Growth Of Future Liver Remnant Research Articles

Right portal vein ligation is still relevant for left hemi-liver hypertrophy: results of a comparative study using a propensity score between right portal vein ligation and embolization.

In two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer, future liver remnant (FLR) growth can be achieved using several techniques, such as right portal vein ligation (RPVL) or right portal vein embolization (RPVE). A few heterogeneous studies have compared these two techniques with contradictory results concerning FLR growth. The objective of this study was to compare FLR hypertrophy of the left hemi-liver after RPVL and RPVE. This was a retrospective comparative study using a propensity score of patients who underwent RPVL or RPVE prior to major hepatectomy between January 2010 and December 2020. The endpoints were FLR growth (%) after weighting using the propensity score, which included FLR prior to surgery and the number of chemotherapy cycles. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients undergoing simultaneous procedures, the morbidity and mortality, the recourse to other liver hypertrophy procedures, and the number of invasive procedures for the entire oncologic program in intention-to-treat analysis. Fifty-four consecutive patients were retrospectively included and analyzed, 18 in the RPVL group, and 36 in the RPVE group. The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After weighting, there was no significant difference between the RPVL and RPVE groups for FLR growth (%), respectively 32.5% [19.3-56.0%] and 34.5% [20.5-47.3%] (p = 0.221). There was no significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes except for the lower number of invasive procedures in RPVL group (median of 2 [2.0, 3.0] in RPVL group and 3 [3.0, 3.0] in RPVE group, p = 0.001)). RPVL and RPVE are both effective to provide required left hemi-liver hypertrophy before right hepatectomy. RPVL should be considered for the simultaneous treatment of liver metastases and the primary tumor.

Portal vein embolization with N-butyl-cyanoacrylate improves liver hypertrophy compared to microparticles – A Swedish multicenter cohort study

BackgroundAn adequate future liver remnant (FLR) is fundamental for major liver resections. To achieve sufficient FLR, portal vein embolization (PVE) may be used. The most effective material for PVE has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in FLR growth between n-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue (NBCA) and microparticles. Material/methodsaretrospective study was performed at three Swedish hepatobiliary centers and included patients who underwent PVE 2013–2021. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and procedure-related data were collected. Data were analyzed with respect to embolizing material. ResultsA total of 265 patients were included: 160 in the NBCA group and 105 in the microparticle group. The NBCA group had a higher degree of hypertrophy (12.1 vs. 9.4 % points, p = 0.003) and a higher resection rate (68 vs. 59 %, p = 0.01) than the microparticle group. Procedure-related data all indicated the superiority of NBCA. No difference in inducing hypertrophy was observed when comparing patients who received chemotherapy before PVE with those who received chemotherapy before and after PVE within the NBCA group. Discussion/conclusionThis retrospective multicenter study supports the superiority of NBCA compared to microparticles in the setting of PVE. Chemotherapy after PVE does not seem to negatively affect hypertrophy.

Abstract No. 169 Comparing Future Liver Remnant Growth Following Double Vein Embolization in Patients Who Are Surgically Naïve Versus Those Who Have Undergone Prior Partial Left Hepatectomy

Abstract No. 169 Comparing Future Liver Remnant Growth Following Double Vein Embolization in Patients Who Are Surgically Naïve Versus Those Who Have Undergone Prior Partial Left Hepatectomy

Portal Vein Embolization: Rationale, Techniques, and Outcomes to Maximize Remnant Liver Hypertrophy with a Focus on Contemporary Strategies.

