Gemcitabine Cisplatin Research Articles

Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment Strategies for Surgically Resectable Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Urinary Tract

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX) has been recommended as the optimal strategy in surgically resectable neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the urinary tract (NEC-URO). ObjectiveTo determine the systemic therapy regimen and timing, which are most active against NEC-URO. Design, setting, and participantsWe used our institutional historical clinical and pathological database to study 203 patients (cT2, 74%; cT3/4a, 22%; and cTx, 4%) with surgically resectable NEC-URO between November 1985 and May 2020. A total of 141 patients received neoCTX and 62 underwent initial radical surgery, 24 of whom received adjuvant CTX (adjCTX). InterventionNeoadjuvant CTX with etoposide/cisplatin (EP), an alternating doublet of ifosfamide/doxorubicin (IA) and EP, dose-dense methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC), gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC), or others. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOverall survival (OS), downstaging rate, and pathological complete response using a multivariable model adjusting for tumor- and patient-related factors. Results and limitationsDownstaging rate was significantly improved with neoCTX versus initial surgery (49.6% vs 14.5%, p < 0.0001), stage cT2N0 versus cT3/4N0 (44% vs 25%, p = 0.01), or presence of carcinoma in situ (47% vs 28%, p = 0.01). Downstaging was greatest with IA/EP (65%) versus EP (39%), MVAC/GC (27%), or others (36%, p = 0.04). After adjusting for age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, IA/EP was still associated with improved downstaging (odds ratio = 3.7 [1.3–10.2], p = 0.01). At a median follow-up of 59.7 mo, 5-yr OS rates for neoCTX followed by surgery, surgery alone, and surgery followed by adjCTX were 57%, 22%, and 30%, respectively. An NEC regimen (IA/EP or EP) versus a urothelial regimen (MVAC/GC or others) was associated with improved survival (145.4 vs 42.5 mo, hazard ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.25–0.94). ConclusionsNeoadjuvant CTX remains the standard-of-care treatment for NEC-URO with an advantage for NEC regimens over traditional urothelial regimens. IA/EP improves pathological downstaging at the time of surgery compared with EP, but is reserved for younger and higher function patients. Patient summaryIn this report, we looked at the outcomes from invasive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract in a large US population. We found that the outcomes varied with treatment strategy. We conclude that the best outcomes are seen in patients treated with chemotherapy prior to surgery and regimens tailored to histology and tolerance.

Prospective Efficacy of Two Cycles Toripalimab Plus Induction Chemotherapy in T4 or N3 Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective and Mechanistic Study

Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) as the most commonly used induction chemotherapy is the standard first-line systemic treatment for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the toxicity of three cycles induction chemotherapy following on chemoradiotherapy remains a pertinent issue. Additional monoclonal antibody against human programmed death-1 (PD-1) has shown promising efficacy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In this study, we compared three cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin as classical induction chemotherapy with two cycles of induction chemotherapy plus toripalimab, and then both groups treated with the similar concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging T4 or N3 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine (at a dose of 1 g per square meter of body-surface area on days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin (80 mg per square meter on day 1-3), administered every 3 weeks for three cycles, or GP combined with toripalimab (at a dose of 240mg) for two cycles. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (i.e., freedom from disease recurrence [distant metastasis or locoregional recurrence] or death from any cause) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included overall survival, treatment adherence, and safety. A total of 60 patients were included in the trial (30 patients in the toripalimab combined induction chemotherapy group and another 30 in the standard-therapy group). Among 60 patients evaluable for response assessment after induction therapy, all patients had overall response in combined group, including 10 patients (30%) with complete response (CR) in the primary tumor site. 21 patients (70%) were evaluated as partial response (PR) in the standard induction chemotherapy, and another 9 patients were assessed as SDa. At a median follow-up of 27.6 months, the 6-months, 1-, 2-year recurrence-free survival was 100% vs 86.7%, 100% vs 80%, 93% vs 70% in the toripalimab combined induction chemotherapy group and standard-therapy group (stratified hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.87; P = 0.001). Overall survival at 2 years was 93.3% and 100%, respectively (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.79). The incidence of acute adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 76.8% in the standard-induction chemotherapy group and 56% in the standard-therapy group, with a higher incidence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, and vomiting in the induction chemotherapy group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 late toxic effects was 10.2% in the induction chemotherapy group and 10.4% in the combined-therapy group. Two cycles of toripalimab combined with induction chemotherapy of and CCRT shows excellent distant metastatic control with acceptable safety, which is a new promising and effective systemic therapy regimen for high-risk of metastatic NPC patients.

