Freedoms Of Man Research Articles

Violation of the rights of the indigenous Russian and the Russian-speaking population in Donbass and Novorossiya: public law analysis

The adoption by the population of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, Zaporozhye and Kherson oblasts at referendums on September 27, 2022 of decisions to join the Russian Federation within the framework of the procedure for self-determination of peoples poses the task of legal science to comprehend the existence of legal grounds. In doctrine and international practice, as a basis for secession, it is stated that the territorial integrity of states corresponds to the obligation of these states to respect the generally recognized rights and freedoms of man and citizen. Failure to comply with this obligation by the state, that is, violation of human rights against indigenous peoples, can serve as grounds for secession. In this work, the authors examine the prerequisites for self-determination, largely expressed in non-compliance and violation of human rights in relation to the indigenous population of the Donetsk and Lugansk oblasts of Ukraine (since 2014 – the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, respectively), Zaporozhye and Kherson oblasts, which served as an indispensable the basis for self-determination of the people of these territories.

ОТДЕЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПРАВОВОГО ПОЛОЖЕНИЯ СПАСАТЕЛЯ В СОВРЕМЕННОМ РОССИЙСКОМ ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВЕ

Based on the constitutional guarantee of the state to protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, the article considers an array of normative legal acts that determine the legal status of a professional rescuer, that is, a citizen of the Russian Federation who acquired the status of a rescuer in accordance with the procedure established by law and carries out activities on a (regular) basis in professional emergency rescue services or formations. As a result of the conducted research, the definition of a firefighter who is a rescuer in an emergency situation related to fires has been formulated for legislative consolidation. It is concluded that it is inappropriate to divide rescuers, including firefighters, into workers and specialists. According to the authors, it is necessary to classify all rescuers into one category of workers – specialists. To solve this problem, a proposal has been prepared to amend the Federal law «On emergency rescue services and the status of rescuers».

Судебная доктрина баланса частных и публичных интересов в сфере предпринимательской деятельности

The domestic legal literature of different years reflects multiple approaches regarding the prevalence of private or public interests. A significant number of scientific works in recent years have been devoted to promoting the strengthening of the positions of legitimate interests of society and the state, nationalization, and the development of a multi-structure economy to replace the primacy of the market economy. However, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which should be outside of politics, and whose activities are aimed at protecting the foundations of the constitutional system and protecting the fundamental rights and freedoms of man and citizen, combines these approaches and simultaneously formulates a judicial doctrine of the balance of private and public interests in the field of business activity. The used category “judicial doctrine” allows us to move away from a purely scientific understanding of private and public interests in business and to approach practical issues, helps to identify methodological approaches that are characteristic of judicial practice, and establishes a connection with practice in a higher format of possibilities.

Conceptual place and fundamental perspective of judicial precedent in the legal system of Ukraine

This article examines the role and relevance of the introduction of judicial precedent as a source of law in Ukraine, which is related to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 (hereinafter – the Convention), Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter – the ECHR) and judicial practice of national courts. The opinion is substantiated that the introduction of judicial precedent as a source of law in Ukraine will have positive consequences for the legal system of Ukraine and will provide additional protection of human rights and freedoms. Prospects for the possible introduction of judicial precedent as a source of law and important institutional changes that can lead to a complete transformation of the current system are determined. In connection with this, the issue is analyzed, and a generalized characteristic is given regarding the role of court precedent in advanced countries, such as Switzerland, Poland, and France. The properties of the legal systems of the world, the peculiarities of the use and status of the Convention, and the judicial practice of the ECHR in Ukraine are also considered. The article presents an analysis of scientific research by advanced scientists and lawyers who formed a professional view on issues related to judicial precedent and possible reform of the current legal system. A generalized description of the concept regarding the nature and features of judicial precedent as a source of law is provided. Simultaneously, the author of the article notes that the issue of defining the conceptual place and fundamental perspective of judicial precedent in the legal system of Ukraine is very relevant and important for Ukraine, as it is related to the protection and provision of rights and freedoms of man and citizen. Accordingly, special attention is paid to the fact that this issue should be resolved at the legislative level, as this will help to avoid collisions, misunderstandings, and possible duplication of norms. Moreover, the introduction of legislative innovations and reforms requires the generation of an appropriate legal bridgehead with the possible training of courts. Thus, the author concludes that the main consequences of the introduction of judicial precedent as a source of law will be the following: stability and predictability of the legal system, increasing the independence of the judicial branch of government, borrowing the best international experience, unification, and harmonization of current judicial practice, respectively, additional protection of rights and civil liberties.

