FVH-DWI Mismatch Research Articles

Comparison between MRI FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch and perfusion based triage for thrombectomy in the late time window.

The clinical impact of patient selection using FLAIR vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients who have been symptomatic for over 6 h remains unclear. Herein, a retrospective study was conducted to compare the inter-rater reliability and clinical outcomes of patients selected for thrombectomy based on FVH-DWI mismatch with perfusion. Patients with anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion selected simultaneously with MRI and perfusion imaging in the late time window from a single-center retrospective study were categorized into EVT-applicable (FVH-DWI mismatch on MRI or perfusion imaging meeting the DEFUSE3 standards) and EVT-inapplicable groups based on MRI and perfusion imaging. The primary outcome was the 90-day functional independence rate. Safety outcomes encompassed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality in 90 days. We assessed the consistency of the two profiles and compared the differences in functional independence rates of EVT patients among the EVT-applicable groups determined by MRI and perfusion. A total of 130 patients were enrolled, of which 114 were classified into the EVT-applicable group after triaging using MRI images. In this group, 96 patients underwent EVT, with 53 of them (55.2%) achieving functional independence. A total of 110 patients were divided into EVT-applicable group based on perfusion, among which 92 underwent EVT, with 49 of them (53.2%) achieving functional independence. The consistency of identifying EVT indication was moderate between two groups (κ = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.17-0.67). The functional independence rate was comparable between patients in the two EVT-applicable groups based on the two methods (55.2% vs. 53.2%, p = 0.789). MRI triaging based on FVH-DWI mismatch showed moderate inter-rater reliability compared with perfusion-based triage and comparable efficacy in predicting clinical outcomes after EVT.

FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch and DWI-FLAIR mismatch ASPECTS for prediction of good outcome after recanalization in anterior circulation stroke; multicenter observational study

IntroductionAcute ischemic stroke is a medical emergency caused by decreased blood flow to the brain, leading cause of long-term disability. Recanalization, one of the most concerning difficulties linked with intracranial arterial occlusion, has been used to reduce mortality in ischemic stroke treatment. The mismatch concepts MR PWI-DWI or DWI-FLAIR can help identify patients for thrombolysis. PurposeThis paper introduces a novel method of predicting revascularization using the value of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity FVH-DWI mismatch and DWI-FLAIR mismatch, which releases anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Moreover, we present a new scoring system following anatomical region distributed for MCA territory called a DWI-FLAIR MISMATCH ASPECTS. ResultStatistical analysis was performed to predict revascularization and functional outcome with 110 patients with anterior circulation LVO treated with EVT. We found that FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 71 patients (89.9 %) with complete revascularization and present in 8 patients (10.1 %) with no/partial revascularization, which had no significant difference (p = 0.12), and there was no significant difference between good functional outcome and poor functional outcome. Moreover, in 76 patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch ASPECTS of > 6 point-group, present FVH-DWI mismatch in 57 patients (83.8 %) with complete revascularization had a significant difference as compared to 11 patients (16.2 %) with absent FVH-DWI mismatch (p < 0.05). The clinical outcome in complete revascularization is better than no/partial revascularization, and complete revascularization is independently associated with good functional outcomes (p < 0.05). ConclusionFVH-DWI mismatch paired with DWI-FLAIR mismatch ASPECTS > 6 points may be possible to predict revascularization in patients with anterior circulation LVO.

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity-diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch and functional outcome after endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH) outside of the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion, termed FVH-DWI mismatch, may represent penumbral tissue with good collateral status. Consecutive patients who underwent endovascular reperfusion therapy (EVT) for acute internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA)-M1 occlusion were enrolled. FVH-DWI mismatch score was defined as the number of cortical Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score areas (I and M1 to M6) that involved FVH but no DWI lesion (0 to 7 points). The outcome measure was set as good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2, at 90 days after onset. Of 196 consecutive patients who underwent EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion, 32 without brain MRI before EVT were excluded, and the remaining 164 were analyzed. The median FVH-DWI mismatch score was 2 (interquartile range, 0 to 4). At 90 days after EVT, 2 patients were lost-to follow-up, and 73 had good functional outcome. The frequency of good functional outcome at 90 days after EVT increased significantly with increasing FVH-DWI mismatch score (P for trend <0.001). FVH-DWI mismatch score was independently associated with good functional outcome at 90 days after onset (adjusted odds ratio per 1 point,1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.89). Patients with large FVH-DWI mismatch had good functional outcome after EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion.