Comparison analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib or gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly aggressive primary liver cancer, with increasing incidence worldwide. Effective first-line treatments for advanced ICC patients are currently limited. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) and lenvatinib as first-line treatment in advanced ICC patients. This retrospective cohort study included 51 advanced ICC patients, among whom 25 patients were administered with PD-1/PD-L1 plus lenvatinib and 26 patients were administered with PD-1/PD-L1 plus GC. Baseline characteristics including demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and imaging examination were collected. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and sixth- and ninth-month overall survival (OS) rate. Survival curve was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportion risk model was performed to investigate independent risk factors of PFS and OS. The secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events. The median age of advanced ICC patients in our study was 58.0 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 48.0-72.4) years, with 33 male and 18 female patients. Patients in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib group were more likely to be in ECOG grade above 1, develop ascites, and have an elevated level of ALT. The ORR was 16.0% in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib group and 23.1% in the GC group (p = 0.777). The DCR was 52.0% in the lenvatinib group and 46.2% in the GC group (p = 0.676). The combination treatment of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib was associated with longer PFS than the GC group; however, it was not statistically significant (lenvatinib: 9.5 months, GC: 5.1 months, p = 0.454). The sixth-month and ninth-month OS rates were 82.0% and 76.9% in the lenvatinib group and 87.4% and 71.5% in the GC group. After adjusting for confounders, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that ECOG grade above 1 was an independent risk factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]= 3.388, 95% CI = 1.312-8.746, p = 0.012) and OS (HR = 4.220, 95% CI = 1.131-15.742, p = 0.032). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib or GC all demonstrated significant efficacy and safety as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ICC. As for patients who refuse or are intolerant to chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 plus lenvatinib would be recommended.

Disitamab vedotin in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for locally and locally advanced bladder urothelial carcinoma: a two-center's real-world study.

Objective: Our study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of Disitamab Vedotin (DV, RC48-ADC), an innovative humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with tubulin-disrupting antimitotic drug monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) via a cleavable peptide linker. This treatment combined immune checkpoint inhibitors as part of the bladder sparing approach for selected patients suffering from locally and locally advanced bladder urothelial carcinoma. Patients and methods: We conducted a two-center, real-world study involving locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients. Patients were classified based on HER2 expression (IHC 3+/2+/1+) or lack of HER2 expression (IHC 0). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), assessed by the investigator following the criteria of RECIST V1.1. Secondary endpoints encompassed the pathological complete response rate (pCR), pathological partial response rate (pPR), and pathological stable disease (pSD), along with recurrence-free survival (RFS), the pathological downstaging rate, and the safety profile of the treatment. Results: In this study, nine patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up duration of 12.0months. The overall confirmed ORR was 88.9%, Five patients achieved a complete response (CR), and three patients achieved a partial response (PR). The radiological complete response (rCR) aligned perfectly with pCR. The median radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) spanned 12.0months (range from 8.0 to 17.0months). One patient diagnosed with disease progression (PD) underwent a radical cystectomy. The pathological stage evolved from T2N0M0 to T3aN2M0, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with a gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) combination radiotherapy. At the 9-month follow-up, neither recurrence nor metastasis was observed. The rate and intensity of complications were manageable among these patients, with no evidence of grade 4 and 5 adverse events. Conclusion: The combination of DV and PD-1 demonstrated considerable activity in the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with HER2 IHC 0/1+/2+/3+ muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), along with the longest reported median radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) to date. With an extended duration of treatment, the safety profile of DV plus PD-1 was also confirmed to be manageable.

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined With Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Different clinical trials for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma have studied different combinations of immuno-oncology in first-line treatment, but the optimal choice has not been determined. To systematically examine and compare the efficacy and safety of different immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Several electronic databases were systematically searched up to February 2023. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Three RCTs were eligible in the study. Compared with placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP), toripalimab plus GP (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.95) was significantly associated with a better OS. Tislelizumab plus GP generated best progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67), greatest improvement in 1-year PFS rate (RR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.84-5.22), and objective response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04-1.53) over the placebo plus GP. Furthermore, tislelizumab plus GP appeared to be safer than toripalimab plus GP and camrelizumab plus GP in terms of adverse events (AEs)-grade ≥3, treatment-related AEs (TRAEs)-grade ≥3, serious AEs (SAEs), treatment-related SAEs (TRSAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation of treatment. In recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus GP as first-line treatment have better survival outcomes than placebo plus GP with comparable toxicity. Toripalimab plus GP shows the best OS benefit over placebo plus GP, while tislelizumab plus GP generates the best PFS, 1-year PFS rate, ORR, and safety. Tislelizumab plus GP could be the best choice among the ICIs combined with chemotherapy regimens as first-line treatment in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Long-term Outcomes from a Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (SWOG S1314; NCT02177695)

