Gastrointestinal Events In Patients Research Articles

Pharmacogenomics of the Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine in COLCOT.

The randomized, placebo-controlled COLCOT (Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial) has shown the benefits of colchicine 0.5 mg daily to lower the rate of ischemic cardiovascular events in patients with a recent myocardial infarction. Here, we conducted a post hoc pharmacogenomic study of COLCOT with the aim to identify genetic predictors of the efficacy and safety of treatment with colchicine. There were 1522 participants of European ancestry from the COLCOT trial available for the pharmacogenomic study of COLCOT trial. The pharmacogenomic study's primary cardiovascular end point was defined as for the main trial, as time to first occurrence of cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina requiring coronary revascularization. The safety end point was time to the first report of gastrointestinal events. Patients' DNA was genotyped using the Illumina Global Screening array followed by imputation. We performed a genome-wide association study in colchicine-treated patients. None of the genetic variants passed the genome-wide association study significance threshold for the primary cardiovascular end point conducted in 702 patients in the colchicine arm who were compliant to medication. The genome-wide association study for gastrointestinal events was conducted in all 767 patients in the colchicine arm and found 2 significant association signals, one with lead variant rs6916345 (hazard ratio, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.52-2.35], P=7.41×10-9) in a locus which colocalizes with Crohn disease, and one with lead variant rs74795203 (hazard ratio, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.82-3.47]; P=2.70×10-8), an intronic variant in gene SEPHS1. The interaction terms between the genetic variants and treatment with colchicine versus placebo were significant. We found 2 genomic regions associated with gastrointestinal events in patients treated with colchicine. Those findings will benefit from replication to confirm that some patients may have genetic predispositions to lower tolerability of treatment with colchicine.

Adverse gastrointestinal events with sodium polystyrene sulphonate and calcium polystyrene sulphonate use in dialysis patients: a nationwide registry study.

Sodium polystyrene sulphonate (SPS) and calcium polystyrene sulphonate (CPS) are commonly used cation-exchange resins for the treatment and control of hyperkalaemia. However, their use (particularly SPS) has been limited by reports of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) events. The safety of these compounds in patients undergoing dialysis requires larger investigation. To study the occurrence of adverse GI events (occlusion, perforation, thrombosis/ischaemia) in the periods of SPS or CPS exposition versus the periods without exposition in dialysis patients. Dialysis patients were extracted from the French National Registry and merged with the French hospital discharge database (between 2006 and 2017). For our primary analysis, we used patients who had any claim of SPS use (n = 43 771). Time-varying Cox models, negative binomial regression and pre- versus post-treatment average treatment effects. The mean age was 66 ± 15 years, 37% were female and 92% were undergoing haemodialysis. Over a 1-year follow-up, patients on periods with SPS (on-SPS) did not present an increased risk of adverse GI events versus the periods without SPS (off-SPS): incidence rate (IR)(per 1000person years) = 7.4 (6.4-8.7) versus 9.5 (8.1-11.0); adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.60-1.09), P = 0.17. Patients exposed to SPS did not experience a higher rate of adverse GI events in the year after SPS initiation versus the year before SPS initiation; P-value for parallel trend = 0.87. Patients on-CPS also did not show an increased risk of adverse GI events versus off-CPS: IR (per 1000py) = 8.6 (5.1-11.9) versus 7.8 (5.1-11.9); adjusted HR (95% CI) = 0.76 (0.31-1.80), P = 0.52. The rates of adverse GI events in the periods on and off exposure were also similar over a follow-up of 5 years. Our large, nationwide study shows that the incidence of adverse GI events in patients undergoing dialysis was low and that neither the use of SPS nor CPS was associated with increased GI events risk.

Gastrointestinal risk of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastroprotective agents used in the treatment of osteoarthritis in elderly patients: A nationwide retrospective cohort study .

