Frozen Elephant Trunk Research Articles

Distal Aortic Failure Following the Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure for Aortic Dissection.

BackgroundAim of this study was to report and to identify risk factors for distal aortic failure following aortic arch replacement via the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure.MethodsOne hundred eighty-six consecutive patients underwent the FET procedure for acute and chronic aortic dissection. Our cohort was divided into patients with and without distal aortic failure. Distal aortic failure was defined as: (I) distal aortic reintervention, (II) aortic diameter dilatation to ≥ 6 cm or > 5 mm growth within 6 months, (III) development of a distal stent-graft-induced new entry (dSINE) and/or (IV) aortic-related death. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and aortic morphological data were analyzed.ResultsDistal aortic failure occurred in 88 (47.3%) patients. Forty-six (24.7%) required a distal reintervention, aortic diameter dilatation was observed in 9 (4.8%) patients, a dSINE occurred in 22 (11.8%) patients and 11 (6.4%) suffered an aortic-related death. We found no difference in the number of communications between true and false lumen (p = 0.25) but there were significantly more communications between Ishimaru zone 6–8 in the distal aortic failure group (p = 0.01). The volume of the thoracic descending aorta measured preoperatively and postoperatively within 36 months afterward was significantly larger in patients suffering distal aortic failure (p < 0.001; p = 0.011). Acute aortic dissection (SHR 2.111; p = 0.007), preoperative maximum descending aortic diameter (SHR 1.029; p = 0.018) and preoperative maximum aortic diameter at the level of the diaphragm (SHR 1.041; p = 0.012) were identified as risk factors for distal aortic failure.ConclusionThe incidence and risk of distal aortic failure following the FET procedure is high. Especially those patients with more acute and more extensive aortic dissections or larger preoperative descending aortic diameters carry a substantially higher risk of developing distal aortic failure. The prospective of the FET technique as a single-step treatment for aortic dissection seems low and follow-up in dedicated aortic centers is therefore paramount.

Management and Outcomes of Non-A Non-B Aortic Dissection

The results of best medical treatment (BMT), endovascular based treatment (EBT), and total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET) treatment in a single centre experience were reported in non-A non-B aortic dissection patients. From January 2016 to May 2020, 215 consecutive patients with acute or subacute non-A non-B aortic dissection were enrolled. The primary endpoints were all cause death. Secondary endpoints included follow up adverse aortic event (AE), a composite of the outcomes of dissection related death, rupture, retrograde type A aortic dissection, stent graft induced new entry tear, secondary endoleak, and follow up re-intervention. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate associations between different treatments and outcomes. Among the 215 dissection patients, 127 (59.1%) received EBT, 42 (19.5%) received TAR+ FET, and the remaining 46 (21.4%) received BMT. Thirty day mortality was higher in patients receiving TAR+ FET (7.1%) than in those treated with EBT (1.6%) or BMT (2.2%) (p= .12). However, after a median follow up of 39.1 (27.0 - 50.7) months, no additional death was recorded in the TAR+ FET group, while nine (7.3%) patients died in the EBT group and 14 (31.8%) died in the BMT group (p < .001). Specifically, EBT and TAR+ FET showed no significant difference in midterm mortality rate, follow up AE, and re-intervention for complicated or uncomplicated dissection patients involving zone 2. For patients with uncomplicated non-A non-B aortic dissection involving zone 2, EBT could profoundly decrease the mortality rate, follow up AE and re-intervention when compared with BMT (p < .010 for all), although this difference was not statistically significant between TAR+ FET and BMT. No statistical comparison was performed in patients with zone 1 involvement because of the limited number of patients. It was demonstrated that EBT or TAR+ FET might be a viable strategy for non-A non-B aortic dissection patients.

Downstream thoracic endovascular aortic repair following the frozen elephant trunk procedure.