BackgroundThe COXEN gene expression model was evaluated for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). ObjectiveTo conduct a secondary analysis of the association of each COXEN score with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) and by treatment arm. Design, setting, and participantsThis was a randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) or dose-dense methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin (ddMVAC) in MIBC. InterventionPatients were randomized to ddMVAC (every 14 d) or GC (every 21 d), both for four cycles. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisEFS events were defined as progression or death before scheduled surgery, a decision to not undergo surgery, recurrence, or death due to any cause after surgery. Cox regression was used to evaluate the COXEN score or treatment arm association with EFS and OS. Results and limitationsA total of 167 evaluable patients were included in the COXEN analysis. The COXEN scores were not significantly prognostic for OS or EFS in the respective arms, but the GC COXEN score had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.99; p = 0.047) when the arms were pooled. In the intent-to-treat analysis (n = 227), there was no significant difference between ddMVAC and GC for OS (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.54–1.40; p = 0.57) or EFS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.59–1.26; p = 0.45). Among the 192 patients who underwent surgery, pathologic response (pT0 vs downstaging vs no response) was strongly correlated with superior postsurgical survival (5-yr OS 90%, 89% and 52%, respectively). ConclusionsThe COXEN GC score has prognostic value for patients receiving cisplatin-based neoadjuvant treatment. The randomized, prospective design provides estimates of OS and EFS for GC and ddMVAC in this population. Pathologic response (<pT2) performed well as an intermediate endpoint in this modern cohort. For expediency in evaluating new regimens, pathologic response should continue to be used in phase 2 trials. Patient summaryIn this study, we evaluated a biomarker to predict the response to chemotherapy. The results did not meet the preset study parameters, but our study provides information on clinical outcomes with the use of chemotherapy before surgery for bladder cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The value of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive radiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma has been debated since the landmark publication of the Intergroup-0099 trial. 1 Al-Sarraf M LeBlanc M Giri PG et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16: 1310-1317 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar The differing views occur for two reasons: (1) early chemoradiotherapy trials in the 2000s investigated various platinum-based regimens of concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone or in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy, with both strategies showing survival benefits over radiotherapy alone; and (2) it was generally observed that platinum doublet adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy was poorly tolerated. 2 Chua MLK Wee JTS Hui EP Chan ATC Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2016; 387: 1012-1024 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (934) Google Scholar The resistance towards recommending adjuvant chemotherapy to patients in the clinic was compounded after a phase 3 trial in China showed that adjuvant cisplatin–fluorouracil chemotherapy did not significantly improve failure-free survival after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. 3 Chen L Hu CS Chen XZ et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13: 163-171 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (432) Google Scholar Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin–gemcitabine versus cisplatin–fluorouracil chemotherapy for N2–3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trialOur findings suggest that concurrent adjuvant cisplatin–gemcitabine could be used as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with N2–3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, although long-term follow-up is required to confirm the optimal therapeutic ratio. Full-Text PDF

Recent developments in perioperative combination therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

A summary of recent literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of systemic perioperative treatment combinations for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We discuss recent developments in standard and experimental treatment modalities. The VESPER trial has shown that six cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense MVAC are superior to four cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC), though it is unclear whether the superiority is derived from the specific regimen or number of cycles. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, a subject of longstanding debate, was shown to have comparable overall survival-benefit to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in an updated meta-analysis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 show encouraging results, but with no comparative studies to standard care, context is lacking. Immunotherapeutic neoadjuvant anti-CTLA-4/PD-(L)1 combinations or combinations of checkpoint inhibitors with antibody-drug-conjugates are in early stages of development and show promising preliminary results. Six cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense MVAC are superior to four cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is a viable option for patients with high-risk tumours who did not receive prior neoadjuvant treatment. The added value of anti-PD-(L)1 to chemotherapy still needs to be established. Novel developments in immunotherapy combinations, while promising, are still in an early stage and randomized studies are ongoing.