ИСТОРИЯ ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬНОГО ЗАКРЕПЛЕНИЯ ПРАВ И СВОБОД ЧЕЛОВЕКА И ГРАЖДАНИНА В КОНСТИТУЦИЯХ РОССИИ: СРАВНИТЕЛЬНО-ПРАВОВОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ

The article is devoted to the historical process of including the rights of citizens of the RSFSR into the basic laws of our state, and later – the rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the Russian Federation. The corresponding norms of the Constitution of the RSFSR of 1918, the Constitution of the RSFSR of 1925, the Constitution of the RSFSR of 1978, the Constitution of the Russian Federation – Russia are analyzed in comparison, including in comparison with similar norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The considered constitutions as the main normative legal acts of the state allowed us to conclude that the rights and freedoms of man and citizen were legislated in 1918, in the first Soviet Constitution. Subsequently, with the development of the state and society, the volume of human and civil rights and freedoms in Russia increased. The Constitution of the Russian Federation, adopted by popular vote on December 12, 1993, contains the largest number of such rights and freedoms, which, taking into account modern federal legislation, complies with generally recognized norms of international law.

RUSSIAN CONSTITUTION AS A GUARANTEE OF CIVILIZATIONAL IDENTITY AND SOVEREIGN DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN STATE (ON THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY)

The Constitution of Russia, despite pessimistic forecasts during its adoption, caused, among other things, by the idea of the targeted, anticrisis nature of this document, was a reliable basis for the formation of national consent, reconciliation of society, and became the most important guarantee of the preservation of Russian socio-cultural identity based on traditional spiritual and moral values. In modern socio-historical and geopolitical conditions, the consolidating role of the Russian Constitution and its potential associated with ensuring the sovereign development of Russian statehood is increasing. Designed to ensure state development in conditions of historical turbulence, the Russian Constitution enshrined exible, self-adjusting mechanisms for balancing the interests of the individual, society and the state, based both on respect for the heritage and traditions of our ancestors, and on the desire for social progress. It is necessary to consistently reveal the normative, value-semantic content of the current Constitution of Russia, for which an essential prerequisite should be its demythologization in the sense of abandoning its distorted interpretations inspired by the currents of liberal-individualistic globalism. Some judgments on this matter, concerning, in particular, the ideological side of state development, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the system of constitutional values, spiritual, moral and legal education in the education system, are set out in the article with the expectation of further scienti c dialogue and the formation of a new constitutional paradigms of Russian statehood.

Social Sciences (Miscellaneous) Public-Private Partnership in The Field of Public Control

This article is devoted to the analysis of the current state and development of the institution of public-private partnership in the field of public control. The work analyzes the system of legal guarantees that ensure the implementation, protection and protection in the Russian Federation of the system of constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen, the rights and legitimate interests of public associations and other non-governmental non-profit organizations. The role and place of the institution of public control in the system of these legal guarantees has been studied. The main problems that impede the preservation and development of this institution of civil society in Russia are formalized and explored. It is substantiated that the key of these problems is the lack of certainty in the functioning of the institution of public-private partnership in the sphere of public control in the Russian Federation. The work develops and substantiates the author's definition of the concept of public-private partnership in general, as well as its most important variety in the field of public control. The authors formalized and analyzed the main problems associated with the functioning of public-private partnerships in the field of public control, in particular, the lack of: formalization of this institution of civil society in the Russian Constitution; consolidating the concept and content of the institution of public-private partnership in the legislation on public control; a unified approach in the legal framework and scientific legal doctrine to understanding the essence and limits of public-private partnership in the field of public control; a systematic approach in Russia to the analysis, adaptation and use of positive foreign experience in this area of functioning of civil society; proper use of modern digital technologies in this area of interaction between subjects of public control and individuals and legal entities. The work has developed and justified a system of measures to resolve these problems, in particular, by: incorporating the institution of public control into the Basic Law of the Russian Federation, and the institution of public-private partnership into the legislation on public control (with details in it of the concept, essence and limits of implementation the specified institution of public-private partnership in the specified area, taking into account foreign experience and modern digital technologies.); instructions to the Government of Russia, with the support of the Public Chamber of Russia, of the processes of analysis, adaptation and implementation into legislation and the scientific legal doctrine of the institution.

