Indian Gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: A Case of “Play to Pay”

Abstract

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 15, No. 6 ArticlesIndian Gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: A Case of “Play to Pay”William A. Taggart and Thaddieus W. ConnerWilliam A. TaggartSearch for more papers by this author and Thaddieus W. ConnerSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:23 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15605AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGambling on Decentralization: How Sub-National Regulatory Interests Condition the Impact of Federal Policy6 December 2021 | State and Local Government Review, Vol. 53, No. 4Gaming Opportunities: American Indian Casinos, Cash Transfers, and Income Mobility on the ReservationAEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 11120 Years of Indian Gaming: Reassessing and Still Winning27 February 2019 | Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 100, No. 3Resource rents, universal basic income, and poverty among Alaska’s Indigenous peoplesWorld Development, Vol. 106The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and Its Effects on American Indian Economic DevelopmentJournal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 29, No. 3Assessing the Impact of Indian Gaming on American Indian Nations: Is the House Winning?22 February 2013 | Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 94, No. 4Indian gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: Socio-economic determinants of policy adoption9 December 2019 | The Social Science Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2 Volume 15Issue 6Jun 2011 InformationCopyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:William A. Taggart and Thaddieus W. Conner.Indian Gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: A Case of “Play to Pay”.Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2011.355-363.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.15605Published in Volume: 15 Issue 6: June 23, 2011PDF download