Hepatectomy remains the gold standard for curative therapy for patients with limited primary or metastatic hepatic tumors as it offers the best survival rates. In recent years, the indication for partial hepatectomy has evolved away from what will be removed from the patient to the volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR), i.e., what will remain. With this regard, liver regeneration strategies have become paramount in transforming patients who previously had poor prognoses into ones who, after major hepatic resection with negative margins, have had their risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure minimized. Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) via the purposeful occlusion of select portal vein branches to promote contralateral hepatic lobar hypertrophy has become the accepted standard for liver regeneration. Advances in embolic materials, selection of treatment approaches, and PVE with hepatic venous deprivation or concurrent transcatheter arterial embolization/radioembolization are all active areas of research. To date, the optimal combination of embolic material to maximize FLR growth is not yet known. Knowledge of hepatic segmentation and portal venous anatomy is essential before performing PVE. In addition, the indications for PVE, the methods for assessing hepatic lobar hypertrophy, and the possible complications of PVE need to be fully understood before undertaking the procedure. The goal of this article is to discuss the rationale, indications, techniques, and outcomes of PVE before major hepatectomy.

Radiofrequency-assisted ALPPS (RALPPs) for future liver remnant growth: alternative to stage-1 ALPPS

Background: The ALPPS procedure has been recently introduced as a treatment strategy for liver cancer patients. The initial case series of ALPPS reported not only more extensive FLR hypertrophy but also a shorter process (74% FLR increase in 9 days) compared to PVE. However, the mortality and morbidity rates (12% and 64%, respectively) of ALPPS are greater than those of PVE (1.5% and 14%, respectively).

Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure.

Post hepatectomy liver failure is the most common cause of death following major hepatic resections with a perioperative mortality rate between 40% to 60%. Various strategies have been devised to increase the volume and function of future liver remnant (FLR). This study aims to review the strategies used for volume and flow modulation to reduce the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure. An electronic search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 2000 to 2022 using the following search strategy "Post hepatectomy liver failure", "flow modulation", "small for size flow syndrome", "portal vein embolization", "dual vein embolization", "ALPPS" and "staged hepatectomy" to identify all articles published relating to this topic. Volume and flow modulation strategies have evolved over time to maximize the volume and function of FLR to mitigate the risk of PHLF. Portal vein with or without hepatic vein embolization/ligation, ALPPS, and staged hepatectomy have resulted in significant hypertrophy and kinetic growth of FLR. Similarly, techniques including portal flow diversion, splenic artery ligation, splenectomy and pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin are employed to reduce the risk of small for size flow syndrome SFSF syndrome by decreasing portal venous flow and increasing hepatic artery flow at the same time. The current review outlines the various strategies of volume and flow modulation that can be used in isolation or combination in the management of patients at risk of PHLF.

Multimodal perioperative assessment of liver function and volume in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: a comparison of the indocyanine green retention test, 99mTc mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy and gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI.

To compare the dynamic changes in future liver remnant (FLR) function and volume after hepatectomy and to evaluate the associations between three modalities in assessment of liver function. Liver function and volume were quantified pre-operatively, at post-operative day (POD) 7 and POD 28 in 10 patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing hemihepatectomy using the indocyanine green retention (ICG) test, hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. The 99mTc mebrofenin uptake rate in the FLR was applied as a reference of liver function. MRI-derived parameters including liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR), liver-to-spleen ratio (LSR) and hepatocellular uptake index (HUI) were used for liver function assessment. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to evaluate the associations. Increase in liver function ranged from 13 to 152% (median 92%) and in volume from 37 to 134% (median 79%). There was no significant discrepancy in increase between FLR function and volume during the first month following hepatectomy. LMR showed a significant correlation to ICG test (r = -0.66, p < 0.05) while LSR had an association with standardized FLR function obtained by HBS (r = -0.71, p < 0.05). During the first week after hepatectomy, pre-operative HUI and LMR showed the strongest correlation to the FLR growth in function and volume respectively (p < 0.05). The observed growth in FLR volume is closely related to the functional increase within 1 month after hepatectomy. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI might substitute HBS for regional liver function assessment and provide an imaging tool for liver growth prediction. Liver function growth was parallel with liver volume increase during the perioperative period. Liver function assessment with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was comparable with that of HBS indicating that gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI could substitute HBS for regional liver function evaluation.

