G12C Inhibitors Research Articles

An updated overview of K-RAS G12C inhibitors in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer.

The discovery of KRAS mutations, particularly the KRASG12C variant, has been a milestone in understanding the molecular underpinnings of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These mutations are associated with aggressive tumor behavior and resistance to conventional therapies, highlighting the urgent need for targeted interventions. In this comprehensive review, we analyze the advancements in KRAS G12C inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Literature search is made from PubMed, Medline ASCO and ESMO Annual Meetings abstracts by using the following search keywords: "sotorasib", "adagrasib", "divarasib" and "KRAS G12C inhibitors." The last search was on 5June 2024. This review highlights the importance of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and potential adverse effects for treating individual patients and ensuring the best outcomes. Additionally, the review discusses research identifying biomarkers that can predict therapy responses and mentions the combination strategies to overcome resistance. Results of the studies and ongoing clinical trials are also briefly summarized in this review. KRASG12C inhibitors sotorasib, adagrasib and the newer divarasib, has revolutionized treating patients harboring this mutation. Ongoing studies and future clinical trials will refine our understandings with the ultimate goal of improving survival and quality of life for patients with this challenging disease.

274 (PB262): Development of Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Xenograft and Organoid Models with Acquired Resistance to KRAS G12C Inhibitors

274 (PB262): Development of Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Xenograft and Organoid Models with Acquired Resistance to KRAS G12C Inhibitors

312 (PB300): Concurrent inhibition of KRAS G12C and ERK1/2 overcomes acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors (G12Cis) conferred by various genetic alterations

312 (PB300): Concurrent inhibition of KRAS G12C and ERK1/2 overcomes acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors (G12Cis) conferred by various genetic alterations

EP.12C.03 Toxicities Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Followed by KRAS G12C Inhibitors in Patients with Metastatic NSCLC

EP.12C.03 Toxicities Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Followed by KRAS G12C Inhibitors in Patients with Metastatic NSCLC

Brief Report: Phase II Trial of Regorafenib and Oral Methotrexate in Previously Treated Advanced KRAS-Mutant NSCLC

IntroductionThere are no standard targeted treatment options for advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC beyond KRAS G12C inhibitors. A computational model identified regorafenib and low-dose methotrexate as synergistic in preclinical models of KRAS-mutant NSCLC. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination in previously treated advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC. MethodsThis single-arm phase II study included regorafenib 80 to 120 mg daily and oral methotrexate dose escalated to tolerability from 10 to 20 mg twice weekly during the first cycle. Both agents were administered on weeks 1 to 3 of each 4-week cycle. The primary end point was progression-free survival. ResultsIn total, 18 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC were enrolled. Five patients received regorafenib at a 120 mg starting dose with four discontinuing due to toxicity; subsequently, 13 patients were treated at an 80 mg starting dose, with eight dose-escalating to 120 mg after the first cycle. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval 1.8–8.6) and median overall survival was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval 5.2–30.3). The objective response rate was 16.7% and the 8-week disease control rate was 66.7%. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 patients, most often oral mucositis (n = 2) and asymptomatic lipase increase (n = 2). One patient developed asymptomatic grade 4 lipase increase. ConclusionsCombination treatment of regorafenib and oral methotrexate in patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC was limited due to toxicity, and the study did not meet its primary end point. Computational modeling may aid in repurposing therapeutic options though caution must be exercised with tolerability.

Potent covalent irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C IBI351 in patients with advanced solid tumors: First-in-human phase I study

BackgroundIBI351 is an irreversible and covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C. Despite FDA approval of two KRAS G12C inhibitors, there are still significant unmet clinical needs in Chinese patients and ongoing concerns about the optimal dosage. Herein, we presented the phase Ia/Ib study of IBI351 monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors harboring KRAS G12C mutation. MethodsIn phase Ia dose escalation, IBI351 at 250/450/700/900 mg once daily and 450/600/750 mg twice daily (BID) were evaluated. Potentially efficacious doses and optimal recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) were further evaluated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase Ia dose expansion and phase Ib. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and investigator-assessed tumor response were evaluated. ResultsAs of June 13, 2023, 176 patients were enrolled. IBI351 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicity reported across all evaluated doses. The RP2D was determined as 600 mg BID by considering safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics. A total of 168 patients (95.5 %) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), and 64 patients (36.4 %) had grade 3 or higher TRAEs, most commonly gamma-glutamyl transferase increased (10.2 %) and anemia (6.8 %). For patients with NSCLC, the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5 % across all doses. At 600 mg BID, the confirmed ORR was 46.8 % and median progression-free survival was 9.6 months with a median follow-up of 6.9 months. ConclusionsIBI351 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors and showed promising antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C mutation.

