Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Research Articles

Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) - Current literature review of diagnostics and therapy. What has changed in the management?

<b>Introduction:</b> Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are malignancies originating from cells of the diffuse endocrine system. They are rare and localize in the upper and lower parts of the gastrointestinal tract and in the pancreas. Despite such a varied location, GEP-NENs are considered a common group of neoplasms due to the fact of their similar morphology and ability to secrete peptide hormones and biologically active amines. They are associated with clinical manifestations specific to the substances produced by a particular neoplasm. The classification of GEP-NENs is constantly systematized and updated based on their differentiation and grading. The development of available diagnostic and treatment methods for these tumors has made significant progress over the past 10 years and is still ongoing.<b>Aim:</b> In the following paper, we review the diagnostics and treatment of GEP-NENs, taking into account the latest molecular, immunological, or gene-based methods. Imaging methods using markers for receptors allow for high diagnostic sensitivity<b>Methods:</b> Medical databases were searched for the latest information. The authors also sought confirmation of the content of a particular publication in another publications, so as to present the most reliable information possible.<b>Results:</b> Research results revealed that the diagnostics and treatment of GEP-NENs have significantly advanced in recent years. Surgical interventions, especially minimally invasive techniques, have shown efficacy in treating GEP-NENs, with specific therapies such as somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy demonstrating promising outcomes. The evolution of diagnostic methods, including imaging techniques and biomarker testing, has contributed to improved patient care and prognosis.<b>Conclusions:</b> The increasing incidence of GEP-NENs is attributed to enhanced diagnostic capabilities rather than a rise in population prevalence. The study emphasizes the importance of ongoing research to identify specific markers for early detection and targeted therapies to further enhance the effectiveness of treating these rare and heterogeneous malignancies. The findings suggest a positive trajectory in the management of GEP-NENs, with future prospects focused on personalized and targeted treatment approaches.

Expression and clinical value of CXCR4 in high grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is associated with the progression and metastasis of numerous malignant tumors. However, its relationship with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Grade 3 (GEP-NENs G3) is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the expression of CXCR4 in GEP-NENS and to explore the clinical and prognostic value of CXCR4. This study retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data from patients with GEP-NENs who receiving surgery in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2013 to April 2021, and obtained the overall survival of the patients based on follow-up. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on pathological paraffin sections to observe CXCR4 staining. Groups were made according to pathological findings. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve was used to evaluate prognosis. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis. 100 GEP-NENs G3 patients were enrolled in this study. There was a significant difference in primary sites (P=0.002), Ki-67 index (P<0.001), and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) elevation (P=0.008) between neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G3 and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). CXCR4 was highly expressed only in tumors, low or no expressed in adjacent tissues (P<0.001). The expression level of CXCR4 in NEC was significantly higher than that in NET G3 (P=0.038). The K-M curves showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with high CXCR4 expression and patients with low CXCR4 expression, either in GEP-NEN G3 or NEC (P=0.920, P=0.842. respectively). Differential expression of CXCR4 was found between tumor and adjacent tissues and between NET G3 and NEC. Our results demonstrated that CXCR4 can be served as a new IHC diagnostic indicator in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of GEP-NENs G3. Further studies with multi-center, large sample size and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the correlation between CXCR4 expression level and prognosis.

The State-of-the-Art Mechanisms and Antitumor Effects of Somatostatin in Colorectal Cancer: A Review.

Somatostatin, a somatotropin release inhibiting factor (SST, SRIF), is a widely distributed multifunctional cyclic peptide and acts through a transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor (SST1-SST5). Over the past decades, research has begun to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying the anticancer activity of this hormonal peptide. Among gastrointestinal tract (GIT) tumors, direct and indirect antitumor effects of SST have been documented best in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and less well in non-endocrine cancers, including sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). In the latter, the signaling pathways involved in the antitumor function of SST are primarily MAPK/ERK/AKT and Wnt/β-catenin. Direct (involving the MAPK pathway) and indirect (VEGF production) antiangiogenic effects of SST in CRC have also been described. The anti-inflammatory role of SST in CRC is emphasized, but detailed molecular mechanisms are still being explored. The role of SST in tumor genome/tumor microenvironment (TME)/host's gut microbiome interactions is only partially known. The results of SST analogues (SSAs)' treatment of sporadic CRC in monotherapy in vivo are not spectacular. The current review aims to present the state-of-the-art mechanisms and antitumor activity of endogenous SST and its synthetic analogues in CRC, with particular emphasis on sporadic CRC.

