Game Laws Research Articles

Neighbors of Casino San Pablo v. Ken SalazarNo. 09-2384, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D.D.C., March 30, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 7-8 Neighbors of Casino San Pablo v. Ken SalazarNo. 09-2384, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D.D.C., March 30, 2011)Published Online:9 Aug 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15715AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGovernment as a Market Player to Improve Consumer Access to Lifesaving Drugs for a Healthy Budget and Healthy CareSSRN Electronic JournalPolicing Boilerplate: Reckoning and Reforming Rule 344s Popular Yet Problematic ConstructionSSRN Electronic Journal'Power and Greed and the Corruptible Seed': Mental Disability, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and the Death PenaltySSRN Electronic JournalForeign Net Discount Rates: The Case of Undocumented Mexican WorkersSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 15Issue 7-8Jul 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Neighbors of Casino San Pablo v. Ken SalazarNo. 09-2384, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D.D.C., March 30, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jul 2011.495-501.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15715Published in Volume: 15 Issue 7-8: August 9, 2011PDF download

Florida's Internet Cafés: The Future of Gaming or a Vanishing Loophole?

Editor’s note: Initial legal issues arising from the Game Promotion statute were preliminarily addressed in the May 15, 2011 issue of Gaming Law Review & Economics. However, this article will cover recent legal and legislative developments, and evaluate the relevant issues, in greater depth. In recent years, Florida residents have become accustomed to seeing signs for ‘‘Internet Sweepstakes Cafes’’ throughout the state. Currently, there are up to 600 Internet cafe establishments operating sweepstakes games throughout Florida, creating an estimated $1 billion a year marketplace. These businesses allow patrons to use computers to play instant ‘‘sweepstakes’’ games, as a means of promoting other consumer goods or services, under Florida’s ‘‘Game Promotion’’ statute. And while this business model has risen in popularity in recent years, the legal issues have yet to be settled. Operators are now bracing for legal developments from the courts, and are also contending with new regulatory legislation at both the local and state levels. While this business model has risen in popularity in recent years, the legal issues have yet to be settled and therefore retail operators are bracing for decisions from the courts and contending with legislation at both local and state levels. Typically, the operators of these cafes sell Internet access time or long distance phone cards to consumers in connection with their gaming activity. In theory, the businesses allow the public to use their facilities to purchase time on the Internet (or long distance telephone connection minutes) and that ‘‘consumer service’’ is promoted by one or more sweepstakes games played on video terminals available at the location. The purchase of Internet or long distance time is generally associated with credits, which can be used to participate in the instant sweepstakes game, where winners are ultimately revealed on video monitors through entertaining game play. The winning ‘‘tickets’’ or ‘‘chances’’ provided to players are pre-determined by the sweepstakes software, and winners are typically rewarded with cash, prizes, or more sweepstakes chances. Most sweepstakes software allows the winning tickets to be revealed immediately through an ‘‘auto-reveal’’ option selected by the player, or they can be revealed

Gaming Convergence: Further Legal Issues and Psychosocial Impact

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 7-8 ArticlesGaming Convergence: Further Legal Issues and Psychosocial ImpactMark D. GriffithsMark D. GriffithsSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:9 Aug 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15705AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGaming-Gambling Convergence: Trends, Emerging Risks, and Legislative Responses20 April 2021 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 20, No. 4The convergence of play: interrelations of social casino gaming, gambling, and digital gaming in Finland31 May 2020 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3Identifying research streams in online gambling and gaming literature: A bibliometric analysisComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 107Gambling patterns and associated risk and protective factors among Finnish young people9 April 2019 | Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Vol. 36, No. 2Adolescent Gambling and Problem Gambling: Prevalence, Current Issues, and Concerns2 July 2016 | Current Addiction Reports, Vol. 3, No. 3Adolescents’ perceptions of parental influences on commercial and simulated gambling activities17 August 2016 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3Early exposure to digital simulated gambling: A review and conceptual modelComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 55A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies24 February 2014 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2 Volume 15Issue 7-8Jul 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Mark D. Griffiths.Gaming Convergence: Further Legal Issues and Psychosocial Impact.Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jul 2011.461-464.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15705Published in Volume: 15 Issue 7-8: August 9, 2011PDF download

Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. HogenNo. 10-2132-cv, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 64750 (Second Circuit, March 28, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 7-8 CasesCitizens Against Casino Gambling v. HogenNo. 10-2132-cv, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 64750 (Second Circuit, March 28, 2011)Published Online:9 Aug 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15714AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail "Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. HogenNo. 10-2132-cv, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 64750 (Second Circuit, March 28, 2011)." , 15(7-8), pp. 493–494FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byIn Search of a Lasting Lightbulb Moment: The Law and Policy of Product ObsolescenceSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 53 Volume 15Issue 7-8Jul 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. HogenNo. 10-2132-cv, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 64750 (Second Circuit, March 28, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jul 2011.493-494.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15714Published in Volume: 15 Issue 7-8: August 9, 2011PDF download

Poker's Black Friday

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 6 Gambling and the Law®Poker's Black FridayI. Nelson RoseI. Nelson RoseSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:23 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15602AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byMeasuring skill and chance in gamesEuropean Economic Review Volume 15Issue 6Jun 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:I. Nelson Rose.Poker's Black Friday.Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2011.327-331.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15602Published in Volume: 15 Issue 6: June 23, 2011PDF download

Happiness Is: The Las Vegas Gambler

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 6 ArticlesHappiness Is: The Las Vegas GamblerWilliam N. Thompson and Bob PottsWilliam N. ThompsonSearch for more papers by this author and Bob PottsSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:23 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15607AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byWhy people gamble: a model with five motivational dimensions14 August 2012 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1 Volume 15Issue 6Jun 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:William N. Thompson and Bob Potts.Happiness Is: The Las Vegas Gambler.Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2011.365-373.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15607Published in Volume: 15 Issue 6: June 23, 2011PDF download

Indian Gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: A Case of “Play to Pay”

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 6 ArticlesIndian Gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: A Case of “Play to Pay”William A. Taggart and Thaddieus W. ConnerWilliam A. TaggartSearch for more papers by this author and Thaddieus W. ConnerSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:23 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15605AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGambling on Decentralization: How Sub-National Regulatory Interests Condition the Impact of Federal Policy6 December 2021 | State and Local Government Review, Vol. 53, No. 4Gaming Opportunities: American Indian Casinos, Cash Transfers, and Income Mobility on the ReservationAEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 11120 Years of Indian Gaming: Reassessing and Still Winning27 February 2019 | Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 100, No. 3Resource rents, universal basic income, and poverty among Alaska’s Indigenous peoplesWorld Development, Vol. 106The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and Its Effects on American Indian Economic DevelopmentJournal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 29, No. 3Assessing the Impact of Indian Gaming on American Indian Nations: Is the House Winning?22 February 2013 | Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 94, No. 4Indian gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: Socio-economic determinants of policy adoption9 December 2019 | The Social Science Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2 Volume 15Issue 6Jun 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:William A. Taggart and Thaddieus W. Conner.Indian Gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: A Case of “Play to Pay”.Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2011.355-363.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15605Published in Volume: 15 Issue 6: June 23, 2011PDF download

Lottotron, Inc. v. EH New Ventures Inc.No. 09-4942, 2011 U.S. District LEXIS 17794 (D.NJ., February 23, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 6 CasesLottotron, Inc. v. EH New Ventures Inc.No. 09-4942, 2011 U.S. District LEXIS 17794 (D.NJ., February 23, 2011)Published Online:23 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15608AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byTechnical and Vocational Education as an Independent Variable of Economic Development: A Theoretical ProspectiveSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 15Issue 6Jun 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Lottotron, Inc. v. EH New Ventures Inc.No. 09-4942, 2011 U.S. District LEXIS 17794 (D.NJ., February 23, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2011.375-380.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15608Published in Volume: 15 Issue 6: June 23, 2011PDF download