Discovery of Novel, Potent and Orally Bioavailable SMARCA2 PROTACs with Synergistic Anti-tumor Activity in Combination with KRAS G12C Inhibitors.

Cancer genomic studies have identified frequent mutations in subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex including SMARCA4 in non-small cell lung cancer with a frequency of up to 33% in advanced stage disease, making it the most frequently mutated complex in lung cancer. We and others have identified SMARCA2 to be synthetic lethal to SMARCA4, indicating SMARCA2 is a high value therapeutic target. Here, we disclose the discovery and characterization of potent, selective and orally bioavailable Cereblon-based SMARCA2 PROTACs. Biochemically, YDR1 and YD54 are potent SMARCA2 degraders with an average DC 50 of 7.7nM and 3.5nM respectively in SMARCA4 mutant lung cancer cells. Phenotypically, both YDR1 and YD54 selectively inhibited growth of SMARCA4 mutant cancer cells. Further, we showed anti-tumor growth inhibitory activity of YDR1 and YD54 in SMARCA4 mutant xenograft models of lung cancer. Finally, we show that YDR1 and YD54 synergize with the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib to inhibit growth of SMARCA4 and KRAS G12C co-mutant lung cancer cells. These findings provide additional evidence for the utility of single agent or combination regimens containing SMARCA2 PROTACs as synthetic lethal therapeutics against SMARCA4 mutant cancers.

SUNRAY-01, a pivotal, global study of olomorasib (LY3537982) in combination with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy for 1L treatment in KRAS G12C-mutant advanced NSCLC.

TPS218 Background: Mutations in KRAS are among the most frequent oncogenic drivers with the G12C variant found in ~13% of NSCLC. Outcomes for KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC may be improved by combining KRAS G12C inhibitors with current 1L standard of care (SOC). Olomorasib is a potent and highly selective second-generation inhibitor of KRAS G12C, which delivers >90% sustained target occupancy in preclinical models. In the LOXO-RAS-20001 phase 1/2 study, olomorasib in combination with pembrolizumab demonstrated preliminary efficacy and a favorable safety profile.1 Methods: SUNRAY-01 (NCT06119581) is a pivotal, global, phase 3 study in 1L advanced KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC designed to seamlessly 1) optimize the dosing of olomorasib in combination with 1L SOC, and then 2) compare efficacy and safety of olomorasib plus SOC with placebo plus SOC. In the open-label randomized dose optimization (pembrolizumab plus olomorasib 50 mg vs 100 mg BID) and single arm safety lead-in (olomorasib plus pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, platinum), the optimal dose of olomorasib for combination therapy will be determined before the phase 3 study (parts A and B) is opened for enrollment. In part A, 384 participants with PD-L1 expression ≥50% are randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab plus olomorasib or placebo. In part B, 552 participants are randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, platinum plus olomorasib or placebo regardless of PD-L1 expression. Allocation of participants with PD-L1 expression ≥50% to either part A or part B will be at the discretion of the investigator. The primary objective is to compare efficacy based on PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include OS, ORR, DOR, DCR, TTR, PFS2, safety and tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible participants (≥18 years) must have a KRAS G12C mutation in tumor or blood and known PD-L1 expression (0-100%), stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV NSCLC not suitable for curative intent radical surgery or radiation therapy, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and an ECOG PS 0-1. Participants can be enrolled based on local KRAS and PD-L1 testing results. Participants should not have received prior systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC, however 1 cycle of SOC treatment prior to enrollment is allowed if immediate treatment is clinically indicated. Participants with asymptomatic (lesions ≤1.5 cm) or previously treated radiographically stable brain metastases are eligible. Key exclusion criteria include history of pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease and clinically significant active cardiovascular disease or malabsorption syndrome. The study opened for enrollment in December 2023. Reference: 1. Murciano-Goroff et al. 2023 Cancer Res 83 (8 Suppl): CT028. Clinical trial information: NCT06119581 .

Single-cell sensor analyses reveal signaling programs enabling Ras-G12C drug resistance.

