REVIEW Spence, Sarah. TextsandtheSelfinthe Twelfth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1996. Pp. xi+ 167. This is another book which follows the prevailing fashion of exploringthenotionofthe'selfinrelationtomedievalliterature(cf. Gerald Bond's TheLovingSubject). But, giventhatthe field isalargeoneand opentotheadoptionofdifferentcriticalandtheoreticalstances,thisstudy isdistinctive. Theargumentwhichrunsthroughitisthat"thereexistsadirect correlationnotonlybetweentext andbody [inLatin,corpusinreference toboth],butalsobetweenlanguageandself: notlinguisticaffinities,/^/·se, but conceptual possibilities offered by - and between - Latin and the vernacular"(2). Theconceptofthe"spaceofagency"isanimportantfeaturesince itispresent oncethe selfandthevernaculartextdevelop. Thisself, made possible bythetwelfth-centuryvernaculartext, isalsotheresult, inpart, oftherelationshipofLatintothevernacular. Thebookfollowsaninterestingpattern,withchaptersdevotedto Suger'sDeadministrationeandqualifiedas 'writing outofthebody', a comparisonofthethoughtofAbelardandGuibertdeNogent,entitled'text ofthe body', the next, 'text ofthe self, devoted to a discussion ofthe openingofthespaceofagencyintheworkofthetroubadours,GuilhemIX, Jaufre Rudel, BernartdeVentadornandRaimbautd'Aurenga The last, 'writing inthe vernacular', looksattheLaisofMañede France. Thetitleofeachchapterdemonstratestheprogressofthedevelopmentofthoughtandattitudeleadingfromthecentralnotionofthebody inSuger,thealmostinsidiouswayinwhichAbelard,particularly,prefigures theapproachinthetroubadoursandMariedeFrance, where, bycomposinginthevernacular ,thereisconfrontationbetweenbodyandworld. 72 REVIEW There is, therefore, considerable emphasis on the texts which derivefromtheLatintradition,andrightlyso.Thediscussionrangesover mattersrelatingto etymologyandrepercussionsforshiftofmeaningand emphasiswhenthelexemeistakenupinthevernacular, suchashoraand ora, where,henceforth,"tempusest spatium"(WilliamofConches)(22). Inevitably,too,thenotionofthebuildingasspacefiguresimportanthyinthe chapterdevotedto Suger. Whentheselfbecomesimportant so doesthe domainoftheemotions,asshowninthefascinatinginterplayofemotions found in Abelard, whose Historia Calamitatum is a key document. Invidia and cupiditas are analysed in the context of Abelard's own personalexperience. Inthevernaculartexts,thetheoreticalpositiontakenupisthatthe poetryisat onceofthebodyandyet not. Here, Guilhemisdistinguished fromfoliowingpoets:"asthefirsttroubadour,GuilhemIXexperiencesa unique freedom. Text for him is ... a body that is whole and intact, not imperfectandmutilated,evenasitisabodythatcananddoesexistequally well inboththeworld and hismind" (87-88). Thisisto putanawesomeresponsibilityonGuilhemandonemay be led to wonder whetherthe position, as set out, can be a reflection of reality. Firstand foremost, what assurance istherethat he was"the first troubadour"?Scholarsareinagreementthathewasprecededbyothers. Hemaywellhave rejectedthetenetsofthese,but hewascertainlynotthe freeagentrepresentedhere. Hisuseoftechnicalterminologyissuchasto suggestthathewasat least followinganestablishedcanon. Alliedto this point, Spence addsthe remark that LauraKendrick notes howmodern criticismpresentshimas"two-fàced"(86). Hardlymodern: PioRajna in 1 928, wrote anow famousarticle inwhichhe is the "trovatore bifronte", and, incidentally, uses this dualism to prove that he cannot be the first troubadour. It isclearthattheapproachinthisbookdoesnotprecludetheneed forattentiontodetail.Certainly,too,onecangoalongwithapsychoanalytic interpretationprovided that it does not become anachronistic (andthis 73 REVIEW bookdoesnotallowthat,onthewhole),but,ifthisinterpretationdominates sothatwordsarechosentomeanwhatfitsthetheory,thenthisisnotgood forscholarship. Takethediscussionofthewell-knownanddifficult line, "nosn'avemlapessae-1coutel". Whileit ispossiblethatthetwotermsare comparable to Abelard's key terms ofpraecitium 'cliff and gladium 'sword', is it likely? The earthy, proverbial use ofthe expression is the answer to the posturings ofpeople whose basis for love is in words ("paraulas"),"quetalsevand'amorgabán"(and,incidentally,not"gaber", foundinthetext(93)). Indeed,inthisrespect,Guilhemadoptsastandpoint whichisnotthatofhisfellowpoetsbuthe,too,existsaspartofatradition, evenifheretainssomeofthecharacteristicswhichwillnot befollowedby successive poets. Again, to say that "his works, unlike those of the troubadourswhofollow,aredeliberatelynotintertextual"and, "inasense, impossible"because"hispointistoredefinetext inawaythatemphasizes itsalliancewiththe feminine" seemsto missouttheessentials. Howcanwe knowwhetherthereisintertextualityornotwithoutantecedents?Who is to saythatthealliancewiththefemininewasexcludedotherthaninAbelard, withwhomlinksarebeing soughtbySpence?Similarcommentscanbe made inrelation to the othertroubadours studied. Thetoneoftheseremarkswillindicate sufficientlythedifficulty experienced inattemptinganappreciationofthiswork. This isalearned book,inwhichtheknowledgeoftextandauthorisapparent. Butthedanger init isthat ofenunciating atheoryandthenapplyingit toawiderangeof materialratherthanproceedinginductivelyinrespectofeachaspect. It is not a large volume; the chapter devoted to the four troubadours, for example,covers33pages,whichscarcelypermitsanydeepexplorationof detail. This study is defined uniquely in terms ofthe theory being put forward. Itis, however,thought-provoking,well-writtenandattractively presented. It may well be that Sarah Spence will wish to return to the troubadours in a wider context and that will be welcome. Peter T. Ricketts University ofBirmingham 74 REVIEW WORKSCITED Bond, Gerald. The Loving Subject: Desire, Eloquence andPower in Romanesque France. Philadelphia: University ofPennsylvania Press, 1995. Kendrick, Laura. The Game ofLove: Troubadour WordPlay. Berkeley : University ofCalifornia Press, 1988. Rajna Pio. "Guglielmo, conte de Poitiers, trovatore bifronte". Mélanges de linguistique et de littérature offerts à M. Alfred Jeanroy. Paris: Droz, 1928: 349-60. 75 ...