The frozen elephant trunk technique has become a well-established treatment option for patients presenting all thoracic aortic pathologies including acute and chronic dissection, aortic aneurysms and even penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch and descending aorta. Nevertheless, there is a significant incidence of and risk for distal aortic reinterventions after the frozen elephant trunk. Indications mainly include a planned staged approach, diameter progression of downstream aortic segments and the development of distal stent-graft induced new entries (dSINEs). Endovascular stent-graft extension through conventional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a relatively simple and safe method to address any pathologies in the remaining descending thoracic aorta up to the level of the coeliac trunk. In fact, the frozen elephant trunk stent-graft provides an ideal proximal landing zone for any endovascular stent-graft extension. Postoperative outcomes are very promising with very low reported in-hospital mortality and morbidity. In case this 2-staged-approach fails to stabilize the remaining aorta, a 3-step procedure, namely open thoracoabdominal aortic replacement, is simplified because the anastomosis site has moved distally. Follow-up of all patients, following frozen elephant trunk implantation or distal stent-graft extension, is mandatory, ideally in an outpatient clinic dedicated to the aorta in order to identify disease progression or to detect any complications as soon as possible.

Normothermic frozen elephant trunk: our experience and literature review.

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has undoubtable advantages in treating complex and extensive disease of the aortic arch and the thoracic descending aorta. Despite several improvements in cardiopulmonary bypass conduction and surgical strategy, operative times and the institution of systemic circulatory arrest remain the main determinants of early mortality, cerebral/spinal cord injury and visceral organs dysfunction. We have conducted this review to highlight the recent technical advances in arch and FET surgery aiming at the reduction/avoidance of systemic circulatory arrest, and their impact on early outcomes. A literature search (from origin to January 2022), limited to publications in English, was performed on online platforms and database (PubMed, Google, ResearchGate). After a further review of associated or similar papers, we found 4 experiences, described by 11 peer-reviewed published papers, which focused on minimising or avoiding systemic circulatory arrest during total arch replacement plus stenting of the descending thoracic aorta. Recent experiences reported the use of an antegrade endoaortic balloon, advanced and inflated into the stent graft, to provide an early systemic reperfusion soon after the deployment of the stented portion of the FET prosthesis and minimize the circulatory arrest time (down to a mean of 5 minutes), thus avoiding the need of moderate or deep hypothermia (mean systemic temperature 28-30 °C) while allowing a complete arch and FET repair. Our approach, based on off-pump retrograde vascular stent graft deployment in distal arch/descending thoracic aorta, and the use of a retrograde endoballoon, allows the repair of extensive aortic pathologies during uninterrupted normothermic cerebral and lower body perfusion. The use of endoballoon occlusion has emerged in recent years as a safe and effective strategy to allow distal perfusion during FET repair. This technique minimizes or avoids the detrimental effects of hypothermia and systemic circulatory arrest and significantly reduces the operative times.

Single-Center Experience With the Thoraflex™ Hybrid Prosthesis: Indications, Implantation Technique and Results.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the early and mid-term results after the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure for the treatment of complex arch and proximal descending aortic disease in a single-center institution.MethodsFrom April 2015 to July 2021, 72 patients (25 women, 60.4 ± 10.3 years) underwent Thoraflex™ Hybrid implantation at our institution. The indications were thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (n = 16, 22.2%), post-dissection aneurysm (n = 21, 29.2%), and acute aortic dissection (AAD) (n = 35, 48.6%). Antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia (28°C) was employed in all cases. Eighteen patients (25%) have already been operated due to heart or aortic disease.ResultsOverall in-hospital mortality was 12.5% (9 patients). Rates of permanent neurological dysfunction and spinal cord injury were 9.7 and 5.5%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate among patients operated on AAD, TAA, and post-dissection aneurysm were 8.6, 6.2, and 23.8%, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 26 ± 20 months, mortality was 9.7%. Furthermore, 23 patients (31.9%) required a subsequent procedure in distal aorta: endovascular stentgraft extension in 19 patients (26.4%) and open aortic surgery in 4 patients (5.5%). The mid-term survival of patients with type A aortic dissection was 97%.ConclusionsOur experience with the Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis demonstrates its surgical applicability for different types of aortic pathologies with promising outcomes during early and midterm follow-up. Our technique and perioperative management lead to comparable or even superior neurological outcomes and mortality in urgent cases considering other high-volume centers.

Evaluation of the "release and perfuse technique" for aortic arch surgery.