Clinical resistance to rat sarcoma virus (Ras)-G12C inhibitors is a challenge. A subpopulation of cancer cells has been shown to undergo genomic and transcriptional alterations to facilitate drug resistance but the immediate adaptive effects on Ras signaling in response to these drugs at the single-cell level is not well understood. Here, we used Ras biosensors to profile the activity and signaling environment of endogenous Ras at the single-cell level. We found that a subpopulation of KRas-G12C cells treated with Ras-G12C-guanosine-diphosphate inhibitors underwent adaptive signaling and metabolic changes driven by wild-type Ras at the Golgi and mutant KRas at the mitochondria, respectively. Our Ras biosensors identified major vault protein as a mediator of Ras activation through its scaffolding of Ras signaling pathway components and metabolite channels. Overall, methods including ours that facilitate direct analysis on the single-cell level can report the adaptations that subpopulations of cells adopt in response to cancer therapies, thus providing insight into drug resistance.

Current and Emerging Treatment Paradigms in Colorectal Cancer: Integrating Hallmarks of Cancer.

The treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer has evolved over the last two decades, as knowledge of cancer biology has broadened and new targets have emerged. 'The Hallmarks of Cancer' illustrate the crucial capabilities acquired by cells to become malignant and represent the evolution of knowledge of tumor biology. This review integrates these novel targets and therapies into selected hallmarks: sustaining proliferative signaling, inducing vasculature, avoiding immune destruction, genome instability and mutation, reprogramming cellular metabolism, and resisting cell death. The different strategies and combinations under study are based on treatments with anti-EGFR, anti-VEGF, and anti-HER2 agents, KRAS G12C inhibitors, BRAF and MEK inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, new approaches are emerging, including vaccines, WEE1 inhibitors, and PARP inhibitors, among others. The further deciphering of cancer biology will unravel new targets, develop novel therapies, and improve patients' outcomes.

A Critical Review of the Impact of SMARCA4 Mutations on Survival Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

This critical review investigates the impact of SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4) mutations on survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through an analysis of 21 peer-reviewed articles. Survival analyses across this review demonstrated consistently worse outcomes for SMARCA4-mutated vs. SMARCA4 wild-type NSCLC patients, specifically emphasizing class 1 truncating mutations as an independent factor for poor overall survival. In addition, this review explores the clinicopathologic characteristics of SMARCA4 mutations and their impact on various treatment modalities, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) both with and without Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) co-mutations. The potential ineffectiveness of ICI treatment in NSCLC is explored through the impact of SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutations on the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, this NSCLC review consistently reported statistically worse overall survival outcomes for SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutations than SMARCA4 wild-type/KRAS-mutated cohorts, extending across ICIs, chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), and KRAS G12C inhibitors. Designing prospective clinical SMARCA4-mutated or SMARCA4/KRAS co-mutated NSCLC trials to evaluate targeted therapies and immunotherapy may lead to a better understanding of how to improve cancer patients' outcomes and survival rates.

KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy based on tepotinib and omeprazole combination

BackgroundKRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) shows a relatively low response rate to chemotherapy, immunotherapy and KRAS-G12C selective inhibitors, leading to short median progression-free survival, and overall survival. The MET receptor tyrosine kinase (c-MET), the cognate receptor of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), was reported to be overexpressed in KRAS-mutant lung cancer cells leading to tumor-growth in anchorage-independent conditions.MethodsCell viability assay and synergy analysis were carried out in native, sotorasib and trametinib-resistant KRAS-mutant NSCLC cell lines. Colony formation assays and Western blot analysis were also performed. RNA isolation from tumors of KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients was performed and KRAS and MET mRNA expression was determined by real-time RT-qPCR. In vivo studies were conducted in NSCLC (NCI-H358) cell-derived tumor xenograft model.ResultsOur research has shown promising activity of omeprazole, a V-ATPase-driven proton pump inhibitor with potential anti-cancer properties, in combination with the MET inhibitor tepotinib in KRAS-mutant G12C and non-G12C NSCLC cell lines, as well as in G12C inhibitor (AMG510, sotorasib) and MEK inhibitor (trametinib)-resistant cell lines. Moreover, in a xenograft mouse model, combination of omeprazole plus tepotinib caused tumor growth regression. We observed that the combination of these two drugs downregulates phosphorylation of the glycolytic enzyme enolase 1 (ENO1) and the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) 5/6 in the H358 KRAS G12C cell line, but not in the H358 sotorasib resistant, indicating that the effect of the combination could be independent of ENO1. In addition, we examined the probability of recurrence-free survival and overall survival in 40 early lung adenocarcinoma patients with KRAS G12C mutation stratified by KRAS and MET mRNA levels. Significant differences were observed in recurrence-free survival according to high levels of KRAS mRNA expression. Hazard ratio (HR) of recurrence-free survival was 7.291 (p = 0.014) for high levels of KRAS mRNA expression and 3.742 (p = 0.052) for high MET mRNA expression.ConclusionsWe posit that the combination of the V-ATPase inhibitor omeprazole plus tepotinib warrants further assessment in KRAS-mutant G12C and non G12C cell lines, including those resistant to the covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors.

