Functional Independence Measure Motor Score Research Articles

Factors associated with long-term functional outcomes and psychological sequelae in women after breast cancer

The objective of this study was to examine factors impacting long-term functional outcomes and psychological sequelae in survivors of breast cancer (BC). A clinical assessment and structured interview assessed the impact of BC on participants’ (n = 85) current activity and restriction in participation, using validated questionnaires: Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Perceived Impact Problem Profile (PIPP) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). Participants showed good functional recovery (median motor FIM score = 78). Three-quarters (74%) reported pain, 32% reported upper limb weakness, 31% pain limiting shoulder movement and 29% lymphoedema. One third (32%) reported greatest impact on psychological wellbeing. A substantial number of participants reported high levels of depression (22%), anxiety and stress (19% each). Factors associated with poorer current level of functioning and wellbeing included: younger participants, recent diagnoses, aggressive tumour types, receiving chemotherapy, shoulder limitation due to pain, and lymphoedema. BC survivors require long-term management of psychological sequelae impacting activity and participation.

Early predictors of employment outcomes 1 year post traumatic brain injury in a population of Hispanic individuals

To determine which demographic, injury, and rehabilitation factors are associated with employment rates in Hispanic individuals 1 year post traumatic brain injury (TBI). Retrospective study. Longitudinal dataset of the TBI Model Systems National Database. 418 Hispanic individuals with TBI hospitalized between 1990 and 2009 having year 1 follow-up data (18-55 years and not retired at injury). Competitive employment status 1 year post-injury (yes/no). A multiple logistic regression model indicated that pre-injury employment status, pre-injury level of education, etiology, days of posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), associated spinal cord injury, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor at rehabilitation discharge, and length of stay in rehabilitation were significant predictors of competitive employment post-injury, controlling for the effects of each other (all p-values ≤ 0.014). Increases in the odds of not being employed post-injury were associated with not being employed pre-injury, having lower levels of education pre-injury, etiologies due to violence or falls, increased PTA, an associated spinal cord injury, lower FIM motor scores, and greater lengths of stay in rehabilitation. The first year post-TBI is critical for recovery and gainful employment, particularly for Hispanic individuals. Early identification of factors influencing successful gainful employment and expeditious implementation of services to ameliorate these issues are paramount in improving employment outcomes for Hispanic individuals with TBI.

Abstract 2662: Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Predict Stroke Outcomes in the Acute Rehabilitation Setting

Introduction: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a known predictor of cardiovascular morbidity in patients with heart failure, and can predict cardiovascular complications in patients without known cardiovascular disease. Recent studies have focused on the relationship between elevated BNP levels and ischemic stroke. Increased BNP levels were correlated with increased for risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Plasma BNP levels are elevated in patients with acute ischemic stroke and predict death in acute ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. Hypothesis: Admission BNP (aBNP) levels predict outcomes in an acute rehabilitation setting. Methods: 763 patients with ischemic stroke admitted to an acute inpatient rehabilitation unit were assessed. Admission BNP levels, admission and discharge Fugl-Meyer Motor Impairment (FMMI) scores and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score were obtained for each patient. Odds ratios were calculated for aBNP quintile groups and need for transfer to acute care or death versus other discharge disposition (ACDvsO). Spearman Rank Order correlations were calculated for aBNP levels and cardiovascular comorbidities and complications, admission and discharge FMMI and FIM scores. Logistic Regression was used to assess interactions with age and the above co-variables. Results: aBNP quintile cut scores showed the following odds ratios and confidence intervals for ACDvsO discharge disposition: aBNP > 17.5 (O.R.=1.6; CI = 0.83-3.12 ; p=N.S); > 49.5 (1.83; 1.09-3.07; p= 0.02); > 104.9 (2.03; CI = 1.27-3.25; p=.003); >231.3 (2.03; CI = 1.22- 3.38; p= 0.006). aBNP was still a significant predictor of ACDvsO (X2 =6.84;p=.009) with age, admission FMMI and FIM scores entered as co-variables. aBNP was significantly correlated with admission FIM (r=-0.21; p=0.000); discharge FIM (r=-.245; p=0.000) but not with admission FMMI (0.001; p=0.98) or with discharge FMMI (0.019; p=0.70) Conclusion: Rehabilitation Hospital aBNP values can predict a two-fold increase in odds of death or need for transfer to acute care. They are also correlated with admission and discharge FIM scores perhaps indicating less cardiovascular reserve and poor endurance due to underlying cardiovascular disease. Previous studies have correlated BNP levels with stroke severity, however our analysis failed to find a correlation between BNP and FMMI as a measure of motor impairment. Patients with high aBNPs need to be closely monitored for adverse events and rehabilitation intensity needs to be tailored to their needs.