Patient derived tumoroids of high grade neuroendocrine neoplasms for more personalized therapies

There are no therapeutic predictive biomarkers or representative preclinical models for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN), a highly aggressive, fatal, and heterogeneous malignancy. We established patient-derived (PD) tumoroids from biobanked tissue samples of advanced high-grade GEP-NEN patients and applied this model for targeted rapid ex vivo pharmacotyping, next-generation sequencing, and perturbational profiling. We used tissue-matched PD tumoroids to profile individual patients, compared ex vivo drug response to patients’ clinical response to chemotherapy, and investigated treatment-induced adaptive stress responses.PD tumoroids recapitulated biological key features of high-grade GEP-NEN and mimicked clinical response to cisplatin and temozolomide ex vivo. When we investigated treatment-induced adaptive stress responses in PD tumoroids in silico, we discovered and functionally validated Lysine demethylase 5 A and interferon-beta, which act synergistically in combination with cisplatin. Since ex vivo drug response in PD tumoroids matched clinical patient responses to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics for GEP-NEN, our rapid and functional precision oncology approach could expand personalized therapeutic options for patients with advanced high-grade GEP-NEN.

PREF-NET: a patient preference and experience study of lanreotide autogel administered in the home versus hospital setting among patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in the UK

PurposePREF-NET reported patients’ experience of Somatuline® (lanreotide) Autogel® (LAN) administration at home and in hospital among patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs).MethodsPREF-NET was a multicentre, cross-sectional study of UK adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with GEP-NETs receiving a stable dose of LAN, which comprised of (1) a quantitative online survey, and (2) qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted with a subgroup of survey respondents. The primary objective was the description of overall patient preference for home versus hospital administration of LAN. Secondary objectives included describing patient-reported opinions on the experience and associated preference for each administration setting, and the impact on healthcare utilisation, societal cost, activities of daily living and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).ResultsIn the primary analysis (80 patients; mean age 63.9 years), 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.1–100.0) of patients preferred to receive LAN at home, compared with 1.3% (95% CI: 0.0–3.9) who preferred the hospital setting. Among participants, over half (60.3%) received their injection from a non-healthcare professional. Most patients (79.5% [95% CI: 70.5–88.4]) reported a positive effect on HRQoL after the switch from hospital to home administration. Qualitative interviews (20 patients; mean age 63.6 years) highlighted that patients preferred home administration because it improved overall convenience; saved time and costs; made them feel more comfortable and relaxed, and less stressed; and increased confidence in their ability to self-manage their treatment.ConclusionAlmost all patients preferred to receive LAN treatment at home rather than in hospital with increased convenience and psychological benefits reported as key reasons for this preference.

Efficacy and safety of streptozocin-based chemotherapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Japanese clinical practice.

Streptozocin has been used to treat neuroendocrine tumors in Europe and the USA; however, its actual status in Japan has not been fully clarified owing to the rarity of this disease and the relatively recent approval of streptozocin in Japan. We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who were treated with streptozocin-based chemotherapy at two Japanese hospitals between January 2004 and June 2023. The overall response and disease control rates were 27.7 and 74.5%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 and 20.3months, respectively. Performance status ≥1 showed a significant negative correlation with progression-free survival, and performance status ≥1 and liver tumor burden ≥25% showed a significant negative correlation with overall survival. No significant differences were observed in the treatment response between pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed; however, 87.7% of patients expressed a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, which negatively correlated with the duration of streptozocin treatment (r=0.43, P=0.0020). In the streptozocin re-administration group (n=5), no differences were found in efficacy between the initial and second streptozocin treatments. Although streptozocin is a safe, streptozocin-induced renal dysfunction is a dilemma in streptozocin responders. Streptozocin may benefit patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, especially those with a good performance status; however, in some cases, planned streptozocin withdrawal or switching to other drugs should be considered.

