Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI Research Articles

Hypervascular Transformation of Hypovascular Hypointense Nodules in the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of hypovascular hypointense nodules in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and the risk factors for the hypervascular transformation of the nodules through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched the Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for published studies of hypovascular hypointense nodules in patients with chronic liver disease. The pooled proportions of the overall and cumulative incidence rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for the transformation of hypovascular hypointense nodules into hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were assessed by using random-effects modeling. Metaregression analysis was performed. Sixteen eligible studies with 944 patients and 1819 hypovascular hypointense nodules in total were included. The pooled overall rate of hypervascular transformation was 28.2% (95% CI, 22.7-33.6%; I2 = 87.46%). The pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidence rates were 18.3% (95% CI, 9.2-27.4%), 25.2% (95% CI, 12.2-38.2%), and 30.3% (95% CI, 18.8-41.9%), respectively. The metaregression analysis revealed that the mean initial nodule size (cutoff value, 9 mm) was a significant factor affecting the heterogeneity of malignant transformation. Hypovascular hypointense nodules detected in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI carry a significant potential of transforming into hypervascular HCCs. The size of nodules is a significant risk factor for hypervascular transformation.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnostic strategies for differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma.

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) strategy compared with conventional MRI strategy and biopsy to differentiate focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). A decision tree model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of EOB-MRI, conventional MRI with extracellular contrast agents, and biopsy as the initial diagnostic modality in patients with incidentally detected focal liver lesions suspected of being FNH or HCA. We analysed the cost and effectiveness, i.e. probability of successful diagnosis of each strategy. Costs were based on utilisation rates and Medicare reimbursements in the USA and South Korea. In the base case analysis of our decision tree model, the effectiveness of the three strategies was similar. The cost of the EOB-MRI strategy ($1283 in USA, $813 in South Korea) was lowest compared with the biopsy strategy ($1725 in USA, $847 in South Korea) and the conventional MRI strategy ($1750 in USA, $962 in South Korea). One-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed unchanged results over an acceptable range. EOB-MRI strategy is the most cost-effective strategy for differentiating FNH from HCA in patients with incidentally detected focal liver lesions in a non-cirrhotic liver. • The effectiveness of the three strategies was similar. • The cost of the EOB-MRI strategy was lowest. • EOB-MRI strategy is the most cost-effective for differentiating FNH from HCA.

An excerpt of 2016 consensus recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology about diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI

An excerpt of 2016 consensus recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology about diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI

Multiparametric imaging for detection and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and perfusion-CT: which parameters work best?

BackgroundMRI and perfusion-CT (PCT) are both useful imaging techniques for detection and characterization of liver lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of imaging parameters derived from PCT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods36 patients with liver cirrhosis and a total of 67 lesions referred to our hospital for multi-parametric diagnosis of HCC-suspected liver lesions in the setting of liver cirrhosis were prospectively enrolled and underwent PCT and MRI. HCC diagnosis was confirmed either by histology (n = 60) or interval growth (n = 7). For PCT, mean/max blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), k-trans, arterial liver perfusion (ALP), portal venous perfusion (PVP) and hepatic perfusion index (HPI) were quantified. Two readers identified the lesions based on single maps each being blinded to the number of lesions.MRI-protocol included fat-suppressed T1w-VIBE sequences obtained before, 2, 5, 10 and 20 min after the injection of gadoxetic acid as well as non-enhanced coronal HASTE, axial T1w-VIBE, fat-suppressed T2w-TSE and DWI. Quantitative analysis was performed using enhancement ratios between tumor and liver parenchyma for post-contrast in the hepatobiliary phase (RIRHB), arterial (ERa) and late-venous (ERv) phases as well as signal intensity ratios (liver/parenchyma) on T1w (RIRT1) and T2w (RIRT2).ResultsIn PCT analysis, all lesions exhibited high BFmax values (63–250 mL/100 g tissue) and were visible on HPI maps with high degrees of arterial blood supply of (HPI > 96%).In MRI, RIRHB was negative in 8/67. 12/67 HCCs were missed on DWI. 46/67 HCCs showed wash-in and 47/67 HCC showed wash-out of contrast agent. 6/67 HCCs were missed on T1w and 11/67 were missed on T2w-sequences when analyzed separately, while analysis of multiparametric MRI combining typical enhancement pattern, visibility on hepatobiliary phase and T1w-images the same number of lesions as PCT irrespective of their size (1–19 cm) were detected. Quantification of early enhancement by ERa or ERv did not improve detection rates.ConclusionsPerfusion-CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were comparable in detecting HCC lesions. For PCT a mean HPI > 96% proved to be a very robust parameter for detection and characterization of HCC.