FLAIR vascular hyperintensity with DWI for regional collateral flow and tissue fate in recanalized acute middle cerebral artery occlusion

PurposeFluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) extent or FVH-DWI mismatch as a primary influencing factor of clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke is controversial. This study elucidated the regional pathophysiology and tissue fate in four types of cortical territories classified by the initial FVH and DWI findings in patients with acute proximal middle cerebral artery (M1) occlusion successfully recanalized using mechanical thrombectomy. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 35 patients successfully recanalized within 24 h of acute M1 occlusion onset between 2016 and 2019. Each Alberta stroke program early CT score area of M1–M6 were categorized as group A (DWI-, FVH-), B (DWI-, FVH+), C (DWI+, FVH+), or D (DWI+, FVH-). Territorial collateral status was graded on a 4-point scale by initial angiogram. Follow-up head computed tomography (CT) findings on days 2–9 were assessed for the territorial outcome. ResultsOverall, 210 cortical territories were identified; of these, 88 (41.9 %) were categorized into group A; 72 (34.3 %), group B; 37 (17.6 %), group C; and 13 (6.2 %), group D. The rate of territories with good collaterals (grade 2 or 3) significantly decreased in the order of groups as 78.3 %, 62.7 %, 27.6 %, and 0%, respectively (Ptrend <.001). Conversely, the rate of territories with any hypo- or hyper-density on follow-up CT significantly increased in the order of groups as 13.4 %, 23.1 %, 88.5 %, and 85.7 %, respectively (Ptrend <.001). ConclusionCategorization of cortical areas based on the FVH and DWI findings can stratify territorial collateral status and tissue fate.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) ischemic volume is related to FLAIR hyperintensity-DWI mismatch and functional outcome after endovascular therapy.

We assessed whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) volume was associated with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities (FVH)-DWI mismatch and functional outcome in patients with acute stroke who received endovascular therapy (EVT). Fifty-three acute stroke patients who received EVT were enrolled. FVH-DWI mismatch, DWI volume on admission, DWI volume on follow-up, DWI volume growth, the functional outcome at 3 months (mRS) and other clinical data were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the value of DWI volume in predicting functional outcome after stroke. The FVH-DWI mismatch group had a smaller DWI volume on admission (13.86±19.58 vs. 65.07±52.21; t=-4.301, P=0.000), a smaller DWI volume on follow-up (29.88±33.52 vs. 112.43±87.19; t=-4.143, P=0.000), and a lower DWI volume growth (16.02±19.90 vs. 47.36±40.06; t=-3.326, P=0.003) than those of the no FVH-DWI mismatch group. The good functional outcome group had a smaller DWI volume on admission (13.30±13.26 vs. 68.56±54.28; t=-5.611, P=0.000), a smaller DWI volume on follow-up (27.65±18.80 vs. 120.25±90.37; t=-5.720, P=0.000), lower DWI volume growth (14.35±15.06 vs. 51.69±41.17; t=-4.737, P=0.001) and a higher FVH-DWI mismatch ratio (75.76% vs. 35%; t=8.647; P=0.004) than those of the poor functional outcome group. ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of DWI volume on admission for predicting functional outcome were 65% and 96.97%, respectively (the optimal cut-off value: 33.50 mL); DWI volume on follow-up was 48.6 mL, with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 87.88%, respectively; DWI volume growth was 22.25 mL, with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 87.88%, respectively. DWI volume and DWI volume growth can provide the prognostic information of acute stroke patients after thrombectomy.

FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch most likely to benefit from recanalization and good outcome after stroke

We assessed the value of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch in predicting revascularization and functional outcome in stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).Seventy-two acute stroke patients within 6 hour of stroke onset who received EVT were enrolled. FVH-DWI mismatch, revascularization (mTICI score), functional outcome (mRS at 3 months) and other clinical data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to predict revascularization and functional outcome after stroke.Twenty-nine patients (60.42%) had FVH-DWI mismatch in patients with complete revascularization and 8 patients (33.33%) had FVH-DWI mismatch in patients with no/partial revascularization, and there was significant difference in 2 groups (t = 4.698; P = .045). The good functional outcome group (37/72; 51.39%) had higher FVH score (4.38 ± 1.53 vs 3.49 ± 1.52; t = 2.478; P = .016), higher FVH-DWI mismatch ratio (81.25% vs 48.15%; t = 10.862; P = .002), higher complete revascularization ratio (83.78% vs 48.57%; t = 10.036; P = .002) than the poor functional outcome group (35/72; 48.61%). Spearman's rank correlation analysis revealed that FVH-DWI mismatch was positively correlated with complete revascularization (r = 0.255; P = .030) and good functional outcome (r = 0.417; P = .000). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that FVH-DWI mismatch was independently associated with complete revascularization (OR, 0.328; 95% CI, 0.117–0.915; P = .033) and good functional outcome (OR, 0.169; 95% CI, 0.061–0.468; P = .001).Assessments of FVH-DWI mismatch before thrombectomy therapy might be useful for predicting revascularization and functional outcome in stroke patients with LVO.

Application of FLAIR Vascular Hyperintensity-DWI Mismatch in Ischemic Stroke Depending on Semi-Quantitative DWI-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score.

Objective: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a simple, widely used method to estimate the size of the infarct. Our aim is to determine whether there is a relationship between DWI-ASPECTS and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-DWI mismatch and to better quantify FVH-DWI mismatch to assess the prognosis of cerebral infarction.Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with MCA stenosis or occlusion with cerebral infarction was performed by dividing this cohort into FVH-DWI match group and FVH-DWI mismatch group based on FVH and DWI results. The clinical and imaging data of these two groups of patients were reviewed and analyzed to identify associations between FVH-DWI mismatch and prognosis of patients for preservation of neurological function. Correlation between DWI-ASPECTS and FVH-DWI mismatch was also performed.Results: FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 66/109 (60.55%) patients, and FVH-DWI match was present in 43/109 (39.45%). Patients with FVH-DWI mismatch had higher DWI-ASPECTS (7.0 vs. 4.0, P < 0.001) and lower mRS at 3 months (3.0 vs. 4.0, P < 0.001) than patients without FVH-DWI mismatch. Multiple regression analysis suggested that DWI-ASPECTS (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 2.5–9.2, P < 0.001) remained significantly associated with FVH-DWI mismatch. Two threshold points for DWI-ASPECTS of 3 and 8 can be used to distinguish whether there is a mismatch in FVH-DWI by smooth curve fitting.Conclusions: The DWI-ASPECTS score was an independent predictor of FVH-DWI mismatch. At DWI-ASPECTS ≤ 3, the FVH-DWI mismatch offers no prognostic value; whereas, at DWI-ASPECTS ≥ 8, the FVH-DWI mismatch had the highest prognostic value. DWI-ASPECTS can roughly determine whether there is a FVH-DWI mismatch in order to select optimal clinical treatment and accurately assess prognosis.

Diffusion-weighted imaging volume and diffusion-weighted imaging volume growth in acute stroke: associations with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensities-diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch and functional outcome.