A phase II study of toripalimab combined with gemcitabine-cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

e16602 Background: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care in MIBC with improved pathologic response (PaR) and overall survival (OS) compared to radical cystectomy (RC) alone. The efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy as a new neoadjuvant treatment option for MIBC still needs further confirmation. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of toripalimab (an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) combined with gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with MIBC. Methods: Eligible pts with MIBC (cT2-T4a, N≤1, M0) who were candidates for RC were enrolled. Toripalimab (240mg, d1) combined with GC (gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 d1,d8 plus cisplatin 35mg/m2 d1,d2) every 21 days, up to 4 cycles. RC was performed within 6 weeks after the last dose treatment. The primary endpoint was PaR (≤ pT1,N0). Secondary endpoints were PFS at 2 years and safety. Results: Between Apr 2021 and Jun 2022, 16 pts (4 pts cT2, 11 pts cT3, 1 pts cT4) were enrolled and received 4 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, with median age of 63.5 and 75% male. 14 of the 16 pts underwent RC and two declined RC. Among 14 evaluable pts, PaR ≤pT1N0 was achieved in 12 pts (85.71%, 4 were pT0, 8 were pT1/a/is). Survival data are not yet mature. The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade were anemia (14/16; 87.5%) and nausea/vomiting (11/16; 68.75%). One had Grade≥3 AEs (hemorrhagic shock) while on study that was unrelated to GC or toripalimab. Five pts experienced grade 1-2 immune related AEs, including thyroiditis (3/16, 18.75%) and rash (2/16,12.5%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant toripalimab combined with GC showed promising safety and efficacy in MIBC with significant pathologic downstaging rates. Clinical trial information: NCT04861584 .

Trastuzumab (T) plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) for treatment naïve HER2 positive biliary tract adenocarcinomas (BTC): A multicentre open-label, phase II study (TAB).

4089 Background: HER2 over-expression or amplification is seen in 4%-16% of BTCs and is a therapeutic target of interest. Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) is one of the standard regimens of choice in advanced BTCs. We aimed to evaluate the clinical activity of GC plus anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab as initial treatment in HER2-positive BTC. Methods: This study was an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, multi institutional, phase II trial in patients (pts) aged 18 years or older with HER2-positive (defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ and FISH positive), treatment naïve BTCs. Patients received GC (Gem 1000 mg/m2 IV and Cisplatin 25mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 8, q 3 weeks) combined with Trastuzumab at 8mg/kg as initial dose followed by 6mg/kg q 3 -weekly till disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicities. The primary end-point of the study was an improvement in 6-month progression free survival (PFS) from 40% (historical cohort) to 60% in the study arm. Next generation sequencing to evaluate HER2 and other mutations was conducted on the tissue samples of the patients screened for this study. Results: From March 2020 to August 2022, of the 876 patients were screened for HER2 status, 118 (13.4%) were found to have HER2 positive status and 90 of them were enrolled into the study. A majority of patients had GBC (95.6%) and at-least 2 sites of metastatic disease beyond primary (77.8%). With a median follow up of 8.5 months, 72 patients had PD and the median PFS was 7.95 months (95% CI: 6.84 -9.06; median overall survival (OS) was 9.95 months (95% CI: 9.25 – 10.66). Partial responses (PR) were seen in 8 patients (8.9%) and 61 had stable disease (67.7%) for a disease control rate of 76.6%. Common chemotherapy-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were anemia [26 (28.9%)], neutropenia [18(20%)] and thrombocytopenia [8(8.9%)] while one patient has Trastuzumab related asymptomatic fall in cardiac ejection fraction (&gt;=10%). The presence of isolated TP53 mutations predicted for inferior PFS compared to patients with other mutations (TERT promoter, HER2, PIK3CA etc) or no detected mutations (6.51 months vs. 12.02 months vs. 10.58 months; p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: The combination of GC and trastuzumab shows near doubling of survival in treatment naive HER2 positive BTC in a prospective manner for the first time and sets the stage for a larger phase III trial with the combination. Evaluating mutations like TP53, HER2, TERT promoter and PIK3CA along with HER2 testing could be considered as a preferred modality to select these patients for anti HER2 therapy. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2019/11/021955 . [Table: see text]

Final overall survival analysis of JUPITER-02: A phase 3 study of toripalimab versus placebo in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