Transcatheter arterial embolization-salvaged ALPPS, a novel ALPPS procedure especially for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and severe fibrosis/cirrhosis.

BackgroundThe associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with fibrosis/cirrhosis is often associated with limited growth of future liver remnant (FLR). We introduced a new procedure named transcatheter arterial embolization-salvaged ALPPS (TAE-salvaged ALPPS) which was shown to be especially suitable for HCC patients with cirrhosis or fibrosis who failed adequately to respond to conventional ALPPS. The short-term efficacy and safety for the TAE-salvaged ALPPS on patients with HCC and fibrosis/cirrhosis were studied.MethodsConsecutive HCC patients who underwent TAE-salvaged ALPPS in our hospital between November 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively studied. The new ALPPS procedure included conventional ALPPS stage-1 using associating liver partition and portal vein ligation. When FLR failed to reach sufficient hypertrophy, TAE was carried out 2 weeks later followed by liver resection 3 weeks after ALPPS stage-1.ResultsNine of 10 patients had a single tumor (median diameter 14.0 cm, range, 5.2–17 cm). The remaining patient had multiple tumors (diameter of one tumor 14.0 cm, and two satellite foci 2.0 and 3.0 cm). R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100%) after a median of 21 days. Six patients had cirrhosis, 1 had METAVIR grade-3 fibrosis, and 3 had METAVIR grade-2 fibrosis. The median increase in FLR volume after TAE-salvaged ALPPS was 69.7% (34.4–143.9%). The absolute and relative kinetic growth rates (KGRs) were 9.9 (7.1–17.3) mL/day and 3.4% (1.9–7.2%)/day, respectively. The median absolute KGRs were 15.7, 2.6, and 19.5 mL/day in the first, second, and third postoperative weeks after ALPPS stage-1, respectively. The rapid increase in KGR on the third week was induced by TAE. The overall postoperative morbidity rates were 50,0% (5/10), 20.0% (2/10) and 70.0% (7/10) after ALPPS stage-1, TAE and ALPPS stage-2, respectively. The 90-day mortality rate was 10.0% (1/10). The median overall survival was 40 months.ConclusionsThe new TAE-salvaged ALPPS induced significant increases in FLR volumes within 3 weeks in patients with HCC and fibrosis/cirrhosis. The procedure is promising in treating patients with HCC and fibrosis/cirrhosis who fail to achieve sufficient FLR hypertrophy after conventional ALPPS stage-1.

P-176 Left hemi-liver hypertrophy after right portal vein ligation versus embolization: A comparative study

In two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer, future liver remnant (FLR) growth can be achieved using several techniques like right portal vein ligation (RPVL) and right portal vein embolization (RPVE). Few heterogeneous studies (patients, diagnosis, hepatopathy, technical modalities) have compared these two techniques with contradictory results regarding the FLR growth. The objective of this study was to compare the FLR hypertrophy of left hemi-liver (segments I to IV) after RPVL and RPVE in a serie of consecutives patients all treated for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

Portal Vein Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate-Glue: What Impact Does a Central Vascular Plug Have?

PurposeTo examine if the addition of a central vascular plug (CVP) to portal vein embolization (PVE) with N-butyl cyanoacrylate-glue (NBCA) increases future liver remnant (FLR) growth.Material and MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective study of 115 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing PVE in 2013–2019. All patients were embolized with NBCA as the main embolic agent. In 2017–2019 NBCA was combined with a CVP in the central part of the right portal vein. Growth of the FLR and standardized FLR (sFLR) including degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR) were analyzed, as well as procedure data such as use of cone-beam CT (CBCT), dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time and contrast dose.ResultsA total of 40 patients (35%) underwent PVE with a combination of CVP and NBCA. The DH was higher in these patients after 4 weeks, mean 13.6% (SD 7.8) vs. 10.5% (SD 6.4; p = 0.022), verified in multivariate analysis (coefficient 4.1, p = 0.015). A CVP did not significantly increase the resection rate (90% vs 82%, p = 0.4). Cone beam CT was used in 65 patients (57%). Use of CBCT did not affect FLR growth, and fluoroscopy time and contrast doses were not different in patients having a CBCT or not. Slightly lower DAP (median 3375 vs. 4499 cGy*cm2; p = 0.09) was seen in procedures where CBCT was used.ConclusionA CVP in addition to NBCA embolization was associated with increased growth of the FLR compared to NBCA alone.