Curative Resection of Single Primary Hepatic Malignancy: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Category LR-M Portends a Worse Prognosis

The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between preoperative Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories and prognosis after curative resection of single hepatic malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease. Between January 2008 and December 2010, 225 patients with chronic liver disease underwent resection of single hepatic malignant tumors (218 hepatocellular carcinomas, three cholangiocarcinomas, four biphenotypic carcinomas) after undergoing gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists retrospectively categorized the tumors into LI-RADS categories. Differences in disease-free survival duration between categories were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Reviewer 1 categorized two (0.9%) patients as having LR-3, 53 (23.6%) LR-4, 159 (70.7%) LR-5, and 11 (4.9%) LR-M lesions. The corresponding numbers for reviewer 2 were six (2.7%) LR-3, 30 (13.3%) LR-4, 178 (79.1%) LR-5, and 11 (4.9%) LR-M. The 2-year cumulative recurrence or death rates were 15.1% for lesions categorized LR-3 or LR-4 by reviewer 1, 31.7% for LR-5, and 60% for LR-M. For lesions categorized by reviewer 2 the corresponding rates were 20.6% for LR-3 or LR-4, 29% for LR-5, and 54.5% for LR-M. Disease-free survival was significantly worse among patients with lesions categorized as LR-M than for lesions categorized as LR-3 or LR-4 or as LR-5 (p < 0.01 for both reviewers). Disease-free survival did not significantly differ between patients with LR-3 or LR-4 and those with LR-5 lesions (reviewer 1, p = 0.301; reviewer 2, p = 0.291). Patients with tumors preoperatively categorized as LR-M may have a worse prognosis than those with tumors categorized LR-3, LR-4, or LR-5 after curative resection of single hepatic malignancy.

Subtraction Images of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Effect on the Diagnostic Performance for Focal Hepatic Lesions in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of subtraction images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI on the image interpretation of focal hepatic lesions in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively analyzed 255 malignant nodules from 233 patients with chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis (187 men and 46 women; mean age, 55.2 years) who underwent preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and surgical resection. We compared the detection rate of arterial hypervascularity on visual assessment with that of subtraction images. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the pathologic profile of the lesion (HCC vs non-HCC), the lesion size (≤ 3 vs > 3 cm), and the MRI technique (1.5 vs 3 T). We assessed the effect of subtraction images in diagnosing HCC according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines compared with that of visual assessment. After excluding six patients whose images were not of nondiagnostic quality, 249 nodules (215 HCCs, 27 cholangiocarcinomas, and seven combined HCC and cholangiocarcinomas) from 227 patients were analyzed. Subtraction images more sensitively detected the arterial hypervascularity of all of the hepatic lesions than did visual assessment (sensitivity, 89.2% vs 72.4%; p < 0.001). In all of the subgroup analyses, the same tendency was observed (p = 0.001-0.145). Compared with visual assessment only, arterial hypervascularity determined by both subtraction images and the visual enhancement patterns increased sensitivity from 76.5% to 87.5% (p < 0.001) in diagnosing HCCs, with a minimal decrease in specificity from 80.9% to 78.1% (p = 0.332). Adding subtraction images with consideration of visual enhancement patterns can enhance the sensitivity in diagnosing HCC by enhancing the detection of arterial hypervascularity.

