Reviews 267 Susan Clair Imbarrato. Declarations of Independency in EighteenthCentury American Autobiography. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1998.192 pp. ISBN 1-57233-012-0, $32.50. With textual examples ranging from the diary of a woman who began American life as an indentured servant to the autobiographies of Founding Fathers John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, Susan Clair Imbarrato supplies abundant evidence for her argument about the nature of self-construction in eighteenth-century America. Her interest focuses on the relation between acts of self-representation and the ethos of the new Republic. Pointing out the development from seventeenth-century emphasis on community to nineteenth-century Romanticism, with its stress on the individual, Imbarrato shows how eighteenth-century writing about the self helps to effect a transition between the two. The study organizes its six principal texts into three pairings exemplifying different modes of self-rendition. Elizabeth Ashridge, a Quaker woman, and Jonathan Edwards represent the seventeenthcentury spiritual practice of self-examination in their diary records of conversion experiences. Dr. Alexander Hamilton, an eighteenthcentury bon vivant, and Elizabeth House Trist, a woman traveling alone to the frontier for reunion with her husband, produce personal travel narratives. Adams and Jefferson write poUtical autobiographies, extended accounts of their lives and times that Imbarrato pairs interestingly with samples of their letters. The sequence of works, some intended for pubkcation, others not, moves toward secularization and increasing concern with a world outside the self. The context established for examination of these cases includes autobiographical works of the period (notably Benjamin Franklin's) as well as autobiographical theory. Imbarrato attempts to situate her objects of study historically and to analyze them in relation to the problems always at issue in Ufe writing. She considers in particular the question of fictionality and the tension between the growing authority and the continuing uncertainties of writers about themselves. The six autobiographies she considers at length exemplify varied techniques partly corresponding to their diverse personal purposes and intended audience. Imbarrato's treatment of the travel narratives exemplifies the strengths and weaknesses of her book as a whole. The relevant chapter (Chapter Three), entitled "Declaring the Self in the Social Sphere," pretty much takes for granted the participation of travel narratives in the autobiographical tradition, although its introductory section emphasizes the didactic and public purpose of such narratives, even when they are not intended for publication. Imbarrato points out that "the travel narrative vaUdates individual perspective and encourages individual investigation" (40)—a statement undeniably true, but one that does not fully justify including such accounts as "eighteenth- 268 Biography 22.2 (Spring 1999) century American autobiography." Does any first-person factual narrative automatically qualify, no matter what its purpose? The critic does not engage with this fundamental theoretical question. Her account of the actual narratives in question, though, is both engaging and suggestive. She provides wonderful quotations from her texts; she conveys a vivid sense of the personalities that emerge from the stories the travelers teU. Hamilton proves rather disagreeable in his self-satisfaction and self-indulgence, but he is a fine raconteur. Trist, more appealing and far less self-assuming, tells less dramatic stories, on the whole. But her record of, for example, her response to the recurrent necessity, on the road, of sleeping in the same room with men rings with vivid poignancy and iUuminates the frontier situation. Imbarrato seems to disapprove of her for imposing her own standards (she gets up before daylight in order to dress unseen), but her solution to the problem struck me as ingenious and appropriate. Finally Imbarrato suggests that both Hamilton's narrative and Trist's foretell later developments in American fiction. Imbarrato fails, however, to develop this potentially interesting point sufficiently to make it persuasive. This study's most important contribution lies simply in its bringing the specific group of texts to academic attention rather than in its critical analysis. The works Imbarrato considers are by no means unknown. AU have been edited in the twentieth century; Adams and Jefferson are of course especially familiar. But by creating juxtapositions , quoting extended passages, and specifying grounds for attention, Imbarrato invites and enables readers to take the writing of famous and obscure, male...