Impact of trial eligibility criteria on enrollment to KRASG12C inhibitor trials in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

11012 Background: Clinical trials of novel therapies should enroll a population that reflects patients (pts) who might receive the drug upon FDA approval. In 2017 ASCO proposed modifications to common eligibility criteria (EC) to increase the generalizability of trial findings. Despite this, barriers to trial enrollment in the recent era of molecularly-targeted therapies are not well-characterized. We examined a cohort of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pts with KRAS G12C mutations to determine whether EC for trials of KRAS G12C inhibitors allowed enrollment of patients seen as part of routine care at an academic medical center. Methods: We extracted EC for Phase I-III trials among six KRAS G12C inhibitors: sotorasib, adagrasib, LY3537982 , divarasib, JDQ443 and RMC-6291. We retrospectively reviewed pts with NSCLC and G12C mutations detected on universal, NGS-based testing of NSCLCs at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) from 2020 to 2023. We defined dates of disease progression and evaluated pts for clinical trial eligibility for each line of treatment. Pts were deemed trial-eligible if they met all EC, borderline if they had 1 laboratory value < 20% from cutoff, or ineligible. The association between baseline factors including self-reported race, sex, and age with rates of eligibility were evaluated with chi-squared tests. Results: EC criteria for 14 trials were characterized. EC were similar across trials regardless of agent or phase and did not substantially change over time; 1 Phase III trial had expanded EC from the Phase I/II trials. Of 1172 patients with NSCLC, we identified 185 pts with G12C mutations (15%), including 69 pts with advanced or metastatic disease. Of these, 19% (13/69) would have been eligible for any G12C trial, 15% (10/69) were borderline, and 67% (46/69) were ineligible. 9% (6) would have qualified for only 1 of the trials. The most common reasons for ineligibility were poor performance status (54% [30/56]), excluded comorbidities (25% [14/56]), and renal dysfunction (27% [15/56]). Among patients who received therapy after FDA accelerated approval (N = 22), only 23% (5) would have been eligible for the related Phase III trial. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that most patients with KRAS G12C mutations would not have been eligible for relevant trials, including > 75% of patients who received KRAS G12C inhibitors off-trial after accelerated FDA approval. EC did not expand after early phase trials demonstrated evidence of safety. These data should guide sponsor and FDA considerations in the development of trial protocols for targeted therapies, as fewer barriers to trial participation would enable trials to be completed more quickly and would improve the generalizability of trial results.

Safety and efficacy of ifebemtinib (IN10018) combined with D-1553 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS G12C mutation: Results from a phase Ib/II study.