This study assessed the association between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) volume and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-DWI mismatch, functional outcome in patients with acute stroke patients receiving endovascular therapy, as well as the value of DWI volume in predicting functional outcome with stroke patients. In 38 stroke patients who received endovascular therapy, FVH-DWI mismatch, DWI volume on admission, DWI volume on follow-up, DWI volume growth, the functional outcome at 3 months [modified Rankin scale (mRS)], and other clinical data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the associations with the above variables and predict functional outcome after stroke. Compared with no FVH-DWI mismatch group (n = 15), FVH-DWI mismatch group (n = 23) had a smaller DWI volume on admission (t = -2.980; P = 0.008), smaller DWI volume on follow-up (t = -2.911; P = 0.009), lower DWI volume growth (t = -2.328; P = 0.031). The 3-month outcome (1.87 ± 0.92) in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch was better than that (2.93 ± 1.62) of patients with no FVH-DWI mismatch (t = -2.307; P = 0.032). Spearman's rank correlation analysis revealed that FVH-DWI mismatch (r = 0.327; P = 0.045), DWI volume on admission (r = 0.414; P = 0.010), DWI volume on follow-up (r = 0.486; P = 0.002), and DWI volume growth (r = 0.467; P = 0.003) were positively correlated with mRS at 3 months. ROC analysis showed when the optimal cutoff value of DWI volume on admission was 33.50, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting functional outcome was 60 and 95.65%, respectively. Evaluating DWI volume on admission, DWI volume on follow-up as well as DWI volume growth comprehensively may be useful in predicting the functional outcome of acute stroke patients after thrombectomy.

Added assessment of middle cerebral artery and atrial fibrillation to FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch would improve the outcome prediction of acute infarction in patients with acute internal carotid artery occlusion

Whether fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensities (FVH)-DWI mismatch could predict the outcome or not remains in debate. The aim of this study was to identify if FVH combined with the other markers improved favorable outcome prediction of acute infarctions in patients with unilateral acute internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. Consecutive 68 adult acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory infarction patients caused by acute ICA occlusion, including favorable (n = 38, mRS ≤ 2) and unfavorable (n = 30, mRS > 2) groups, were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. The diagnostic efficiency of favorable clinical outcome of FVH-DWI mismatch was compared with those of DWI lesions volumetry and the combined marker of FVH-DWI mismatch and other factors. There were more prominent FVH-DWI mismatch (≥ 3 sections) (84%), less atrial fibrillation (AFib) (13%), and more tandem MCA normal or mild stenosis (63%) in favorable outcome group than those (30%, 40%, and 27%, respectively) in unfavorable group. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the prominent FVH-DWI mismatch was the positive predictive factor for favorable outcome (OR = 2.643 and 3.200). Prominent FVH-DWI mismatch, in combination with tandem MCA normal or mild stenosis, and absence of Afib, had better performance (AUC = 0.875) than that of initial DWI lesion volumetry (AUC = 0.854) and any other single factor (AUC = 0.634~0.820) in predicting favorable outcome. Prominent FVH-DWI mismatch was associated with favorable outcome in acute infarctions in unilateral ICA occlusion patients. Its predictive performance would be improved when combined with the assessment of tandem lesions of MCA and AFib.

FLAIR hyperintensities-DWI mismatch in acute stroke: associations with DWI volume and functional outcome.

The value of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)mismatch in predicting outcome with acute stroke is unclear. We assessed the association between FVH-DWI mismatch and functional outcome in patients with acute stroke patients receiving endovascular therapy. FVH-DWI mismatch, DWI volume, the functional outcome at 3months (modified Rankin scale; mRS) and other clinical data were collected for 59 acute stroke patients receiving MRI within 6h before endovascular therapy. Statistical analysis was performed to predict functional outcome after stroke. Patients with FVH-DWI mismatch (n = 39) had a higher FVH score (p = 0.038), smaller DWI volume (p = 0.007), higher American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (ASITN) (p = 0.043), higher interval time of ASITN (p = 0.038), and better functional outcome (p = 0.010) than patients with no FVH-DWI mismatch (n = 20). The good functional outcome group (n = 32) had a higher FVH score (p = 0.028), smaller DWI volume (p = 0.003) and higher ASITN grade (p = 0.043) than the poor functional outcome group (n = 27). Multivariable logistic analysis demonstrated that DWI volume (OR, 1.031; 95% CI, 1.005-1.058; P = 0.021) and FVH-DWI mismatch (OR, 14.311; 95% CI, 2.670-76.703; P = 0.002) were independently associated with functional outcome. Assessing DWI volume and FVH-DWI mismatch in acute stroke patients might be useful for predicting functional outcome after stroke.

