Carole Pateman depends in Sexual Contract on a distinction between marriage and the family or household: one entails civil subordination between adults; other also encompasses relations among children. In one, subordination is made invisible because engaged by and equal adults. In other, subordination is justified as (temporary) dependence of inferior to superior. This distinction, I argue, usefully frames shifting associations of blackness with dependency in U.S. South. In late 19th century South wives of both races, and black workers of both genders, were understood as household dependents. Subsequently, marriage and employment, as free contracts, were separated from household either wholly or in part. The association of blackness with dependence, and whiteness with independence, was simultaneously transformed: white workers, their civil subordination ideologically masked, could claim independence while racialized dependency was transferred onto clientelistic relations with state. Tracing these linked transformations, I argue, provides a richer account of distinct kinds of subordination involved in wage labor, marriage, and racial hierarchy. I conclude by reexamining contract and subordination in Carole Pateman’s work, arguing that two can be conceptually and historically separated.
Read full abstract