Reviewed by: Contemporary French Environmental Thought in the Post-COVID-19 Era by Keith Moser Abbey Carrico Moser, Keith. Contemporary French Environmental Thought in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. ISBN 978-3-030-96129-9. Pp. 249. Are viruses living? Do all living things have rights? If so, does the COVID-19 virus have rights, and consequently, should we, when receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, "take a moment to mourn the passing of a fellow, microscopic" organism capable of semiosis (86)? In other words, "is it unethical to attempt to wipe out the COVID-19 virus?" (85). This question is not the first line of inquiry in Moser's work, but underlines the deeper, more pressing issue of the complications and consequences of persistent ontological thought that draws on binary Cartesian principles and reductionist logic valuing humans as the only living beings capable of engaging in semiosis, or the process of signification in language. Moser fleshes out the arguments of several key figures whose philosophies have been "cemented" (96, 138) into French environmental thought and whose convergence could help contemporary scholars across the humanities and hard sciences find solutions to the increasing "ecocidal trajectory" (57) we find ourselves in. From Michel Serres, whose "nonanthropocentric reconceptualization of existence" (21) defines his philosophy of communication, Moser furthers the notion that "semiosis is a universal property of life itself" (25) and criticizes the "pervasive doctrine of human exceptionalism" (27). As Moser highlights, epistemologist Edgar Morin argues that human-centered Western thought has removed the human from "the web of life" (68) and that we must "'return the subject to life'" (71). Analyzing a selection of Jacques Derrida's posthumous and late works that venture into environmental ethics and animal philosophy, Moser elucidates a more reserved approach to Serres' contrat naturel, drawing from Derrida's notion of limitrophy and capital beings and suggesting that "ethical lines have to be continually redrawn somewhere" (126). Michel Onfray, "philosophe provocateur" (180), as Moser denotes, would argue that Serres' ideas and some tenants of deep ecology go too far in equating all life forms. However, Moser finds common ground: "According to Onfray, Derrida, and Serres, the notion that we have been granted the divine right to play the role of masters of the universe is linked to our myopic and ecocidal aggression against the hand that feeds" (149). Like Morin's and Derrida's analyses of the gaze of the other-than-human, Dominique Lestel, as Moser explains, "contends that we urgently need to (re)-envision a radically different way of being in the world […] by reconnecting to our cosmic roots to which all species are inextricably linked" (191). Contextualizing and gleaning the most salient and convergent arguments from Serres, Morin, Derrida, Onfray, and Lestel, Moser argues a way forward is through the "interdiscipline of biosemiotics," since it is "uniquely positioned as an indispensable theoretical framework for understanding the unprecedented challenges facing global society" (229). While at times Moser presumes a familiarity with somewhat dense theoretical terminology, [End Page 213] he impeccably places himself within the tradition of French and Francophone environmental thinkers by advocating for a biosemiotics approach to interpreting human and other-than-human interconnectedness. [End Page 214] Abbey Carrico Virginia Military Institute Copyright © 2023 American Association of Teachers of French
Read full abstract