An Illustrated Review of the Recent 2019 World Health Organization Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Radiologic and Pathologic Correlation.

Recent advances in molecular pathology and an improved understanding of the etiology of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have given rise to an updated World Health Organization classification. Since gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs) are the most common forms of NENs and their incidence has been increasing constantly, they will be the focus of our attention. Here, we review the findings at the foundation of the new classification system, discuss how it impacts imaging research and radiological practice, and illustrate typical and atypical imaging and pathological findings. Gastroenteropancreatic NENs have a highly variable clinical course, which existing classification schemes based on proliferation rate were unable to fully capture. While well- and poorly differentiated NENs both express neuroendocrine markers, they are fundamentally different diseases, which may show similar proliferation rates. Genetic alterations specific to well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors graded 1 to 3 and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancers of small cell and large-cell subtype have been identified. The new tumor classification places new demands and creates opportunities for radiologists to continue providing the clinically most relevant report and on researchers to design projects, which continue to be clinically applicable.

Liver Imaging in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has gradually increased over the past few decades with the majority of patients presenting with metastases on initial presentation. The liver is the most common site of initial metastatic disease, and the presence of liver metastasis is an independent prognostic factor associated with a negative outcome. Because NENs are heterogenous neoplasms with variable differentiation, grading, and risk of grade transformation over time, accurate diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine liver lesions are both important and challenging. This is particularly so with the multiple liver-directed treatment options available. In this review article, we discuss the diagnosis, treatment, and response evaluation of NEN liver metastases.

Improving Generalizability of PET DL Algorithms: List-Mode Reconstructions Improve DOTATATE PET Hepatic Lesion Detection Performance.

Deep learning (DL) algorithms used for DOTATATE PET lesion detection typically require large, well-annotated training datasets. These are difficult to obtain due to low incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and the high cost of manual annotation. Furthermore, networks trained and tested with data acquired from site specific PET/CT instrumentation, acquisition and processing protocols have reduced performance when tested with offsite data. This lack of generalizability requires even larger, more diverse training datasets. The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of improving DL algorithm performance by better matching the background noise in training datasets to higher noise, out-of-domain testing datasets. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT datasets were obtained from two scanners: Scanner1, a state-of-the-art digital PET/CT (GE DMI PET/CT; n = 83 subjects), and Scanner2, an older-generation analog PET/CT (GE STE; n = 123 subjects). Set1, the data set from Scanner1, was reconstructed with standard clinical parameters (5 min; Q.Clear) and list-mode reconstructions (VPFXS 2, 3, 4, and 5-min). Set2, data from Scanner2 representing out-of-domain clinical scans, used standard iterative reconstruction (5 min; OSEM). A deep neural network was trained with each dataset: Network1 for Scanner1 and Network2 for Scanner2. DL performance (Network1) was tested with out-of-domain test data (Set2). To evaluate the effect of training sample size, we tested DL model performance using a fraction (25%, 50% and 75%) of Set1 for training. Scanner1, list-mode 2-min reconstructed data demonstrated the most similar noise level compared that of Set2, resulting in the best performance (F1 = 0.713). This was not significantly different compared to the highest performance, upper-bound limit using in-domain training for Network2 (F1 = 0.755; p-value = 0.103). Regarding sample size, the F1 score significantly increased from 25% training data (F1 = 0.478) to 100% training data (F1 = 0.713; p < 0.001). List-mode data from modern PET scanners can be reconstructed to better match the noise properties of older scanners. Using existing data and their associated annotations dramatically reduces the cost and effort in generating these datasets and significantly improves the performance of existing DL algorithms. List-mode reconstructions can provide an efficient, low-cost method to improve DL algorithm generalizability.