Predictors of the Length of Stay of Inpatients in Rehabilitation Setting After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Predictors of the Length of Stay of Inpatients in Rehabilitation Setting After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Can hip-fractured elderly patients maintain their rehabilitation achievements after 1 year?

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to characterize hip-fractured patients who maintained or improved their functional ability, 1 year postdischarge from rehabilitation and to identify factors associated with functional achievement maintenance. Methods: A retrospective study performed in a postacute geriatric rehabilitation center. Two hundred thirty-three hip-fractured patients admitted consecutively from January 2006 to September 2007 were enrolled in the study. The patients were evaluated at discharge from rehabilitation and after 1 year, they were classified into two groups: those who maintained or improved their motor Functional Independence Measure (mFIM) scores and those who deteriorated. The differences between the two patient groups relating to functional, clinical, demographic and fracture-related variables were assessed. Results: One year postrehabilitation, 130 (55.8%) patients exhibited a decline in their mFIM score. Patients whose 1-year mFIM score had improved were discharged from rehabilitation with a less favorable mean mFIM score (50.7 ± 18.5 vs. 55.6 ± 15.2; p = 0.032), achieved a lower mean mFIM score gain during rehabilitation (12.0 ± 9.7 vs. 14.6 ± 8.1; p = 0.03), had a higher education level (p = 0.003) and had a lower rate of chronic lung disease (p = 0.020) compared with patients whose 1-year mFIM score had deteriorated. After 1 year, only 21 patients (9%) were functionally independent in activities of daily living and only 19 (8.2%) were able to walk unassisted. Only 13 patients (5.6%) perceived that they had regained their former functional level. Conclusions: A substantial decline in functional ability of hip-fractured patients occurred 1 year postdischarge from rehabilitation. Healthcare providers should be aware of the necessity for a long-term postrehabilitation physical training program to prevent functional decline. Further efforts should be invested in motivating their patients to exercise.Implications for RehabilitationA considerable decline in functional level occurs in elderly following hip fracture after discharge from post-acute rehabilitation program.Functional deterioration is more noticeable among patients who achieved higher functional performance during rehabilitation.To slow down functional decline, providing continuous physical training to hip-fractured elderly patients after discharge from rehabilitation is recommended.

Physical Therapy Activities in Stroke, Knee Arthroplasty, and Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Their Variation, Similarities, and Association With Functional Outcomes

The mix of physical therapy services is thought to be different with different impairment groups. However, it is not clear how much variation there is across impairment groups. Furthermore, the extent to which the same physical therapy activities are associated with functional outcomes across different types of patients is unknown. The purposes of this study were: (1) to examine similarities and differences in the mix of physical therapy activities used in rehabilitation among patients from different impairment groups and (2) to examine whether the same physical therapy activities are associated with functional improvement across impairment groups. This was a prospective observational cohort study. The study was conducted in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. The participants were 433 patients with stroke, 429 patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 207 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Measures used in this study included: (1) the Comprehensive Severity Index to measure the severity of each patient's medical condition, (2) the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) to measure function, and (3) point-of-care instruments to measure time spent in specific physical therapy activities. All 3 groups had similar admission motor FIM scores but varying cognitive FIM scores. Patients with TKA spent more time on exercise than the other 2 groups (average=31.7 versus 6.2 minutes per day). Patients with TKA received the most physical therapy (average=65.3 minutes per day), whereas the TBI group received the least physical therapy (average=38.3 minutes per day). Multivariate analysis showed that only 2 physical therapy activities (gait training and community mobility) were both positively associated with discharge motor FIM outcomes across all 3 groups. Three physical therapy activities (assessment time, bed mobility, and transfers) were negatively associated with discharge motor FIM outcome. The study focused primarily on physical therapy without concurrently considering other therapies such as occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, nursing care, and case management or the potential interaction of these inputs. This analysis did not consider the interventions that physical therapists used when patients participated in discrete physical therapy activities. All 3 patient groups spent a considerable portion of their physical therapy time in gait training relative to other activities. Both gait training and community mobility are higher-level activities that were positively associated with outcomes, although all 3 groups spent little time in community mobility activities. Further research studies, such as randomized clinical trials and predictive validity studies, are needed to investigate whether higher-level or more-integrated therapy activities are associated with better patient outcomes.

