You have accessJournal of UrologyPenis/Testis/Urethra: Benign & Malignant Disease II1 Apr 2012743 ULTRASOUND DETECTED NON-PALPABLE TESTICULAR LESIONS WHAT DO YOU DO? Claudio Valotto, Fabio Zattoni, Andrea Guttilla, Paolo Beltrami, and Filiberto Zattoni Claudio ValottoClaudio Valotto Padova, Italy More articles by this author , Fabio ZattoniFabio Zattoni Padova, Italy More articles by this author , Andrea GuttillaAndrea Guttilla Padova, Italy More articles by this author , Paolo BeltramiPaolo Beltrami Padova, Italy More articles by this author , and Filiberto ZattoniFiliberto Zattoni Padova, Italy More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.829AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES With the increased use of trans-scrotal ultrasonography, the unexpected detection of non-palpable testicular lesions has become more frequent. The suggested therapeutical approaches vary from radical orchiectomy to simple ultrasound follow-up, but an univocal behavior was not suggested. Herein, we report our experience with non-palpable testicular lesions, incidentally discovered, who underwent surgical exploration. METHODS From April 2008 to October 2011, a total of 25 patients with negative testicular cancer markers, were considered for surgical exploration because of a testicular lesion incidentally detected through an ultrasound exam. Ultrasound findings as well as operative reports (including frozen section evaluations) were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS The suspected lesion was located in the left testis in 10 cases; in the right one in 12 and they were bilateral in the remaining 3 patients. The mean diameter of the ecogenic area was 16.1 mm (range 4-89 mm). All patients were approached through an inguinal incision; the involved testis was initially exposed; the spermatic cord clamped and an intraoperative ultrasound was performed. All lesions were identified and successfully removed. The intraoperative frozen section revealed a benign lesion in 21cases (84 %) (Group 1); a malignant tumor in 4 (16 %) (Group 2). In Group 1, the final histological findings confirmed the frozen section reports in 18/21 cases (85 %) and they were positive for cancer (seminoma) in 3/21 cases (14%). These patients immediately after underwent a radical orchiectomy; the pathological report was negative in one case, while the seminoma was confirmed in 2 cases. In Group 2, the definitive histological exam confirmed the tumor in 3/4 cases (75 %), while it was negative in 1/4 (25 %). All patients underwent a following radical orchiectomy and the pathological reports were negative in 2 patients and positive in the 2 others. The postoperative period was uneventful in all cases. None of our cases had a relapse at a median follow-up of 18 months. CONCLUSIONS According to our experience, ultrasound detected non-palpable lesions of the testis are lesions with a benign prognosis in 80 % of the cases. Among the malignant ones, only the seminoma histotype was detected. In the light of that, a surgical conservative approach may be recommended in all patients with such lesions. A negative frozen section does not exclude the presence of a seminoma, but, in our experience, the deferred treatment did not compromise the oncological control of the disease. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e304-e305 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Claudio Valotto Padova, Italy More articles by this author Fabio Zattoni Padova, Italy More articles by this author Andrea Guttilla Padova, Italy More articles by this author Paolo Beltrami Padova, Italy More articles by this author Filiberto Zattoni Padova, Italy More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract