Background: The efficacy of high-dose intravenous gamma-globulin (IVGG) treatment in Kawasaki disease (KD) is well known. But it is unclear whether the IVGG products manufactured by various companies are equally efficacious in treatment of KD and whether they are equally safe. Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of various IVGG products in patients with KD. Methods: We studied 142 patients with KD who had no coronary artery complications on admission and within the first 9 days of illness. Using a random number table, 50 patients were selected to receive freeze-dried, sulfonated product (Venilon-I; product A), 56 patients were selected to receive pH4-treated product (Polyglobin-N; product B), and the remaing 36 patients were selected to receive polyethyleneglycol-treated product (Venoglobulin-IH; product C). The doses of IVGG (2g/kg X 1 day or 1g/kg X 1 day) were determined by Harada's score. All patients were treated with IVGG in combination with aspirin. Results: There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in regard to age, gender, Harada's score, and illness days when IVGG was initiated. The incidence rate of patients who needed additional IVGG treatment was similar in all groups (product A.26.0%, B 21.4%, C 30.6%). The incidence of coronary artery complications was similar in all groups (product A 10.0%, B 8.9%, C 2.8%). The adverse effects of IVGG were seen in 4 patients, but all patients recovered after IVGG was discontinued. There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in regard to adverse effects (product A 0%, B 1.8%, C 5.6%). Conclusion: We concluded that there are no significant differences among 3 IVGG products in regard to their efficacy and safety.
Read full abstract