Foreign national legislation on combating domestic violence

This article examines the foreign experience of bringing to justice for domestic violence. Domestic violence definitely falls under the violation of a large number of internationally recognized human rights that the State is obliged to defend and protect: the right to life and physical integrity, the right not to be the object of bullying or cruel treatment, inhuman or degrading treatment, the right to equal protection from the law and freedom from discrimination based on gender and others. As we can see, the origins of gender inequality were determined primarily by cultural and religious factors, as well as the peculiarities of the legal system in different countries. As a result, domestic violence has been recognized for granted almost all over the world for a long time and for a long time, and in some sources of social norms it was even recorded in legislative forms.Violence against women and domestic violence can no longer be considered a private matter, and that States must take a firm stand and take measures to prevent violence, protect victims and punish perpetrators. This issue has become extremely relevant at the present time, when the Republic of Kazakhstan is becoming an almost full-fledged participant in global integration processes, supporting the idea of prioritizing the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. The paper provides a comparative analysis of the legislation of the United States of America, Canada, Germany, Austria and France. It is concluded that the positive foreign experience in the field of prevention of domestic violence, which can be applied in Kazakhstan, should be: the construction and creation of social institutions whose activities are aimed at preventing domestic violence (USA) - the need to introduce a system of support for social initiatives in the field of prevention of domestic violence (USA) - the creation on the basis of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic Kazakhstan Institute for Research on Domestic Violence (Canada); grouping of measures aimed at preventing domestic violence by group affiliation (France); the need to assess the effectiveness of measures applied in the field of prevention of domestic violence (Germany).

Problematic aspects of the implementation of legal guarantees of human and citizen rights in Ukraine

The article describes the basic rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen, which are inalienable rights and freedoms enjoyed by a person from birth. They form the basis of the legal status enshrined in the state constitution and enjoy the highest legal protection. The most important and complex relations between people and the relations between the state and the person in legal form are regulated by formulating the rights, freedoms and obligations underlying the legal status of a person, which is one of the most important not only legal, but also juridical. also political categories. The most important features of the rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen are: naturalness, continuity, equality, social justification, respect for international standards, state guarantee. The problem of guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of a person by giving them a real character is not only of a practical nature. In the modern context of the development of the rule of law and civil society, it is important to develop a holistic scientific concept of human rights and freedoms, which covers a wide range of theoretical provisions regarding the essence and content of rights and freedoms, their structure and mechanism. Local self-government bodies play an important role in ensuring constitutional rights and freedoms. A real environment for the existence of human rights is possible in the conditions of a democratic state governed by the rule of law. Democracy, rule of law and human rights are inseparable. The rule of law is a guarantee of the reality of human rights in terms of protection from violations by the authorities, and human rights are the main condition and characteristic of democracy, the humanistic and human dimension of the rule of law. The article concludes that the basis of democracy in the state is the guarantee of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen by the Constitution of the state, not only formally, but also in practice. Therefore, taking into account the individual shortcomings of state bodies in regulating the system of human and citizen rights, the number of human rights organizations is growing day by day, both at the national and international levels. At the same time, the article concludes that it is impossible to build a legal state in a society with developed legal nihilism. And respect for the rights of society can be caused only by concern for the same rights of people and citizens.