Assessment of Liver Transplant Grafts on Gadoxetic Acid Enhanced-MRI in Pediatric Patients

Assessment of Liver Transplant Grafts on Gadoxetic Acid Enhanced-MRI in Pediatric Patients

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging.

To assess major imaging features of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) on contrast-enhanced CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and to estimate whether the combination of signal intensity favouring HCC on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) can act as a major feature in LI-RADS. Four hundred twenty one patients with 445 observations were included. Major features of LI-RADS on CT and MRI as well as HBP and DWI features were assessed. Diagnostic performances of LR-5 according to LI-RADS v2014 and modified LI-RADS which incorporate combination of HBP and DWI were assessed. Pairwise comparisons of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed. For HCCs, capsule appearance had the highest rate of discordance between CT and MRI (32.7%), followed by washout appearance (22.2%). Specificity (75%) of LR-5 of LI-RADS v2014 was lower than that (77.1-79.2%) of modified LI-RADS. Area under the ROC curve of modified LI-RADS (0.755-0.775) was not significantly different from that of LI-RADS v 2014 (0.709) (p > 0.05). There were substantial discordances between CT and MRI for capsule and washout appearances in hepatic observations, and combination of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and DWI might be able to be incorporated as a major feature of LI-RADS. • Major imaging features of LI-RADS showed substantial discordances on CT and MRI. • An observation may be categorized differently depending on used imaging exam. • CT and MRI should both be performed for LR-3 and LR-4 observations. • Combination of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and DWI may be a major feature.

Additional value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the surgical management of colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases

Objective: To assess the impact of preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI (Primovist/Eovist) compared to a standard non-hepatospecific Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI on the surgical management of colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastasis. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 123 patients who underwent both a Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI and a non-hepatospecific Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI for evaluation of liver metastasis, within 30 days, from January 2012 to December 2015 at the CHU de Quebec was performed. The number of lesions identified on each MRI was compared. In cases where the number of lesions differed from one imaging modality to another, the surgeons were asked if their surgical plan was modified by the additional findings of the Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI. Results: Compared to the non-hepatospecific Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI, the Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI found new lesions in 24 of the 121 patients (19.8%), excluded lesions in 28 patients (23.1%) and identified the same number of lesions in 69 patients (57.0%). Regardless of the size, 95.8% of the patients with a unique liver metastasis seen on the non-hepatospecific Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI had no new lesions on the Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI. The addition of the Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI directly altered the surgical management in 28 % of the patients. Conclusion: Despite the additionnal cost associated with a Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI compared to a standard non-hepatospecific Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI, the use of this contrast agent has a significant impact on the surgical management of patients with liver metastasis more specifically in patients with more than one liver metastasis identified on a standard non-hepatospecific Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI.

The value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for differentiation between hepatic microabscesses and metastases in patients with periampullary cancer.

We aimed to identify features that differentiate hepatic microabscess from hepatic metastasis on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in patients with periampullary cancer. We included 72 patients (31 patients with 83 hepatic microabscesses and 41 patients with 71 hepatic metastases) who had a history of periampullary cancer and underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Image analysis was performed for margin, signal intensity, rim enhancement, perilesional hyperaemia, pattern on DWI and dynamic phases, and size discrepancy between sequences by consensus of two observers. Multivariate analysis revealed that the following significant parameters favour microabscess: a history of bile duct cancer, perilesional hyperaemia, persistent arterial rim enhancement through the transitional phase (TP), and size discrepancy between T1WI and T2WI and between T1WI and hepatobiliary phase image (HBPI). The diagnostic accuracy for microabscess was highest (90.9%) when showing a size discrepancy ≥30% between T1WI and HBPI or persistent arterial rim enhancement through the TP. When the lesion was positive for both these variables, specificity reached 100%. The combination of a size discrepancy between T1WI and HBPI and persistent arterial rim enhancement through the TP represents a reliable MRI feature for distinguishing between hepatic microabscess and metastasis in patients with periampullary cancer. • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is useful for distinguishing hepatic microabscess from metastasis. • Hepatic microabscess showed significant size discrepancy ≥30% between T1WI and HBPI. • Arterial rim enhancement persistent through the TP indicates hepatic microabscess.