Vance v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.No. 31A04-1007-CC-501, 2011 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 213 (Court of Appeals of Indiana, February 21, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 6 CasesVance v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.No. 31A04-1007-CC-501, 2011 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 213 (Court of Appeals of Indiana, February 21, 2011)Published Online:23 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15611AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 15Issue 6Jun 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Vance v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.No. 31A04-1007-CC-501, 2011 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 213 (Court of Appeals of Indiana, February 21, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2011.399-402.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15611Published in Volume: 15 Issue 6: June 23, 2011PDF download

State of Georgia v. Damani2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, February 21, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 6 CasesState of Georgia v. Damani2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, February 21, 2011)Published Online:23 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15610AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail "State of Georgia v. Damani2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, February 21, 2011)." , 15(6), p. 397FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byUCC InsuranceSSRN Electronic JournalCanine Tracking and Scent Identification: Factoring Science into the Threshold for AdmissibilitySSRN Electronic Journal Volume 15Issue 6Jun 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:State of Georgia v. Damani2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, February 21, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2011.397-397.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15610Published in Volume: 15 Issue 6: June 23, 2011PDF download

Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardNo. 106 MM 2009, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 514 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, March 8, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 6 CasesGreenwood Gaming and Entertainment, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardNo. 106 MM 2009, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 514 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, March 8, 2011)Published Online:23 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15613AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 15Issue 6Jun 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardNo. 106 MM 2009, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 514 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, March 8, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2011.409-415.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15613Published in Volume: 15 Issue 6: June 23, 2011PDF download

Riley-Jackson v. Casino Queen, Inc.No. 07-CV-0631-MJR, U.S. District (S.D. Ill., December 1, 2010)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 5 CasesRiley-Jackson v. Casino Queen, Inc.No. 07-CV-0631-MJR, U.S. District (S.D. Ill., December 1, 2010)Published Online:26 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15512AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byDeveloping Choice Neighborhoods: An Early Look at Implementation in Five Sites - Interim ReportSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 15Issue 5May 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Riley-Jackson v. Casino Queen, Inc.No. 07-CV-0631-MJR, U.S. District (S.D. Ill., December 1, 2010).Gaming Law Review and Economics.May 2011.301-306.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15512Published in Volume: 15 Issue 5: May 26, 2011PDF download

Sports Wagering Prohibition in the United States: An Exercise in Futility and the Best Development for Organized Crime

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 5 ArticlesSports Wagering Prohibition in the United States: An Exercise in Futility and the Best Development for Organized CrimeJoseph M. KellyJoseph M. KellySearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:26 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15508AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byIllegal gambling businesses & organized crime: an analysis of federal convictions17 February 2017 | Trends in Organized Crime, Vol. 21, No. 3Sports betting and the integrity of Australian sport: Athletes' and non-athletes’ perceptions of betting-motivated corruption in sportInternational Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, Vol. 52Organized Crime Offenders in Canada: Risk, Reform, and RecidivismJournal of Offender Rehabilitation, Vol. 52, No. 2 Volume 15Issue 5May 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Joseph M. Kelly.Sports Wagering Prohibition in the United States: An Exercise in Futility and the Best Development for Organized Crime.Gaming Law Review and Economics.May 2011.257-259.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15508Published in Volume: 15 Issue 5: May 26, 2011PDF download

A Close-Up Look at the Beast: What Form and Structure Would State-Licensed Internet Gambling Take in the United States?

