ABSTRACT The ‘Niitaka’ pear relies heavily on artificial pollination, owing to its lack of viable pollen; however, drone-based approaches remain underexplored. This study compared drone-assisted pollen dusting and suspension methods with conventional artificial and natural pollination, aiming to evaluate their effects on fruit set rate, pollen adhesion, and fruit quality. Initial trials revealed that although pollen dusting (17.6%) outperformed suspension pollination (9.5%) in fruit set, both methods were inferior to artificial (37.7%) and natural pollination (27.5%). Notably, sugar content was the highest in drone-treated fruits. In a follow-up trial, a lightweight drone equipped with a precision nozzle and internal compressor achieved a higher fruit set rate (21.0%) than that of the previous system, while using only 8 g of pear pollen (one-fourth the initial amount per unit area). Therefore, even minor design improvements can significantly enhance pollination efficiency, highlighting the potential of drone-assisted pollination as a sustainable alternative for pear cultivation.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
29502 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Fruit Quality
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
28932 Search results
Sort by Recency