Sequential Portal Vein Embolization and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Future Liver Remnant Growth: A Minimally Invasive Alternative to ALPPS Stage-1 in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of sequential portal vein embolization (PVE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (PVE+RFA) as a minimally invasive variant for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) stage-1 in treatment of cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods: For HCC patients with insufficient FLR, right-sided PVE was first performed, followed by percutaneous RFA to the tumor as a means to trigger FLR growth. When the FLR reached a safe level (at least 40%) and the blood biochemistry tests were in good condition, the hepatectomy was performed. FLR dynamic changes and serum biochemical tests were evaluated. Postoperative complications, mortality, intraoperative data and long-term oncological outcome were also recorded.Results: Seven patients underwent PVE+RFA for FLR growth between March 2016 and December 2019. The median baseline of FLR was 353 ml (28%), which increased to 539 (44%) ml after 8 (7–18) days of this strategy (p < 0.05). The increase of FLR ranged from 40% to 140% (median 47%). Five patients completed hepatectomy. The median interval between PVE+RFA and hepatectomy was 19 (15–27) days. No major morbidity ≥ III of Clavien-Dindo classification or in-hospital mortality occurred. One patient who did not proceed to surgery died within 90 days after discharge. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 3–50) months, five patients were alive.Conclusion: Sequential PVE+RFA is a feasible and effective strategy for FLR growth prior to extended hepatectomy and may provide a minimally invasive alternative for ALPPS stage-1 for treatment of patients with cirrhosis-related HCC.

Combined simultaneous embolization of the portal vein and hepatic vein (double vein embolization) \u2013 a technical note about embolization sequence

BackgroundSimultaneous portal vein embolization (PVE) and hepatic vein embolization (HVE) has been shown to be feasible, safe and lead to a faster growth of future liver remnant (FLR) than PVE alone. The objective of this study is to highlight different technical aspects as well as importance of embolization order.Materials and methodsSeven patients were treated with simultaneous PVE and HVE. In three cases, HVE was performed first followed by PVE and in four cases the other way around. Portal vein branches were embolized using Glubran-Lipiodol mixture in all cases. Hepatic veins were embolized using Amplatzer II plugs sized 8–20 mm. Specific consideration was given to depth of glue penetration in the portal vein defined by visible branch order on the treated side.ResultsSix of seven patients were discharged home the same day. One patient with infected tumor necrosis died of liver failure 40 days later, otherwise there were no periprocedural clinical complications. Median glue penetration was to the 5th order (4th – 5th) when PVE was performed first and 3rd order (2nd - 4th) when PVE was performed after HVE. In one PVE first case, glue spillage was seen due to marked reduced flow in the right portal vein. There was sufficient FLR growth for subsequent surgical resection in the remaining six patients.ConclusionPVE should be performed prior to HVE because the reduced flow in the portal vein after HVE leads to less deep glue penetration with presumably increased risk of contralateral spillage.

