Reviewed by: Frontier Narratives: Liminal Lives in the Early Modern Mediterranean by Steven Hutchinson Ana Laguna Keywords Mediterranean, Frontier, Slavery, Martyrdom, Renegades, Multiple Alterities, Ana Laguna, Steven Hutchinson hutchinson, steven. Frontier Narratives: Liminal Lives in the Early Modern Mediterranean. Manchester UP, 2020, 228 pp. When Fernand Braudel's monumental study of the Mediterranean was first published in 1949, little appeared to have escaped his masterly purview. Even the measured John H. Elliott noted that the French historian had obviously employed in his "total history" the mechanics of "total war," since they both require one to "throw in everything you've got" (25).1 Indeed, in combining its geopolitical shifts, demographic struggles, and financial systems, Braudel was able to tell us much of the history of the Mediterranean. What he left out, however, were many of its stories. Some seventy years later, Steven Hutchinson's impressive Frontier Narratives succeeds in filling that void, recovering not only these stories, but also the voices, identities, and life experiences of their protagonists. Like Braudel's, Hutchinson's study encompasses the whole Mediterranean in its scope and tackles the ever-changing crucibles of its plural and dynamic orbit. But Hutchinson's monograph moves beyond Braudel's, incorporating a wealth of historical and literary records not available to the French historian. Frontier Narratives's conceptual core revolves around slavery and religious conversion, central vectors that give way to the study's other related subjects, such as martyrdom and apostasy. While each section is revelatory on its own, in my opinion, the book's second chapter, on slavery, offers some of its most outstanding contributions. Hutchinson identifies three distinct modalities of enslavement sadly at play in the early modern world: the trans-Atlantic, the trans-Saharan, and what he calls the "Mediterranean frontier." He is obviously most interested in the Mediterranean variant, which he defines as the "enslavement of Muslims by Christians and Christians by Muslims within the Mediterranean region" (40). This form of bondage affected millions of people and emerged as a residue of the sporadic warfare between [End Page 322] political, trade, and religious rivals, and as a result of the constant coastal attacks that plagued the eastern and western Mediterranean banks. As Hutchinson explains, it is the "bilateralism" of these attacks and captures that "contrasts sharply with trans-Atlantic and trans-Saharan slavery, even if there were common elements in all three kinds" (44). This bilateralism prompted the appearance of "mutually recognized procedures" that codified the traffic and exchange of captives. While "for some, slavery would turn out to be perpetual, for others it would end or evolve into something else, through escape, ransom, exchange of slaves, emancipation, conversion, social integration, and so on" (44). Hutchinson then proceeds to examine each of these outcomes—escape, ransom, exchange of slaves, emancipation, conversion, and social integration—in both female and male captives, and in each of the Muslim and Christian domains. In this sweeping examination of frontier captivity, it's striking to see the minimal role played by race, the most defining feature in other forms of slavery. Hutchinson is emphatic about this fact, noting that "Mediterranean frontier slavery had virtually nothing to do with race as such" (42). If he speaks of black and white slaves, it is to remind his readers of how differently those categories apply to the Mediterranean basin; while black slaves originate from sub-Saharan Africa and the Canary Islands, "white" ones not only come from Spanish coastal cities, but also from the territories in North Africa, the Levant, and Ottoman Turkey. Even the antagonized, dispersed demographic of Moriscos count in this context as white. It soon becomes apparent that, beyond arbitrary chromatic differences or perceptions, what is particularly distinct in frontier slavery is its reversibility, the fact that it could equally affect both sides of the Christian–Muslim equation. Early modern dwellers seemed to be aware of the reality that they "could be enslaved and commodified by … the other" (43), as exemplified in the comment of a renegade captor to one of his despondent new captives: "Have patience, brother, it's the fortune of war, today for you, tomorrow for me" (48). This potential reversibility disrupts the great operative power...
Read full abstract