The hypothermic circulatory arrest is a major limitation of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique, associated with a high incidence of postoperative mobility and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients suffering from different aortic arch diseases treated with the release and perfuse technique (RPT). We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who had undergone aortic arch repair with the RPT at our Institution between October 2019 and September 2021. Preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative data were collected. A total of 18 patients undergoing aortic arch surgery with the use of RPT were analyzed. Twelve of them (67%) were males, and the median age of the entire cohort was 67 (56-73) years. The primary indications for surgery included acute type A aortic dissection (50%), chronic type B aortic dissection (33%), and chronic aneurysms (17%). The median cardiopulmonary bypass-, aortic cross-clamp- and circulatory arrest times were163 (147-213) min, 69 (51-120) min, and 10 (8-13) min, respectively. The median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 4 (2-7) and 12 (11-16) days, respectively. One patient (6%) died during the first 30 days after surgery. Considering the anatomical limitations related to the use of this technique, the RPT can be safely performed and could represent a promising strategy to reduce the circulatory arrest time during aortic arch surgery. Nevertheless, further studies are required to demonstrate its efficacy.

P45 OUTCOME AFTER ACUTE TYPE A AORTIC DISSECTION: THE ROLE OF AN AORTIC TEAM AND AN AORTIC REGIONAL NETWORK

Abstract Background The outcome of acute type–A aortic dissection (A–AAD) repair is strictly related both to surgical factors and patient conditions. Improvement in surgical experience and in diagnosis and treatment protocols could significantly increase survival for patients affected by A–AAD. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on patients outcomes of a standardized integrated surgical approach and of a regional aortic hub and spokes network. Materials and Methods From 2004 to 2021, a total of 258 patients underwent repair of A–AAD. In 2010 in our Institution was created the Aortic Team, with cardiac surgeons dedicated on the treatment of aortic pathologies, while in 2017 was created a regional aortic network between hub and spokes in order to standardize the diagnosis and treatment algorithm. Thus, patients were distributed among three periods: 2004–2010 (Era 1, n = 90), 2011–2016 (Era 2, n = 87), and 2017–2021 (Era 3, n = 81). Results Baseline demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. Compared to Era1 and Era2, clinical status at time of operation was better in Era3, because of less rates of malperfusion (16% vs 11% vs 4%, p = 0.01) and hemodynamic compromise (34% vs 38% vs 22%, p = 0.07). Patients of Era 3 were less likely to Axillary artery cannulation was almost routinely used in Eras 2 (86%) and 3 (91%) while femoral artery was mainly cannulated in Era 1 (91%) (p &amp;lt; 0.01). Retrograde cerebral perfusion was predominantly used in Era 1 (60%) while antegrade cerebral perfusion was preferred in Eras 2 (94%,) and 3 (100%); (p &amp;lt; 0.01). There was a significant increase of arch replacement procedures from Era 1 (11%) to Eras 2 (33%) and 3 (48%) (p &amp;lt; 0.01). Frozen elephant trunk was mainly performed in Era 3. Operative mortality was 13% in Era 1, 11% in Era 2, and 4% in Era 3 (p = 0.07, p = 0.03 between Era 1 and Era3). Actuarial survival at 3 years is 74%, in Era 1, 78% in Era 2, and 89% in Era 3 (p = 0.05). Patients of Era 3 received less re–exploration for bleeding (p = 0.02) and less high inotropic support (p = 0.04). Conclusions With increasing experience and a more aggressive approach, including total arch replacement, repair of A–AAD can be more tailored to patients conditions, being performed with low operative mortality in many patients. Moreover, patient care and treatment by a multidisciplinary regional organization allows faster diagnosis and effective clinical stabilization allowing to further improve early and late outcomes.

The great vessel freeze-out: A meta-analysis of conventional versus frozen elephant trunks in aortic arch surgery.

