Objectives: X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging (PCI) is an emerging modality whose availability in clinics for mammography and lung imaging is expected to materialize within the coming years. In this study, we evaluate the PCI performances with respect to current conventional imaging modalities in the context of osteo-articular disorders diagnosis. Materials and Methods: X-ray PCI was performed on 3 cadaveric human hands and wrists using a synchrotron beam. Conventional CT, MRI and Ultrasound were also performed on these three samples using routine procedures as well as research protocols. Six radiologists and rheumatologists independently evaluated qualitatively and semi quantitatively the images' quality. Medical interpretations were also made from the images. Results: PCI allows the simultaneous visualization of both the high absorbing and the softer tissues. The 6 reader evaluations characterized PCI as a visualization tool with improved performances for all tissue types (significant p-values) which provides sharper outlines and clearer internal structures than images obtained using conventional modalities. The PCI images contain overall more information, especially at smaller scales with for instance more visible micro-calcifications in our chondrocalcinosis case. Conclusions: Despite a reduced number of samples used, this pilot study highlights the possible medical benefits of PCI for osteo-articular disorders evaluation. Although PCI is not yet available in hospitals, the improved visualization capabilities demonstrated so far and the enhanced tissue measurement quality let suggest strong diagnosis benefits for rheumatology in case of a widespread application of PCI. Funding: Part of this study was financed by Labex PRIMES. Grenoble MRI facility IRMaGe was partly funded by the French program “Investissement d’Avenir” run by the ‘Agence Nationale pour la Recherche’; grant 'Infrastructure d’avenir en Biologie Sante' - ANR-11-INBS-0006. Declaration of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study. Ethical Approval: Anatomical pieces were extracted from body to science donors. This donation was granted by our local ethics committee. However, due to local regulations, the anatomic pieces obtained from donors did not grant us access to the details of the patients’ medical history.