Osteoarthritis is highly prevalent in older adults and often treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). COX-2-selective NSAIDs have been shown to offer better gastrointestinal (GI) safety benefits than non-selective NSAIDs (ns-NSAIDs). However, most COX-2-selective NSAIDs have not been comprehensively evaluated for use in combination with gastroprotective agents (GPAs). This study compared the risk of adverse GI events in patients treated with COX-2-selective NSAIDs and ns-NSAIDs alone, or in combination with GPAs. We utilized National Health Insurance Claim Data collected from 2012 to 2015. Newly diagnosed patients with osteoarthritis (60 years or older) were included in this study. The study population was divided into two groups: 1) COX-2-selective NSAID treatment and 2) ns-NSAIDs treatment. Patients were followed-up for up to 6 months to determine whether GI events occurred. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify differences in risk. Subgroup analyses were conducted for monotherapies and combination treatments with GPAs. The number of subjects prescribed COX-2-selective NSAID and ns-NSAIDs were 20,868 (5.6%) and 353,494 (94.4%), respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors, COX-2-selective NSAID were safer than ns-NSAIDs (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.82). Use of GPAs with COX-2-selective NSAID was associated with a lower risk of GI events than use of ns-NSAIDs (aHR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97). Use of COX-2-selective NSAID was associated with a lower risk of GI adverse events than use of ns-NSAIDs as a monotherapy. Furthermore, COX-2-selective NSAID were safer than ns-NSAIDs in combination with GPAs. .

Real-world Strategies for Management of Gastrointestinal Events in Patients Treated with Delayed-release Dimethyl Fumarate: EFFECT Gastrointestinal Sub-study Results

Introduction Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) associated with DMF can result in premature treatment discontinuation. Objectives To characterize effective real-world patient education and management strategies at sites initiating treatment with delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF), as well as the impact of GI events on treatment persistence. Patients and methods EFFECT ( NCT02776072 ) is a retrospective study of patients age ≥ 18 treated with DMF in the clinical practice setting. Data were captured via retrospective medical record review at a single time point. Sites completed a structured questionnaire regarding typical GI management practices at the center using a scale of 0%, > 0–25%, > 25%–75%, and > 75%–100%. Results Overall, 826 DMF-treated patients were enrolled at 65 sites; 809 were eligible for analysis. Over Year 1, incidence of GI events was 27% (216/809). Sites reporting that counseling was likely to occur by both the prescriber and an additional health care provider had lower discontinuation rates vs. sites that did not (2% [6/286] vs. 7% [33/495]). Discussion Sites with lower vs. higher discontinuation rates were also likely to provide patients specific details regarding GI events (5% [33/693] vs. 10% [11/116]), recommend taking DMF with food (5% [39/750] vs. 9% [5/59]), or recommend using symptomatic GI therapies (3% [15/469] vs. 9% [29/340]). Conclusion Overall, treatment persistence was high in this study, potentially due to most sites reporting a high likelihood of counseling and mitigation strategy recommendations for potential DMF-related GI events.

Meta-analysis on safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy combining with proton pump inhibitors for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective: To analyze the impact of dual antiplatelet (DAPT) therapy combining with or without proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on the main outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant literature and the references obtained from these sources were retrieved manually from inception till September 2017. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established follow the Cochrane review standard. A total of 977 literatures were included, 193 duplicates were excluded, 74 reviews, case reports, letters and systematic reviews were excluded, 667 literatures were excluded after reading the title and abstract, 34 literatures were excluded due to non-randomized control studies and unrelated outcome indicators, and 9 literatures were finally included with a total of 16 589 patients. RevMan 5.3 software was used to compare the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiogenic death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, all-cause death, stent thrombosis, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding and gastrointestinal events in patients with DAPT combining with or without PPI after PCI. Results: MACE was observed in 8 out of the 9 included literatures, and the results showed that MACE occurred in 561 out of 6 282 patients receiving DAPT combining with PPI therapy and in 951 out of 9 632 patients using DAPT alone (OR=1.15, 95%CI 0.88-1.51, P>0.05). Cardiogenic death was observed in 7 out of the 9 included literatures, and the results showed that cardiogenic death occurred in 172 out of 6 453 patients receiving DAPT combining with PPI treatment and in 321 out of the 9 839 patients using DAPT alone (OR=0.97, 95%CI 0.80-1.18, P>0.05). Recurrent myocardial infarction was observed in 7 out of the 9 included literatures, the results showed 416 out of 6 282 cases in DAPT combining with PPI therapy group experienced recurrent myocardial infarction and 691 out of 9 632 cases in DAPT group experienced recurrent myocardial infarction (OR=1.01, 95%CI 0.89-1.16, P>0.05). Four out of 9 literatures observed revascularization. The results showed that revascularization was performed in 64 out of 2 173 patients receiving DAPT combining with PPI therapy and in 105 out of the 2 770 patients using DAPT alone (OR=1.33, 95%CI 0.55-3.24, P>0.05). All-cause death was observed in 7 out of the 9 included literatures, and the results showed that all-cause death occurred in 172 out of the 6 453 patients in DAPT combining with PPI therapy group and in 321 out of the 9 839 patients using DAPT alone (OR=0.97, 95%CI 0.80-1.18, P>0.05). Three out of the 9 included articles observed stent thrombosis, and the results showed that stent thrombosis occurred in 99 out of 2 997 patients receiving DAPT combining with PPI therapy and in 245 out of the 6 198 patients treated with DAPT (OR=1.07, 95%CI 0.83-1.37, P>0.05). Stroke was observed in 2 out of the 9 included literatures. The results showed that stroke occurred in 5 out of 2 019 patients receiving DAPT combining with PPI therapy, and in 4 out of the 2 033 patients treated with DAPT (OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.29-3.49, P>0.05). Gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 6 out of the 9 included literatures. The results showed that gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 26 out of 3 517 patients receiving DAPT combined with PPI therapy, and in 93 out of the 3 506 patients treated with DAPT, gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly lower in the DAPT combining with PPI group than DAPT alone group (OR=0.27, 95%CI 0.17-0.41, P<0.01). Gastrointestinal events were reported in 6 out of the 9 included articles. Similarly, gastrointestinal events were observed in 51 out of 3 517 patients receiving DAPT combined with PPI therapy, and in 190 out of the 3 506 patients treated with DAPT alone, the incidence of gastrointestinal events in the DAPT combined with PPI group was significantly lower than DAPT alone group (OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.14-0.42, P<0.01). Conclusions: The incidence of MACE, cardiogenic death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, all-cause death, stent thrombosis and stroke are not affected by DAPT combined with PPI therapy after PCI, while the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and gastrointestinal events could be reduced by adding PPI to DAPT in patients undergoing PCI.