Rescue radiofrequency ablation or percutaneous ethanol injection: a strategy for failed RALPPS stage-1 in patients with cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundThe future liver remnant (FLR) faces a risk of poor growth in patients with cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after stage-1 radiofrequency-assisted ALPPS (RALPPS). The present study presents a strategy to trigger further FLR growth using supplementary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI).MethodsAt RALPPS stage-1 the portal vein branch was ligated, followed by intraoperative RFA creating a coagulated avascular area between the FLR and the deportalized lobes. During the interstage period, patients not achieving sufficient liver size (≥ 40%) within 2–3 weeks underwent additional percutaneous RFA/PEI of the deportalized lobes (rescue RFA/PEI) in an attempt to further stimulate FLR growth.ResultsSeven patients underwent rescue RFA/PEI after RALPPS stage-1. In total five RFAs and eight PEIs were applied in these patients. The kinetic growth rate (KGR) was highest the first week after RALPPS stage-1 (10%, range − 1% to 15%), and then dropped to 1.5% (0–9%) in the second week (p < 0.05). With rescue RFA/PEI applied, KGR increased significantly to 4% (2–5%) compared with that before the rescue procedures (p < 0.05). Five patients proceeded to RALPPS stage-2. Two patients failed: In one patient the FLR remained at a constant level even after four rescue PEIs. The other patient developed metastasis. Except one patient died after RALPPS stage-2, no severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) occurred among remaining six patients.ConclusionsRescue RFA/PEI may provide an alternative to trigger further growth of the FLR in patients with cirrhosis-related HCC showing insufficient FLR after RALPPS stage-1.Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Portal vein embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue is superior to other materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

It remains uncertain which embolization material is best for portal vein embolization (PVE). We investigated the various materials for effectiveness in inducing future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, technical and growth success rates, and complication and resection rates. A systematic review from 1998 to 2019 on embolization materials for PVE was performed on Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane. FLR growth between the two most commonly used materials was compared in a random effects meta-analysis. In a separate analysis using local data (n = 52), n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) was compared with microparticles regarding costs, radiation dose, and procedure time. In total, 2896 patients, 61.0 ± 4.0 years of age and 65% male, from 51 papers were included in the analysis. In 61% of the patients, either NBCA or microparticles were used for embolization. The remaining were treated with ethanol, gelfoam, or sclerosing agents. The FLR growth with NBCA was 49.1% ± 29.7 compared to 42.2% ± 40 with microparticles (p = 0.037). The growth success rate with NBCA vs microparticles was 95.3% vs 90.7% respectively (p < 0.001). There were no differences in major complications between NBCA and microparticles. In the local analysis, NBCA (n = 41) entailed shorter procedure time and reduced fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001), lower radiation exposure (p < 0.01), and lower material costs (p < 0.0001) than microparticles (n = 11). PVE with NBCA seems to be the best choice when combining growth of the FLR, procedure time, radiation exposure, and costs. • The meta-analysis shows that n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) is superior to microparticles regarding hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, 49.1% ± 29.7 vs 42.2% ± 40.0 (p = 0.037). • There is no significant difference in major complication rates for portal vein embolization using NBCA, 4% (24/681), compared with microparticles, 5% (25/494) (p > 0.05). • Local data shows a shorter procedure time, 215 vs 348 mins from arrival to departure at the interventional radiology unit, and fluoroscopy time, 43 vs 96 mins (p < 0.001), lower radiation dosage, 573 vs 1287 Gycm2 (p < 0.01), and costs, €816 vs €4233 (p < 0.0001) for NBCA compared to microparticles.

Regenerative Liver Surgery - ALPPS and Associated Techniques.

Hepatectomy is the only potentially curative treatment of hepatic tumors, but remains challenging in case of multiple, bilobar lesions and those located in the vicinity of the hepatic hilum and hepatic veins. Regenerative liver surgery utilizes the unique ability of the liver to re-grow after tissue loss and vascular deprivation. All concepts subsumed under this term aim to increase the resectability of hepatic tumors by stimulating growth of future liver remnant. Many of these techniques have evolved over the last decades. ALPPS (associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) is an advanced technique combining portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection which gave rise to many variants, all with the common goal of extending resectability. This article reviews techniques currently available for regenerative liver surgery focusing on ALPPS, its mechanisms of liver regeneration, indications, advantages, drawbacks, results and future perspectives.