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 5 ArticlesA Close-Up Look at the Beast: What Form and Structure Would State-Licensed Internet Gambling Take in the United States?Martin D. OwensJr.Martin D. OwensJr.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:26 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15504AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 15Issue 5May 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Martin D. OwensJr..A Close-Up Look at the Beast: What Form and Structure Would State-Licensed Internet Gambling Take in the United States?.Gaming Law Review and Economics.May 2011.279-282.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15504Published in Volume: 15 Issue 5: May 26, 2011PDF download

Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. GiannouliasNo. 3-09-1056, 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 43 (Ill. App., January 27, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 5 CasesEmpress Casino Joliet Corp. v. GiannouliasNo. 3-09-1056, 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 43 (Ill. App., January 27, 2011)Published Online:26 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15511AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byEnforcing Outbound Forum Selection ClausesSSRN Electronic JournalEnforcing Inbound Forum Selection Clauses in State CourtSSRN Electronic JournalTransitional Justice Cascades: Integrating Post-Conflict Justice Across Levels of Government and Levels of OffendingSSRN Electronic JournalCyber Contracts in Tanzania under the Electronic Transaction Act, No.13 of 2015SSRN Electronic JournalThe Ease of Exercising the Right to Bear Arms Reaches a Hollow Point: Louisiana's Right to Bear Arms Secured for the FutureSSRN Electronic JournalDiscovery and the Evidentiary Foundations of Implicit BiasSSRN Electronic JournalWarning: A Post-Sale Duty to Warn Targets Small ManufacturersSSRN Electronic JournalBad Tax Shelters -- Accountability or the Lack Thereof: Ten Years of Tax MalpracticeSSRN Electronic JournalHolding Corporate Officers Strictly Liable Under Patent and Copyright LawSSRN Electronic JournalHistory of Adultery and Fornication Criminal LawsSSRN Electronic JournalThe Death of Discretion in the Digital AgeSSRN Electronic JournalThe Law and Paraphilias: Sex Crimes (Re)Constructed as Mental DisordersSSRN Electronic JournalJudicial Deference to Tax Regulations Promulgated under I.R.C. § 6501(e)SSRN Electronic JournalOne Strike and You're Out: Padilla Advisement About Public Housing EligibilitySSRN Electronic JournalThe Dangerous Trend Blurring the Distinction between a Reasonable Expectation of Confidentiality in Privilege Law and a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Fourth Amendment JurisprudenceSSRN Electronic JournalThe Exportability of the Principles of Software: Lost in Translation?SSRN Electronic JournalThe Future of Securities LitigationSSRN Electronic JournalNarrative and Truth in Judicial Opinions: Corporate Charitable Giving CasesSSRN Electronic JournalWhen Animal Owners Attack: Veterinary Malpractice in IllinoisSSRN Electronic JournalA Square Peg in a Round Hole? Whether Make Whole Relief Is Available Under Erisa Section 502(A)(3)SSRN Electronic JournalTort Suits Filed by Rape and Sexual Assault Victims in Civil Courts: Lessons for Courts, Classrooms and ConstituenciesSSRN Electronic JournalGenocide, Murder and the Fundamental Human Right to Defend One's LifeSSRN Electronic JournalThe Blockbuster Punitive Damages AwardsSSRN Electronic JournalUsing Law Against Itself: Bush v. Gore Applied in the CourtsSSRN Electronic JournalThe Structure of the Fiduciary RelationshipSSRN Electronic JournalWhen the Machine That Goes Ping Causes Harm: Default Torts Rules and Technologically-Mediated Health Care InjuriesSSRN Electronic JournalHaste Makes Waste: Congress and the Common Law in CyberspaceSSRN Electronic JournalFinancing Information Technologies: Function and FairnessSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 15Issue 5May 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. GiannouliasNo. 3-09-1056, 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 43 (Ill. App., January 27, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.May 2011.313-316.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15511Published in Volume: 15 Issue 5: May 26, 2011PDF download

Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Association, Inc. v. HolderNo. 09-1301 (GEB), 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23383 (D. NJ, March 7, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 5 CasesInteractive Media Entertainment & Gaming Association, Inc. v. HolderNo. 09-1301 (GEB), 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23383 (D. NJ, March 7, 2011)Published Online:26 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15516AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byKnow When to Fold 'Em: The International Effects of Murphy v. NCAA and Why Antigua Holds the CardsSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 15Issue 5May 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Association, Inc. v. HolderNo. 09-1301 (GEB), 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23383 (D. NJ, March 7, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.May 2011.317-324.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15516Published in Volume: 15 Issue 5: May 26, 2011PDF download