BackgroundThe optimal treatment strategy for complex aortic arch and proximal descending aortic pathologies remains controversial. Despite the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique's increasing popularity, its use over the conventional elephant trunk (CET) remains a matter of physician preference and outcomes are varied.MethodsThis meta‐analysis of available comparative studies of FET versus CET sought to examine differences in survival, reintervention, and adverse events. The following databases were searched from inception—May 2020: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Studies retrieved were then screened for eligibility against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria with a protocol registered on Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/hrfze/.ResultsThe search identified 1911 citations, with five studies included. The resultant meta‐analysis included 313 CET and 292 FET cases. FET had lower perioperative mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.42; 0.60], p < .001) and improved 1‐year survival compared to CET (hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% CI: [0.42; 0.95], p = .03). There were no significant differences in rates of overall or open reinterventions following FET versus CET, but FET did yield a significantly higher rate of endovascular reintervention (RR: 2.32, 95% CI: [1.17; 4.61], p = .03). No significant differences were observed in the incidences of postoperative stroke, spinal cord injury, or renal failure between groups.ConclusionsThe FET technique yields superior rates of perioperative and medium‐term survival with no significant increase in overall reinterventions. There was no significant difference in the rate of spinal cord injury between groups, providing further large‐scale evidence that the FET is an acceptable, safe alternative to the CET.

Aortic remodeling in aortic dissection after frozen elephant trunk: overcoming the challenges

The introduction of the single-step hybrid frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure expanded the surgeon's armamentarium in managing aortic dissection (AD). This is evident by the reduction in mortality and complication rates associated with conventional techniques used to repair ADs. Although FET still carries a risk of certain complications, it has been associated with excellent aortic remodeling following the procedure. The main scope of this review is to evaluate aortic remodeling in aortic dissection after FET as well as to highlight the challenges that may arise and ways to overcome them. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase to highlight the evidence in the literature on aortic remodeling in aortic dissection after FET. The FET procedure promotes excellent long-term remodeling, this is seen in the substantial increase in the size of the true lumen along with the decrease in that of the false lumen (FL), in addition to significant FL thrombosis. However, this occurs to a lesser extent more distally at the level of the abdominal aorta. Negative remodeling may present a major challenge to the process of aortic remodeling, nevertheless, this can be overcome with endovascular reintervention which has demonstrated highly favorable results. Additionally, the choice of FET graft, in terms of type and length, seems to influence outcomes. Namely, the Thoraflex™ Hybrid graft can be considered the superior graft on the global market. On the other hand, there seems to be a debate in the literature on the optimal FET graft length. The FET procedure has revolutionized the field of aortovascular surgery and promotes excellent long-term aortic remodeling. Negative remodeling can occur but can also be favorably overcome with endovascular reintervention. Finally, the choice of FET graft may also influence results, thus, should be taken with great care.

Endovascular reintervention after frozen elephant trunk: where is the evidence?

The introduction of the single-step hybrid frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure for total arch replacement has revolutionized the field of aortovascular surgery. FET has proven to achieve excellent results in the repair of complex thoracic aorta pathologies. However, there remains a risk of reintervention post-FET for a variety of causes. This secondary intervention can either be performed endovascular, with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), or via open surgery. Multiple FET hybrid prosthesis are commercially available, each requiring different rates of endovascular reintervention. The current review will focus on providing an overview of the reintervention rates for main causes in relation to the FET grafts on the market. In addition, strategies to prevent reintervention will be highlighted. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase to highlight the evidence in the literature on endovascular reintervention after FET. The main causes for secondary intervention are distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE), endoleak and negative aortic remodeling, and to a much lesser extent, graft kinking and aorto-esophageal fistulae. In addition, it is clear that the Thoraflex Hybrid (Terumo Aortic, Inchinnan, UK) is the superior FET device, showing excellent reintervention rates for all the above causes. Interestingly, the choice of FET device as well as its size and length can help prevent the need for reintervention. The FET procedure is indeed associated with excellent clinical outcomes, however, the need for reintervention may still arise. Importantly, the Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis has shown excellent results when it comes to endovascular reintervention. Finally, several strategies exist that can prevent reintervention.

Kinking of Frozen Elephant Trunk Hybrid Prostheses: Incidence, Mechanism, and Management.