Rehabilitation Following Total Knee Replacement, Total Hip Replacement, and Hip Fracture

To determine whether clinical outcomes and reimbursement for care differed between patients with hip fracture, total knee replacement (TKR), and total hip replacement (THR) undergoing an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) versus skilled nursing facility (SNF). A total of 541 patients (IRF = 409, SNF = 131) with unilateral hip fracture, TKR, and THR were recruited. The IRF and SNF patients were matched on age, sex, diagnosis, severity index, and ambulation Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score on admission. Comparisons of discharge motor FIM scores, length of stay, discharge ambulation devices, discharge disposition, use of home health services, transfer to acute care, and total reimbursement for the inpatient stay were carried out between matched pair groups. From a sample of 541 patients, 102 matched IRF-SNF pairs were created. The mean length of stay for those receiving care in IRF was 10.7 (4.2) days, compared to 25.5 (16.5) days for those receiving care in SNF (P < .001). Costs of care in the IRF setting were $11,984 ($5254) compared to that in the SNF setting, that is, $10,001 ($7141) (P = .008). As compared to patients receiving care in the SNF setting, those in the IRF were more likely to ambulate independently (87.5% vs 74.0%; P = .019), manage stairs independently (68.4% vs 34.7%; P < .001), require less home care (33.7% vs 76.4%; P < .001), and were less likely to use a walker at discharge (41.7% vs 67.7%; P < .001). There were no differences between settings in terms of transfers to acute care, ability to dress the lower body, toilet transfers, and discharge to home. When patients were matched for age, gender, operative diagnosis, severity index, and admission ambulation FIM score, those who received rehabilitation in the IRF had shorter length of stay and superior functional outcomes than those in the SNF setting. Cost of stay in an IRF was, however, significantly greater.

Relationship between function, strength and electromyography of upper extremities of persons with tetraplegia

Cross-sectional. To analyze the relationships between functional tests, arm strength and root mean square of surface electromyography (EMG). Sao Paulo, Brazil. Twenty-four individuals with chronic tetraplegia participated. Upper extremity motor score (UEMS), functional independence measure (FIM) motor score, spinal cord independence measure III and capabilities of upper extremity (CUE) were performed. Muscle strength of the right elbow flexors-extensors was assessed using dynamometry and manual muscle test (MMT) and EMG of right biceps and triceps brachii were performed. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and Mann-Whitney's U-test were used. Functional tests and UEMS correlated strongly among them. UEMS highly correlated with triceps dynamometry and EMG. The dynamometry showed a very high correlation with MMT on the extensor group and a moderate correlation with flexor group. Triceps EMG showed moderate correlation with FIM and CUE. High correlations between triceps EMG and elbow extensors dynamometry and MMT were observed. A significant better performance on functional tests was observed on lower ASIA motor levels. The low-tetraplegia group showed a significant higher score on triceps EMG and dynamometry. Arm strength and EMG seem to be related to functional capabilities and independence in chronic tetraplegia.

Functional Level During the First Year After Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Course and Predictors of Outcome

Background : The objective of this study was to describe the functional level during the first year after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to evaluate the predictive impact of pre-injury and injury-related factors. Methods : A cohort of 65 patients with moderate (N = 21) or severe (N = 44) TBI were examined with FIM (Functional Independence Measure) at admission and discharge from the rehabilitation clinic (on average two months after injury) and at 12 months, and with GOSE (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended) at 12 months after injury. Possible predictors were analyzed in a regression model using FIM total score at 12 months as outcome. Results : All mean FIM scores improved significantly from injury to discharge from sub-acute rehabilitation. In the later period from discharge to 12 months after injury, the mean FIM motor score improved in severe TBI but not in moderate TBI patients. The mean FIM cognitive scores did not improve in any of the groups. At 12 months, 95% with moderate TBI had a FIM score from 109 - 126 (functionally independent) compared to 74% with severe TBI. Functional global outcome as assessed by GOSE was “good recovery” in 52% with moderate TBI versus 33% in severe TBI, “moderate disability” in 33% with moderate TBI versus 31% in severe TBI, and “severe disability” in 14% with moderate TBI versus 36% in severe TBI. Predictors such as PTA duration (B = -0.209), GCS admission rehabilitation (B = 5.058) and LOS rehabilitation (B = 0.458) explained 47% of the FIM variance 12 months post injury. Conclusions : The greatest improvement after moderate and severe TBI was in the sub-acute phase during the stay in a specialized rehabilitation unit. Residual disability was reported in 47% of moderate TBI patients as measured by GOSE at 12 months post injury indicating the importance of post-acute rehabilitation for these patients. Longer stays at the rehabilitation unit, a short PTA period and a high GCS score at admission to rehabilitation were positive predictors of functional level (FIM) at 12 months follow-up demonstrating that these factors are common predictors of early and late TBI phases. doi:10.4021/jnr20w