Betting on Reconciliation: Law, Self-Governance, and First Nations Economic Development in Canada

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 4 ArticlesBetting on Reconciliation: Law, Self-Governance, and First Nations Economic Development in CanadaPaul Seaman, Brenda Pritchard, and David PotterPaul SeamanSearch for more papers by this author, Brenda PritchardSearch for more papers by this author, and David PotterSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:4 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15406AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySettler colonialism, Indigenous cultures, and the promotional landscape of tourism in Ontario, Canada's ‘near North’19 February 2019 | Journal of Heritage Tourism, Vol. 14, No. 3 Volume 15Issue 4Apr 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Paul Seaman, Brenda Pritchard, and David Potter.Betting on Reconciliation: Law, Self-Governance, and First Nations Economic Development in Canada.Gaming Law Review and Economics.Apr 2011.207-219.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15406Published in Volume: 15 Issue 4: May 4, 2011PDF download

Bashkin v. San Diego CountyNo. 08cv1450-WQH-WVG, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7878 (S.D. CA, January 27, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 4 CasesBashkin v. San Diego CountyNo. 08cv1450-WQH-WVG, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7878 (S.D. CA, January 27, 2011)Published Online:4 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15411AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byFailed Strategy: Using Trade Secret Laws to Assert Ownership of Employees' Social Media Accounts in the Journalism IndustrySSRN Electronic JournalBuying Voice: Financial Rewards for Whistleblowing LawyersSSRN Electronic Journal(The Competence to Testify of Mentally Disordered and Mentally Retarded Persons)SSRN Electronic JournalDiscovery and the Evidentiary Foundations of Implicit BiasSSRN Electronic JournalPolicing Boilerplate: Reckoning and Reforming Rule 344s Popular Yet Problematic ConstructionSSRN Electronic JournalTransnational Class Actions in the Shadow of PreclusionSSRN Electronic JournalPA-‘Trolling’ the False Marking Frontier: Giving Section 292 The Proper Makeover in Wake of the America Invents ActSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 15Issue 4Apr 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Bashkin v. San Diego CountyNo. 08cv1450-WQH-WVG, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7878 (S.D. CA, January 27, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Apr 2011.237-241.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15411Published in Volume: 15 Issue 4: May 4, 2011PDF download

AK Tournament Play, Inc. v. Town of WallkillNo. 09 Civ. 10579 (LAP), 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4873 (S.D.N.Y, January 19, 2011)

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 4 CasesAK Tournament Play, Inc. v. Town of WallkillNo. 09 Civ. 10579 (LAP), 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4873 (S.D.N.Y, January 19, 2011)Published Online:4 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15412AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byThe Law and Social Psychology of Racial Disparities in School DisciplineSSRN Electronic JournalPolicing Boilerplate: Reckoning and Reforming Rule 344s Popular Yet Problematic ConstructionSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 15Issue 4Apr 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:AK Tournament Play, Inc. v. Town of WallkillNo. 09 Civ. 10579 (LAP), 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4873 (S.D.N.Y, January 19, 2011).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Apr 2011.243-246.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15412Published in Volume: 15 Issue 4: May 4, 2011PDF download

From Constraint to Competition: 50 Years of Change in British Gambling Policy

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 3 ArticlesFrom Constraint to Competition: 50 Years of Change in British Gambling PolicyDavid MiersDavid MiersSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:19 Mar 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15306AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byThe Gambling Market in Great Britain Volume 15Issue 3Mar 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:David Miers.From Constraint to Competition: 50 Years of Change in British Gambling Policy.Gaming Law Review and Economics.Mar 2011.93-103.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15306Published in Volume: 15 Issue 3: March 19, 2011PDF download