6009 Background: There are currently no FDA-approved IO therapies for NPC. Toripalimab in combination with Gemcitabine-Cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy had shown significant improvement over chemotherapy alone in progression-free survival (PFS) as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic (r/m) NPC at the interim PFS analysis of JUPITER-02 (NCT03581786) study. The final overall survival (OS) analysis results are summarized here. Methods: Patients with r/m NPC (n = 289) were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab 240 mg (n = 146) or placebo (n = 143) in combination with GP once every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 6 cycles, followed by monotherapy with toripalimab or placebo Q3W until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Stratification factors were ECOG performance score (0 vs. 1) and extent of disease (recurrent vs. primary metastatic) at enrollment. The primary endpoint was PFS by an independent review committee. Secondary endpoints included OS and safety. Results: By the cutoff date of Nov 18, 2022, when 133 events were reached for the final OS analysis, the median survival follow up was 30.1 months. A significant improvement in OS was observed for the toripalimab arm over the placebo arm: HR = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.89), two-sided p = 0.0083. The median OS was not reached in the toripalimab arm and was 33.7 months in the placebo arm. The 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 78.0% vs. 65.1%, and 64.5% vs. 49.2% respectively. A consistent effect on OS, favoring the toripalimab arm, was observed in nearly all subgroups, including PD-L1 high and PD-L1 low expression subgroups. No new safety signals were identified in the toripalimab arm since the interim report. The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (89.7% vs 90.2%) and fatal AEs (3.4% vs 2.8%) were similar between two arms. However, AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (11.6% vs 4.9%), immune-related (irAEs) (54.1% vs. 21.7%) and Grade ≥3 irAEs (9.6% vs. 1.4%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to GP chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for r/m NPC provided clinically important and highly significant OS advantage over GP alone with a manageable safety profile. These results support the use of toripalimab with GP chemotherapy as the new standard care for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03581786 .

A phase III randomized trial of eribulin (E) with or without gemcitabine vs standard of care (SOC) for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) refractory to or ineligible for PD/PDL1 antibody (Ab): SWOG S1937.

TPS4608 Background: UC is 2nd most common genitourinary cancer. Current SOC offers platinum-based (PB) first line chemotherapy (chemo) with ddMVAC or gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) regimens. For cisplatin ineligible patients (pts), SOC includes gemcitabine-carboplatin (GCa), and in select pts pembrolizumab. Erdafitinib is approved for pts with FGFR alterations and Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is approved for previously treated pts. A phase I/II CTEP study of eribulin (E) for metastatic UC (mUC) established the activity of E in UC with objective response rate (ORR) of 37.5% and a median progression free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months (mo) and median overall survival (OS) of 9.5 mo (N=150). A phase II CTEP study of gemcitabine-eribulin (GE) in cisplatin ineligible mUC showed an ORR of 50%, median OS of 11.9 mo and median PFS of 5.3 mo (N=24). The most common Grade 3-4 toxicities included: neutropenia 63%, anemia and fatigue 29%. Pts with liver metastases benefited from therapy with 5 responders in 7 pts for GE vs 12 out 49 E. Methods: This is a phase III, randomized 3 arm study comparing E vs. GE vs. SOC (docetaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine). E is given at 1.4mg/m2 on day (D) 1 and 8 of a 21 D cycle. In the GE arm, gemcitabine is added to E at 1000 mg/m2 dose to D1 and D8. SOC follows standard dosing of the agents. There is no limit to the number/sequence of prior regimens. A simplified summary of eligibility criteria is presented here. All pts must have: received frontline systemic treatment such as PB chemo or a non-platinum regimen; received PD1/PDL1 Ab or be deemed ineligible for PD1/PDL1 Ab; received EV. Assuming a median OS for the SOC arm of 7 mo the study seeks to find at least a 50% increase in median OS to 10.5 mo (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.667). One-sided 0.0125 type I error to account for testing of two primary hypotheses (Each arm vs. SOC). 87% power to detect a 3.5 mo improvement in OS. We require 140 eligible (155 total) pts in each arm for a total of 465. The study was activated in Feb 2021 and accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04579224 .

