Abstract Introduction Our institution has utilized the suspension epidermal autograft solution since a first application with FDA compassionate use protocol. We have since used this commercially available technology for the management of deep partial thickness and full thickness burn wounds. There is a non-adherent dressing in the commercially available kits to cover the suspension in a semi-porous fashion. We often would have beautifully dressed extremities and trunks only to find that in positions of function the non-adherent layer would pop through the intact staples. We then investigated the source of this discrepancy and found the non-elastic property of the dressing the likely culprit. We then began the process to determine an alternative dressing that could work more efficiently. Methods In an effort to determine if the institutional standard of care could be benefitted by this patient-based observation, the charts of patients that underwent simultaneous application of the epidermal autograft suspension and the poly lactic acid polymer dressing were interrogated. The data was identified by the institutional tissue tracker. Once the patient was identified, the chart was then reviewed to determine the desired data points. We evaluated the charts of patients that were recorded as utilizing the suspension epidermal autograft charge as wells charges for the poly lactic acid polymer skin substitute. The charts were then evaluated to determine if there were any deviations from our expected outcomes using the suspension alone. Results Our preliminary results indicate that the patients were able to discharge sooner as the wound care associated with the polymer skin substitute is more streamlined. It did not reflect any areas of graft loss but did in 2 instances remained in place longer than our standard. The wound was healed beneath but the skin substitute remained adhered. Conclusions The simultaneous use of suspension epidermal autografts and poly lactic acid skin substitutes has become common place for our institution. A quick review as a QI project has resulted in the desire to delve further into comparative data points. A formal retrospective review of the charts will be undertaken for a case series of about 20 patients.