Assessment of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI phases for LI-RADS categorization and non-invasive grading of hepatocellular carcinoma

Assessment of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI phases for LI-RADS categorization and non-invasive grading of hepatocellular carcinoma

Quantitative analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma

ObjectiveTo confirm the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. MethodsNinety-five HCC patients underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI before surgical intervention. The correlations among the signal absolute enhancement, contrast enhancement ratio (CER) and tumor histological grade were analyzed. ResultsThe correlation between CER of tumor-to-liver and the grades of tumor differentiation is the most significant negative. The k-value for the CER of tumor-to-liver and histopathologic analysis is 0.62, which gives evidence of good agreement. ConclusionThe quantitative analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can predict the histological grades of small HCCs.

MRI of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Typical Features Are Less Frequent Below a Size Cutoff of 1.5 cm.

The purposes of this study were to analyze MRI features of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on the basis of size and to evaluate the difference in frequency of typical radiologic hallmarks of HCC (arterial enhancement and washout) according to the tumor size. Enrolled were 86 patients with 110 HCCs 3 cm or smaller who underwent surgical resection or transplantation. Two radiologists reviewed gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI features for signal intensity of T2-weighted and T1-weighted imaging, diffusion restriction, presence of arterial enhancement, washout on portal and transitional phases, and signal intensity on the hepatobiliary phase. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal HCC cutoff size for radiologic hallmarks of HCC. Tumors were divided into two groups by cutoff size, and the frequencies of MRI features were assessed. On ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff for radiologic hallmarks of HCC was 1.5 cm in independent and consensus reviews by two radiologists. HCCs smaller than 1.5 cm showed typical finding of HCC less frequently than HCCs 1.5 cm or larger in diameter. In subgroup analyses, HCCs with diameters between 1 and 1.5 cm showed similar MRI findings to HCCs with diameters 1 cm or less but significantly different findings compared with HCCs with diameters from 1.5 to 2 cm and 2-3 cm. HCCs smaller than 1.5 cm in size less frequently showed MRI findings seen typically in larger HCCs. Therefore, small HCCs are harder to detect with certainty not only because of small size but also because of the lower frequency of typical MRI findings.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma occurring in liver transplants.

Characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on magnetic resonance (MR) images were compared in patients who did or did not undergo liver transplantation (LT), and we evaluated the relationship of these findings with overall survival (OS) and time-to-tumour recurrence (TTR) after transplantation. The enhancement pattern of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images of 25 patients with recurrent HCCs (LT group) and 25 surgically confirmed HCC patients in the non-transplanted (control) group were compared. Typical enhancement was defined as 1) arterial enhancement and delayed wash-out and 2) absence of typical features of cholangiocarcinoma consisting of arterial rim enhancement and target appearance on hepatobiliary phase images. OS and TTR were analyzed in the LT group according to these patterns using the log-rank test. HCCs in the LT group significantly more often had an atypical enhancement pattern (16/25, 64.0%) than those in the control group (5/25, 20.0%; p = 0.004). However, OS and TTR did not differ significantly according to these enhancement patterns of recurrent HCC (p > 0.05). Although enhancement patterns of recurrent HCC in transplanted liver did not affect OS and TTR, these HCCs that arise after LT frequently revealed atypical enhancement on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. • Recurrent HCCs after LT showed atypical enhancement on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. •They showed absence of delayed wash-out or cholangiocarinoma-like features. • Enhancement patterns of recurrent HCCs did not affect OS and TTR.

Multimodality imaging to assess immediate response following irreversible electroporation in patients with malignant hepatic tumors.