8605 Background: KRAS G12C mutation is present in about 12-14% of NSCLC population. Ifebemtinib (IN10018) is a highly potent and selective oral inhibitor of focal adhesion kinase (FAK). D-1553 (garsorasib) is a novel oral and potent KRAS G12C inhibitor. Preclinical data showed that ifebemtinib in combination with KRAS G12C inhibitors had synergistic anti-cancer effect in multiple KRAS G12C mutant cancer models. This study is to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of ifebemtinib combined with D-1553 in solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutation. Here we report the preliminary data from phase II part of front-line NSCLCs with KRAS G12C mutation. Methods: Locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC subjects without prior systemic anti-cancer therapy were enrolled. Subjects were required to have KRAS G12C mutation in tumor tissues. All subjects were assigned to the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of ifebemtinib (100mg qd) + D-1553 (600mg bid). Results: As of 31 January 2024, 33 front-line NSCLC subjects with KRAS G12C mutation were enrolled and received the combination therapy. Median age was 65yrs (range 58, 83), 93.9% were male, and 81.8% had stage IV metastatic disease. Median study follow-up (FU) was 2.2 months (range 1.1, 9.2). The safety profile of the combination therapy is comparable to each single agent without additive toxicities. No ifebemtinib- or D-1553-related death was reported. Four subjects (12.1%) had ifebemtinib-related SAEs (diarrhea, enteritis, oedema peripheral and proteinuria) as assessed by investigators, and all SAEs were also considered D-1553 related. Six subjects (18.1%) had ≥ Grade 3 ifebemtinib-related AEs as assessed by investigators, and all were also D-1553 related AEs. The majority of ifebemtinib-related AEs were CTCAE Grade 1 or 2. There was no event leading to study treatment discontinuation. We have observed continuing tumor shrinkage in almost all subjects who had at least 2 tumor assessments. Among 16 subjects with ≥ 3 months FU, preliminary efficacy found that 14 had best overall response of partial response (PR) including 12 confirmed PRs and 2 unconfirmed but still in treatment, 1 had stable disease (SD), and 1 had progressive disease (PD). The overall response rate (ORR) was 87.5% (95%CI: 56.6, 96.2), and disease control rate (DCR) was 93.8% (95%CI: 63.6, 98.5). The median duration of response (DOR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached. Conclusions: The combination of ifebemtinib and D-1553, as a dual-oral regimen, showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety profile in KRAS G12C mutant front-line NSCLC population. Long term follow-up is needed to assess the potential of such novel combo. Clinical trial information: NCT06166836 ; NCT05379946 .

Characterization of BTX-10908, a first-in-class, orally bioavailable SOS1 bifunctional degrader for the treatment of KRAS- and RTK-driven cancers.

e15192 Background: Despite early clinical responses of targeted therapeutics against specific nodes in the RTK-RAS-MAPK pathway, limitations in the depth and duration of efficacy occur due to the emergence of adaptive and acquired resistance mechanisms. Resistance can result from the removal of feedback inhibition to reactivate RTKs, on-target amplification and new mutations. The efficacy of these oncogene-targeted agents in the clinic could be improved by co-treatment with additional therapies that address either type of resistance mechanism. The RAS guanine nucleotide exchange factor, Son of Sevenless 1 (SOS1), represents an ideal target to enhance clinical potency of other pathway inhibitors for two reasons. In addition to mitigating inputs from upstream RTKs to downstream RAS proteins, SOS1’s activity is also regulated by ERK- and RSK-mediated negative feedback inhibition with upstream and downstream inhibitors alleviating this inhibition to reengage pathway activation. Methods: To address this need, we utilized our PRODEGY platform to generate orally bioavailable, Cereblon (CRBN)-based SOS1 bifunctional degrader, BTX-10908, for the treatment of KRAS- and RTK-driven tumors. Results: BTX-10908 demonstrated rapid and potent SOS1 degradation with <10nM DC50 and maximum degradation > 90%. Consistent with BTX-10908’s mechanism of action, SOS1 degradation required CRBN and the proteasome. Not only did it reduce active RAS levels, but BTX-10908 also inhibited downstream signaling proteins (pERK, pRSK, pS6) and lowered ERK-mediated transcripts in KRAS- and EGFR-mutant as well as MET amplified cell lines under anchorage-independent (3D) conditions. Additionally, drug washout experiments demonstrated prolonged suppression of pERK and ERK-regulated transcripts with SOS1 degradation whereas rebound occurred quicker with SOS1 inhibitors. BTX-10908 displayed CRBN- and SOS1-dependent antiproliferative activity with IC50 values ranging from 0.5-20nM. Notably, BTX-10908 was significantly more potent than the clinical SOS1 inhibitor at reducing pERK levels and cell viability in multiple KRAS- and RTK-driven cell lines. Oral administration of BTX-10908 resulted in dose-dependent SOS1 degradation and tumor growth inhibition in H358 (KRAS G12C) and H441 (KRAS G12V) xenografts. The combination of BTX-10908 with KRAS G12C inhibitors (Sotorasib, Adagrasib) and various RTK inhibitors (EGFR, Met, BCR-ABL, and FLT3) prevented pathway reactivation driven by these inhibitors resulting in synergistic effects in in vitro proliferation assays and enhanced tumor growth inhibition in KRAS-mutant xenograft models. Conclusions: Our developmental candidate, BTX-10908, displayed robust in vitro and in vivo activity supporting its further development for monotherapy and combination therapies of KRAS and RTK-driven cancers.

Candidate molecular alterations associated with potential resistance in KRAS G12D gastrointestinal cancers.