Reduction in postpercutaneous coronary intervention angina in addition to gastrointestinal events in patients on combined proton pump inhibitors and dual antiplatelet therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can potentially attenuate the antiplatelet effects of P2Y12 inhibitors with associated adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Medline was searched using Pubmed from inception to 8 November 2017 for randomized control trials studying the effect of PPIs on coronary artery disease with concomitant use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Overall, 692 studies were identified of which five randomized control trials were included. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan, version 5.3. Five studies with 6239 patients (3113 on PPI with DAPT and 3126 with only DAPT) were included. Our analysis showed that PPI significantly reduced the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) bleed [22 vs. 66, odds ratio (OR)=0.37, confidence interval (CI)=0.23-0.61, P≤0.0001, I=0%], GI ulcers and GI erosions (7 vs. 18, OR=0.39, CI=0.16-0.94, P=0.04, I=0%), and the incidence of post-PCI unstable angina in patients treated with PPI and P2Y12 agents (46 vs. 67, OR=0.67, CI=0.45-0.99, P=0.05, I=0%). There was an insignificant difference in myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular cause of mortality. A trend toward decreased all-cause mortality with PPIs was noted. Heterogeneity was calculated using I. Concomitantly administered PPIs with P2Y12 inhibitors have a protective effect on the GI events. It also decreases the post-PCI angina without increased adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Events During Lapatinib Therapy: A Meta-Analysis From 12,402 Patients With Cancer.

Lapatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as an anticancer therapeutic agent, has adverse events associated with treatment resulting in noncompliance and withdrawal from the therapy. Here, we performed meta-analysis of published clinical trials to determine relative risk (RR) and incidence of gastrointestinal events during lapatinib therapy in patients with cancer. A comprehensive literature search was performed and summary incidence, RR, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of trials. Thirty-six trials with 12,402 patients were included; summary incidences of all-grade gastrointestinal events in patients with cancer were diarrhea 57.8%, nausea 30.8%, and vomiting 19.6%. Lapatinib combination with chemotherapy or any anti-HER2 mAbs were associated with significant risk of all-grade diarrhea [(RR 3.64, 95% CI, 2.96-4.49), (RR 2.89, 95% CI, 2.21-3.79), respectively] and high-grade diarrhea [(RR 11.25, 95% CI, 7.31-17.33), (RR 9.96, 95% CI, 7.23-13.72), respectively], and lapatinib combination with chemotherapy group showed a significantly increased risk of all-grade nausea (RR 1.54, 95% CI, 1.25-1.89). Lapatinib combination with chemotherapy or any anti-HER2 mAbs were associated with significant risk of all-grade vomiting [(RR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.12-1.93), (RR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.11-1.52), respectively]. Lapatinib combination with any anti-HER2 mAbs was associated with a significant risk of high-grade vomiting (RR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.41-3.61). This study revealed a significantly increased risk of diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in patients with cancer receiving lapatinib, suggesting that appropriate clinical intervention and gastrointestianal protective agents should be emphasized.