Benefit from revascularization after thrombectomy according to FLAIR vascular hyperintensities-DWI mismatch.

We tested whether FLAIR vascular hyperintensities (FVH)-DWI mismatch could identify candidates for thrombectomy most likely to benefit from revascularization. We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients with proximal MCA occlusion from 18 stroke centers randomized in the IV-thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy arm of the THRACE trial (2010-2015). We tested the associations between successful revascularization on digital subtraction angiography (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3) and 3-month favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2), stratified on FVH-DWI mismatch status, with secondary analyses adjusted on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and DWI lesion volume. FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 79% of patients, with a similar prevalence at 1.5T (80%) and 3T (78%). Successful revascularization (74%) was more frequent in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch (63/79, 80%) than in patients without (11/21, 52%), p = 0.01. The OR of favorable outcome for revascularization were 15.05 (95% CI 3.12-72.61, p < 0.001) in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch and 0.83 (95% CI 0.15-4.64, p = 0.84) in patients without FVH-DWI mismatch (p = 0.011 for interaction). Similar results were observed after adjustment for NIHSS (OR = 12.73 [95% CI 2.69-60.41, p = 0.001] and 0.96 [95% CI 0.15-6.30, p = 0.96]) or for DWI volume (OR = 12.37 [95% CI 2.76-55.44, p = 0.001] and 0.91 [95% CI 0.16-5.33, p = 0.92]) in patients with and without FVH-DWI mismatch, respectively. The FVH-DWI mismatch identifies patients likeliest to benefit from revascularization, irrespective of initial DWI lesion volume and clinical stroke severity, and could serve as a useful surrogate marker for penumbral evaluation. • The FVH-DWI mismatch, defined by FLAIR vascular hyperintensities (FVH) located beyond the boundaries of the DWI lesion, is associated with large penumbra. • Among stroke patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion referred for thrombectomy, those with FVH-DWI mismatch are most likely to benefit from revascularization. • FVH-DWI mismatch provides an alternative to PWI-DWI mismatch in order to select patients who are candidates for thrombectomy.

Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Vascular Hyperintensities-Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Mismatch Identifies Acute Stroke Patients Most Likely to Benefit From Recanalization.

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities (FVH) beyond the boundaries of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion (FVH-DWI mismatch) have been proposed as an alternative to perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI)-DWI mismatch. We aimed to establish whether FVH-DWI mismatch can identify patients most likely to benefit from recanalization. FVH-DWI mismatch was assessed in 164 patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion before intravenous thrombolysis. PWI-DWI mismatch (PWITmax>6sec/DWI>1.8) was assessed in the 104 patients with available PWI data. We tested the associations between 24-hours complete recanalization on magnetic resonance angiography and 3-month favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), stratified on FVH-DWI (or PWI-DWI) status. FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 121/164 (74%) patients and recanalization in 50/164 (30%) patients. The odds ratio for favorable outcome with recanalization was 16.2 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-46.5; P<0.0001) in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch and 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-12.1; P=0.22) in those without FVH-DWI mismatch (P=0.048 for interaction). Recanalization was associated with favorable outcome in patients with PWI-DWI mismatch (odds ratios, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-31.3; P=0.0001) and in patients without PWI-DWI mismatch (odds ratios, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-44.1; P=0.047), P=0.76 for interaction. The FVH-DWI mismatch may rapidly identify patients with proximal occlusion most likely to benefit from recanalization.