3519 Background: KRAS G12D commonly occurs in pancreatic (PDAC) and colorectal (CRC) cancers. Though developing KRAS G12D inhibitors is pertinent, it is expected that primary and acquired resistance will limit efficacy, similar to those seen with KRAS G12C inhibitors. Here, we assessed the prevalence and outcomes of candidate mutations co-occurring with KRAS G12D in PDAC and CRC using liquid biopsy data. Methods: Patients with advanced CRC and PDAC tested with Guardant360 genomic profiling from 2020 to 2023 (~2500 & 3500 samples) were included. Candidate resistance mutations were determined based on mutations reported following KRAS G12C inhibition. Patients with advanced CRC and PDAC tested with Guardant360 at Mayo Clinic (2016-2023) (1158 & 904 samples) were assessed for overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into three groups: KRAS G12D alone, KRAS G12D with candidate resistance alterations, and KRAS G12D not detected (ND). OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for multivariable survival analyses. Results: The Guardant360 database reported KRAS G12D in 16.5% of CRC and 40.2% of PDAC samples. The Table below summarizes the most frequent candidate resistance alterations co-occurring with KRAS G12Dincluding point mutations of KRASand PIK3CAand amplifications of EGFR, KRAS, BRAFand MYC. In the Mayo cohort, 8.9% of CRC and 23.5% of PDAC patients had KRAS G12D. In CRC, those with KRAS G12Dand ≥1 candidate resistance alteration had a significantly lower OS (mOS 18.7m) than KRAS G12D alone (30.9m), and ND (37.3m) ( p=0.004). The presence of concurrent candidate resistance alterations with KRAS G12D remained a poor prognostic factor with HR 2.1 (95% CI: 1.3 – 3.2, p=0.001) after adjusting for age and other patient characteristics. Similarly, in PDAC, those with KRAS G12D and ≥1 resistance mutation had significantly lower OS (mOS 8.1m) than KRAS G12D alone (10.5m) and ND (16.1m) (p<0.0001). In multivariable analyses, both KRAS G12D with candidate resistance alterations (HR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4-3.3, p<0.001) and G12Dalone (HR 1.6; 1.3–2.0, p<0.001) were poor prognostic factors. Among patients with serial Guardant360, treatment response trended with KRAS G12D variant allele frequency. Conclusions: Circulating tumor DNA testing is a useful tool to reveal candidate molecular alterations linked to potential resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in patients with KRAS G12D gastrointestinal cancers. KRAS G12D with these concurrent molecular alterations is a poor prognostic factor in both PDAC and CRC. [Table: see text]

SUNRAY-01, a pivotal, global study of olomorasib (LY3537982) in combination with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy for 1L treatment in KRAS G12C-mutant advanced NSCLC.

TPS8649 Background: Mutations in KRAS are among the most frequent oncogenic drivers with the G12C variant found in ~13% of NSCLC. Outcomes for KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC may be improved by combining KRAS G12C inhibitors with current 1L standard of care (SOC). Olomorasib is a potent and highly selective second-generation inhibitor of KRAS G12C, which delivers >90% sustained target occupancy in preclinical models. In the LOXO-RAS-20001 phase 1/2 study, olomorasib in combination with pembrolizumab demonstrated preliminary efficacy and a favorable safety profile.1 Methods: SUNRAY-01 (NCT06119581) is a pivotal, global, phase 3 study in 1L advanced KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC designed to seamlessly 1) optimize the dosing of olomorasib in combination with 1L SOC, and then 2) compare efficacy and safety of olomorasib plus SOC with placebo plus SOC. In the open-label randomized dose optimization (pembrolizumab plus olomorasib 50 mg vs 100 mg BID) and single arm safety lead-in (olomorasib plus pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, platinum), the optimal dose of olomorasib for combination therapy will be determined before the phase 3 study (parts A and B) is opened for enrollment. In part A, 384 participants with PD-L1 expression ≥50% are randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab plus olomorasib or placebo. In part B, 552 participants are randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, platinum plus olomorasib or placebo regardless of PD-L1 expression. Allocation of participants with PD-L1 expression ≥50% to either part A or part B will be at the discretion of the investigator. The primary objective is to compare efficacy based on PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include OS, ORR, DOR, DCR, TTR, PFS2, safety and tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible participants (≥18 years) must have a KRAS G12C mutation in tumor or blood and known PD-L1 expression (0-100%), stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV NSCLC not suitable for curative intent radical surgery or radiation therapy, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and an ECOG PS 0-1. Participants can be enrolled based on local KRAS and PD-L1 testing results. Participants should not have received prior systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC, however 1 cycle of SOC treatment prior to enrollment is allowed if immediate treatment is clinically indicated. Participants with asymptomatic (lesions ≤1.5 cm) or previously treated radiographically stable brain metastases are eligible. Key exclusion criteria include history of pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease and clinically significant active cardiovascular disease or malabsorption syndrome. The study opened for enrollment in December 2023. 1Murciano-Goroff et al. 2023 Cancer Res 83 (8 Suppl): CT028. Clinical trial information: NCT06119581 .