The global leadership into malnutrition criteria reveals a high percentage of malnutrition which influences overall survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Patients with neuroendocrine tumours located in the gastroenteropancreatic tract (GEP-NETs) and treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSA's) are at risk of malnutrition which has been reported previously evaluating weight loss or body mass index (BMI) only. The global leadership into malnutrition (GLIM) criteria include weight loss, BMI, and sarcopenia, for diagnosing malnutrition. These GLIM criteria have not been assessed in patients with GEP-NETs on SSA. The effect of malnutrition on overall survival has not been explored before. The aim of this study is to describe the presence of malnutrition in patients with GEP-NET on SSA based on the GLIM criteria and associate this with overall survival. Cross-sectional study screening all patients with GEP-NETs on SSA's for malnutrition using the GLIM criteria. Body composition analysis for sarcopenia diagnosis were performed. Bloods including vitamins, minerals, and lipid profile were collected. Overall survival since the date of nutrition screening was calculated. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to identify malnutrition as risk factor for overall survival. A total of 118 patients, 47% male, with median age 67 years (IQR 56.8-75.0) were included. Overall, malnutrition was present in 88 patients (75%); based on low BMI in 26 (22%) patients, based on weight loss in 35 (30%) patients, and based on sarcopenia in 83 (70%) patients. Vitamin deficiencies were present for vitamin D in 64 patients (54%), and vitamin A in 29 patients (25%). The presence of malnutrition demonstrated a significantly worse overall survival (p-value = .01). In multivariate analysis meeting 2 or 3 GLIM criteria was significantly associated with worse overall survival (HR 2.16 95% CI 1.34-3.48, p-value = .002). Weight loss was the most important risk factor out of the 3 GLIM criteria (HR 3.5 95% CI 1.14-10.85, p-value = .03) for worse overall survival. A high percentage (75%) of patients with GEP-NETs using a SSA meet the GLIM criteria for malnutrition. Meeting more than 1 GLIM criterium, especially if there is weight loss these are risk factors for worse overall survival.

Head-to-Head Comparison of SSTR Antagonist [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 with SSTR Agonist [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Patients with Well Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Imaging Study.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are slow-growing tumors that express high levels of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). Recent studies have shown the superiority of radiolabeled SSTR antagonists in theranostics compared to agonists. In this prospective study, we compared the diagnostic efficacy between [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC and [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 in the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with well differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs. Histologically proven GEP-NET patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC & [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 PET/CT scans, which were analyzed. The qualitative analysis involved the visual judgment of radiotracer uptake validated by the morphological findings using CT, which was considered as the reference standard. Quantitative comparisons were presented as the standardized uptake value (SUV) corrected for lean body mass: SULpeak, SULavg, and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR). In total, 490 lesions were confirmed via diagnostic CT. The lesion-based sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 PET/CT was 94.28% (462/490) and 83.46% (409/490) for [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (p < 0.0001). [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 had statistical significance over [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC in liver metastases [100% vs. 89.4%; p < 0.0001 (292 vs. 253 {283 lesions on CT})] and bone metastases [100% vs. 82.9%; p = 0.005 (45 vs. 34 {41 lesions on CT})]. Statistical significance was also noted for the TBR SULpeak of the primary and liver lesions. [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 showed better sensitivity and a higher target-to-background ratio than [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 PET/CT can be used to quantify the extent of skeletal and liver metastases for better planning of SSTR agonist- or antagonist-based therapy.

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) expression is associated with better clinical outcome and prognosis in rectal neuroendocrine tumors

Somatostatin analogues have recently been used as therapeutic targets for metastatic or surgically unresectable gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and associated somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression has been well demonstrated in most GEP NETs, with the exception of rectal NETs. SSTR2 immunohistochemical expressions were evaluated in 350 surgically or endoscopically resected rectal NETs and compared to clinicopathologic factors. SSTR2 expression was observed in 234 (66.9%) rectal NET cases and associated tumors with smaller size (p = 0.001), low pT classification (p = 0.030), low AJCC tumor stage (p = 0.012), and absence of chromogranin expression (p = 0.009). Patients with rectal NET and SSTR2 expression had significantly better overall survival than those without SSTR2 expression both by univariable (p = 0.006) and multivariable (p = 0.014) analyses. In summary, approximately two-thirds of rectal NETs expressed SSTR2. SSTR2 expression was significantly associated with favorable behavior and good overall survival in patients with rectal NETs. Furthermore, SSTR2 expression can be used as prognostic factors. When metastatic disease occurs, SSTR2 expression can be used a possible target for somatostatin analogues.

