ABSTRACT On March 20, 2017, the High Court of Uttarakhand in India declared the Ganga and Yamuna rivers as living entities, making it the country’s first order to give legal rights to rivers. In another order passed 10 days later, the same court granted legal personhood to nature in Uttarakhand. The article traces the legal journey of two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) in the Uttarakhand High Court that became the springboards through which the Ganga and Yamuna throughout their respective courses in India, and nature within Uttarakhand, were granted legal personhood. Reasons that may have led to these orders are ascertained. Connections between the PILs and the two high court orders, or their lack thereof, are analysed. Whether human rights and nature’s rights are adequately explained in the orders, and whether the basic conditions for implementing them were fulfilled before the orders were passed, is discussed. The article also examines whether Uttarakhand-centric issues of the environment, infrastructure development, climate change, and disasters are mentioned in the analysed court rulings. Whether the March 2017 orders draw from the past and address the future of growing environmental concerns in the State is discussed.
Read full abstract