IntroductionKinking of the Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) stent graft is one of the most devastating complications of the FET procedure. It can present post-operatively with reduced arterial pressures in the lower limbs and intermittent claudication. However, it can also be visualized intra-operatively by the surgeons. Unresolved kinking of the stent graft can result in intraluminal thrombus formation and subsequent multi-organ septic emboli.AimsThe main scope of this review is to collate, summarize and present all the evidence in the literature on kinking of FET stent grafts.MethodsWe carried out a comprehensive literature search on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and Scopus to collate all research evidence on the incidence, mechanism, and management of FET graft kinking.ResultsIncidence of kinking is variable, ranging from 0% to 8% in the literature, with varying rates associated with each stent graft type. The Thoraflex HybridTM prosthesis seemed to be the most commonly used and superior graft, and out of all the 15 cases of kinking reported in the literature, 5 (33.3%) were associated with just the Frozenix graft which had the highest incidence. There are multiple theories regarding the mechanism of kinking, including the direction of blood flow, the length of the stent grafts used, and the position of the prosthesis in relation to the flexure of the aorta. Multiple reparative management techniques have been suggested in the literature and include total endovascular repair, open repair, balloon dilatation, and deploying a second stent graft.ConclusionGraft kinking is one of the most critical complications of the FET technique. Its life-threatening sequelae warrant appropriate follow-up of these patients post-operatively, in addition to time management if kinking is suspected. Given the limited evidence in the literature, future studies should incorporate graft kinking into their outcomes reporting.

Outcomes of reoperation for total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk after previous cardiovascular surgery

BackgroundAortic arch replacement(TAR) combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique is a high-risk operation after previous cardiovascular surgery. The aim of the study was to review our strategy and outcomes in this cohort. MethodData were reviewed for patients who underwent TAR combined with FET after previous cardiovascular surgery from January 2010 to December 2020. The patients were divided into elective group and non-selective group. Results63 eligible patients were divided into elective(n = 44) and non-elective(n = 19) groups. The interval between two operations was shorter in non-elective group than elective groups (P = 0.001). The indication for reoperation was different in two groups (P = 0.000), however, the type of reoperations has no differences. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was shorter in elective group than non-elective group (P = 0.000). The over-all 30-day mortality rate was 17.5%, and it was higher in non-elective group (P = 0.013). The 24h drainage increased in non-elective group (P = 0.001) as well as re-explore rate for bleeding (P = 0.022). Postoperative hospital stay prolonged in non-elective group (P = 0.002). However, rates of survival without further aortic events were 72.3 ± 7.1% in elective group, 72.9 ± 13.5% in non-elective group at 5 years, respectively (P = 0. 955). ConclusionReduced 30-day mortality and shortened post-operative hospital stay was observed in elective group, however, long-term survival rate without reintervention were not affected.

Surgical Repair of Two Kinds of Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BackgroundRetrograde dissection is now recognized as an important complication following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The purpose of this study is to describe two different situations of TAAD after TEVAR. We will introduce the surgical methods used to repair TAAD following TEVAR at our center, and evaluate its long-term prognosis.MethodsBetween January 2010 and October 2019, 50 patients who had previously received TEVAR treatment for TBAD were admitted to our center for repair of a type A aortic dissection. According to the patients’ CT angiographies and intra-operative findings, we identified two distinct groups: a retrograde group (stent-induced new aortic injury, with retrograde extension involving the ascending aorta) and an antegrade group (entry tear located in the aortic root, ascending aorta or the aortic arch, away from the edges of the stent grafts). The options for treatment of the proximal aorta were Bentall procedure (12/50, 24.0%) and ascending aorta replacement (38/50, 76.0%). All patients underwent total arch replacement (TAR) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation. Survival over the follow-up period was evaluated with the Kaplan–Meier survival curve and the log-rank test.ResultsThe median interval time from prior TEVAR to reoperation was 187 days (IQR: 30.0, 1375.0 days). 18.0% of TAAD after TEVAR did not have any obvious symptoms at the time of diagnosis, most of which were found on routine follow-up imaging. The patients in the retrograde group were younger than those in the antegrade group (44.0 ± 9.4 vs. 51.4 ± 10.5 years, P = 0.012). No significant differences in the incidence of post-operative complications or mortality were noted between the two groups. The mean follow-up time was 3 years. No late death or complications occurred after one year following surgery upon follow-up. The asymptomatic survival rate one year after surgery was 90.0%.ConclusionThe TAR and FET technique was feasible and effective for complicated TAAD after TEVAR. The surgical success rate and long-term prognosis of patients undergoing the timely operation are satisfactory.

