Reviewed by: Embodiments of Will: Anatomical and Physiological Theories of Voluntary Animal Motion from Greek Antiquity to the Latin Middle Ages, 400 B.C.-A.D. 1300 Sabrina Grimaudo Michael Frampton . Embodiments of Will: Anatomical and Physiological Theories of Voluntary Animal Motion from Greek Antiquity to the Latin Middle Ages, 400 B.C.-A.D. 1300. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag, 2008. xxxv + 623 pp. Ill. $100.00 (978-3-639-08294-4). Embodiments of Will is the evocative title of this monograph aiming to reconstruct the history of the two main theories on the origin of voluntary animal motion, from Aristotle to Mondino dei Luzzi (fourteenth century): the cardiocentric theory and the cerebrocentric one. It is a history in which, as Frampton shows, scientific knowledge, philosophical convictions, and "beliefs" linked to the paradigms dominant at different times are inextricably interwoven. The work is based not only on a reading of many Greek and Latin sources, Arabic compendia, and medieval texts but also on dissections personally carried out by the author (a practicing physician) according to Aristotle and Galen and documented by photographs. After a brief introductory chapter, we really get into classical antiquity in chapters 2 and 3 (part I). Chapter 2 examines the first works from the Greek world that developed a systematic investigation of voluntary animal motion (hekousios kinesis): Aristotle's De incessu animalium and, above all, De motu animalium. Frampton's analysis is broadened here in order to take in on one side the forerunners of Aristotle's reflection (Pre-Socratics, Corpus Hippocraticum, Plato especially in Timaeus), extending on the other hand to more or less all the Aristotelian corpus.. Consistent with his biological and philosophical system, which is clearly cardiocentric, in Aristotle the theory of voluntary motion also hinges on the heart and the neura (cardiosinew theory). Chapter 3 is devoted to Galen's cerebrocentric theory. Here Frampton shows that Galen, in response to the revival of Aristotle's cardiocentrism by Chrysippus through valorization of the role of the vagus nerve, "translates" the issue of the origin of movement into the terms of the place of the hegemonikon. In opposition to what the Stoics maintained, this part of the soul, also responsible for the motor impulse, is not placed in the heart but in the brain, from which the nerves spring (cerebroneuromuscular theory). Galen, in keeping with his epistemological style, proves this through anatomical demonstrations carried out both by dissection of dead bodies and by vivisection of animals. Perhaps it is the shift of the axis of Galen's reflection and his focusing on the problem of the place of the hegemonikon that explain why Frampton decides to base his analysis above all on De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, leaving out other works by Galen that are nevertheless pertinent to the theme in question (De motu musculorum, De motibus dubiis). In this respect, chapter 3 proves to be less exhaustive than chapter 2. [End Page 132] Part II (chaps. 4 and 5) traces the history of the classical theories of voluntary animal motion from late antiquity to the threshold of the Renaissance, well remarking the decisive role played in those centuries by the Latin translations of the texts of Aristotle, Galen, and Avicenna in the prevalence of one or the other theory. During the early Middle Ages (chap. 4) we find some reflection on the theme, more or less by accident, in the works of authors who are not physicians, all oriented toward a cerebrocentric solution deriving from Plato and Galen. This was a situation destined to change following the spread, in the centuries of the late Middle Ages (chap. 5), of Latin translations of Aristotle's biological works and Avicenna's Canon, which leads to a clear reaffirmation of the cardiocentric theory of voluntary movement, fully reflected in the great anatomy manual of Mondino dei Luzzi (Anatomia, Bologna, 1316). Having thus become part of the curriculum of the universities, this theory was substantially to be dominant until the publication of De corporis humani fabrica by Andreas Vesalius (1543), which was to mark its definitive eclipse in favor of the cerebrocentric model worked out by Galen. The bibliography is rich, though of uneven value. The...
Read full abstract