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced multiphase CT (CECT), and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in identifying residual tumor in the subacute follow-up of patients with malignant hepatic tumors treated by irreversible electroporation (IRE). We enrolled 16 patients with 21 hepatic lesions treated by IRE and examined by CEUS and CECT at 1day after IRE and by EOB-MRI at 7days after IRE. Follow-up examinations by EOB-MRI or CECT and CEUS were performed at 3-month intervals. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and assessed the probability of residual tumor using a five-point scale with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The sensitivity and specificity were also evaluated. Verifiable local recurrence was assessed using follow-up imaging as the reference standard. The mean area under the ROC curve was significantly higher for CEUS (0.980) than for CECT (0.742, P<0.01) and EOB-MRI (0.806, P<0.01), as were the sensitivity and specificity (mean 85.7 and 85.7% for CEUS, respectively, vs 64.3 and 46.4% for CECT and 78.6 and 64.3% for EOB-MRI). CEUS was found to be superior to CECT and EOB-MRI for the diagnosis of residual tumor in the subacute phase following IRE.

High-flow haemangiomas versus hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma showing “pseudo-washout” on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatic MRI: value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of small lesions

To validate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the differentiation of high-flow haemangiomas showing pseudo-washout appearance on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatic MRI from small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). DWI (b=50, 800s/mm2) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for 50 haemangiomas (6.4±2.9mm) showing intense enhancement on arterial dominant phase imaging and hypointensity on transitional and/or hepatobiliary phase imaging during gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively analysed and compared with that of 113 hypervascular HCCs (12.8±3.7mm). In addition to measurement of mean ADC values on DWI and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on corresponding T2-weighted imaging, qualitative analysis of DWI was performed for each lesion by two independent observers using a five-point scale. Both of mean ADC value (1.902 versus 0.997×10-3mm2/s) and mean CNR (119.2 versus 36.9) for haemangioma were significantly larger than for HCC (p<0.001). On receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.995 for ADC values was significantly larger than 0.915 for CNRs (p=0.002). When the ADC value of 1.327×10-3mm2/s was used as the threshold for the diagnosis of haemangioma, the sensitivity and specificity were 98% and 97.3%, respectively. The mean sensitivity and specificity of qualitative analysis for the differentiation of haemangioma from HCC were 92% and 99.1%, respectively. For high-flow small haemangiomas showing pseudo-washout appearance during gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatic MRI, high b-factor DWI including an ADC map may provide additional information to enhance the confidence to exclude small hypervascular HCCs.

Biliary tract enhancement in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI correlates with liver function biomarkers

PurposeTo evaluate the association between gadoxetic-acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging measurements and laboratory and clinical biomarkers of liver function and fibrosis. Materials and methodsOne hundred thirty nine consecutive patients with suspected liver disease or liver tumor underwent gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MR imaging. MR imaging measurements during the hepatobiliary phase included biliary tract structure-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR). These measurements were compared with Child-Pugh classification, end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI). ResultsThe SIRs of cystic duct and common bile duct were significantly correlated with Child-Pugh classification (P=0.012 for cystic duct and P<0.0001 for common bile duct), MELD score (P=0.0016 and P=0.0033), and APRI (P=0.0022 and P=0.0015). The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve were: (74%, 88%, 0.86) with the SIR of common bile duct for the detection of patients with Child-Pugh class B or C; (100%, 87%, 0.94) with the SIR of cystic duct for MELD score (>10); (65%, 76%, 0.70) with the SIR of common bile duct for APRI (>1.5). ConclusionGadoxetic-acid contrast enhancement of cystic duct and common bile duct could be used as biomarkers to assess liver function.

Increased hepatic FDG uptake on PET/CT in hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome.

