Abstract Background Following STRIDE II guidelines, patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are tightly monitored evaluating effectiveness of IBD-therapies and predicting flares. In many centres, patients on stable conventional therapy typically have annual outpatient visits with their IBD physician, while patients on advanced therapies are seen every six months. However, the growing number of IBD patients in active follow-up is straining outpatient clinic capacity and increasing time pressures on healthcare professionals. Furthermore, many patients do not require specialised interventions during these visits, and those in long-term remission often prefer less frequent follow-up to reduce absenteeism from work or school. We aimed to evaluate the potential optimization of resources of remote monitoring for IBD patients in a large-volume referral centre. Methods An anonymous survey was conducted in 300 adult IBD patients, either untreated or on stable subcutaneous or oral maintenance therapy for at least two years, to assess their interest in a remote monitoring program and gather insights into their preferences for its implementation. Results Of the 300 patients, 48% were male, 68% had Crohn’s disease, 31% ulcerative colitis and 1% IBD type unclassified. Forty-one percent had a disease duration of more than 20 years. Additionally, 17% were without any IBD-related therapy, 9% were on conventional therapy only, and 74% were receiving subcutaneous or oral advanced therapy. Most patients (68%) were actively employed, 70% of whom worked full-time. Notably, 77% (n=230) expressed interest in significantly reducing their outpatient visits in favour of remote monitoring. The study also identified cost and time savings for patients, as an outpatient visit takes approximately 3 hours (range 2-4 hours). Also, 24% incur public transport cost of 25 to 56 euros to attend the clinic (N = 41). Among the patients interested in remote monitoring, 94% were willing to complete three-monthly questionnaires taking about 10 minutes, and 94% agreed to annual blood analyses. Regarding faecal calprotectin, 66% were open to conducting home-based stool analyses every three months, while 72% would agree to bring a stool sample to their general practitioner or local hospital. Also, 79% were willing to attend biennial outpatient visits (Fig1). Patients also emphasized the importance of personal contact in establishing a trustworthy and safe remote monitoring system. Conclusion Remote monitoring is a promising program for IBD patients in stable remission, offering potential financial and time savings for employers, patients, and society. However, further research is required to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this approach.
Read full abstract