Phase 1/2 trial of the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor in combination with docetaxel in previously treated, advanced KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8597 Background: KRAS mutant NSCLC remains a therapeutic challenge. Although KRAS G12C inhibitors are now approved for cases harboring that specific mutation, their efficacy is modest and the G12C variant accounts for only 40% of KRAS mutations in NSCLC. To date, there are no approved targeted therapies for non-G12C KRAS mutant NSCLC. Selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) modulate cancer cell biology by retaining certain proteins—such as tumor suppressors—within the nucleus, where they remain physiologically active. The XPO1 inhibitor selinexor demonstrated efficacyinpreclinicalNSCLC models harboring various KRAS mutations. Methods: In this 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase 1/2 trial, patients with previously treated advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC received selinexor (dosed orally weekly) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV every three weeks (NCT03095612). Prior treatment with KRAS G12C inhibitors was permitted. Results: Among 40 enrolled patients, median age was 66 years, 22 (55%) were female, and 34 (85%) were white. KRAS mutation types included G12C (28%), G12V (23%), G12D (20%), G12A (13%), G12R (5%), G13C (5%), and one case each of G12S, G13D, Q61L, and K117N. Patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-4). The maximum tolerated dose of selinexor was 60 mg PO weekly combined with docetaxel. The most common adverse events (AE) were nausea (73%, Gr ≥3 8%), fatigue (70%, Gr ≥3 5%), neutropenia (65%, Gr ≥3 60%), diarrhea (58%, Gr ≥3 10%), anorexia (50%, Gr ≥3 0%), and vomiting (45%, Gr ≥3 5%). Of 32 patients evaluable for efficacy, 7 (22%) had partial response (PR) and 18 (56%) had stable disease (SD) as best response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.9-5 months); median overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.5-13.7 months). Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly among KRAS mutation types. However, TP53co-mutations (48%) were associated with significantly worse outcomes: disease control rate (PR + SD) 27% vs 92% ( P=0.006); median PFS 1.8 vs 7.4 months ( P<0.001); median OS 5.8 vs 17 months ( P=0.006). Additional biomarker studies are ongoing. Conclusions: Selinexor plus docetaxel is tolerated with multi-agent supportive care. The combination shows moderate efficacy across KRAS mutation types, with promising activity in TP53 wild type cases. Clinical trial information: NCT03095612 .

TTF-1 negativity as a biomarker of outcomes to immunotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy, and KRAS G12C inhibitors in lung adenocarcinoma.

8608 Background: Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) expression is routinely assessed in lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) and is negative (TTF-1Neg) in 15-20% of cases. Whether these tumors differ from LUAD expressing TTF-1 (TTF-1Pos) in terms of biologic features and outcomes is unclear. Methods: Patients (pts) with LUAD and available TTF-1 expression by IHC at five institutions were included. Clinicopathologic, genomic, and outcomes data were compared according to TTF-1 expression. Results: Among 3,315 pts with LUAD, TTF-1 was negative in 15% (N=499). Compared to TTF-1Pos (N=2,816), pts with TTF-1Neg LUAD were more likely male (44% vs 38%, P=0.01), smokers (82% vs 74%, P<0.001), with stage IV disease at diagnosis (76% vs 71%, P<0.001), and lower median PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS, 1% vs 10%, P<0.001). At stage IV diagnosis, TTF-1Neg cases less commonly had brain metastasis than TTF-1Pos cases (35% vs 44%, P=0.04), but more frequently had bone metastasis (53% vs 45%, P=0.03). TTF-1Neg LUAD was enriched for KRAS, STK11, KEAP1, SMARCA4, and CDKN2A mutations (q<0.05), while TTF-1Pos LUAD was enriched for EGFR and MET mutations (q<0.05). Compared to TTF-1Pos LUAD, TTF-1Neg LUAD had higher prevalence of KRAS G12D (12% vs 4%, P<0.001) and G12V mutations (11% vs 7%, P=0.001), but similar frequency of G12C mutations (14% vs 15%, P=0.82). The association between TTF-1 and treatment outcomes was next investigated. Pts with stage III unresectable TTF-1Neg LUAD who received durvalumab after chemo-radiation (N=20), compared to TTF-1Pos cases (N=174), had shorter median progression-free survival (mPFS, 7.6 vs 24.7 months, P=0.01) and overall survival (mOS, 22.7 months vs not reached, P=0.01). Among pts with stage IV LUAD, TTF-1Neg cases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (N=237), compared to TTF-1Pos (N=1,161), had worse objective response rate (ORR, 17% vs 28%, P<0.001), mPFS (2.5 vs 4.7 months, P<0.001) and mOS (9.8 vs 20.9 months, P<0.001). Similarly, pts with TTF-1Neg LUAD (N=297) treated with chemoimmunotherapy, compared to TTF-1Pos cases (N=920), had worse ORR (27% vs 42%, P<0.001), mPFS (4.6 vs 8.1 months, P<0.001) and mOS (11.2 vs 23.4 months, P<0.001). TTF-1 negativity retained its association with worse outcomes after adjusting for treatment line, ECOG performance status, smoking status, PD-L1 TPS, STK11/ KEAP1 mutation status in multivariable cox regression models. Lastly, pts with KRAS G12C mutated TTF-1Neg LUAD treated with KRAS inhibitors (N=25), compared to TTF-1Pos (N=138), had worse ORR (12% vs 35%, P=0.03), mPFS (2.7 vs 5.9 months, P<0.001), and mOS (4.4 vs 12.1 months, P<0.001). After excluding mucinous LUAD cases, which are more commonly TTF-1Neg, similar results were observed. Conclusions: TTF-1 negativity identifies a unique clinicopathologic and genomic subset of LUAD with worse outcomes to diverse systemic therapies.

Effect of targeting FAK by ifebemtinib and immunogenic cell death of Kras G12C/G12D inhibition on the efficacy of PD1 blockade.

e15102 Background: Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is one major component of focal adhesion complex and is important in regulating cancer cell survival. Previously, we found that a clinical-stage FAK inhibitor, ifebemtinib (aka IN10018) can overcome drug resistance of Kras G12C inhibitors by down regulating the FAK-YAP signaling. Combination of Kras G12Ci and FAKi has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in NSCLC. Here, we reported that targeting Kras G12D by selective Kras G12Di can also be enhanced by ifebemtinib. Further, Kras G12C inhibition plus PD1 blockade has demonstrated clinical benefits in PD-L1 high expression patient population, but ≈30% of patients experienced early disease progression; this might be attributed to loss-of-function of LKB1 and others. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) of Kras inhibition is enhanced by ifebemtinib, ICD reportedly enhances anti-PD1 activity. Thus, Kras inhibition and PD1 blockade plus ifebemtinib may be an ideal combination for patients with Kras G12D. Methods: Cell killing and apoptosis assays were performed to test the combination of Kras G12D inhibition and ifebemtinib. FACs analysis evaluated exposure levels vs. ICD biomarkers. The mice inoculated with CRC GP2D and PDAC PC-07-0013 were used for evaluating the combinational effects of Kras G12Di and ifebemtinib. The tumor bearing mice with Kras G12D mutant/LKB1 loss, NSCLC KPL, and CRC CT26 with knock-in Kras G12C were used for testing the effects of Kras inhibition, ifebemtinib, and PD1 blockade. Results: Ifebemtinib enhances the drug effects of Kras G12D inhibition in vitro and in vivo. The dual regimen of ifebemtinib and Kras inhibition outperformed either monotherapy with significant ICD induction in vitro (calreticulin/GRP94 exposure). The triple regimen of Kras inhibition, FAK inhibition and PD1 blockade exhibited stronger anti-cancer effects compared to the other related therapies, especially in a Kras G12D mutant, LKB1 loss animal model which is intrinsically resistant to PD1 blockade/Kras G12D inhibition. Conclusions: We discovered that targeting FAK by ifebemtinib enhances the anti-cancer effects of Kras G12D inhibition. It promotes ICD by targeting Kras G12D or G12C, further primes the dual regimen of Kras inhibition and ifebemtinib towards a response to anti PD1 therapy. The preclinical results warrant a further evaluation in the clinic.