Real-world Strategies for Management of Gastrointestinal Events in Patients Treated with Delayed-release Dimethyl Fumarate: EFFECT Gastrointestinal Sub-study Results (P5.345)

Real-world Strategies for Management of Gastrointestinal Events in Patients Treated with Delayed-release Dimethyl Fumarate: EFFECT Gastrointestinal Sub-study Results (P5.345)

Enterocolitis in Patients with Cancer Treated with Docetaxel.

Enterocolitis is a rare, but serious gastrointestinal complication associated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with cancer. The incidence, clinical presentation and outcome of enterocolitis in patients with cancer treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy was assessed in this study Patients and Methods: All patients treated with docetaxel for cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 at the University Hospital of Besançon were identified and their medical records reviewed. During this period, 1,227 patients received docetaxel chemotherapy and gastrointestinal events occurred in 381 (31.1%) patients. In multivariate analysis, a higher risk of gastrointestinal events was associated with a higher dose of docetaxel (≥75 mg/m2) (odds ratio(OR)=46.2; 95% confidence interval(CI)=5.4-397.0, p=0.0005) and the first cycle of docetaxel (OR=4.2; 95% CI=1.8-10.1, p=0.001). Among the 381 patients with gastrointestinal events, grade 3/4 neutropenia, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and rectal bleeding were diagnosed in 65 (17.1%), 51 (13.4%), 37 (9.7%); 12 (3.1%), seven (1.8%) and three (0.8%) patients, respectively; 54 patients (14.2%) were hospitalized. Computed tomographic scan was performed for 39 patients (10.2%). Twenty-seven patients presented radiological signs of enterocolitis. Three deaths (0.8%) related to enterocolitis were recorded. Docetaxel was resumed in 261 patients (68.5%) and the dose was reduced in 89 patients (23.4%). Docetaxel was discontinued in 120 patients (31.5%). Gastrointestinal events in patients treated with docetaxel may be a potential sign of fatal enterocolitis and require particular attention. Dose reduction at the first cycle may reduce the risk of such events.

Incidence and mitigation of gastrointestinal events in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving delayed-release dimethyl fumarate: a German phase IV study (TOLERATE).

Background:Gastrointestinal (GI) events are common adverse events (AEs) associated with delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an approved treatment for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The objective of the TOLERATE study was to evaluate GI tolerability and GI mitigation via symptomatic therapies in patients initiating DMF in a real-world clinical setting in Germany.Methods:TOLERATE was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm study performed at 25 German sites. Endpoints were frequency, severity, duration (all primary) and mitigation of GI-related events (secondary). Patients were instructed to take DMF according to the prescribing information for up to 12 weeks and to document GI events and intake of GI-symptomatic therapy on numerical rating scales, using eDiaries.Results:A total of 211 patients were included in the safety population (71% female; mean age 40 ± 11 years). Of these, 185 patients (87.7%) reported GI-related events, out of which nearly half received GI-symptomatic therapy (84/185; 45.4%). The most frequently reported GI events were upper abdominal pain, flatulence and nausea. GI-related events peaked during the first 3 weeks of therapy and rapidly decreased thereafter. The severity of GI events over 12 weeks according to the Modified Overall Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale were mild to moderate in the majority of patients reporting GI-related events and taking symptomatic GI medication (53.6%). Only 10% of all patients discontinued study treatment due to AEs in general, while 6.6% discontinued due to GI-related events. The severity of GI-related events decreased over time in patients who received symptomatic treatment with one or more medications (e.g. acid secretion blockers, antidiarrhoeals or antiemetics).Conclusion:Gastrointestinal events associated with delayed-release DMF were mainly mild to moderate in severity. Prevalence of GI events peaked during the first 3 weeks of therapy and rapidly faded thereafter. Although 44.9% of patients experiencing GI events used common GI symptomatic therapies, only 6.6% of patients discontinued DMF because of GI events, suggesting that GI events could be managed well with common symptomatic therapy.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Events During Vandetanib Therapy in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials.

Vandetanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as an anticancer therapeutic agent, has adverse events associated with treatment resulting in noncompliance and withdrawal from the therapy. Here, we performed meta-analysis of published clinical trials to determine relative risk (RR) and incidence of gastrointestinal events during vandetanib therapy in patients with cancer. A comprehensive literature search was performed and summary incidence, RR, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of trials. Twenty-two trials with 6382 patients were included summary incidences of all-grade gastrointestinal events in patients with cancer were anorexia 24% (95% CI, 20%-28%), constipation 17% (95% CI, 13%-20%), diarrhea 46% (95% CI, 40%-53%), nausea 29% (95% CI, 25%-33%), and vomiting 17% (95% CI, 14%-21%). Incidences of vandetanib-associated gastrointestinal events stratified by tumor histology were statistically insignificant. Vandetanib was associated with a significant risk of all-grade diarrhea (RR 1.75, 95% CI, 1.42-2.16) and high-grade diarrhea (RR 1.94, 95% CI, 1.43-2.64) and significantly decreased risk of all-grade constipation (RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.71-0.91). Summary RR showed a significant risk of vandetanib-associated constipation (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.93) and diarrhea (all-grade: RR 1.68, 95% CI, 1.31-2.14 and high-grade: RR 1.57, 95% CI, 1.14-2.17) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. This study revealed a significantly increased risk of diarrhea and a reduced risk of constipation in patients with cancer receiving vandetanib, suggesting that appropriate and frequent clinical monitoring should be emphasized.

Efficacy and Safety of Proton-Pump Inhibitors in High-Risk Cardiovascular Subsets of the COGENT Trial

BackgroundProton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been demonstrated to reduce rates of gastrointestinal events in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Data are limited regarding the efficacy and safety of PPIs in high-risk cardiovascular subsets after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. MethodsAll patients enrolled in COGENT (Clopidogrel and the Optimization of Gastrointestinal Events Trial) were initiated on DAPT (with aspirin and clopidogrel) for various indications within the prior 21 days. These post hoc analyses of the COGENT trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of omeprazole compared with placebo in subsets of patients requiring DAPT for the 2 most frequent indications: 1) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (for any indication) within 14 days of randomization (n = 2676; 71.2%); and 2) patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome managed with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 1573; 41.8%). Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate effect sizes through final follow-up. ResultsMedian follow-up duration was 110 days (interquartile range 55-167). In percutaneous coronary intervention-treated patients, omeprazole significantly reduced rates of composite gastrointestinal events at 180 days (1.2% vs 2.7%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.85; P = .02) without increasing composite cardiovascular events (5.4% vs 6.3%; HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.67-1.50; P = 1.00). Similarly, omeprazole lowered risk of the primary gastrointestinal endpoint at 180 days in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (1.1% vs 2.7%; HR 0.37; 95% CI, 0.13-1.01; P = .05) without a significant excess in cardiovascular events (5.6% vs 4.5%; HR 1.40; 95% CI, 0.77-2.53; P = .27). ConclusionsPPI therapy attenuates gastrointestinal bleeding risk without significant excess in major cardiovascular events in high-risk cardiovascular subsets, regardless of indication for DAPT. Future studies will be needed to clarify optimal gastroprotective strategies for higher-intensity and longer durations of DAPT.

Prevention of gastrointestinal events in patients on antithrombotic therapy in the peri-endoscopy period: review of new evidence and recommendations from recent guidelines.

Management of patients on antithrombotic therapy undergoing endoscopic procedures can be challenging. Although guidelines from major gastrointestinal endoscopy societies provide useful recommendations in this regard, data are limited concerning the bleeding risk of new complex endoscopic procedures and the management of novel anticoagulants in patients needing invasive procedures. The approach to the management of antithrombotic therapy often needs to be formulated on an individual basis, especially in patients with high thrombotic risk undergoing a high-risk endoscopic procedure. In addition to the procedure-related bleeding risk, endoscopists also need to consider the urgency of the endoscopic procedure, the thromboembolic risk of the patient if antithrombotic therapy is temporarily withheld, and the timing of discontinuation/resumption of antithrombotic therapy in the decision-making process. Diagnostic endoscopic procedures with or without biopsy can often be done without interruption of antithrombotic therapy. If possible, elective procedures with high bleeding risk should be delayed in patients on antithrombotic therapy for conditions with high thrombotic risk. If high-risk procedures cannot be delayed in these patients, thienopyridines, traditional and novel anticoagulants are usually withheld, whereas aspirin withdrawal is decided on a case by case basis. In patients with high thrombotic risk, communication with the prescribing clinician before proceeding to procedures with high bleeding risk is particularly important in optimizing the peri-procedural management plan of antithrombotic therapy.