Efficient Rehabilitation Care for Joint Replacement Patients

There has been lengthy debate as to which setting, skilled nursing facility (SNF) or inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), is more efficient in treating joint replacement patients. This study aims to determine the efficiency of rehabilitation care provided by SNF and IRF to joint replacement patients with respect to both payment and length of stay (LOS). This study used a prospective multisite observational cohort design. Tobit models were used to examine the association between setting of care and efficiency. The study enrolled 948 knee replacement patients and 618 hip replacement patients from 11 IRFs and 7 SNFs between February 2006 and February 2007. Output was measured by motor functional independence measure (FIM) score at discharge. Efficiency was measured in 3 ways: payment efficiency, LOS efficiency, and stochastic frontier analysis efficiency. IRF patients incurred higher expenditures per case but also achieved larger motor FIM gains in shorter LOS than did SNF patients. Setting of care was not a strong predictor of overall efficiency of rehabilitation care. Great variation in characteristics existed within IRFs or SNFs and severity groups. Medium-volume facilities among both SNFs and IRFs were most efficient. Early rehabilitation was consistently predictive of efficient treatment. The advantage of either setting is not clear-cut. Definition of efficiency depends in part on preference between cost and time. SNFs are more payment efficient; IRFs are more LOS efficient. Variation within SNFs and IRFs blurred setting differences; a simple comparison between SNF and IRF may not be appropriate.

Comparison of patients managed in specialised spinal rehabilitation units with those managed in non-specialised rehabilitation units

Prospective open cohort study. Compare the demographic characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes for both non-traumatic SCI (NT-SCI) and traumatic SCI (T-SCI) patients admitted into either specialist spinal cord injury rehabilitation units (SCIRUs) or non-specialist rehabilitation units (NSRUs). Rehabilitation units in Australia. The Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre maintains a national database on inpatients admitted to most (130/145) public and private rehabilitation units in Australia. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of spinal cord injury (SCI) and were discharged between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2006. Patients were excluded if admitted for <7 days, only for assessment, or were a readmission following a previous SCI. There were 668 patients with confirmed SCI admitted (NT-SCI n=361, 54.0%; T-SCI n=307, 46.0%). NT-SCI patients were much less likely to be admitted into a specialist SCIRU (30.5%) compared with T-SCI patients (70.4%). For both NT-SCI and T-SCI patients, those admitted to a specialist SCIRU tended to be younger (P=0.000), have a longer length of stay in rehabilitation (P=0.000), and lower Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor subscale score on admission (P=0.000) than those admitted to a NSRU. For NT-SCI patients, after adjusting for covariates, those admitted into specialist SCIRU had greater improvement in their FIM motor score during rehabilitation. This finding was not demonstrated in T-SCI patients. There are differences in the characteristics of SCI patients admitted to SCIRU compared with NSRU. NT-SCI patients admitted to SCIRU have greater functional gain.

