Frontal Assessment Battery Scores Research Articles

Loss of expectation-related mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease makes analgesic therapies less effective

Expectation/placebo-related mechanisms and specific effects of therapies show additive effects, such that a therapy is less effective if the placebo component is absent. So far, the placebo component has been disrupted experimentally by using covert administrations of treatments. Here, we show for the first time that disruption of expectation/placebo-related analgesic mechanisms may occur in a clinical condition, Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In order to assess the placebo component of a therapy, we used the recently developed open–hidden paradigm. A local anesthetic was applied, either overtly or covertly, to the skin of AD patients to reduce burning pain after venipuncture. The placebo (psychological) component is represented by the difference between the analgesic effect after open (expected) and after hidden (unexpected) application. We correlated the placebo component with both cognitive status and functional connectivity among different brain regions. We found that AD patients with reduced Frontal Assessment Battery scores showed reduced placebo component of the analgesic treatment. We also found that the disruption of the placebo component occurred when reduced connectivity of the prefrontal lobes with the rest of the brain was present. Remarkably, the loss of these placebo-related mechanisms reduced treatment efficacy, such that a dose increase was necessary to produce adequate analgesia. These findings highlight the active role of cognition and prefrontal lobes in the therapeutic outcome and underscore the need of considering a possible revision of the therapeutic approach in Alzheimer patients in order to compensate for the loss of the endogenous expectation and placebo mechanisms.

Subscores of the FAB differentiate frontotemporal lobar degeneration from AD

To determine the clinical utility of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), a short test of frontal lobe functions, in differentiating frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) from Alzheimer disease (AD). FAB total scores and subscores for 23 subjects with FTLD and 31 subjects with AD were compared for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Concurrent validity of the FAB with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and other scales was also assessed. The FAB did not have positive predictive value for FTLD. Total FAB scores did not differ between the FTLD and AD groups. However, three subtests of the FAB (mental flexibility, motor programming, and environmental autonomy) demonstrated significant differences between the two groups. Total FAB scores correlated with scores on the MMSE, a more general test of cognition. The Frontal Assessment Battery did not discriminate subjects with frontotemporal lobar degeneration from those with Alzheimer disease, though certain subtests may be helpful in differential diagnosis.

Can the frontal assessment battery (FAB) differentiate bradykinetic rigid syndromes? Relation of the FAB to formal neuropsychological testing

The frontal assessment battery (FAB) is a bedside test of executive function. It takes less than 10 minutes to administer and a low score indicates executive dysfunction. To determine whether the FAB could detect the more severe subcortical dementia that is a feature of PSP and differentiate it from other bradykinetic rigid syndromes, we studied 17 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP); 11 with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and 12 with Parkinson’s disease (PD). We compared FAB scores with the results of more detailed tests of executive and general cognitive function. FAB scores were significantly lower in PSP than in MSA or PD (p=0.02 and p<0.001) and were also found to be significantly lower in MSA than in PD (p=0.047). We divided the study group into those with an FAB score <15 and those with an FAB score ≥15, regardless of the clinical diagnosis. While 82% of the PSP group had FAB scores of <15, such scores were recorded in only 36% of the MSA and 8% of the PD groups. The lexical fluency and motor series subscores of the FAB discriminated 70% of the PSP, MSA and PD patients. The FAB scores correlated with tests of executive function, as well as with scores on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, the Mini Mental State Examination and other tests of general cognitive function. A stepwise regression analysis revealed that across the groups, among the variables that correlated with FAB scores, alternating semantic fluency accounted for 80% of FAB variance. These results suggest that the FAB is a valid and easily applicable bedside test to discriminate executive dysfunction in these three frequently confused bradykinetic rigid syndromes. Dr. Dominic Paviour is supported by a grant from The PSP (Europe) Association.