ABSTRACTMost constitutive models did not initially consider special behaviors in some soils with singular characteristics (e.g., soft soils with diatom content). For example, at first, these models did not consider the effect of soil structure and viscosity. However, in the last decades, these variables have been incorporated into several constitutive models to describe the mechanical behavior of the soil in its natural state. Structure and viscosity laws that adequately reproduce the soil behavior had to be developed to include these variables. This paper compares the mechanical behavior of soft soils in Bogotá with different constitutive models. Bogotá’s soft soils are lacustrine deposits with a high content of diatoms in their structure. Natural soil samples with intact structures show a high‐water content, which can be higher than 300%, liquid limits of up to 400%, void ratios higher than five, and friction angles of almost 40°. In addition, the model validations were made through the simulations of triaxial tests in compression and shear paths. Modified Cam Clay (MCC), hypoplastic (HP), and subloading Cam Clay (SCC) were the constitutive models used. Two models are based on an elastoplastic framework, and the third uses a HP framework. Several lessons were learned from the simulations regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the models compared to the tests carried out. Finally, the extensive discussion revolves around determining the most suitable model for simulating the mechanical behavior of soft soils containing diatoms in Bogotá.