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with de novo urothelial carcinoma: thirty years of experience from a single center

BackgroundDe novo urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a leading cause of death after kidney transplant (KT). The efficacy of various treatments, apart from surgery, and the prognosis for patients with urothelial carcinoma after kidney transplantation remain unclear.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the efficacy of chemotherapy with gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC) or gemcitabine + carboplatin (GCa), bladder infusion chemotherapy, and immunosuppression therapy for de novo UC in kidney transplantation recipients at different sites and T stages. We evaluated the prognosis and compared the difference using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test.ResultsOf the 97 kidney transplantation recipients with de novo UC, 51 (52.6%) were diagnosed with upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC), 17 (17.5%) with bladder carcinoma (BC), and 29 (29.9%) with both UTUC and BC. The five-year survival rates for BC, UTUC, and BC + UTUC with ≤ T1 stage were 100%, 88.2%, and 57.7%, respectively, while the survival rates for UTUC, BC + UTUC with ≥ T2 stage were 90.2% and 48.2%. Cyclosporine A significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in UTUC with ≤ T1 stage (p = 0.017). Rapamycin significantly improved PFS in UTUC with ≥ T2 stage (p = 0.026). Bladder infusion chemotherapy and GC/GCa chemotherapy had no significant effect on each T stage and site. Patients with UTUC + BC had the poorest overall survival (OS) compared with those with BC and UTUC.ConclusionThe prognosis of UC in different sites varies. GC/GCa chemotherapy and bladder infusion chemotherapy appear to have no effect on prognosis. Rapamycin can delay the progression of advanced UTUC.

PD36-08 PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOLLOWING NEOADJUVANT GEMCITABINE, CISPLATIN AND ATEZOLIZUMAB

PD36-08 PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOLLOWING NEOADJUVANT GEMCITABINE, CISPLATIN AND ATEZOLIZUMAB

MP32-04 GEMCITABINE–CISPLATIN VERSUS MVAC CHEMOTHERAPY IN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA: A NATIONWIDE COHORT STUDY

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP32-04 GEMCITABINE–CISPLATIN VERSUS MVAC CHEMOTHERAPY IN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA: A NATIONWIDE COHORT STUDY Se Young Choi, Jong Hyun Tae, Byung Hoon Chi, In Ho Chang, Tae-Hyoung Kim, Soon Chul Myung, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin Wook Kim, and Yong Seong Lee Se Young ChoiSe Young Choi More articles by this author , Jong Hyun TaeJong Hyun Tae More articles by this author , Byung Hoon ChiByung Hoon Chi More articles by this author , In Ho ChangIn Ho Chang More articles by this author , Tae-Hyoung KimTae-Hyoung Kim More articles by this author , Soon Chul MyungSoon Chul Myung More articles by this author , Jung Hoon KimJung Hoon Kim More articles by this author , Jin Wook KimJin Wook Kim More articles by this author , and Yong Seong LeeYong Seong Lee More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003265.04AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the trends in methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) and gemcitabine–cisplatin (GC) regimens in Korean patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) and compared the side effects and overall survival (OS) rates of the two regimens using nationwide population-based data. METHODS: The data of patients diagnosed with UC between 2004 and 2016 were collected using the National Health Insurance Service database. The overall treatment trends were assessed according to the chemotherapy regimens. The MVAC and GC groups were matched by propensity scores. Cox proportional hazard analysis and Kaplan–Meier analysis were performed to assess survival. RESULTS: Of 3,108 patients with UC, 2,880 patients were treated with GC and 228 (7.3%) were treated with MVAC. The transfusion rate and volume were similar in both the groups, but the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) usage rate and number were higher in the MVAC group than in the GC group. Both groups had similar OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that the chemotherapy regimen was not a significant factor for OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that a period of ≥3 months from diagnosis to systemic therapy enhanced the prognostic effects of the GC regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The GC regimen was widely used as the first-line chemotherapy in more than 90% of our study population with metastatic UC. The MVAC regimen showed similar OS to the GC regimen but needed greater use of G-CSF. The GC regimen could be a suitable treatment option for metastatic UC after ≥3 months from diagnosis. Source of Funding: This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2022R1A2C2008207) © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e441 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Se Young Choi More articles by this author Jong Hyun Tae More articles by this author Byung Hoon Chi More articles by this author In Ho Chang More articles by this author Tae-Hyoung Kim More articles by this author Soon Chul Myung More articles by this author Jung Hoon Kim More articles by this author Jin Wook Kim More articles by this author Yong Seong Lee More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Gemcitabine–cisplatin versus MVAC chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide cohort study