Application of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma related to hepatitis B virus: comparison with traditional one-stage right hepatectomy.

BackgroundAssociating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently been suggested to cause rapid liver hypertrophy among patients having inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). However, ALPPS is still considered as a controversial hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, especially for those with cirrhosis. This is ascribed to the high mortality and morbidity. The present study aimed to evaluate the ALPPS safety and feasibility for HCC patients related to hepatitis B virus (HBV).MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study. Consecutive HCC cases undergoing ALPPS or RH at our hospital between September 2014 and June 2018 were included. The demographic and clinical data of patients were collected, and oncological results of ALPPS patients were compared with those receiving right hepatectomy (RH).ResultsA total of 14 ALPPS patients and 21 RH patients were consecutively collected between September 2014 and June 2018. All ALPPS patients received stage II operations, with 100% resection of R0. The median growth of FLR between operations was 48% (range, ‒0.06% to 100%) in 17 days (range, 9–30 days). 3 ALPPS patients (21.4%) suffered from severe complications (grade ≥IIIb) according to the Clavien-Dindo grade, including 1 with renal failure, and 2 with the FLR/SLV of <30% and liver failure, and 1 (4.8%) with severe complication (liver failure) after the stage I RH. Difference in the long-term survival, either overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS), between ALPPS and RH was not statistically significant.ConclusionsOur results suggest that ALPPS should be performed in highly selected patients with cirrhosis. Patients with 30%< the FLR/SLV <30% and ages <60 years old are recommended. And a longer interval time between stages is suggested to improve the safety of ALPPS. Because the long-term survival after ALPPS is similar to that after RH, which indicates that the long waiting time between stage does not increase the risk of tumor progression.

A comparative study on preoperative portal vein embolization using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus coils

Objective To compare preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus coils. Methods From March 2016 to June 2018, 21 consecutive patients with a future liver remnant (FLR) ratio of less than 45% before planned major hepatectomy for malignant or benign liver diseases were enrolled from the First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital into this study. The patients were divided to receive portal vein embolization (PVE) using TAGM distally and coils proximally (the TC group) and PVE using multiple coils (the CC group). Post-PVE complications, liver function, routine blood tests; FLR hyperplasia, types of liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results Eight patients were included in the TC group. There were 4 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (55.3±7.7) years. Of 13 patients included into the CC group, there were 11 males and 2 females, with a mean age of (52.6±11.3) years. There were no significant differences in sex, age, types of hepatic diseases, volume of FLR, ratio of FLR, ratio of standard FLR, types of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, major complications, and liver failure rates between the two groups. All patients in the two groups had successful PVE. The TC group developed effective growth of volume of FLR with one patient who failed to undergo surgery because of tumor progression. In the CC group, four patients failed to undergo liver resection: one patient developed thrombosis of the left branch and main trunk of portal vein; tumor progression occurred in one patient and two patients had insufficient FLR growth. Compared with the CC group, the TC group had a significantly higher volume of FLR hyperplasia [(9.0±2.8) % vs. (5.2±3.8) %, P 0.05], a greater but insignificant increase in percentage of proliferation [(33.6±20.1) % vs. (20.9±15.1) %, P>0.05]. Conclusions This study showed that PVE with TAGM plus coils is safe and effective. It induced a better degree of hypertrophy of FLR compared to PVE using multiple coils. Key words: Liver diseases; Portal vein embolization; Tris-acryl gelatin microsphere; Coils; Major hepatectomy

Dilatation of left portal vein after right portal vein embolization: a simple estimation for growth of future liver remnant.

