Until the First World War, relations between labour and management were on an individual, rather than a collective, basis. Employers and workers had organized for collective action, but, except in the printing and coal mining industries, relations between the trade unions, strongly influenced by syndicalism, and the defensive associations of employers were chiefly violent in nature. Both unions and employers opposed government intervention in the labour market, and the government respected this sentiment. During the war it became necessary for the government to bring employers and unions together on arbitration committees and in less formal discussions in order to encourage uninterrupted production through the peaceful settlement of industrial disputes. Thus the first widespread contact between employers and unions took place under the auspices of the government. The syndicalist philosophy of the French trade unions was abandoned, partly as a result of this demonstration of the importance of governmental support, and partly as a result of the political success of the Communists in Russia. After the war the legal status of the collective bargaining contract was defined,1 but this action was indirect and, as time showed, unavailing as a means of encouraging collective bargaining. The policy of the government was more clearly demonstrated by another law, passed after agreement between representatives of labour and management, which established the principle of a working day limited to eight hours.2 Representatives of employers and unions were given the task of applying this principle to particular industries and regions, and only in case of disagreement was the system of application decided by the government. Since the eight-hour-day law the direct regulation of working conditions and the association of employers and unions both in the formulation of legislation and in its administration have been important features of French labour law.
Read full abstract