Surgical Treatment of Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Data are scarce regarding retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment outcomes of patients who developed RTAD after TEVAR.From January 2015 to January 2020, 25 consecutive patients (aged 52 ± 11.69 years) of RTAD after TEVAR received open surgery. All patients received total arch replacement (TAR) with the frozen elephant trunk (FET). The proximal part of the TEVAR stent was removed using a wire scissor. The distal part of the TEVAR stent in the descending aorta was preserved. Data of 50 random patients of type A aortic dissection without prior TEVAR were collected during the same period. We compared the perioperative and midterm follow-up outcomes between patients with prior TEVAR and patients without prior TEVAR.The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time were 173.7 ± 44.1, 109.5 ± 31.4, and 21.6 ± 6.8 minutes in the RTAD group, respectively. These times are similar to those of the no-RTAD group. The median interval between the initial TEVAR procedure and RTAD was 8.5 months (range, 0-72 months). New entry tears that were induced by the proximal end of the TEVAR stent were found in 23 (92%) patients of the RTAD group. There were no significant differences in major adverse events and overall survival between the two groups.TAR with the FET technique was feasible for the treatment of RTAD after TEVAR, with acceptable early and midterm results.

"Why is frozen elephant trunk better than classical elephant trunk?"

The treatment of complex aortic arch disease, in chronic or acute setting, has always represented a fascinating challenge for the heart surgeon also because, often, the involvement of the aortic arch is associated with a simultaneous involvement of the ascending aorta and of the proximal portion of the descending thoracic aorta. In recent years, there have been many surgical and/or endovascular techniques and approaches in a single step or multiple steps proposed with the aim of treating and simplifying these complex conditions. The first procedure available for this purpose was the conventional elephant trunk technique, proposed by the German surgeon Hans Borst, back in 1983. In the following years, the technique has undergone modifications, up to what is nowadays considered its most modern evolution, represented by the frozen elephant trunk which allows managing the proximal descending thoracic aorta using the antegrade release of a self-expandable stent graft. In this review article, we try to analyze the advantages and drawbacks of both techniques from clinical and practical points of view.

Total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique for a right-sided aortic arch with a Kommerell diverticulum and aberrant right vertebral artery

The best treatment for a right-sided aortic arch (RAA) and Kommerell diverticulum (KD) has not been determined due to the rarity of these conditions. The current trend in the treatment of this disease is to increase the endovascular approach without a sternotomy. We describe a rare condition with an association of an RAA with a KD of an aberrant left subclavian artery and an anomalous right vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch (AVA). The left vertebral artery was missing. Also, there was an incomplete circle of Willis due to the absence of the left and right posterior communication arteries. Therefore, the AVA was the only artery to supply the vertebral-basilar system. In our case, a simple thoracic endovascular aortic repair was not suitable because of the sharply curved arch and short landing zone. Also, a debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair was not appropriate because that approach would not permit reconstruction of the AVA. The patient successfully underwent a total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique. This procedure could be an effective option for patients with RAAs with KDs associated with another arch vessel anomaly.

Aortic Balloon Occlusion Technique Does Not Improve Peri-Operative Outcomes for Acute Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Patients With Lower Body Malperfusion.

BackgroundThe management of malperfusion is vital to improve the outcomes of surgery for acute type A acute aortic dissection (ATAAD). Open arch repair under hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (HCA/sACP) is safe and efficient but associated with inevitable hypothermia and ischemia-reperfusion injury. The aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) technique is shown to be organ protective by allowing higher temperature and shorter circulatory arrest time. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new technique for ATAAD patients with lower body malperfusion.MethodsBetween January 2013 and November 2020, 355 ATAAD patients with lower body malperfusion who underwent arch repair in our institute were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ABO group (n = 85) and HCA/sACP group (n = 271). Propensity score matching was performed to correct baseline differences.ResultsUsing the propensity score matching, 85 pairs were generated. Circulatory arrest time was significantly lower in the ABO group compared with the HCA/sACP group (median, 8 vs. 22 min; p < 0.001). The incidence of in-hospital mortality (10.6 vs. 12.9%; p = 0.812), stroke (7.1 vs. 7.1%; p = 1.000), dialysis (25.9 vs. 32.9%; p = 0.183), hepatic dysfunction (52.9 vs. 57.6%; p = 0.537), tracheostomy (4.7 vs. 2.4%; p = 0.682), paraplegia (1.2 vs. 4.7%; p = 0.368) were comparable between ABO and HCA/sACP groups. Other outcomes and major adverse events were comparable. The multivariable logistic analysis did not recognize ABO technique protective against any major adverse outcomes.ConclusionsFor ATAAD patients with lower body malperfusion, the ABO technique allows the performance of arch repair with frozen elephant trunk (FET) under higher temperature and shorter circulatory arrest time. However, ABO technique did not improve perioperative outcomes. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this technique.

