Introduction More than young age, high activity level is worldwide highlighted as the major factor affecting the longevity of primary total hip replacement (THR). Aim of this multicentric French symposium was to overview the results of current prosthetic options choosen by a pannel of members of the “Hip and Knee French Society“ (SFHG) to treat 1ary or 2ary hip arthritis in active and younger than 50 years old patients. Material and methods According to the selection criteria (ie., virgin or hardware-free hips, no high dysplasia > Crowe 2, no rheumatoïd or juvenile arthritis, activity > Devane 2 and age < 50), 1419 1ary THRs were reviewed, performed by 12 surgical groups from 17 institutions. The majority (72%) of the 9 implant combinations had cementless fixation (89% HA coated), 15.1% were fixed with cement and 10% had hybrid fixation. Mean age was 41.2 years and activity level graded Devane 4 and 5 was reported for 55.7% of patients (inter-series range, isr, 38 to 81%). Main diagnosis were hip osteonecrosis (36%) and dysplasia in 27%. Results At 7.9 year average follow-up (isr, 6.4 to 14.2 years), overall complication rate was 2.5% and average reoperation rate was 7.3% (isr, 3.8 to 13%). Ten-year survival rate from revision for any cause was > 95% for all THR combinations except for 3: the cementless Bousquet THR (86.4%, mainly due to failure of fixation of alumina coated double cup), the cementless ABG THR (90.9%, mainly due to acetabular osteolysis of HA-coated cup with zirconia-PE bearings) and the hybrid Osteal-Cerafit THR with alumina-alumina bearings (90.4%). With revision for aseptic loosening, 10-year survivorship was < 95% for 2 THR combinations: 88.6% for the Bousquet THR and 92.3% for the Osteal-Cerafit THR, whilst up to 100% for4 cementless combinations (the ABG-HA, the Omnifit-HA and the non-HA Alloclassic-Armor or CSF cups). With bearing revision (for wear, fracture, osteolysis and dislocation or impingement), 10-year survival was < 97% only for the Zirconia-PE (94%). Discussion and conclusion The main limits of the study were its retrospective aspect except for 3 series, an average follow-up < 10 years. Nevertheless, some observations can be drawn. 1/On the femoral side, cementing according to the “French paradox“ technique remained an efficient option, at least with smooth super-steel implant like the Charnley-Kerboull stem (10-year survival from revision for aseptic lossening, 97.6%); nevertheless, in this young and active population, all 6 uncemented stems showed better survival than the 2 smooth cemented ones. 2/On the acetabular side, except the alumina-coated Bousquet cup and the Ti-mesh Cerafit-cup, either cemented (Charnley-Kerboull) or all other cementless cups, including the threaded rings, provided 10-year survivorship > 99%. 3/At least, the 7.9 year average follow-up was not sufficient to show any significant difference between 10-year survival of the various bearings used, including hard-on-hard ones (alumina-alumina 32 mm, 98.6% survival at 10 years; Metasul 28 mm, 100% survival but at 8 years only). Another decade will be necessary to allow more conclusive appraisal on this crucial matter.
Read full abstract