Risk factors, prognostic factors, and nomograms for distant metastases in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based study.

Patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have a poor prognosis for distant metastasis. Currently, there are no studies on predictive models for the risk of distant metastasis in GEP-NETs. In this study, risk factors associated with metastasis in patients with GEP-NETs in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram model for metastasis risk prediction was constructed. Prognostic factors associated with distant metastasis in patients with GEP-NETs were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox, and a nomogram model for prognostic prediction was constructed. Finally, the performance of the nomogram model predictions is validated by internal validation set and external validation set. A total of 9145 patients with GEP-NETs were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that T stage, N stage, tumor size, primary site, and histologic types independent risk factors associated with distant metastasis in GEP-NETs patients (p value < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses demonstrated that age, histologic type, tumor size, N stage, and primary site surgery were independent factors associated with the prognosis of patients with GEP-NETs (p value < 0.05). The nomogram model constructed based on metastasis risk factors and prognostic factors can predict the occurrence of metastasis and patient prognosis of GEP-NETs very effectively in the internal training and validation sets as well as in the external validation set. In conclusion, we constructed a new distant metastasis risk nomogram model and a new prognostic nomogram model for GEP-NETs patients, which provides a decision-making reference for individualized treatment of clinical patients.

Epidemiological, Clinical and Biological Hemogram Features in a Cohort of Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients.

We conducted a retrospective study based on 55 patients diagnosed with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs)-gastric (G-NET), small bowel (SB-NET) and colonic (C-NET), hospitalized and evaluated within the Surgical, Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine Clinics, in The Clinical Emergency County Hospital Craiova, between May 2016 and April 2024. We aimed in this study to analyze the epidemiological aspects and clinical characteristics of patients with GEP-NETs. In our study group, the patients' ages were between 39-82 years, with a mean of 66.40 (±12.46) years. The incidence of GEP-NETs cases in young patients was insignificant low-1 case. 45.46% of all patients lived in urban areas. 16.36% were G-NET, 14,54 were SB-NET and 69.09% were C-NET. The GEP-NETs diagnosis was established by immunohistochemistry features. Also, we observed that the most frequency localization was on the ascending colon, while the rarest on the colon it is located on the transverse colon and the rarest is on the small bowel, in spite of the generally literature data. From the C-NET group, 49.09% have been presented arterial hypertension probable explained by serotonin and dopamine secretion an inflammatory through phenotype expression and just one patient has been presented an erythematous psoriasis, which could be also explained by the same neurotransmitter's involvement as a possible purposed mechanism. The results obtained in our study demonstrate that could be a common profile of GEP-NETs patients through epidemiological general information and clinical characteristics. Also, we demonstrate that, in the last years, the incidence increased for the GEP-NETs.

Plasma miRNA expression in patients with genetically confirmed multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome and its phenocopies