PurposeImaging features of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), an increasingly common drawback of chemotherapy, were evaluated via 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT).Experimental DesignThis retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board, with a waiver of informed consent. FDG PET/CT studies of 35 patients (male, 24; female, 11; median age, 53.2 years) obtained between January, 2005 and December, 2012 were analyzed before and after systemic chemotherapy. Diagnosis of SOS was based on histologic (n=13) or gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (n=22) findings. On PET/CT images, ROIs drawn on non-tumorous liver generated mean standardized uptake value (SUVliver). Total lesion glycolysis of liver (TLGliver) was calculated as: SUVliver × CT-derived hepatic volume. Paired t-test was applied to compare changes before and after SOS.ResultsMean (±standard error [SE]) values of hepatic volume (baseline, 1307.7±46.2 cm3; SOS, 1395.4±41.3 cm3; p=0.004), SUVliver (baseline, 2.08±0.06; SOS, 2.27±0.07; p=0.02), and TLGliver (baseline, 2697.5±114.5; SOS, 3170.2±134.2; p=0.001) significantly increased with development of SOS. In contrast, mean SUVaorta was unchanged (baseline, 1.53±0.04; SOS, 1.50±0.04; p=0.52).ConclusionsHepatic FDG uptake on PET/CT intensified after onset of SOS and thus may be an inappropriate reference in this setting, potentially skewing chemotherapeutic responses gauged by lesion-to-liver SUV ratio.

Prediction of postoperative liver failure using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

We intended to determine the usefulness of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on preoperative prediction of the risk of postoperative liver failure (PLF) using measurement of relative liver enhancement (RLE) in patients who underwent surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 121 HCC patients who had underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI before surgery between January 2012 and April 2015 at our hospital was retrospectively analyzed. RLE was calculated as the ratio of signal intensity measurements of the liver parenchyma in each liver segment before and 20 min after intravenous administration of gadoxetic acid. PLF was defined based on the "50-50 criteria" (prothrombin time <50% and serum bilirubin >5 mg/dL on 5 days after surgery). Of the 121 patients, 74 (61.2%) patients had liver cirrhosis, clinically. Median tumor size 2.8 cm (range, 1-14 cm), 106 (87.6%) patients had a single HCC, and 101 (83.5%) patients had HCC within Milan criteria. Based on the "50-50 criteria", PLF was observed in 7 (5.8%) patients. Mean RLE was significantly lower in patients with PLF than those without it (55.9% vs 85.5%, P < 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, decreased RLE was a significant independent risk factor for PLF in HCC patients (odds ratio 0.97, P = 0.03). Optimal cut-off RLE value was 82.36. RLE was significantly lower in patients with PLF than those without it. Measurement of RLE using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging before surgery can be useful for prediction of PLF in HCC patients who receive surgical treatment.

Hepatic Angiomyolipoma Versus Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Noncirrhotic Liver on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: A Diagnostic Challenge.

The purpose of this study is to describe the imaging characteristics of hepatic angiomyolipoma (AML) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and to identify imaging features that are helpful for differentiating it from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a noncirrhotic liver. We retrospectively identified 18 patients with pathologically proven hepatic AMLs who had undergone gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI between 2008 and 2012. We randomly chose 36 patients with noncirrhotic liver who had a single HCC diagnosed radiologically during the same period. None of the HCCs was of the fibrolamellar variant. Two readers reviewed images in consensus to assess the lesion size, the presence of fat, signal intensity characteristics, enhancement profile, early draining veins, intratumoral vessels, and tumor capsules. The tumor-to-liver contrast ratios were measured. These features and the measurements were compared between the two groups. AMLs are more commonly found in women (83.3%), whereas HCCs are more common in men (75%) (p < 0.01). The size of AMLs (3.4 cm) and HCCs (4.3 cm) did not differ significantly. Intratumoral fat was identified in both AMLs (50.0%) and HCCs (30.6%). The dynamic enhancement profile (arterial hypervascularity and hypointensity during the delayed phase) was similar qualitatively and quantitatively except for the portal phase. AMLs and HCCs differed significantly with regard to isointensity on DWI (16.7% vs 0.0%; p = 0.03), washout in the portal phase (61.1% vs 88.9%; p = 0.03), early draining veins (27.8% vs 2.8%; p = 0.01), intratumoral vessels (55.6% vs 22.2%; p = 0.03), and presence of capsule (11.1% vs 50.0%; p = 0.01). On gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI of noncirrhotic liver, AML is often indistinguishable from HCC on the basis of the enhancement profiles. Female sex and some imaging features including DWI could facilitate the differentiation.