was performed every 2 cycles in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety was assessed in accordance with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. The survival data were obtained by medical records or telephone. Follow-ups were performed until February 3rd, 2021. A total of 16 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 5, 4, 4, and 3 patients treated with GEM/CAP combination as the second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line settings, respectively. There were 8 patients with partial response (PR) (50.00%), 6 with stable disease (SD) (37.50%), 2 with progressive disease (PD) (12.50%), and none with complete response (CR). The objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 50.00% and 87.50%, respectively. The most common hematological and nonhematological adverse events (AEs) at any grade were neutropenia (31.25%) and hand-foot syndrome (43.75%). At a median follow-up of 29.3 months with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 20.3 to 38.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.1 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 41.5 months (95% CI: 3.1-79.8 months). This retrospective study demonstrated the potential clinical benefit of GEM in combination with CAP for pretreated PLELC. Future multicenter large-scale, prospective studies are warranted.

Mucin 4 Confers Gemcitabine Resistance and an Unfavorable Prognosis in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma via AKT Activation.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) exhibits aggressive biological behavior and a poor prognosis. Gemcitabine (GEM)-based chemotherapy is the first-line chemotherapy for advanced CCA but has a response rate of only 20-30%. Therefore, investigating treatments to overcome GEM resistance in advanced CCA is crucial. Among mucin (MUC) family members, MUC4 showed the greatest increase in the resistant versus parental sublines. MUC4 was upregulated in whole-cell lysates and conditioned media from gemcitabine-resistant (GR) CCA sublines. MUC4 mediated GEM resistance by activating AKT signaling in GR CCA cells. The MUC4-AKT axis induced BAX S184 phosphorylation to inhibit apoptosis and downregulated GEM transporter human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) expression. The combination of AKT inhibitors and GEM or afatinib overcame GEM resistance in CCA. In vivo, capivasertib (an AKT inhibitor) increased GEM sensitivity in GR cells. MUC4 promoted EGFR and HER2 activation to mediate GEM resistance. Finally, MUC4 expression in patient plasma correlated with MUC4 expression. Paraffin-embedded specimens from non-responders expressed significantly more MUC4 than did those from responders, and this upregulation was associated with poor progression-free survival and overall survival. In GR CCA, high MUC4 expression promotes sustained EGFR/HER2 signaling and AKT activation. The combination of AKT inhibitors with GEM or afatinib might overcome GEM resistance.

Efficacy of Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine Combination in L-Sarcomas.

Although the overall survival of advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients has increased in recent years, the median progression-free survival is lower than 5 months, meaning that there is an unmet need in this population. Among second-line treatments for advanced STS, eribulin is an anti-microtubule agent that has been approved for liposarcoma. Here, we tested the combination of eribulin with gemcitabine in preclinical models of L-sarcoma. The effect in cell viability was measured by MTS and clonogenic assay. Cell cycle profiling was studied by flow cytometry, while apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry and Western blotting. The activity of eribulin plus gemcitabine was evaluated in in vivo patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In L-sarcoma cell lines, eribulin plus gemcitabine showed to be synergistic, increasing the number of hypodiploid events (increased subG1 population) and the accumulation of DNA damage. In in vivo PDX models of L-sarcomas, eribulin combined with gemcitabine was a viable scheme, delaying tumour growth after one cycle of treatment, being more effective in leiomyosarcoma. The combination of eribulin and gemcitabine was synergistic in L-sarcoma cultures and it showed to be active in in vivo studies. This combination deserves further exploration in the clinical context.

The combination of gemcitabine and ginsenoside Rh2 enhances the immune function of dendritic cells against pancreatic cancer via the CARD9-BCL10-MALT1 / NF-κB pathway

Cold tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of pancreatic cancer (PC) with minimal dendritic cell (DC) and T cell infiltration can result in insufficient immunotherapy and chemotherapy. While gemcitabine (GEM) is a first-line chemotherapeutic drug for PC, its efficacy is reduced by immunosuppression and drug resistance. Ginsenoside Rh2 (Rh2) is known to have anti-cancer and immunomodulatory properties. Combining GEM with Rh2 may thus overcome immunosuppression and induce lasting anti-tumor immunity in PC. Here, we showed that after GEM−Rh2 therapy, there was significantly greater tumor infiltration by DCs. Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 (CARD9), a central adaptor protein, was strongly up-regulated DCs with GEM−Rh2 therapy and promoted anti-tumor immune responses by DCs. CARD9 was found to be a critical target for Rh2 to enhance DC function. However, GEM−Rh2 treatment did not achieve the substantial anti-PC efficacy in CARD9−/− mice as in WT mice. The adoptive transfer of WT DCs to DC-depleted PC mice treated with GEM−Rh2 elicited strong anti-tumor immune responses, although CARD9−/− DCs were less effective than WT DCs. Our results showed that GEM−Rh2 may reverse cold TIME by enhancing tumor immunogenicity and decreasing the levels of immunosuppressive factors, reactivating DCs via the CARD9-BCL10-MALT1/ NF-κB pathway. Our findings suggest a potentially feasible and safe treatment strategy for PC, with a unique mechanism of action. Thus, Rh2 activation of DCs may remodel the cold TIME and optimize GEM chemotherapy for future therapeutic use.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Management and End-of-life Care of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Objective The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has altered the delivery of medical care. The present study evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on the outcomes of unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC) patients who received end-of-life care. Methods We retrospectively compared the management of PC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (from April 2020 to March 2021) to the preceding year, which was unaffected by the pandemic (from April 2019 to March 2020), based on a prospectively maintained institutional database. Results A total of 178 patients were included in the COVID-19-exposed group and 201 patients were included in the COVID-19-unexposed group. The median overall survival was similar between the groups (exposed vs. unexposed: 12.6 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.174). Treatment regimens and relative dose intensities and the progression-free survival of GnP (gemcitabine in combination with nab-paclitaxel) and mFOLFIRINOX as first- and second-line chemotherapy did not differ significantly between the two groups. Only 9.0% of patients died at home in the COVID-19-unexposed group, compared to 32.0% in the COVID-19-exposed group (p <0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that death during the COVID-19 exposed period was independently associated with home death (odds ratio: 4.536, 95% confidence interval: 2.527-8.140, p <0.001). Conclusions While the COVID-19 pandemic did not seem to influence chemotherapeutic treatment for PC patients at our institution, it had a large impact on end-of-life care. These findings may promote discussion about end-of-life care in Japan.