MEN-1 is a rare autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations in MEN1 gene encoding the menin protein. This syndrome is characterized by the occurrence of parathyroid tumors, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, pituitary adenomas, as well as other endocrine and non-endocrine tumors. If a patient with the MEN-1 phenotype carry no mutations in the MEN1 gene, the condition considers a phenocopy of syndrome (phMEN1). The possible cause of this changes could be changes in epigenetic regulation, particularly in microRNA expression that might affect menin signaling pathways. to identify differently expressed circulating miRNAs in plasma in patients with genetically confirmed MEN-1 syndrome, its phenocopies and healthy controls. single-center, case-control study was conducted. We assessed plasma microRNA expression in patients with genetically confirmed MEN-1 (gMEN1), phMEN1 and healthy controls. Morning plasma samples were collected from fasting patients and stored at -80°C. Total RNA isolation was performed using miRNeasy Mini Kit with QIAcube. Thelibraries were prepared by the QIAseq miRNA Library Kit following the manufacturer. Circulating miRNA sequencing was done on Illumina NextSeq 500 (Illumina). Subsequent data processing was performed using the DESeq2 bioinformatics algorithm. we enrolled 21 consecutive patients with gMEN1 and 11 patients with phMEN1, along with 12 gender matched controls. Median age of gMEN1 was 38,0 [34,0; 41,0]; in phMEN1 - 59,0 [51,0; 60,0]; control - 59,5 [51,5; 62,5]. The gMEN1 group differed in age (p&lt;0.01) but not gender (р=0.739) or BMI (р=0.116) compared to phMEN1 and controls group, the last two groups did not differ by these parameters (p&gt;0.05). 25 microRNA were differently expressed in groups gMEN1 and phMEN1 (21 upregulated microRNAs, 4 - downregulated). Comparison of samples from the phMEN-1 group and relatively healthy controls revealed 10 differently expressed microRNAs: 5 - upregulated; 5 - downregulated. In the gMEN-1 and control groups, 26 differently expressed microRNAs were found: 24 - upregulated; 2 - downregulated. The miRNAs most differing in expression among the groups were selected for further validation by RT-qPCR (in the groups of gMEN1 vs phMEN1 - miR-3613-5p, miR-335-5p, miR-32-5p, miR-425-3p, miR-25-5p, miR-576-5p, miR-215-5p, miR-30a-3p, miR-141-3p, miR-760, miR-501-3p; gMEN1 vs control - miR-1976, miR-144-5p miR-532-3p, miR-375; as well as in phMEN1 vs control - miR-944, miR-191-5p, miR-98-5p). In a pilot study, we detected microRNAs that may be expressed differently between patients with gMEN-1 and phMEN-1. The results need to be validated using different measurement method with larger sample size.

Radiosensitizing Favors Response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients With Highly Proliferative Neuroendocrine Malignancies: Preliminary Evidence From a Clinical Pilot Study.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) represents a cornerstone of treatment regimens for patients with low proliferative neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, in patients experiencing somatostatin receptor-positive NET with higher proliferation rates, a value and potential therapeutic benefit of PRRT as part of multimodal treatment approaches and potentially with addition of radiosensitizing agents has not yet been established. In this study, 20 patients with histologically confirmed gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET with proliferation rates (Ki67) between 15% and 55% were treated either with PRRT only (n = 10) or with a combination therapy (n = 10) comprising PRRT and capecitabine/temozolomide (CAP/TEM) for at least 2 consecutive cycles. Disease control rate in patients treated with PRRT alone was 60% (40% stable disease and 20% partial response). Strikingly, in patients treated with PRRT in combination with radiosensitization (CAP/TEM), the disease control rate was 90% (20% stable disease and 70% partial response). The median progression-free survival in the PRRT only group was 12 months, whereas the median progression-free survival in the PRRT + CAP/TEM group was 26 months and has not been yet reached for all patients in the group during the observation period. The median disease-specific survival for patients with PRRT alone was 51 months, whereas this end point was not yet reached in the PRRT + CAP/TEM group. Moreover, the PRRT + CAP/TEM group showed a significantly higher reduction of SSTR-PET-based metabolic tumor volume and chromogranin A levels compared with the PRRT only group. Importantly, adverse events of all grades did not differ between both groups. PRRT + CAP/TEM represents a highly promising and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen for patients experiencing somatostatin receptor-positive NET with higher (Ki67 ≥ 15%) proliferation rate. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Using 177Lu-DOTATATE: Nursing Roles in Managing Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a diverse family of cancers that occur within the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) via 177Lu-DOTATATE is a newer therapeutic option for certain patients with somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs. This review informs on how oncology nurses treating patients with GEP-NETs receiving PRRT using 177Lu-DOTATATE can facilitate care. Guidance on the monitoring, management, and care of patients undergoing PRRT for GEP-NETs was developed based on published literature and the nursing experience of the authors. A case study is summarized to highlight key concepts. Oncology nurses provide assessment, education, direct care, and emotional support when caring for patients with GEP-NETs receiving PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE. As the treatment landscape evolves, so too will these roles and responsibilities.