Time to Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital Admission and Functional Outcomes of Stroke Patients

To study the association of time to inpatient rehabilitation hospital (IRH) admission and functional outcomes of patients who have had a stroke. A retrospective cohort study. A regional IRH. Moderately (n = 614) and severely (n = 1294) impaired patients who had a stroke who were admitted to the facility between 2002 and 2006. Not applicable. Change in total, motor, and cognitive Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores between IRH admission and discharge. After controlling for patient demographics and initial medical conditions and functional status, shorter periods from stroke onset to IRH admission were significantly associated with greater functional gains for these patients during IRH hospitalization. Moderately impaired patients achieved a greater total FIM gain when admitted to an IRH within 21 days of stroke. Severely impaired patients showed a gradient relationship between time to IRH admission and total FIM gain, with significantly different functional gain if admitted to an IRH within 30 and 60 days after stroke diagnosis. Results of multiple regression analysis also showed that age, race/ethnicity, side of stroke, history of a previous stroke, functional measures at IRH admission, IRH length of stay, and selected medications were associated with total, motor, and cognitive FIM score changes. In addition, certain factors such as older age, diagnosis of a hemorrhagic stroke or a previous history of stroke, and initial functional status were associated with longer periods between diagnosis and admission to an IRH after the stroke occurred. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that earlier transfer to an IRH may lead to better functional improvement after stroke. However, certain factors such as age, race/ethnicity, initial medical conditions and functional status, and length of stay at an IRH contributed to functional gain. Factors affecting the time to IRH admission also were addressed.

Inpatient Rehabilitation Improved Functional Status in Asthenic Patients with Solid and Hematologic Malignancies

The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes in asthenic patients with hematologic malignancies with those of asthenic patients with solid tumors after inpatient rehabilitation. We hypothesized that asthenic patients with hematologic malignancies are less likely than patients with solid tumors to make functional improvement after rehabilitation. The records of 60 asthenic cancer patients (30 consecutive patients with solid tumors and 30 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies) who underwent inpatient rehabilitation at a comprehensive cancer center between October 2005 and October 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with focal neurologic deficits were excluded. All patients admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation unit received 3 hrs of more of therapy per weekday. The main outcomes included total, motor, and cognitive Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, hospital and rehabilitation length of stay, and FIM efficiency. The mean total FIM score significantly improved in patients with solid tumors (mean, 15; range, -6 to 38) and in patients with hematologic malignancies (mean, 17; range, -3 to 27); however, between-group differences in FIM scores were not significant (P = 0.31). The solid tumor patients were significantly older than the hematologic malignancy patients (71 ± 11 vs. 64 ± 12 yrs; P = 0.02), but the mean rehabilitation lengths of stay were the same for each group (9.5 days; P = 0.82). The mean FIM efficiency in the hematologic malignancy group was higher than that of the solid tumor group (1.9 vs.1.4; P = 0.049). Asthenic patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies could benefit from inpatient rehabilitation and make significant functional gain.

Long-term outcome of severe stroke patients: Is the ADL status at discharge from a stroke center indicative of the long-term outcome?

The objective of this study was to examine the possibility of predicting the long-term outcome of severe stroke patients from the ADL status at discharge. The design is a retrospective observational study in the stroke center at Tokushima University Hospital. Severe stroke patients at discharge with Barthel Index (BI) scores ≤ 40 (N=51) were divided into two subgroups retrospectively, improved and unimproved. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and BI were analyzed at discharge, 3 and 6 months after onset. Correlation analysis between BI and FIM showed good correlation, especially between BI and motor FIM (mFIM). In conclusion, the ADL status at discharge from a stroke center is not definitely indicative of the long-term outcome, although good recovery of severe stroke cases was observed in males and younger patients, and in patients with motor FIM score>25. This result shows that the first 3 months after the attack should be regarded as an important time window for intensive rehabilitation.

Correlation of shoulder range of motion limitations at discharge with limitations in activities and participation one year later in persons with spinal cord injury

To study the correlation between limited shoulder range of motion in persons with spinal cord injury at discharge and the performance of activities, wheeling performance, transfers and participation one year later. Multicentre prospective cohort study. A total of 146 newly injured subjects with spinal cord injury. Shoulder range of motion was measured at discharge. One year later, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), transfer ability, wheelchair circuit and Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) were assessed. Corrections were made for possible confounding factors (age, gender, level and completeness of injury, time since injury and shoulder pain). All subjects with limited shoulder range of motion at discharge had a lower FIM motor score and were less likely (total group 5 times, and subjects with tetraplegia 10 times less likely) to be able to perform an independent transfer one year later. Subjects with limited shoulder range of motion in the total group needed more time to complete the wheelchair circuit. No significant associations with the PASIPD were found in either group. Persons with spinal cord injury and limited shoulder range of motion at discharge are more limited in their activities one year later than those without limited shoulder range of motion.