Risk of gastrointestinal events with sorafenib, sunitinib and pazopanib in patients with solid tumors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of clinical trials

Gastrointestinal (GI) events have been described with sorafenib, sunitinib and pazopanib in cancer patients. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the incidence and relative risk (RR) in patients with cancer treated with these agents. PubMed databases were searched for articles published till May 2013. Eligible studies were selected according to PRISMA statement. Summary incidence, RR, and 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of selected studies. A total of 6,447 patients were available for the meta-analysis; 2,260 had renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and 4,187, 1,691 non-small cell lung cancers, 599 hepatocellular cancers, 1,066 breast cancers, 165 neuroendocrine tumors, 304 gastrointestinal stromal tumors and 362 soft tissue sarcomas. Diarrhea was the most common GI event. When stratified by tumor type (RCC vs. non-RCC), the difference among the incidences of GI events was significant for diarrhea (p < 0.001) and vomiting (p = 0.006), that resulted higher in RCC patients. In RCC patients, sorafenib registered the lower incidence and RR of all grades GI events. The difference was statistically significant for sorafenib versus sunitinib-related all and high-grade events (p < 0.001) and for sorafenib versus pazopanib all grades GI events (p < 0.001) and high-grade anorexia (p < 0.001). Treatment with VEGFR TKIs sorafenib, sunitinib and pazopanib is associated with a significant increase in the risk of GI events in patients with cancer, and frequent clinical monitoring should be emphasized when managing these three and newer VEGFR TKIs.

Low‐dose acetylsalicylic acid and gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding – a cohort study of the effects of proton pump inhibitor use patterns

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage patterns and risk of severe gastrointestinal events in patients treated with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (LDA). A nationwide cohort study in Sweden. All Swedish residents ≥ 40 years of age, without cancer and receiving LDA treatment (≥ 80% adherence for 365 days between 2005 and 2009) were identified in the Swedish Prescription Register. Continuous PPI use was defined as > 60 of 90 days covered by daily PPI doses and further divided into high (≥ 80%) or moderate (< 80) adherence. All other PPI use was defined as intermittent use. The risk of a combined end-point of gastrointestinal ulcer or bleeding was analysed using Cox proportional hazard models. We also investigated risk of > 45 days of LDA treatment interruption. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 7880 of 648,807 (1.2%) LDA-treated patients experienced gastrointestinal events. In multivariable-adjusted models, both intermittent-PPI and no-PPI use were associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding compared with continuous PPI use with a high level of adherence [hazard ratio (HR) 1.83 (95% CI 1.66-2.02) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.05-1.23), respectively]. Amongst continuous PPI users, moderate adherence also increased the risk of gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding [HR 1.22 (95% CI 1.07-1.40)]. The risk of LDA treatment interruption was higher with intermittent PPI use [HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.14-1.19)] than continuous PPI use with high adherence. In this large cohort of LDA users, intermittent PPI use was associated with higher risk of gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding and interrupted LDA treatment, compared with continuous PPI use.

AB1360 Gastrointestinal events in patients receiving NSAIDs for rheumatic diseases in routine practice: The pan-european evidence study

BackgroundManagement of patients with rheumatic diseases and at risk for developing NSAID-associated gastrointestinal (GI) events (symptoms and/or complications) varies not only across Europe but also within each country.ObjectivesThe pan-European EVIDENCE...

Su1039 Risk Factors for Aspirin-Associated Gastrointestinal Events in Patients Treated With Aspirin or PA32540 for Secondary Cardiovascular Protection in Two Phase 3 Studies

Su1039 Risk Factors for Aspirin-Associated Gastrointestinal Events in Patients Treated With Aspirin or PA32540 for Secondary Cardiovascular Protection in Two Phase 3 Studies