This study assessed the trends in methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) and gemcitabine–cisplatin (GC) regimens in Korean patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) and compared the side effects and overall survival (OS) rates of the two regimens using nationwide population-based data. The data of patients diagnosed with UC between 2004 and 2016 were collected using the National Health Insurance Service database. The overall treatment trends were assessed according to the chemotherapy regimens. The MVAC and GC groups were matched by propensity scores. Cox proportional hazard analysis and Kaplan–Meier analysis were performed to assess survival. Of 3108 patients with UC, 2,880 patients were treated with GC and 228 (7.3%) were treated with MVAC. The transfusion rate and volume were similar in both the groups, but the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) usage rate and number were higher in the MVAC group than in the GC group. Both groups had similar OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that the chemotherapy regimen was not a significant factor for OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that a period of ≥ 3 months from diagnosis to systemic therapy enhanced the prognostic effects of the GC regimen. The GC regimen was widely used as the first-line chemotherapy in more than 90% of our study population with metastatic UC. The MVAC regimen showed similar OS to the GC regimen but needed greater use of G-CSF. The GC regimen could be a suitable treatment option for metastatic UC after ≥ 3 months from diagnosis.

First Evidence of Activity of Enfortumab Vedotin on Brain Metastases in Urothelial Cancer Patients

Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate directed against Nectin-4, significantly prolonged survival compared to standard chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. The overall response rate in the phase 3 EV301 trial leading to approval was 40.6%. However, no data have been published yet regarding the effect of EV on brain metastases. Here, we present three patients from different centers with brain metastases receiving EV. A 58-year-old white male patient, who had been heavily pretreated for urothelial carcinoma with visceral metastases and a solitary clinically active brain metastasis, started on EV 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. After three cycles, the first evaluation showed a partial remission by RECIST v1.1, with a near complete response on the brain metastasis and disappearance of neurological symptoms. The patient is currently still receiving EV. A second, 74-year-old male patient started on the same regimen, after previous progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and avelumab in maintenance. The patient achieved a complete response and received therapy for five months. Nevertheless, therapy was discontinued at the patient's request. Shortly after, he developed new leptomeningeal metastases. Upon rechallenge with EV, there was a significant reduction in the diffuse meningeal infiltration. A third, 50-year-old white male patient also received EV after previous progression on cisplatin-gemcitabine and atezolizumab maintenance, followed by palliative whole-brain radiotherapy and two cycles of vinflunine. After three cycles of EV, there was a significant reduction in the brain metastases. The patient is currently still receiving EV. These are the first reports on the efficacy of EV in patients with urothelial carcinoma and active brain metastases.

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of bladder (MIBC): A combined retrospective analysis of two prospective studies.

496 Background: Bladder preservation CRT in patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is one of the promising treatment strategies for MIBC. A combined analysis of raw data from two prospective phase II studies was performed to better evaluate the feasibility of selective bladder preservation CRT. Methods: The analysis was based on primary efficacy data from two independent studies, including 76 MIBC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by bladder preservation CRT. The efficacy data included metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). For the present analysis, starting point of survivals was defined as the date of commencing CRT. Results: Sixty-four patients received gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) combination chemotherapy in neoadjuvant setting, and 12 received nivolumab plus GC. After completion of planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 66 patients with a cCR and 10 who did not have a cCR but refused surgery were treated with CRT. With a median follow-up of 45 (95% CI, 41-48) months, a total of 39 recurrences was observed (51%): metastatic (n=28) and within the urinary tract (n=11). Median DFS or MFS was not reached. The 12- and 24-month DFS rates were 81% and 66%, respectively. MFS rates at 12- and 24-month were 87% and 75%, respectively. Both DFS (P=0.055) and MFS (P=0.014; HR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.85) appeared to be affected by the achievement of a cCR. Conclusions: The strategy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation CRT based on the cCR is feasible in the treatment of MIBC.

A phase III randomized trial of eribulin (E) with or without gemcitabine vs standard of care (SOC) for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) refractory to or ineligible for PD/PDL1 antibody (Ab): SWOG S1937.