Functional Level During the First Year After Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Course and Predictors of Outcome

Background : The objective of this study was to describe the functional level during the first year after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to evaluate the predictive impact of pre-injury and injury-related factors. Methods : A cohort of 65 patients with moderate (N = 21) or severe (N = 44) TBI were examined with FIM (Functional Independence Measure) at admission and discharge from the rehabilitation clinic (on average two months after injury) and at 12 months, and with GOSE (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended) at 12 months after injury. Possible predictors were analyzed in a regression model using FIM total score at 12 months as outcome. Results : All mean FIM scores improved significantly from injury to discharge from sub-acute rehabilitation. In the later period from discharge to 12 months after injury, the mean FIM motor score improved in severe TBI but not in moderate TBI patients. The mean FIM cognitive scores did not improve in any of the groups. At 12 months, 95% with moderate TBI had a FIM score from 109 - 126 (functionally independent) compared to 74% with severe TBI. Functional global outcome as assessed by GOSE was “good recovery” in 52% with moderate TBI versus 33% in severe TBI, “moderate disability” in 33% with moderate TBI versus 31% in severe TBI, and “severe disability” in 14% with moderate TBI versus 36% in severe TBI. Predictors such as PTA duration (B = -0.209), GCS admission rehabilitation (B = 5.058) and LOS rehabilitation (B = 0.458) explained 47% of the FIM variance 12 months post injury. Conclusions : The greatest improvement after moderate and severe TBI was in the sub-acute phase during the stay in a specialized rehabilitation unit. Residual disability was reported in 47% of moderate TBI patients as measured by GOSE at 12 months post injury indicating the importance of post-acute rehabilitation for these patients. Longer stays at the rehabilitation unit, a short PTA period and a high GCS score at admission to rehabilitation were positive predictors of functional level (FIM) at 12 months follow-up demonstrating that these factors are common predictors of early and late TBI phases. J Neurol Res. 2011;1(2):48-58 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jnr20w

Predictors of outcome in acute traumatic central cord syndrome due to spinal stenosis

the objective of this study was to elucidate the relationship between admission demographic data, validated injury severity measures on imaging studies, and clinical indicators on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), manual dexterity, and dysesthetic pain at least 12 months after surgery for acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS) due to spinal stenosis. over a 100-month period (January 2000 to April 2008), of 211 patients treated for ATCCS, 59 cases were due to spinal stenosis, and these patients underwent surgical decompression. Five of these patients died, 2 were lost to follow-up, 10 were not eligible for the study, and the remaining 42 were followed for at least 12 months. in the cohort of 42 patients, mean age was 58.3 years, 83% of the patients were men, and 52.4% of the accidents were due to falls. Mean admission ASIA motor score was 63.8 (upper extremities score, 25.8 and lower extremities score, 39.8), the spinal cord was most frequently compressed at skeletal segments C3-4 and C4-5 (71%), mean midsagittal diameter at the point of maximum compression was 5.6 mm, maximum canal compromise (MCC) was 50.5%, maximum spinal cord compression was 16.5%, and length of parenchymal damage on T2-weighted MR imaging was 29.4 mm. Time after injury until surgery was within 24 hours in 9 patients, 24-48 hours in 10 patients, and more than 48 hours in 23 patients. At the 1-year follow-up, the mean ASIA motor score was 94.1 (upper extremities score, 45.7 and lower extremities score, 47.6), FIM was 111.1, manual dexterity was 64.4% of baseline, and pain level was 3.5. Stepwise regression analysis of 10 independent variables indicated significant relationships between ASIA motor score at follow-up and admission ASIA motor score (p = 0.003), MCC (p = 0.02), and midsagittal diameter (p = 0.02); FIM and admission ASIA motor score (p = 0.03), MCC (p = 0.02), and age (p = 0.02); manual dexterity and admission ASIA motor score (p = 0.0002) and length of parenchymal damage on T2-weighted MR imaging (p = 0.002); and pain level and age (p = 0.02) and length of parenchymal lesion on T2-weighted MR imaging (p = 0.04). the main indicators of long-term ASIA motor score, FIM, manual dexterity, and dysesthetic pain were admission ASIA motor score, midsagittal diameter, MCC, length of parenchymal damage on T2-weighted MR imaging, and age, but different domains of outcome were determined by different predictors.