Gastrointestinal Events with Clopidogrel: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Clopidogrel prevents cardiovascular events, but has been linked with adverse gastrointestinal (GI) complications, particularly bleeding events. We aimed to investigate the risk of adverse GI events in patients treated with clopidogrel. A nationwide population-based cohort study based on linkage of three administrative registries in Denmark. All individuals who redeemed at least one prescription of clopidogrel from 1996 to 2008 were included as exposed subjects (n = 77,503). For each exposed subject, three matched controls were randomly selected from the background population (n = 232,510). Follow-up began on January 1, 1996, and was censored on December 31, 2007, or if patients emigrated or died. The study endpoint was the occurrence of any gastritis, GI ulcer or bleeding. Analyses were adjusted for comorbidity and medication. Regardless of dose, adjusted odds ratios associating clopidogrel use with the study endpoint were statistically significant and followed a dose-response pattern. The crude absolute risk of GI events were: never users: 2.2 %; <0.1 defined daily dose (DDD) of clopidogrel per day: 7.1 %; 0.1-0.39 DDD: 6.0 %; 0.4-0.79 DDD: 5.7 %; ≥0.80 DDD: 4.4 %. Adjusted odds ratios were: <0.1 DDD: 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.26-1.42; 0.1-0.39 DDD: 1.58, 95 % CI: 1.48-1.68; 0.4-0.79 DDD: 1.91, 95 % CI: 1.77-2.06; ≥0.80 DDD: 1.77, 95 % CI: 1.66-1.89, all p-values < 0.01. Depending on the dose, numbers needed to harm ranged from 58 to 33 patients receiving 12 months of clopidogrel treatment. The well-known cardioprotective effect of clopidogrel must be carefully weighed against an increased risk of GI events.

How Do Gastrointestinal or Liver Comorbidities Influence the Choice of Pain Treatment in Inflammatory Arthritis? A Cochrane Systematic Review

To assess efficacy and safety of pharmacological pain treatment in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and gastrointestinal (GI) or liver comorbidities. A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register up to June 2010, as well as American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism meeting abstracts (2007-2010). The population investigated was defined as patients with IA and existing or prior reported GI or liver disease treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), opioids or opioid-like drugs, paracetamol, antidepressants, neuromodulators, or muscle relaxants. Outcomes of interest were defined as efficacy evaluated by common pain measures and safety evaluated by withdrawals due to adverse events, worsening of comorbidity, and mortality. Out of 2869 identified studies only a single open-arm trial fulfilled inclusion criteria assessing the safety and efficacy of naproxen in 58 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and GI comorbidities. The presence of fecal occult blood was reported in 1/58 participants tested between Weeks 1 to 26 and 2/32 participants tested between Weeks 27 to 52. Over the course of the study, 7 participants (12.1%) withdrew due to adverse events; no serious adverse events were reported. Among the 14 studies excluded due to inclusion of a mixed population (osteoarthritis or other rheumatic conditions) or an intervention that was already withdrawn, 5 trials reported a higher risk of developing GI events in patients with prior GI events when treated with NSAID. Very little evidence regarding safety and efficacy of pain treatment in patients with IA and GI or hepatic comorbidities was found. In patients with a history of GI events, extrapolating from other studies, NSAID should be used cautiously since there is evidence that these patients are at a higher risk of developing adverse events.

Increased Incidence and Impact of Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota: A Longitudinal Population-based Study

To assess the incidence and mortality impact of upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) events in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to non-RA subjects. We identified incident upper and lower GI events and estimated their incidence rates using person-year methods in a population-based incident RA cohort of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA (1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria first fulfilled between January 1, 1980, and January 1, 2008) and non-RA subjects from the same population. The study included 813 patients with RA and 813 non-RA subjects (mean followup 10.3 and 10.8 yrs, respectively); 68% women; mean age 55.9 yrs in both cohorts. The rate of upper GI events/100 person-years was 2.9 in RA versus 1.7 in the non-RA cohort (rate ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.4, 2.2); for lower GI events, the rates were 2.1 in RA versus 1.4 in the non-RA cohort (rate ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 1.9). The incidence of upper GI bleed, perforation, ulcer, obstruction, and any upper GI event in RA declined over calendar time; the incidence of lower GI events remained unchanged. Exposure to glucocorticoids, prior upper GI disease, abdominal surgery, and smoking were associated with lower GI events in RA. Both upper and lower GI events were associated with increased mortality risk in RA. There is increased risk of serious upper and lower GI events in RA compared to non-RA subjects, and increased GI-related mortality in RA. Prominent declines in incidence of upper, but not lower GI events in RA highlight the need for studies investigating lower GI disease in patients with RA.