Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) was first recognized and reported in 1989. After that, considerable research was published (using the term ‘‘nitric oxide synthase,’’ a search of PubMed from its inception through March 2011 produced 54 335 articles). The significance of NO gained even more importance following the Nobel Prize award in 1998 to R. Furchgott, L. Ignarro, and F. Murad. In humans and generally in mammals, these synthases catalyze NO production from L-arginine and co-substrates, molecular oxygen, and 5 electrons provided by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH). There are 3 NOS isoforms that are products of different genes, with different localization, regulation, catalytic properties, and inhibitor sensitivity. NOS-1 is located mainly in neuronal tissue, NOS-2 is inducible in a wide range of cells and tissues, whereas NOS-3 is found in vascular endothelial cells (also called eNOS). However, NOS-3 is not only expressed by vascular endothelial cells (where it mediates relaxation, migration, and inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cells growth, inhibition of platelet and leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium, and limitation of the oxidation of low-density lipoprotein particles), but it is also present within cardiac myocytes, where the enzyme associates with the scaffolding/regulatory protein caveolin 3 in T tubules of plasmalemmal caveolae. It follows that many investigators have studied the cardiac effects of various NOS inhibitors, NO-donating drugs, and NO itself. Indeed we have witnessed an explosion of information regarding NO, leading to a better understanding of its physiological and pathophysiological roles. Another, important issue concerning NO was the encoding of the NOS-3 gene, which has been extensively screened for polymorphisms. Much attention has focused on putatively functional variants (-786T>C [rs2070744], intron 4 27-basepair repeat, and Glu298Asp [rs1799983]). In this issue of Angiology, Rahimi and Nourosi-Rad reported the role of NOS-3 G894T polymorphism on predisposition to coronary heart disease (CHD). They found significantly higher frequency of the NOS-3 894T allele in patients with CHD, independently of the presence of diabetes mellitus, compared with controls. They also observed 2.15 times increased CHD risk in the presence of the T allele of NOS-3 gene. Studies examining the functionality of NOS-3 G894T polymorphism found that individuals with the -786C variant have lower NOS-3 messenger RNA (mRNA) and serum nitrite/nitrate levels. Also, homozygotes for the -786C allele have a decreased maximal forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine, a pharmacologic model to evaluate NO production in vivo. In case–control studies among Japanese participants, those carrying the C-786 and T894 alleles of the NOS-3 gene had a significantly higher risk of vasospastic angina, supporting a functional role of these polymorphisms on coronary endothelial function. In addition, mice in which the NOS-3 gene has been deleted are hypertensive, and those with deletions in both the apolipoprotein E and NOS-3 genes have increased susceptibility to atherosclerosis. Endothelial NO availability is influenced by intensity of synthesis. Thus, the gene encoding the NOS-3 is an attractive candidate gene for cardiovascular risk. A recently published meta-analysis supported an influence of this variant on CHD risk. Nevertheless, there are some conflicting studies that were discussed by Rahimi and Nourosi-Rad. One can argue that the small number of individuals in this study is a major limitation. However, research evaluating the genetic associations with atherosclerosis is a promising tool for primary and secondary prevention. The NOS-3 G894T polymorphism may become a useful genetic marker to identify individuals prone to the development of atherosclerotic diseases. CHD is a multifactorial disorder with genotype, environmental, and ethnic interactions, which have an important role in its development. Larger populations of patients and controls