To evaluate correlation between growth rate of left portal vein (LPV) and future liver remnant (FLR) after right portal vein embolization (PVE), and to design models predicting FLR growth rate and volume using LPV area measurements on computed tomography (CT). A total of 134 patients (59.6±10.2years; 103 men) who underwent right PVE with contrast-enhanced CT before and 3-5weeks after PVE were retrospectively identified. Kinetic hypertrophy ratio (KHR) and kinetic degree of hypertrophy (KDH) served as growth rate parameters. Correlations between LPV growth rate and FLR growth rate and volume change were evaluated by linear regression analysis. The agreements between actual volumetrically determined growth rates and volume of FLR and those estimated from regression equation using LPV measurements were assessed by Bland-Altman plots. Growth rates of LPV and FLR correlated significantly (P<0.001). The mean difference between actual and estimated value was 0.1% for KHR-FLR (actual, 9.5±6.0%; estimated, 9.4±3.8%), 0.0% for KDH-FLR (actual, 3.3±1.4%; estimated, 3.3±0.7%), -3.8cm3 for FLR volume (actual, 642.5±167.8cm3 ; estimated, 646.4±156.5cm3 ), and -0.1% for proportion of FLR volume (actual, 48.7±7.8%; estimated, 48.9±7.8%). After right PVE, FLR growth rate and volume can be simply estimated from the change in LPV area.

A single-center experience with 312 venous resections with pancreatectomy: Only elevated Ca 19-9 indicates impaired survival

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has emerged as an additional tool to increase the size of the future liver remnant (FLR) in the settings of advanced tumor burden in the liver. Initial reports have indicated high feasibility but also high mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the initial experience with ALPPS in Scandinavia regarding feasibility, morbidity, and mortality.We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent ALPPS since its introduction at 3 Scandinavian hepatobiliary centers.Thirty-six patients were identified, 21 male and 15 female. Median age was 67 years (22–83). Colorectal liver metastases (n = 25) were the most common indication for ALPPS followed by hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 4), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 4), and other (n = 3). Median growth of the FLR between the operations was 67% (−17 to 238) in 6 (5–13) days. All patients completed the second operation, and 71% of the resections were R0. Although the total percentage of patients with complication(s) was 92%, only 4 patients (11%) had a grade 3b complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and no other severe complications were noted. There was no in-hospital mortality, but 1 (2.8%) patient died within 90 days of operation.ALPPS is a highly feasible method to stimulate FLR growth in patients with colorectal liver metastases as well as primary hepatobiliary malignancies. The treatment can be carried out with relative safety.

Future liver remnant growth after various portal vein embolization regimens: a quantitative comparison

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of right portal vein embolization using ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH-PVE) compared to other embolic agents and surgical right portal vein ligation (PVL).Material and methods: Patients with right sided liver malignancies scheduled for extensive surgery and receiving induction of liver hypertrophy via right portal vein embolization/ligature between 2010–2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Treatments included were ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx®, EVOH-PVE), ethiodized oil (Lipiodol®, Lipiodol/PVA-PVE), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA-PVE) or surgical ligature (PVL). Liver segments S2/3 were used to assess hypertrophy. Primary outcome was future liver remnant growth in ml/day.Results: Forty-one patients were included (EVOH-PVE n = 11; Lipiodol/PVA-PVE n = 10; PVA-PVE n = 8; PVL n = 12), the majority presenting with cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal metastases (n = 11; n = 27). Pre-interventional liver volumes were comparable (p = .095). Liver hypertrophy was successfully induced in all but one patient receiving Lipiodol/PVA-PVE. Liver segment S2/3 growth was largest for EVOH-PVE (5.38 ml/d) followed by PVA-PVE (2.5 ml/d), with significantly higher growth rates than PVL (1.24 ml/d; p < .001; p = .007). No significant difference was evident for Lipiodol/PVA-PVE (1.43 ml/d, p = .809).Conclusions: Portal vein embolization using EVOH demonstrates fastest S2/3 growth rates compared to other embolic agents and PVL, potentially due to its permanent portal vein embolization and induction of hepatic inflammation.