Patterns of Rehabilitation After Hip Arthroplasty and the Association with Outcomes

To examine the patterns of rehabilitation after elective and nonelective hip arthroplasty and its association with outcomes over an episode of postacute care. Data were obtained from a multisite prospective observational cohort study and its companion follow-up study. Patterns of care were measured by the combination of settings of care where hip arthroplasty patients received rehabilitation therapy. Main outcome measure was motor portion of the functional independence measure. Approximately 90% of hip arthroplasty patients received rehabilitation care from more than one setting. Eight patterns of care were identified in the follow-up period. Patterns of subsequent care were driven more by initial setting than by etiology. Nonelective hip arthroplasty patients had lower motor functional independence measure scores and used more rehabilitation services than did elective hip arthroplasty patients. Patterns of care were modest factors (accounted for only 7% of variance) in predicting patient motor functional independence measure over an episode of postacute care. Etiology of hip arthroplasty is associated with amounts of rehabilitation care used and outcomes. After the initial postacute rehabilitation setting, patients continued to receive considerable amounts of therapy in various settings. It is important to look beyond a single setting of care to an entire episode of care when examining clinical outcomes.

Clinical practice improvement approach in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: a pilot study

The objective of this study was to explore methods examining patient complexity and therapy interventions in relation to functional outcomes from an inpatient multiple sclerosis (MS) rehabilitation program. Retrospective and prospective data for 24 consecutive inpatients at a tertiary rehabilitation facility assessed (i) impairment/disability - Expanded Disability Status Scale, Neurological Impairment Set, (ii) complexity of intervention - Rehabilitation Complexity Scale, Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA), the type and duration of therapy, (iii) Function - Barthel Index (BI), functional independence measure (FIM), (iv) hospital length of stay, discharge destination. The mean length of stay was 20 days (SD=15.7); male : female ratio was 10 : 14; 11 (46%) had Expanded Disability Status Scale scores more than 6.5, and all discharged to community. Over one-half had 'moderate-severe' scores for fatigue, and deficits in motor function and mood that resulted in significant functional limitation. Rehabilitation Complexity Scale scores showed substantial complexity with two-thirds requiring specialized nursing. The NPTDA score (median 22 interquartile range 20-23) showed moderate dependency on admission in the following domains: physical, cognitive and psychosocial programs and preparing for discharge. The mean physiotherapy and occupational therapy received was 45.76 and 24.04 min/day, respectively. Functional gains from admission to discharge for FIM and BI were significant (P<0.001). There were strong correlations between the total NPTDA and FIM motor scores (Spearman's ρ -0.80) and BI (ρ -0.83), but only weak correlations with the FIM cognitive score (ρ -0.33). In conclusion, this pilot study provided information about the complex interplay of patient and process factors, and their interrelationships that impact functional outcomes in MS rehabilitation. A prospective study is now planned using appropriate tools to understand the 'black box' of rehabilitation.

Functional Outcome after Stroke in Patients with Aphasia and Neglect: Assessment by the Motor and Cognitive Functional Independence Measure Instrument

Background: The role of neuropsychological deficits in predicting functional outcome in patients with aphasia and neglect at the end of rehabilitation after stroke has been poorly investigated. This was the aim of this prospective study evaluated using a Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument. Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident [125 patients with aphasia, 45 with neglect and 131 without either aphasia or neglect (WAN)] were enrolled. Backward multiple linear regression analysis was used to predict motor and cognitive FIM, discharge destination, and length of stay. The independent variables were age, gender, aphasia, stroke type, stroke lesion size, comorbidity, bladder catheter, stroke severity, trunk control test, initial motor FIM, and committed caregiver identified on admission to rehabilitation. Results: At the end of rehabilitation, patients with neglect had significantly lower final motor FIM scores and lower daily efficiency improvement in motor FIM scores compared with those with aphasia (both p < 0.001) and WAN (both p < 0.001). Patients with aphasia showed lower final cognitive FIM scores compared with those with neglect (p < 0.001) and those without deficits (p < 0.001). Neglect was a predictor of final motor FIM (β = –0.24) and efficiency in motor FIM (β = –0.29), while aphasia was a predictor of final cognitive FIM (β = –0.54). Neglect and aphasia did not differ and were not predictors of discharge destination and length of stay. Conclusions: Patients with neglect have lower motor FIM scores if compared with those with aphasia, while patients with aphasia have lower cognitive FIM scores. Neglect is a predictor of motor FIM, while aphasia is a predictor of cognitive FIM scores.