VALUE POLICY AND HUMAN RIGHTS: EXPERIENCE OF POLITICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS

In the proposed publication, the author, using philosophical reflection, the dialectical method, the discursive approach, the formal legal method, political and legal comparative studies, analytical and descriptive techniques, comprehends the doctrinal and factual relationship of the value-oriented course with human rights within the framework of the current state of Russian domestic political systems. The political and legal structure of human rights in the Russian political field is outlined, the philosophical foundations underlying the doctrine of human rights are revealed, the limits and possibilities of spiritual reception of the idea of human rights in a non-European society are determined, the metaphysical and axiological basis of value-oriented Russian politics as a consistent implementation of the metaphilosophical idea of patriotism is revealed, an intellectual synthesis of the doctrine of human rights with value narratives is carried out. A clear connection between the institution of human rights and the directions of political thought and political practices that defend or pursue the idea of gradually reducing state interference in the private lives of individuals and the functioning of social entities within civil society is affirmed. It is suggested that the further development of a value-oriented course in the Russian Federation will inevitably raise the question of replacing the bourgeois-individualistic approach to the institution of human rights with a moral approach, where freedoms and warrants are orchestrated by the spiritual carcass of Russian civilization. The necessity of revising the approaches used in political and legal theory to defining leading state powers by replacing them with a definition of the state through the perspective of sovereign power, which can deviate from normally operating formulas of law in extraordinary situations, is substantiated. In conclusion, an inference is drawn that value policy sets the moral focus of interpretation, comprehension and approaches to the implementation of constitutionally enshrined rights and freedoms of man and citizen, and acts as a kind of explication of existing normative legal institutions of a general order.

МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЙ ИНСТРУМЕНТАРИЙ МНОГОМЕРНОЙ ОЦЕНКИ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ СОЦИАЛЬНОГО ГОСУДАРСТВА РОССИИ

The Constitution of the Russian Federation states (Article 7) that the country is a social state, the main goal of which is to create conditions for ensuring a decent life and free development of people. The formation of a social state is a long process and Russia is only at the beginning, gradually forming its fundamental elements, the most important of which are the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, a highly developed socially oriented economy, social partnership and social responsibility, social justice, social democracy. The social functions of the state ensure the quality of life and represent, in fact, all spheres of society’s life, therefore assessing the level of effectiveness of the social state is very important, but difficult due to its polycriteria and multi-level nature. In the context of multidimensional life support of the population, it is necessary to assess social and economic inequality in many parameters (financial situation, labor activity, housing conditions, life safety, public health, education, culture, transport infrastructure, information and communication resources, living potential of the population) as separate territories countries and social groups. Empirical research has revealed deep differentiation in the socio-economic development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and their inequality in the performance of social functions of the state, including the livelihoods of the rural population. To develop government management decisions in order to ensure social justice, a methodological toolkit for multidimensional assessment of the effectiveness of the social state is proposed, based on a systematic approach taking into account the contribution of administrative-territorial entities, which allows us to identify problem areas that require priority attention, identify strategic goals and measures to achieve them.

On the powers of the National Police of Ukraine under martial law

In this article, the author analyzes the legislative acts which currently regulate the activities of the National Police of Ukraine. It is stated that the activities of the National Police of Ukraine are very multifaceted, and therefore they are regulated by the rules of various branches of law.
 However, the bulk of these norms are still administrative and legal, since most of the police tasks are performed in the course of public administration, provision of police services in the areas of public safety and order, protection of human rights and freedoms, as well as the interests of society and the state, provision of services to assist persons who need such assistance for personal, economic, social reasons or as a result of emergencies, within the limits established by law.
 The author notes that main idea of the Constitution of Ukraine during wartime, as well as in peacetime, remains unchanged and consists in establishing limits for public authorities to prevent arbitrariness and guarantee human rights and freedoms. At the same time, the constitutional goals and priorities of the entire state during wartime have significant specifics.
 It is noted that with the introduction of martial law in Ukraine, the powers of many government agencies have undergone significant changes. Due to the adoption of amendments to the current legislation in the field of public security and order, the powers of the National Police of Ukraine have also changed to some extent.
 The author of the article emphasizes that the priority among such changes is to guarantee the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, as well as further development of a democratic state in which the rule of law is strictly enforced.
 The author concludes that during the martial law in Ukraine, the powers of the National Police have been significantly expanded by introducing appropriate amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On the National Police».
 At the same time, when expanding the powers of law enforcement agencies, including the police during martial law, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine should take into account that the actual circumstances of war or martial law do not automatically constitute grounds for restricting the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens.