177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in newly diagnosed patients with advanced grade 2 and grade 3, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Primary analysis of the phase 3 randomized NETTER-2 study.

LBA588 Background: Currently, there is no universally accepted first line (1L) therapy for higher grade, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and an unmet medical need remains in these patients (pts). Radioligand therapy (RLT) is an innovative cancer treatment that crosses the traditional domains of systemic, radiation or surgical therapies. The Phase 3 NETTER-2 study (NCT03972488) evaluated [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (hereafter 177Lu-DOTATATE) as 1L treatment in pts with Grade (G) 2 and G3 advanced GEP-NETs. This is the first trial to assess 1L RLT in any solid tumor. Methods: Eligible pts were newly diagnosed with somatostatin receptor-positive high G2 or G3 (Ki-67 ≥10% and ≤55%) advanced GEP-NETs within the last 6 months prior to enrollment. Pts were randomized (2:1) to receive 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE (4 × 7.4 GBq) plus 30 mg octreotide long-acting release (LAR) at 8-weekly intervals during 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment then every 4 weeks (177Lu-DOTATATE arm), or 60 mg octreotide LAR every 4 weeks (control arm), stratified by grade (G2 vs G3) and tumor origin (pancreas vs other). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), centrally assessed using RECIST 1.1. Objective response rate (ORR), a key secondary endpoint, was tested hierarchically after PFS. Results: Overall, 226 pts were randomized to the 177Lu-DOTATATE (n = 151) or control (n = 75) arms. Most tumors originated in the pancreas (54.4%) or small intestine (29.2%); G3 tumors were reported in 35.0% of pts. Median cumulative dose of 177Lu-DOTATATE was 29.2 GBq, with 87.8% of pts receiving all 4 doses. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was significantly prolonged by ~14.3 months from 8.5 months (7.7, 13.8) in the control arm to 22.8 months (19.4, not estimable) in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm; stratified hazard ratio 0.276 (95% CI: 0.182, 0.418; p &lt; 0.0001). The ORR was significantly higher in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm (43.0%) vs the control arm (9.3%); stratified odds ratio 7.81 (95% CI: 3.32, 18.4; p &lt; 0.0001). PFS and ORR results were consistent across all pre-specified demographic and prognostic subgroups. Among adverse events of special interest to RLT, G3/4 leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in ≤3 pts each in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm. One case of myelodysplastic syndrome was reported (177Lu-DOTATATE arm). Conclusion: 177Lu-DOTATATE significantly prolonged PFS and demonstrated a clinically meaningful ORR, compared with high-dose octreotide LAR, in pts with newly diagnosed advanced G2 and G3 GEP-NETs. Safety was in line with the established profile of 177Lu-DOTATATE. This is the first randomized study to demonstrate efficacy of RLT as 1L treatment in any malignancy and will change clinical practice. Further investigations of RLT as a therapeutic option in other settings is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03972488 .

Quality of surveillance in patients with completely resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