Incidence of Distal Stent Graft Induced New Entry vs. Aortic Remodeling Associated With Frozen Elephant Trunk

BackgroundThe introduction of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for total arch replacement (TAR) has revolutionized the field of aortivascular surgery by allowing hybrid repair of complex aortic pathologies in a single step through combining an open surgical approach with an endovascular one. FET has been associated with favorable aortic remodeling, however, its is also associated with development of distal stent graft induced new entry (dSINE) tears postoperatively. The rate of aortic remodeling and the incidence of dSINE have been linked together, in addition, there seems to be a relationship between these two variables and FET insetion length as well as graft size.AimsThe scope of this review is to highlight the rate of aortic remodeling as well the incidence of dSINE associated with different FET devices available commercially. This review also aimed to investigate the relationship between aortic remodeling, dSINE, FET insertion length and FET graft size.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search using multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase in order to collate all research evidence on the above mentioned variables.ResultsThoraflex™ Hybrid Plexus seems to yield optimum aortic remodeling by promoting maximum false thrombosis as well true lumen expansion. Thoraflex Hybrid™ is also associated with the lowest incidence of dSINE post-FET relative to the other FET devices on the market. Aortic remodeling and dSINE do influence each other and are both linked with FET graft length and size.ConclusionThe FET technique for TAR shows excellent aortic remodeling but is associated with a considerable risk of dSINE development. However, Thoraflex™ Hybrid has demonstrated itself to be the superior FET device on the aortic arch prostheses market. Since aortic remodeling, dSINE, FET insertion length and stent graft size are all interconnect, the choice of FET device length and size must be made with great care for optimum results.

Can preoperative features predict residual false lumen remodelling after tear-oriented limited resection for acute type I dissection?

Our goal was to identify the preoperative findings in computed tomography correlated with the postoperative changes of the false lumen (FL) remaining in the descending thoracic aorta following tear-oriented surgery for acute type I dissection. Patients who underwent ascending +/- partial arch replacement, with available preoperative and postoperative late (>1 year) CT scans, were included. Preoperative cross-sectional parameters were measured by the semi-automated centreline method at the level of the anastomosis. The parameters of the patients who presented positive remodelling of the proximal descending thoracic aorta were compared with those of the patients who did not in the late images. Among the included 101 patients, positive remodelling of the proximal descending thoracic aorta was observed in 46.5%, of which 76.6% extended downwards to the middle descending thoracic aorta. In the univariable analysis, an FL area ratio <50% (P < 0.001), a circumferential ratio of dissection <50% (P = 0.028), an FL width <20 mm (P = 0.008) at the distal anastomotic zone and not leaving residual arch branches having patent false lumens (P = 0.005) correlated with positive remodelling. The number of fulfilled above-mentioned features revealed a better correlation, which was stronger in patients without Marfan syndrome and in those older than 50 years. The cross-sectional extent of dissection at the presumed distal anastomotic zone is associated with descending thoracic aorta positive remodelling following tear-oriented replacement for acute type I aortic dissection. Considering the anatomical features in determining the extent of aortic replacement, some of the non-Marfan elderly patients can be spared from aggressive total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique.

Removal of a frozen elephant trunk using a polyvinyl tube

The increasing use of total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk (FET) is expected to lead to an increase in the prevalence of graft infections requiring replacement involving an FET, which is generally a more invasive procedure than the initial surgery. Herein, we describe a novel method for FET removal using a polyvinyl tube as the storage device. The procedure is completed using the same median sternotomy approach as the initial surgery. We report on the outcomes for six patients. Our procedure is simple to perform and safe and caused no injury to the aorta in our case series.