Functions of the Prosecutor’s Office in the mechanism of ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens, the interests of society and the state

After Ukraine gained independence, political, economic, social, organizational, legal and other changes began to take place in the Ukrainian state, which affected all spheres of socially useful life. The activity of the prosecutor’s office, which inherited the basic principles of its activity from the prosecutor’s office of the former Soviet Union, could not avoid such changes. Adoption in 1990 of the Declaration on the State Sovereignty of Ukraine and introduction of the Law of October 24, 1990 No. 404-XII of amendments and additions to Chapter 19 «Prosecutorship» of the Constitution (Basic Law) of the Ukrainian SSR, the formation of a new independent prosecutor’s office of the Ukrainian state was initiated, in Art. 162 of which it was declared that higher supervision over the observance and correct application of laws by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, ministries, state committees, departments, other bodies of state and economic management and control, the Government of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, local Councils of People’s Deputies, their executive and administrative bodies, military units, political parties, public organizations, mass movements, enterprises, institutions and organizations, regardless of the forms of ownership, subordination and affiliation, officials and citizens is carried out by the Prosecutor General of Ukraine and prosecutors subordinate to him. At the same time, the activities of the prosecutor’s office and their officials did not always receive a favorable assessment of their activity from the citizens, which prompted the state leadership through the reorganization of the prosecutor’s office to make permanent changes that would bring the activity of the prosecutor’s office closer to the best international standards in consistently ensuring the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. interests of society and the state. Attention is drawn to the fact that after 2014, as well as the full-scale invasion of Russian military aggression against Ukraine, the functions of the prosecutor’s office underwent significant changes, which requires theoretical research, due to the fact that the reform of the activities of the prosecutor’s office continues even in today’s conditions.

TENDENCIES IN IMPROVING THE APPLICATION OF LEGAL RULES OF NATIONAL MINORITIES AND ETHNIC GROUPS

In the paper, the authors discuss the tendencies of development and improvement of legal guarantees of international and national regulations of individual countries and definitions of the term national minority and ethnic groups. We start from the hypothesis that international and national legal rules are well established, with the aim of improvement, but in practical application at the local level, the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of National Minorities, which represents the first comprehensive regional international agreement and legally binding international instrument, are bypassed or omitted, dedicated to the protection of national minorities. The definition of new and special rights and freedoms of man and citizen, that is, the scope and application of human rights and freedoms can be classified into different groups. The work will deal with the analysis of the rights and freedoms of ethnic groups and national minorities, the rights and freedoms of foreigners and stateless persons, the position of law in the field of governance, the constitutional duties of man and citizen in accordance with the criteria of the mutual relationship between the individual, that is, the citizen and the state. Researching the right to education, freedom of scientific and artistic creation represents freedom of thought as one of the spiritual freedoms. The Constitution of the Republic of Serbia guarantees the freedom of scientific and artistic creativity, the publication of scientific and artistic works, guarantees moral and material rights to authors, and more. The essential part of the analysis refers to the research and strict application of the rights of members of national minorities, that is, the detailed elaboration and respect of minority rights, the prohibition of discrimination of national minorities, equality in the management of public affairs, the prohibition of forced assimilation, the right to preserve uniqueness and develop the spirit of tolerance, as well as the right to association and cooperation with compatriots. The Framework Convention of the Council of Europe on the Protection of National Minorities - represents the first comprehensive regional international agreement and the first legally binding international instrument, which is entirely dedicated to the protection of national minorities.

Конституционное право на свободу творчества как основа всех культурных прав и свобод

The article is devoted to the study of the constitutional right to freedom of creativity. The author notes that the right to freedom of creativity is the basis of all cultural rights and freedoms of man and citizen. In addition, it distinguishes between the concepts of “creative activity in a broad sense” and “creative activity to create cultural values”. Proposed changes to the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal legislation on culture.

