Impact of trial eligibility criteria on enrollment to KRASG12C inhibitor trials in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

11012 Background: Clinical trials of novel therapies should enroll a population that reflects patients (pts) who might receive the drug upon FDA approval. In 2017 ASCO proposed modifications to common eligibility criteria (EC) to increase the generalizability of trial findings. Despite this, barriers to trial enrollment in the recent era of molecularly-targeted therapies are not well-characterized. We examined a cohort of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pts with KRAS G12C mutations to determine whether EC for trials of KRAS G12C inhibitors allowed enrollment of patients seen as part of routine care at an academic medical center. Methods: We extracted EC for Phase I-III trials among six KRAS G12C inhibitors: sotorasib, adagrasib, LY3537982 , divarasib, JDQ443 and RMC-6291. We retrospectively reviewed pts with NSCLC and G12C mutations detected on universal, NGS-based testing of NSCLCs at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) from 2020 to 2023. We defined dates of disease progression and evaluated pts for clinical trial eligibility for each line of treatment. Pts were deemed trial-eligible if they met all EC, borderline if they had 1 laboratory value < 20% from cutoff, or ineligible. The association between baseline factors including self-reported race, sex, and age with rates of eligibility were evaluated with chi-squared tests. Results: EC criteria for 14 trials were characterized. EC were similar across trials regardless of agent or phase and did not substantially change over time; 1 Phase III trial had expanded EC from the Phase I/II trials. Of 1172 patients with NSCLC, we identified 185 pts with G12C mutations (15%), including 69 pts with advanced or metastatic disease. Of these, 19% (13/69) would have been eligible for any G12C trial, 15% (10/69) were borderline, and 67% (46/69) were ineligible. 9% (6) would have qualified for only 1 of the trials. The most common reasons for ineligibility were poor performance status (54% [30/56]), excluded comorbidities (25% [14/56]), and renal dysfunction (27% [15/56]). Among patients who received therapy after FDA accelerated approval (N = 22), only 23% (5) would have been eligible for the related Phase III trial. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that most patients with KRAS G12C mutations would not have been eligible for relevant trials, including > 75% of patients who received KRAS G12C inhibitors off-trial after accelerated FDA approval. EC did not expand after early phase trials demonstrated evidence of safety. These data should guide sponsor and FDA considerations in the development of trial protocols for targeted therapies, as fewer barriers to trial participation would enable trials to be completed more quickly and would improve the generalizability of trial results.