Previous experimentation with background music has indicated that subjects may focus on a task to the exclusion of the music (Geringer & Nelson, 1979; Madsen & Wolfe, 1979). The present study was designed to investigate whether a music-related task affects achievement on a test related to that music and whether task or no-task listening conditions affect subsequent music preference. Ninety fourth-graders were block-randomized and assigned to three groups. The music-guide (n = 30) and music-only groups (n = 30) heard 5 min. of an orchestral music excerpt. Listening was conducted individually with headphones. The music-guide group completed a forced-choice written task while listening. The task related musical aspects of the excerpts to a choice of responses on the guide. An achievement test, emphasizing the same aspects as the guide, was then given to these two groups. All 90 subjects subsequently participated in operant and verbal measures of musical preference. Each subject was given 200 sec. to indicate which of four comparable orchestral excerpts was preferred. One excerpt was the one heard previously by the music-guide and music-only groups. An Operant Music Listening Recorder allowed each subject to select excerpts, and duration of listening time per excerpt was recorded. Verbal preference was then assessed. Results of the study may be summarized as follows: (1) Guided and music-only listening conditions did not result in significantly different scores on the music achievement test (t = 1.6, df = 58, f~ > .lo). (2) Neither listening condition influenced verbal or operant preference when compared with the control group (x 3.77, df = 6, p > .70; Friedman two-way analysis of variance, xr2 = 5, p = .20). (3) The Spearman rank correlation berween the verbal and operant preference measures was .68 (p < .02). Although the present study required subjects to attend to the music to complete the task, results were not unlike those of studies involving background music and musically unrelated tasks.
Read full abstract