591 Background: The incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are increasing worldwide. Surgery remains the only curative modality. Because of limited data on patterns of recurrence, real-world surveillance practices and duration vary widely. In 2018, the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Research Collaboration (CommNETs) published consensus surveillance guidelines for patients with completely resected GEP-NETs. Our aim was to assess adherence to the CommNETs guidelines for surveillance practices for this patient population at our center. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with GEP-NETs seen for a new patient appointment at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC) from 2019-2022. Patients were included if they had a completely resected GEP-NET and followed on surveillance at our center. Demographic and tumor characteristics, surveillance practices, and clinical outcomes were abstracted. Summary statistics and a descriptive comparison of surveillance practices were completed. Results: Out of the 374 new patient appointments, 87 met the inclusion criteria. The main reasons for exclusion were metastatic disease at presentation (n=128), primary tumor not resected (n=58), and patients not followed at PMCC (n=49) so their surveillance practices cannot be determined from our records. The primary tumor sites were pancreatic (n=50, 57%), appendiceal (n=15, 17%), small bowel (n=11, 13%), rectal (n=10, 12%), and colon (n=1, 1%). Thirty-eight patients (44%) had stage 1 disease, 21 patients (24%) had stage 2, and 28 patients (32%) had stage 3. Forty-six patients (53%) had a WHO tumor grade of 1, 36 patients (41%) had grade 2, and 5 patients (6%) had grade 3. The median duration of follow-up was 18.2 months. Adherence to ordering the recommended surveillance investigations was 23% (20/87). Within the adherent cases, there was a higher number of appendiceal, WHO grade 1, and stage 1 tumors. Sixty-six patients (76%) had at least one test that was not recommended by the guidelines. The most frequent unnecessary tests were CT chest in all patient groups and CT pelvis in pancreatic NETs (Table). Six patients were lost to follow up and none discharged from surveillance. Conclusions: Adherence to the CommNETs consensus guidelines was low at our center, suggesting the guidelines had a minor impact on surveillance practices and providing an area for improvement in process of care and resource utilization. [Table: see text]

Repeat peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine neoplasms: A NET Center of Excellence experience.

590 Background: Lu177 DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionucleotide Therapy (PRRT) was FDA approved in the United States in 2018 however this treatment modality has been widely available in European nations since early 2000s. Therefore, the data for the safety and efficacy of repeat PRRT are almost exclusively from European centers. We present a real-world experience with repeat PRRT in a cohort of US patients. Methods: We used our single-center longitudinal IRB approved neuroendocrine tumor (NET) registry to identify patients who had been previously treated with at least 1 dose of PRRT (PRRT 1, either Lu 177 DOTATATE or Y90 DOTATOC) and following disease progression were retreated with a second course of PRRT (PRRT 2). Patients who received alpha PRRT were not included. We reviewed patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, time to progression after PRRT 1 and PRRT 2 and toxicity. Results: A total of 153 patients received at least 1 dose of Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT at our institution post FDA approval, out of which, 13/153 (8.5%) patients received repeat PRRT .2/13 patients were excluded due to lack of adequate follow up. All patients included were white (11/11, 100%). Median age of the participants was 65 years (IQR 63, 67) and 54.5% (6/11) patients were females. Most patients had grade 2 (9/11,81.8%) followed by grade 1 NET (2/11, 18.2%) and all except one patient included had a gastroenteropancreatic origin NET (10,11, 90.9%). 45.5% (5/11) patients received Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT only both for PRRT1 and PRRT 2, while 54.5% (6/11) patients received Y90 DOTATOC PRRT for PRRT1. Median number of lines therapies before PRRT1 and PRRT were 2 (IQR 2,5) and 1 (IQR 1,2) respectively. Patients received a median of 3 (IQR 2, 4) and 3 (IQR 1,4) cycles for PRRT1 and PRRT2 respectively. At first restaging scan after PRRT1 (3-6 months), 54.5% and 45.5% patients had partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) respectively. At first restaging scan after PRRT2 (3-6 months), 45.5%, 27.3% and 9.1% patients had SD, progressive disease (PD) and PR respectively; 2/11 patients (18.2%) died before first restaging scan. Median PFS for PRRT1 (n=11) was 22.5 months (IQR 12.7, 30.7). Median PFS (n=5) for PRRT2 was 10.9 months (IQR 10.05, 25.7). PFS was not reached for 1 patient after PRRT2. 1 (9.1%) patient each developed grade 2 nephrotoxicity and grade 3 thrombocytopenia after PRRT2. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first of its kind analysis describing the safety and effectiveness of repeat PRRT in a US cohort. We show that repeat PRRT may benefit select patients and has an acceptable safety profile. Larger prospective clinical studies are required to identify patient groups that are more likely to benefit from repeat PRRT.