Differentiation of the Competence of the Prosecutor's Office and the Court to Ensure the Legality of Operational Investigative Activities

The relevance of the study is determined by the role and place of the legal institution for the protection of human, civil rights, and freedoms as an attribute of the rule of law, the need for proper control and supervisionof their compliance. The Constitution of the Russian Federation proclaims that a person, his rights and freedoms are the highest value, and the state is obliged to recognize, respect and protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, judicial protection is guaranteed to everyone. This implies, on the one hand, that everyone is guaranteed to ensure the implementation of the active right to appeal in court decisions, actions or inactions of public authorities and their officials, and on the other hand, verification of compliance with the passive right, which is mainly implemented through control and supervisory procedures. At the same time, in the process of implementing certain functions of the state (in particular, law enforcement), authorized bodies are allowed to apply measures that significantly limit the fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms of a person. An important place among these types of state activities is occupied by operational investigative activities (OIA). In the field of OIA, citizens are often limited in their ability to independently defend their rights and legitimate interests, and therefore a special role in this area is given to the court and the prosecutor’s office. As part of the study, an attempt was made to comprehensively study the theoretical, legal and practical issues of organizing the activities of the prosecutor and the court to protect human and civil rights, the legitimate interests of legal entities in the production of operational investigations, analyze the relationship between prosecutorial and judicial activities, and develop an organic mechanism for their implementation, excluding «mutual substitution» and duplication of competencies.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL MECHANISM FOR REGULATING THE RIGHT TO HOUSING OF CERTAIN CATEGORIES OF CITIZENS IN RUSSIA

The article is devoted to the Study of the constitutional and legal mechanism for regulating the right to housing of certain categories of citizens in Russia. The article defines the concepts of "regulation" and "constitutional and legal mechanism of regulation", and also discusses various approaches to the definition of the latter. The authors believe that the basis of the legal mechanism of regulation is the constitutional legal mechanism of regulation. The object of the study is the inalienable constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen, which are vested in him by the State. The article highlights the elements of the mechanism of legal regulation: the rule of law, legal relationship, law enforcement act.

Судебная власть в системе средств защиты прав и свобод человека и гражданина

The article is devoted to the study of a number of problems related to the role of the judiciary in the system of means of protecting the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. The author substantiates the point of view that justice differs favorably from other human rights means by being connected by law and law in the substantive and procedural senses, which guarantees the true dominance of legal forms over extra-legal ones. Even if extrajudicial state authorities or local governments exercise their powers in order to realize the legitimate interests of rights holders, such activities should be based on the concept of preventive justice. Any illegal action or inaction of authorized subjects of the state apparatus is under the protective influence of the constitutional institution of subsequent judicial protection, if the right holder considers it necessary to resort to this form when other means have been exhausted.

Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Kyrgyz Republic: The Impact of Administrative and Judicial Control on the Construction Sector

The article analyzes the legal framework of administrative justice and administrative-judicial control in the Kyrgyz Republic from the point of view of protecting human and civil rights and freedoms for the construction sector. The trends in the development of these institutions in the country are considered. The article examines the features of administrative and legal regulation, elements of administrative law, from the point of view of their direct connection with the problem of ensuring human rights and freedoms and Citizen. Administrative and judicial control is disclosed in the forms determined by the specifics of relations in the specified industry. The main problem in the Kyrgyz Republic today is the creation of mechanisms of administrative justice that would fully ensure the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, guarantee the effectiveness of the judicial system itself, as well as the rule of law. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal foundations of administrative justice and administrative-judicial control in the Kyrgyz Republic in the context of the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms in the field of public administration for construction. The main research methods are the formal legal and comparative legal methods.

Образ справедливого социального государства в контексте обеспечения ключевых конституционных прав и свобод: социологический анализ

The article presents an interdisciplinary analysis of the concept of “social state” in close connection with social justice and ensuring the constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen based on the results of a socio-logical study (online survey) conducted in August-October 2023 on the basis of three Moscow universities (n = 400), in order to study the patterns, structure and factors of formation of the imperatives of youth con-sciousness in the system of ensuring the rights enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, identi-fying factors determining the development of civil legal consciousness and human potential. The research was carried out within the framework of project no. 1023042500239-9-5.4.4 “Formation and consolidation in the minds of young people of the image of a fair social state in the context of ensuring key constitutional rights and freedoms”. Scientific topic code FZNW-0223-0050. The results obtained allow us to conclude that in the minds of young people an ambiguous image of a modern social state has been formed, which, on the one hand, is supported by the idea of the state’s responsibility to ensure constitutional guarantees in the field of education, health care, employment, social protection; on the other hand, a readiness is being formed to taking personal responsibility for one’s own well-being in conditions of political and economic instability in the country and the world.