TPS581 Background: UC is 2nd most common genitourinary cancer. Current SOC offers platinum-based (PB) first line chemotherapy (chemo) with ddMVAC or gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) regimens. For cisplatin ineligible patients (pts), SOC includes gemcitabine-carboplatin (GCa), and in select pts pembrolizumab. Erdafitinib is approved for pts with FGFR alterations and Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is approved for previously treated pts. A phase I/II CTEP study of eribulin (E) for metastatic UC (mUC) established the activity of E in UC with objective response rate (ORR) of 37.5% and a median progression free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months (mo) and median overall survival (OS) of 9.5 mo (N=150). A phase II CTEP study of gemcitabine-eribulin (GE) in cisplatin ineligible mUC showed an ORR of 50%, median OS of 11.9 mo and median PFS of 5.3 mo (N=24). The most common Grade 3-4 toxicities included: neutropenia 63%, anemia and fatigue 29%. Pts with liver metastases benefited from therapy with 5 responders in 7 pts for GE vs 12 out 49 E. Methods: This is a phase III, randomized 3 arm study comparing E vs. GE vs. SOC (docetaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine). E is given at 1.4mg/m2 on day (D) 1 and 8 of a 21 D cycle. In the GE arm, gemcitabine is added to E at 1000 mg/m2 dose to D1 and D8. SOC follows standard dosing of the agents. There is no limit to the number/sequence of prior regimens. A simplified summary of eligibility criteria is presented here. All pts must have: received frontline systemic treatment such as PB chemo or a non-platinum regimen; received PD1/PDL1 Ab or be deemed ineligible for PD1/PDL1 Ab; received EV. Assuming a median OS for the SOC arm of 7 mo the study seeks to find at least a 50% increase in median OS to 10.5 mo (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.667). One-sided 0.0125 type I error to account for testing of two primary hypotheses (Each arm vs. SOC). 87% power to detect a 3.5 mo improvement in OS. We require 140 eligible (155 total) pts in each arm for a total of 465. The study was activated in Feb 2021 and accrual is ongoing. Funding: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819. Clinical trial information: NCT04579224 .

Genomic analysis from BLASST-1 (Bladder Cancer Signal Seeking Trial) of nivolumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in patients with MIBC undergoing cystectomy.

559 Background: BLASST-1 is multi-center phase II trial evaluating neoadjuvant nivolumab (N) with gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) for patients (pts) with MIBC undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) (NCT03294304). 41 pts with MIBC (cT2-T4a, N≤1, M0) were enrolled between Feb 2018 and June 2019; (cT2N0 90%, cT3N0 7%, cT4N1 3%). Pts received C (70mg/m2) IV on D1, G (1000mg/m2) on D1, D8 and N (360 mg) IV on D8 every 21 days for 4 cycles followed by RC within 8 wks. Primary endpoint was pathologic down staging (PaR; ≤pT1N0). Safety, Relapse-free survival (RFS), Progression-free survival (PFS) and biomarker analyses were secondary endpoints. PaR rate was 65.8%, pCR (≤pT is N0) rate was 49% and there were no safety concerns or delays to RC. At a median follow-up of 15.8 mos, 12-month RFS rate was 85.4% and PFS including death from any cause was 83%. We now report correlation of PaR with tumor mutation patterns of responders (R) and non-responders (NR) using Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS). Methods: DNA was extracted from pre-treatment tumor samples and sequenced to an average depth of 150X and DNA extracted from matched normal tissue (peripheral blood) to a mean depth of 50X. We analyzed 32 Tumor/Normal pairs and 6 Tumor only Whole Genome Samples; 26 pts were classified as (R) and 12 as (NR). Raw sequencing data samples were aligned to hg38 genome build using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) followed by duplicate-read removal and base-quality score recalibration using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK). Somatic SNV and INDELS were called by combination of 5 callers (Mutect2, Strelka, VarScan, Platypus and SomaticSniper) for Tumor/Normal pairs and Mutect2 for Tumor only samples following the guidelines of GDC DNA-Seq analysis pipeline. Set of genes known to be significantly mutated in MIBC and shown to impact response/resistance to chemotherapy/immunotherapy respectively were selected. Samples were grouped by response status. Results: Median tumor mutational burden (TMB) for the dataset closely matches with TCGA results. Genes ERCC2, ARID1A, DSP, HMCN1, ERBB2, ERBB3, STAG2, BRCA2 present in (R) only, whereas VHL, ERCC4, PALB2, CDKN2A and CSMD3 present in (NR) only. We also grouped genes based on their biological processes by known Oncogenic Signaling Pathways and the 3 most common pathways are Genome Integrity, RTK Signaling and Transcription Factor with the latter two primarily enriched in (R). We identified a SNP rs2853669 in 5 (NR) and 14 (R). Conclusions: The genomic analysis suggests ERCC2, ARID1A, DSP, HMCN1, ERBB2, ERBB3,STAG2, BRCA2 correlated with PaR and VHL, ERCC4, PALB2, CDKN2A and CSMD3 correlated with lack of response. In addition, RTK Signaling and Transcription Factor were primarily enriched in (R). This genomic correlation of response/resistance to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in MIBC can help guide future biomarker-driven studies. Clinical trial information: NCT03294304 .